Executive SummaryUpdated on Oct 5, 2025
Comodo Advanced Endpoint Protection and ThreatLocker Zero Trust Endpoint Protection Platform both operate in the endpoint security market. Comodo appears stronger in ransomware prevention through sandboxing, while ThreatLocker excels with its Zero Trust policies and application control.
Features: Comodo offers effective sandboxing for malware containment, ransomware prevention, and provides integration capabilities and remote management tools. It incorporates machine learning and AI for threat detection. ThreatLocker distinguishes itself with a Zero Trust approach, robust application controls, ring-fencing, and allowlisting to manage software activity and user permissions, providing detailed visibility and effective cross-platform integration.
Room for Improvement: Comodo could benefit from improved communication about procedures, more detailed reporting, faster support, enhanced data loss prevention, and infrastructure modernization. ThreatLocker could improve flexibility in learning mode, reporting, administrative integrations, and reduce the user interface learning curve to offer better training and assistance.
Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Both solutions support Private, Public, and Hybrid Cloud deployment. Comodo's support experiences vary with occasional delays, while ThreatLocker is praised for responsive and supportive service, though there is a mention of improving support speed.
Pricing and ROI: Comodo provides competitively priced offerings seen as market-standard, though endpoint licensing could be more cost-effective, delivering solid ROI with comprehensive threat protection. ThreatLocker is competitively priced with its extensive security offerings, allowing scalability and flexibility with a significant ROI, appreciated for its value when bundling features, though new feature pricing may pose challenges.
