We performed a comparison between CyberArk Endpoint Privilege Manager and Fortinet FortiClient based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Privileged Access Management (PAM) solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."The password rotation and the session recording are the most valuable features."
"The most valuable feature is that it does lifecycle management and that it will change to whatever the end target is."
"It offers great performance."
"We were able to reduce the number of privileged accounts by 50%, which helped to simplify our privileged access management environment."
"This is the number one product for privilege account security."
"The solution allows me to give access and privileges to each user individually"
"The department management aspect of the solution is the most valuable aspect."
"I am impressed with the product's seamless integration. The PAM wallet and enterprise password wallet are good also good."
"It supports securely connections for VPN users from outside our environment during the lockdown."
"The most valuable features are malware detection, integrates well with other solutions, and ease of use for all users."
"What I like most about FortiClient is that it's easy to use. The way it displays information is very straightforward."
"It is very powerful."
"There is a lot of documentation available online."
"The VPN connection is the feature that I like the most."
"Fortinet FortiClient is easy to use, and the single-access managed login is pretty good."
"I find all of the features valuable."
"CyberArk Endpoint Privilege Manager is not suitable for the current situation because when you compare it to OTP, OTP is the strongest password solution. You can use it as a one-time password, but you have to log into the password manager itself and if you don't change your password, it will be the weakest link in the security. In OTP, you don't have that weakest link."
"Performance could be better. We have a couple of problems with CyberArk right now. One of the problems is performance in our environment. Support also takes a long time to respond. If the user already has local admin rights, then I can't collect any events in the console from this device. There are also some options in CyberArk that are not working properly, and are not helpful in this case. I can't collect any information to create a proper policy for the device. I have to investigate everything manually, or even disable the local admin from the device. I can collect the events only after this, and it's very time consuming. In my case, it's a waste of resources."
"The product needs a streamlined user interface; improvements to the user interface can enhance user experience and make the solution more intuitive to navigate."
"CyberArk meets clients' need very spot-on. It covers everything customers ask for. As for improvements, honestly, the feedback's been really positive. I haven't heard any specific areas that need work."
"CyberArk is a pretty heavy solution."
"The product's threat protection and defense capabilities need enhancement."
"One area that has room for improvement is in managing the credentials for network devices."
"Can be improved by allowing computers to be excluded from policies."
"There is room for improvement by increasing the solution's knowledge base."
"It would be nice to see more in hand features in terms of the DLP, so that the solution can be integrated with the DLP, as well as more reporting features on the end point."
"The initial setup was probably more complex. The configuration was somewhat unclear."
"I think that FortiClient can enhance the multifactor authentication."
"Sometimes there are issues when we are trying to connect."
"The user interface could be more inviting."
"The solution can improve by adding new remote console or endpoint features to make the solution easier to use."
"We'd like to see a deployment wizard to help implementation become streamlined."
More CyberArk Endpoint Privilege Manager Pricing and Cost Advice →
CyberArk Endpoint Privilege Manager is ranked 6th in Privileged Access Management (PAM) with 26 reviews while Fortinet FortiClient is ranked 16th in Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP) with 85 reviews. CyberArk Endpoint Privilege Manager is rated 8.0, while Fortinet FortiClient is rated 8.0. The top reviewer of CyberArk Endpoint Privilege Manager writes "Offers integrated solutions and expands its capabilities through strategic acquisitions". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Fortinet FortiClient writes "Easy to set up and user-friendly with good support ". CyberArk Endpoint Privilege Manager is most compared with Microsoft Defender for Endpoint, BeyondTrust Endpoint Privilege Management, CrowdStrike Falcon, CyberArk Privileged Access Manager and Tanium, whereas Fortinet FortiClient is most compared with OpenVPN Access Server, Fortinet FortiEDR, Microsoft Defender for Endpoint, Microsoft Azure VPN Gateway and Kaspersky Endpoint Security for Business. See our CyberArk Endpoint Privilege Manager vs. Fortinet FortiClient report.
We monitor all Privileged Access Management (PAM) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
