DNIF HYPERCLOUD vs Trellix ESM comparison

"I like the MITRE table, a feature I saw for the first time in the same solution. There was one MITRE tactic table, which can be used to identify threats if you have all kinds of rules enabled or if you have rules for all the tactics in the MITRE table. There are 14 tables in MITRE, and those 14 tables consist of multiple columns, tactics, and techniques. It was one of the first SIEM tools I saw that had that particular MITRE table. On that basis, you can create new rules and identify existing ones. At any point, if an alert is triggered, it will try to match it to any of those MITRE tactics. I liked that creating a workbook on MITRE business was straightforward. I also like that you can search using SQL or DQL."

"The most valuable feature of the solution is the number of EPS it can handle."

"The beauty of the solution is that you can develop infrastructure for a data lake using open sources that are separate from the licenses."

"The User Behavior Analytics is a built-in threat-hunting feature. It detects and reports on any kind of malware or ransomware that enters the network."

"The solution is quite stable and offers good performance. It also works on a virtual machine. We haven't found any issues with it so far. It's been reliable."

"The dashboard is helpful, and it creates visualizations to let staff review event data and identify patterns and anomalies."

"Great for scaling productivity for log monitoring purposes."

"Has a great search capability."

"The most valuable feature is for the security operation center because it provides visibility of all traffic within the company infrastructure."

"It is easy to use and deploy. It comes with user-friendly manuals."

"It is user-friendly. The notification part of McAfee ESM is very easy."

"The most valuable feature is that if the scanning does find something, it quarantines it. Then you can decide what you are going to do with it."

"It is a good central viewpoint for issues. These can then be investigated in more detail on the subnet server(s)/endpoints."

"The most valuable feature is the correlation rules."

"The ease of use is the most valuable feature. Over the years I have always been using this solution and have become comfortable with it."

"It enables us to detect malicious threats, issues, or vulnerabilities in our network."

"The solution's command line should be simpler so that routine commands can be used."

"I feel that DNIF needs to invest more in marketing, considering that it operates at a very competitive speed."

"I think DNIF HYPERCLOUD can implement the ability to export more than 100,000. At the moment, we can't go beyond that. So many times, if you're checking for the firewall logs and working on something related to authentication or network-related traffic, while that log count is low, the account goes beyond that. You can't restrict the logs or the amount of data you can export. It's very important for my situation. It would be better if they could increase the capacity of exports. Although there are many more types of searching in DNIF HYPERCLOUD, people still struggle to query out what they want because not everyone is good at SQL or DQL. The easiest way to query out in DNIF is using the GUI-based interface. But in the GUI interface, you can use operator calls. It gets tricky when you want to search for a specific type of event. You don't know where it will be passed and whether it will be consistent. In the initial phase, it's tough for us to use DNIF. You cannot pass every event in a stable DNIF. When we used that particular tool, we used to get those logs, but sometimes many things are not getting passed. So, we used to export the sheet or export the data into Excel and weigh the required details. In the next release, I would like them to improve the export of the columns and make the application more user-friendly. I would also like a threat-hunting feature in the next release."

"The solution should be able to connect to endpoints, such as desktops and laptops... If this solution had a smart connector to these logs- Windows, Linux, or any other logs - without affecting the performance of the connector, that would be wonderful."

"The EBA could be improved."

"There are currently some issues with machine learning plug-ins."

"Dependency on the DNIF support team was frustrating."

"The vendor is fairly new and it's not as big as some of the international competitors. It's not a mature product. If you ask them to move data, it might take a lot of time."

"The solution needs to improve case management. The UI is confusing."

"The user interface could be more user-friendly."

"The product is mature and needs little improvement, but we could enhance the customized dashboarding based on use cases."

"McAfee is no more providing security updates on this product, and the enhancements to this product seem to have stopped. Moreover, we don't get proper support, and we struggle to get its support. It would be good if they can add some AI engine and out of the box use cases because it is currently limited to the same scenario and the same setup. I have done a POC for Securonix, LogRhythm. These products are much more ahead as compared to McAfee ESM. They have included multiple modules in the same solution. Correlation is very easy. If McAfee ESM can improve, especially in such implementations, then I believe it would be much better."

"We would welcome integrations with some of the new McAfee acquisitions, e.g., behavioural analytics."

"There are some banking and transactional cases that are local, South America transactions. I would like to see them add features that can be used locally, to make those transactions more reliable."

"Customized reports and alerting functionality could be included in the dashboard."

"Areas of Trellix ESM that could be improved or enhanced include checking on the clients who are still on-prem, especially banks, as most are not moving everything to the cloud due to confidentiality and accessibility during network outages."

"The pricing is based on the log size."

"The solution requires a huge infrastructure and that is costly."

"Price-wise, the product is quite economical. I rate the solution's price as three or four on a scale of one to ten, where one is considered to be a very economically priced tool."

"The licensing cost is based on EPS."

"The cost is dependent on the customer's environment and requirements."

"We pay for our licensing fees on a yearly basis, and there are no costs in addition to the standard licensing fees."

"The pricing is good, and they are competitive compared to providers such as RSA and IBM QRadar."

"The product is slightly expensive."

"Regarding pricing, Trellix ESM is not that expensive. It's less than half the cost of IBM QRadar."

"You should buy the distributed option instead of the all-in-one for environments with more than 1000 end points."

"The cost is all included. The finance department handles the financial part, and we mostly don't get involved in it."