Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

DeepL Translator vs Jamf Connect comparison

 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive Summary

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Categories and Ranking

DeepL Translator
Ranking in AI Customer Experience Personalization
20th
Average Rating
8.6
Number of Reviews
2
Ranking in other categories
Translation Management Software (1st)
Jamf Connect
Ranking in AI Customer Experience Personalization
64th
Average Rating
9.0
Reviews Sentiment
5.9
Number of Reviews
13
Ranking in other categories
ZTNA as a Service (14th)
 

Mindshare comparison

As of January 2026, in the AI Customer Experience Personalization category, the mindshare of DeepL Translator is 1.0%. The mindshare of Jamf Connect is 0.4%. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
AI Customer Experience Personalization Market Share Distribution
ProductMarket Share (%)
DeepL Translator1.0%
Jamf Connect0.4%
Other98.6%
AI Customer Experience Personalization
 

Featured Reviews

reviewer2293203 - PeerSpot reviewer
Content Owner - International Markets at a tech vendor with 201-500 employees
Provides high-quality translations, understanding nuances and context well and provides API to automate translations
We translate a lot of content into Spanish. DeepL is set up for other languages like English and maybe others with different country variations, like British English or American English. With Spanish, there's only a general Spanish. However, Spanish can be very different depending on the country. My impression of DeepL is that they try to have standard, plain Spanish. But I would like the option of choosing different Spanish because Spanish from Spain, especially, is quite different from Latin American Spanish. In future releases, I would like to see an option for saving previous translations. For example, other translators, like Google Translate, save your past searches, and that might be something useful.
Joost Van 'T Wout - PeerSpot reviewer
Senior Endpoint Engineer (macOS/Jamf) at PVH Corp.
Customizable and good password management but needs better user-level profile deployment
The main use case for Jamf Connect was to synchronize local accounts with the identity provider, like Entra. However, due to some limitations with the enrollment sequence and user limitations, we decided to discontinue using it We previously used Jamf Connect to synchronize local accounts with…

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Pros

"It makes our work faster and more efficient, freeing up time for more complex tasks. The basic translation is done by DeepL, allowing us to focus on other details. The main improvement is in speed and efficiency."
"It's a good and stable tool, so you should use it if you have a need."
"The solution is scalable."
"Jamf Connect is a pretty simple and straightforward tool overall."
"It's connection with Azure is the most valuable. It is easy to deploy and connect."
"Jamf Connect is an identity provider, and once you log in, you will have all the device's access."
"The most valuable feature is ease of access. It's convenient to do things like resetting passwords. Previously, users were bound to their domain. We had to bind the user to the domain and log them in through the AD. Now, using Jamf Connect, we don't face any of these challenges. Resetting passwords is hassle-free so we can regularly rotate passwords according to best practices."
"The most valuable feature is the synchronization of passwords with a local password, which works well."
"Jamf Connect allowed us to fully customize everything, offering a branded way to change passwords and manage integration with Entra instead of LDAP."
 

Cons

"In future releases, I would like to see an option for saving previous translations. For example, other translators like Google Translate, save your past searches, and that might be something useful."
"When a Mac is joined to Azure, the generic Pro console in the MDM should accurately display the Mac as joined to Azure in the inventory section. Currently, it shows "no domain account found," which can be misleading."
"The solution needs to improve its licensing."
"We have faced issues with the product's configuration. If we use the tool with other business manager solutions, then there is the issue of naming conventions. The tool needs to be careful with newer updates so that it doesn't break any of the existing configurations."
"The main use case for Jamf Connect was to synchronize local accounts with the identity provider, like Entra. However, due to some limitations with the enrollment sequence and user limitations, we decided to discontinue using it."
"Jamf Connect is beginning to implement Multi-Factor Authentication for offline authentication, but the setup documentation is insufficient."
"The solution's UI could be more user-friendly for the setup process."
"The solution’s technical support is bad and should be improved."
"Jamf's support could be improved."
 

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The solution offers a fair price. If you're a casual user, you might not want to pay for it, so it's good to have the free version. The free version is good enough for what a casual user would need. But definitely, the prices are fair for this tool."
"We pay 2 dollars per device monthly. For the plus version, you have to pay 4 dollars per month. I think the product will give discounts based on the number of users and devices."
"The pricing is definitely on the higher side."
"It's relatively inexpensive."
"Jamf Connect has a yearly licensing cost, which is expensive."
"The pricing model could be improved, especially considering the availability of alternative MDM solutions like Kandji, which offers similar features for free or at a lower cost."
"I rate the cost as three out of ten, with ten being the highest."
"The pricing is good."
"The solution's price is reasonable."
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which AI Customer Experience Personalization solutions are best for your needs.
881,114 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
University
10%
Educational Organization
9%
Financial Services Firm
9%
Manufacturing Company
8%
Computer Software Company
18%
Financial Services Firm
14%
Insurance Company
7%
Healthcare Company
6%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
No data available
By reviewers
Company SizeCount
Small Business4
Midsize Enterprise2
Large Enterprise9
 

Questions from the Community

Ask a question
Earn 20 points
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Jamf Connect?
Jamf Connect requires a per-device license fee, which becomes quite expensive given our large company size. Each device that gets enrolled with Jamf Connect requires a monthly license payment.
What needs improvement with Jamf Connect?
There is room for improvement with Jamf Connect in reducing its cost and overcoming limitations during pre-stage enrollment, which prevent it from creating MDM-capable users. This limitation affect...
What is your primary use case for Jamf Connect?
The main use case for Jamf Connect was to synchronize local accounts with the identity provider, like Entra. However, due to some limitations with the enrollment sequence and user limitations, we d...
 

Also Known As

No data available
Wandera, Wandera Private Access
 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

Information Not Available
Mastercard, Deloitte, PayPal, Toshiba, BNP Paribas, EY, Otis, Rollins, Eurostar, Frontier, Sealy, Rolex, VITAS Healthcare
Find out what your peers are saying about DeepL Translator vs. Jamf Connect and other solutions. Updated: December 2025.
881,114 professionals have used our research since 2012.