We performed a comparison between Comodo cWatch and F5 Advanced WAF based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about Amazon Web Services (AWS), F5, Microsoft and others in Web Application Firewall (WAF)."The FIM feature, the information in the new management system, and their support are the most valuable features. The scanned results are quite fast as compared to other platforms compared to scanning timing. It takes about a minute or two minutes. Also, the results of the Comodo scan results are in detail."
"The solution is pretty stable. I've never faced pressing issues or hanging issue."
"The web application firewall itself is most valuable. It provides positive security and negative security. In negative security, it blocks a task such as cross-site scripting, code injection, etc. In positive security, it lets you specify and enforce things, such as the parameters allowed in username and password fields and the number of characters allowed in a field."
"I like the security features, especially against SQL injection."
"F5 Advanced WAF secures our connectivity and combines both the main functions of WAF (balancing and web application security)."
"One of the most valuable features is the Local Traffic Manager."
"There are a lot of good features."
"Good technology for mitigating different application attacks, e.g. DDoS, DNS, and layer seven attacks."
"Good dashboard and reporting."
"The solution isn't too expensive. The license allows you to license what you need and leave out what you don't need."
"A small problem is from the support team. Sometimes they are a bit delayed."
"The solution needs to build better performance, specifically in the hardware resources."
"The tool needs to improve its pricing."
"The delay times on firmware patches and software updates could be better and improved."
"The Sandbox integration feature could be improved."
"I would like for there to be a cloud-based solution, this would also help to improve scalability."
"I would like to see additional controls."
"While F5 Advanced WAF does limit the number of partners in certain regions to ensure successful business transactions, they could also benefit from expanding their partnerships and making it easier for more people to learn about and become experts in F5 Advanced WAF. By doing so, they could increase the reach and exposure of their solution, similar to how Cisco has become widely recognized in the security industry."
"The solution should include RASP for another level of protection at the code itself."
"There is a gap in report management."
Earn 20 points
Comodo cWatch is ranked 36th in Web Application Firewall (WAF) while F5 Advanced WAF is ranked 2nd in Web Application Firewall (WAF) with 55 reviews. Comodo cWatch is rated 9.6, while F5 Advanced WAF is rated 8.6. The top reviewer of Comodo cWatch writes "Excellent security, good encryption, and pretty stable". On the other hand, the top reviewer of F5 Advanced WAF writes "Flexible configuration, reliable, and highly professional support". Comodo cWatch is most compared with Cloudflare, Atomic ModSecurity Rules, Sucuri, AWS WAF and SiteLock, whereas F5 Advanced WAF is most compared with Fortinet FortiWeb, Microsoft Azure Application Gateway, AWS WAF, Imperva Web Application Firewall and F5 BIG-IP Local Traffic Manager (LTM).
See our list of best Web Application Firewall (WAF) vendors.
We monitor all Web Application Firewall (WAF) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
