Corelight vs Gigamon Deep Observability Pipeline comparison

Corelight and Gigamon are both solutions in the Network Detection and Response (NDR) category. Corelight is ranked #13, while Gigamon is ranked #16 with an average rating of 8.3. Corelight holds a 4.1% mindshare in NDaR, compared to Gigamon’s 1.8% mindshare. Additionally, 100% of Corelight users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of Gigamon users who would recommend it.

Corelight

Read 5 Corelight reviews

2,049 Views
1,783 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Gigamon Deep Observability ...

Read 9 Gigamon Deep Observability Pipeline reviews

4,146 Views
373 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Corelight

Gigamon Deep Observability ...

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Nov 6, 2024

Gigamon Deep Observability Pipeline and Corelight are competing in the network visibility and security space. Despite Gigamon seeming favorable with pricing and support, Corelight's superior features make its value worthwhile.

Features: Gigamon provides robust network traffic management, enhanced security analytics, and extensive data aggregation. Corelight offers an open-source platform, seamless integration capabilities, and diverse feature sets ideal for complex environments.

Room for Improvement: Gigamon could enhance its user interface and further simplify its integration process. Improving AI-driven analytics would boost its effectiveness. Corelight could benefit from additional documentation, reduce initial complexity, and improve its GUI for better user experience.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Gigamon offers straightforward deployment with comprehensive documentation and strong support, ensuring smooth integration. Corelight is slightly more complex but gains from a robust support team and an active user community for effective issue resolution.

Pricing and ROI: Gigamon's initial setup costs are higher, but ROI is achieved through enhanced network performance over time. Corelight offers competitive pricing, with ROI driven by its scalable open-source model, reflecting flexibility for expanding network requirements.

To learn more, read our detailed Corelight vs. Gigamon Deep Observability Pipeline Report (Updated: December 2025).

Buyer's Guide

Corelight vs. Gigamon Deep Observability Pipeline

December 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 879,425 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Corelight

Ranking in Network Detection and Response (NDR)

13th

Average Rating

9.0

Reviews Sentiment

7.6

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Network Traffic Analysis (NTA) (7th)

Gigamon Deep Observability ...

Ranking in Network Detection and Response (NDR)

16th

Average Rating

8.6

Reviews Sentiment

6.5

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability (39th), Event Monitoring (11th), Data Loss Prevention (DLP) (32nd), Security Information and Event Management (SIEM) (43rd), Web Application Firewall (WAF) (31st), Advanced Threat Protection (ATP) (26th), Network Packet Broker (NPB) (1st)

Mindshare comparison

As of January 2026, in the Network Detection and Response (NDR) category, the mindshare of Corelight is 4.1%, down from 4.9% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Gigamon Deep Observability Pipeline is 1.8%, up from 1.0% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Network Detection and Response (NDR) Market Share Distribution
Product	Market Share (%)
Corelight	4.1%
Gigamon Deep Observability Pipeline	1.8%
Other	94.1%

Network Detection and Response (NDR)

Featured Reviews

HamadaElewa

Technical Sales Manager at Spire Solutions

An expensive solution to monitor internet traffic with multiple dashboards

The huge library especially the open source link, makes it the main engine for Corelight with some enhancements in the commercial version. It has a very powerful level, such as signature-based attacks or behavioral attacks, with enhancements in the design. It is very flexible for intelligent implementations like IPs, especially between big companies and banks. Corelight is easy to understand and monitor what is going on behind the team. The solution is already integrated with other systems like Suricata, Elastic, and Microsoft tools. It's very easy to integrate signature-based or behavior-based engines. You can use Elastic for the dashboards to get it from Corelight, along with all the benefits and expandability.

Read full review

TuanNguyen13

Senior Relationship Banker at Joint stock Commercial Bank for Foreign Trade of V

Experience boosts operational efficiency while performance sees room for improvement

I don't have specific information on whether it was purchased on the AWS marketplace or somewhere else. I am working with Dynatrace Operator. I am also working with Algosec, Alluvio, CrowdStrike, Firemon, Gigamon Deep Observability Pipeline, and other solutions. I think it's a good tool, and I am satisfied with it. We have not stored cloud workloads with Gigamon Deep Observability Pipeline yet; we are still on-premises. The technical support takes about one to two hours to respond, which is acceptable. I am satisfied with the scalability of the product. The interface is good.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"It's easy to create additional dashboards specific to supporting specific tasks."

"It is easy to deploy and easy to handle."

"The most valuable feature is the embedded IDS from Suricata."

"Corelight is easy to use."

"It's an easy way for us to get visibility in a client's environment."

"The solution is straightforward to set up."

"The Pipeline's Comprehensive Insights into data flows have helped improve operational efficiency and security."

"The most valuable feature for improving network visibility with Gigamon is the packet filtering capability."

"It is a good product. It provides network visibility, which is important. Gigamon can bring some optimizations to my network. It is helpful for security inspection, and it makes my firewall work fast because my firewall doesn't have to do the inspection of the SSL connections, for example."

"The tool's most valuable feature is the encryption feature. From a security perspective, the solution hasn't significantly strengthened our security posture. However, it has greatly improved performance by streamlining encryption processes and avoiding encryption at multiple layers. This has also simplified troubleshooting, as we can whitelist certain processes."

"It has high stability."

"The most valuable feature is NetFlow."

"It offers straightforward integration."

Cons

"In the next release, building a graphical user interface would be helpful."

"Corelight hasn’t added features in a long time."

"Machine learning could be a good improvement, but it's very costly."

"The solution’s architecture is complex and difficult to understand. There are multiple machines and VMs."

"They can enhance the interface of the product. They can make it more interactive and also easier to use for feature access."

"Gigamon Deep Observability Pipeline needs to improve its performance. I face issues with performance because we use SPAN, and the SPAN traffic is not good."

"The graphical user interface could be improved."

"Its filtering feature needs improvement."

"The Gigamon Deep Observability Pipeline should have a feature showing the traffic flow within its platform. Currently, customers have to use separate tools for monitoring, which is inconvenient. If it had its visibility feature, it would make monitoring easier and more complete without needing extra tools."

"They should increase the solution's cluster capacity."

"The security should be improved."

"It only inspects a specific kind of traffic. There should be different kinds of use cases."

"In terms of improvement, while the initial setup is not overly complicated, we did encounter a few issues."

Pricing and Cost Advice

"It's a yearly fee and depends on what you are looking for."

"The solution is highly-priced."

"The solution's price is reasonable."

"I would rate the solution as expensive, around an eight or nine out of ten. There are other competitive solutions available."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Network Detection and Response (NDR) solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

879,425 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

14%

Government

12%

Computer Software Company

Real Estate/Law Firm

Financial Services Firm

14%

Computer Software Company

11%

Healthcare Company

Manufacturing Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

No data available

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	3
Midsize Enterprise	1
Large Enterprise	5

Questions from the Community

What is the biggest difference between Corelight and Vectra AI?

The two platforms take a fundamentally different approach to NDR. Corelight is limited to use cases that require the eventual forwarding of events and parsed data logs to a security team’s SIEM or ...

See all answers

What do you like most about Corelight?

It's easy to create additional dashboards specific to supporting specific tasks.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Corelight?

The solution is too expensive compared to others. If you have the technical knowledge, it's good. Corelight is a very big gap between you and others if you’re new.

See all answers

What do you like most about Gigamon Deep Observability Pipeline?

The most valuable feature for improving network visibility with Gigamon is the packet filtering capability.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Gigamon Deep Observability Pipeline?

Gigamon Deep Observability Pipeline needs to improve its performance. I face issues with performance because we use SPAN, and the SPAN traffic is not good. They need to improve their performance.

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Gigamon Deep Observability Pipeline?

I am working with Gigamon Deep Observability Pipeline and Firemon, and I have been working with it for a year.

See all answers

Comparisons

Vectra AI vs Corelight

Compared 32% of the time

Darktrace vs Corelight

Compared 25% of the time

ExtraHop Reveal(x) vs Corelight

Compared 19% of the time

Cisco Secure Network Analytics vs Corelight

Compared 7% of the time

NetWitness NDR vs Corelight

Compared 6% of the time

More Corelight Competitors

Ixia Network Packet Brokers vs Gigamon Deep Observability Pipeline

Compared 14% of the time

Cisco Nexus Dashboard Data Broker vs Gigamon Deep Observability Pipeline

Compared 10% of the time

NETSCOUT nGeniusONE vs Gigamon Deep Observability Pipeline

Compared 7% of the time

Arista Data ANalyZer vs Gigamon Deep Observability Pipeline

Compared 6% of the time

Big Switch Networks vs Gigamon Deep Observability Pipeline

Compared 5% of the time

More Gigamon Deep Observability Pipeline Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Network Detection and Response (NDR)

December 2025

Download Corelight product report

Buyer's Guide

Event Monitoring

December 2025

Gigamon Deep Observability Pipeline report

Download Gigamon Deep Observability Pipeline product report

Also Known As

No data available

Gigamon, GigaSecure

Overview

Corelight is the most powerful network visibility solution for information security professionals. We provide real-time data that organizations use to understand, detect, and prevent cyber attacks. Our solution is built on Zeek, the powerful and widely-used open source monitoring framework.

Corelight

Gigamon Deep Observability Pipeline is a comprehensive network visibility solution that provides real-time insights into network traffic. It offers SSL inspection and mobile network monitoring for traffic monitoring purposes. The solution optimizes networks, aids in security inspection, and improves firewall performance. It is praised for its performance, power, straightforward integration, stability, and ease of initial setup.

With Gigamon, organizations can gain complete visibility into their network traffic, identify potential threats, and take proactive measures to prevent them. The solution is ideal for organizations of all sizes, including enterprises, service providers, and government agencies.

Gigamon

Sample Customers

Education First

Amica Insurance, College of William & Mary, Gamma, IntercontinentalExchange, OppenheimerFunds

Buyer's Guide

Corelight vs. Gigamon Deep Observability Pipeline

December 2025

Free Report: Corelight vs. Gigamon Deep Observability Pipeline

Find out what your peers are saying about Corelight vs. Gigamon Deep Observability Pipeline and other solutions. Updated: December 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

879,425 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Corelight vs. Gigamon Deep Observability Pipeline report.

See our list of best Network Detection and Response (NDR) vendors.

We monitor all Network Detection and Response (NDR) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.