We performed a comparison between DarwinBox and SAP HCM based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Cloud HCM solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."The most valuable features of the solution are organogram and position-based mapping."
"In our company, we use DarwinBox to maintain the data of our employees and for recruitment purposes."
"The solution that we used previously was very complex. As a result, without referring to the manuals and consulting an expert, it was difficult for a newly hired employee to navigate the platform. However, this is not the case with Darwinbox. It has a very intuitive user interface, and anyone can use it and implement it without having to use a guide or a walk through process. It's very simple."
"SAP HCM has a good performance."
"HCM is a very important module that each organization should want to use. It will help any organization to calculate and control the cost of their human resources."
"I like the talent, recruitment, and learning features the most."
"The platform is simple to use and has a user-friendly dashboard and integration features."
"They provide the most stable and powerful technology in the areas of human resources, information systems, and ERP."
"The most valuable feature is Organizational Management (OM)."
"We have managed to consolidate our payroll for all India operations on this platform."
"The tool's best feature is SAP SuccessFactors."
"DarwinBox is not a stable solution...DarwinBox is not a scalable solution."
"The solution's API integration with third-party applications should be improved."
"Like most software, it has a base version, the vanilla, out-of-the-box version, and customization is required to match it to the unique processes of each company. The Darwinbox team seems to be having difficulty with the customization process. They have to be a little more mature to customize it as per every company's need."
"System usability is a challenge."
"It takes a long time to apply an update patch to the system."
"There are already success factors for the cloud solution which cannot be integrated into S/4 HANA."
"It needs a lot of end user training as it is not intuitive at all."
"The solution is rather expensive."
"The product's learning and development features could be better, including new exclusive LMS tools."
"SAP HCM could improve by having more resources and making it more user-friendly. It is complex."
"SAP HCM needs to improve its UI."
DarwinBox is ranked 13th in Cloud HCM with 3 reviews while SAP HCM is ranked 3rd in Cloud HCM with 48 reviews. DarwinBox is rated 6.4, while SAP HCM is rated 7.6. The top reviewer of DarwinBox writes "The product's servers, integration capabilities, and user interface needs improvement". On the other hand, the top reviewer of SAP HCM writes "Allows you to generate reports, easy integration and offers out-of-the-box support". DarwinBox is most compared with SAP SuccessFactors, ZingHR, PeopleStrong , Workday and Ramco HCM, whereas SAP HCM is most compared with SAP SuccessFactors, Workday, Oracle HCM Cloud, ADP GlobalView Payroll and PeopleSoft. See our DarwinBox vs. SAP HCM report.
See our list of best Cloud HCM vendors and best Talent Management vendors.
We monitor all Cloud HCM reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
