We performed a comparison between AWS WAF and Comodo cWatch based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about Amazon Web Services (AWS), Microsoft, F5 and others in Web Application Firewall (WAF)."The solution is stable."
"AWS has flexibility in terms of WAF rules."
"It is Amazon. Everything is scalable. It is beyond what we need."
"AWS WAF helps mitigate different kinds of bot attacks and SQL injection that happen within the retail industry."
"The security firewall plus the features that protect against database injections or scripting,"
"The most valuable feature is the capability to limit access based on geographical location by restricting specific IP addresses."
"Rule groups are valuable."
"AWS WAF is very easy to use and configure on AWS."
"The solution is pretty stable. I've never faced pressing issues or hanging issue."
"The FIM feature, the information in the new management system, and their support are the most valuable features. The scanned results are quite fast as compared to other platforms compared to scanning timing. It takes about a minute or two minutes. Also, the results of the Comodo scan results are in detail."
"We haven't faced any problems with the solution."
"The product should improve the DDoS-related features."
"An improvement area would be that it's more of a manual effort when you have to enable rules. That's one of the downsides. If that can be done in an automated way, it would be great. That's a lagging feature currently."
"I would like to see it more tightly integrated with other AWS services."
"We should be able to do proper whitelisting."
"There is room for improvement in pricing."
"Technical support for AWS WAF needs improvement."
"In a future release I would like to see automation. There's no interaction between the applications and that makes it tedious. We have to do the preparation all over again for each of our other applications."
"A small problem is from the support team. Sometimes they are a bit delayed."
"The solution needs to build better performance, specifically in the hardware resources."
Earn 20 points
AWS WAF is ranked 1st in Web Application Firewall (WAF) with 52 reviews while Comodo cWatch is ranked 35th in Web Application Firewall (WAF). AWS WAF is rated 8.0, while Comodo cWatch is rated 9.6. The top reviewer of AWS WAF writes "A highly stable solution that helps mitigate different kinds of bot attacks and SQL injection attacks". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Comodo cWatch writes "Excellent security, good encryption, and pretty stable". AWS WAF is most compared with Azure Web Application Firewall, Microsoft Azure Application Gateway, Imperva Web Application Firewall, F5 Advanced WAF and Cloudflare Web Application Firewall, whereas Comodo cWatch is most compared with Cloudflare, Atomic ModSecurity Rules and Sucuri.
See our list of best Web Application Firewall (WAF) vendors.
We monitor all Web Application Firewall (WAF) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.