Comodo Advanced Endpoint Protection and ThreatLocker Zero Trust Endpoint Protection Platform both operate in the endpoint security market. Comodo appears stronger in ransomware prevention through sandboxing, while ThreatLocker excels with its Zero Trust policies and application control.
Features: Comodo offers effective sandboxing for malware containment, ransomware prevention, and provides integration capabilities and remote management tools. It incorporates machine learning and AI for threat detection. ThreatLocker distinguishes itself with a Zero Trust approach, robust application controls, ring-fencing, and allowlisting to manage software activity and user permissions, providing detailed visibility and effective cross-platform integration.
Room for Improvement: Comodo could benefit from improved communication about procedures, more detailed reporting, faster support, enhanced data loss prevention, and infrastructure modernization. ThreatLocker could improve flexibility in learning mode, reporting, administrative integrations, and reduce the user interface learning curve to offer better training and assistance.
Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Both solutions support Private, Public, and Hybrid Cloud deployment. Comodo's support experiences vary with occasional delays, while ThreatLocker is praised for responsive and supportive service, though there is a mention of improving support speed.
Pricing and ROI: Comodo provides competitively priced offerings seen as market-standard, though endpoint licensing could be more cost-effective, delivering solid ROI with comprehensive threat protection. ThreatLocker is competitively priced with its extensive security offerings, allowing scalability and flexibility with a significant ROI, appreciated for its value when bundling features, though new feature pricing may pose challenges.
Without this type of solution, work becomes hampered and files become inaccessible.
If something were to happen without ThreatLocker, the cost would be huge, and thus, having it is definitely worth it.
The main return on investment is peace of mind, knowing that with ThreatLocker on any endpoint, it will almost always block all malicious code or exploits, even zero-day exploits.
It keeps malware, Trojans, and ransomware at bay.
Customer support is generally satisfactory but could be improved, especially in terms of response time.
They have been very responsive, helpful, and knowledgeable.
I would rate their customer support a ten out of ten.
Their support is world-class.
I started off with just the servers, and within a month and a half, I set up the entire company with ThreatLocker.
It seems to primarily operate on the endpoints rather than at a central location pushing out policies.
I would rate it a ten out of ten for scalability.
When deploying on old PCs, servers, or laptops, optimal performance cannot be expected.
The stability of Comodo Advanced Endpoint Protection is rated at ninety-five to ninety-seven percent.
For five years, we have not had a problem.
Once deployed, it downloads the policies locally, so even if the computer doesn't have internet, it doesn't matter.
It has been very stable, reliable, and accessible.
Comodo Advanced Endpoint Protection could improve by extending its auto containment feature to Mac and Linux systems since it currently only supports Windows.
The main areas for improvement are support responsiveness and the additional enhancement with the DLP integration.
Controlling the cloud environment, not just endpoints, is crucial.
This is problematic when immediate attention is needed.
Comprehensive 24-hour log monitoring is a valuable enhancement for both business and enterprise-level users.
Pricing is competitive and considered average compared to other solutions.
After conversations with other partners, it became clear we underpriced it initially, which caused most of our issues.
We are moving towards the Unified solution, where they basically bundle everything together, providing us better stability with the ability to bring in new product offerings without having to go back to the customer and say, 'This is going to cost you.'
I had a really good deal at the time, and it continues to be cost-effective.
It includes an auto containment feature, ensuring files and folders remain secure.
If anything happens or any suspicious activities are detected, an alert is generated, allowing for quick response.
ThreatLocker Zero Trust Endpoint Protection Platform's ability to block access to unauthorized applications has been excellent.
It protects our customers.
The major benefit is fewer breaches overall, as nothing can be run without prior approval. This helps my company protect its data and secure itself effectively.
| Product | Market Share (%) |
|---|---|
| ThreatLocker Zero Trust Endpoint Protection Platform | 1.1% |
| Comodo Advanced Endpoint Protection | 0.6% |
| Other | 98.3% |
| Company Size | Count |
|---|---|
| Small Business | 15 |
| Midsize Enterprise | 1 |
| Large Enterprise | 1 |
| Company Size | Count |
|---|---|
| Small Business | 32 |
| Midsize Enterprise | 4 |
| Large Enterprise | 3 |
Comodo Advanced Endpoint Protection (AEP) delivers patent-pending auto-containment, where unknown executables and other files that request runtime privileges are automatically run in a virtual contain that does not have access to the host system's resources or user data.
ThreatLocker Zero Trust Endpoint Protection Platform empowers organizations with application control, selective elevation, and ring-fencing to enhance security and prevent unauthorized access.
ThreatLocker provides comprehensive security management using application allowlisting to ensure only approved software operates across servers and workstations. The platform's centralized management simplifies security processes by consolidating multiple tools, and its robust capabilities align with zero-trust strategies by actively blocking unauthorized applications and ensuring compliance. Users note intuitive features such as mobile access, helpful training resources, and responsive support, which effectively reduce operational costs and help desk inquiries. The managed service providers prefer ThreatLocker to maintain network integrity by preventing malicious scripts and unauthorized access attempts. However, users identify room for growth in training and support flexibility, the interface, and certain technical challenges like network saturation from policy updates.
What are the most important features?Organizations utilize ThreatLocker for application allowlisting, ensuring only authorized software operates to prevent unauthorized access efficiently. Deployed across servers and workstations, its features support zero-trust principles and are favored by managed service providers for application management and network integrity.
We monitor all Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
