CloudStack vs Microsoft Azure portal comparison

Apache and Microsoft are both solutions in the Cloud Management category. Apache is ranked #7 with an average rating of 8.2, while Microsoft is ranked #43 with an average rating of 8.0. Additionally, 94% of Apache users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of Microsoft users who would recommend it.

CloudStack

Read 34 CloudStack reviews

2,189 Views
2,036 Comparison Views

94% willing to recommend

Microsoft Azure portal

Read 1 Microsoft Azure portal review

18 Views
18 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

CloudStack

Microsoft Azure portal

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between CloudStack and Microsoft Azure portal based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out what your peers are saying about Nutanix, Broadcom, IBM and others in Cloud Management.

To learn more, read our detailed Cloud Management Report (Updated: March 2026).

Buyer's Guide

Cloud Management

March 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 885,837 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

CloudStack

Ranking in Cloud Management

7th

Average Rating

8.0

Reviews Sentiment

6.5

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Microsoft Azure portal

Ranking in Cloud Management

43rd

Average Rating

8.0

Reviews Sentiment

6.8

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Featured Reviews

Tharun Kumar Reddy Thamatam

Senior Infrastructure Consultant at Infosys

Achieving seamless infrastructure management with optimized network and user access controls

I believe enhancements could be made in CloudStack, particularly in the management servers. I had the opportunity to collaborate with one of the Apache CloudStack developers, leading to the installation of additional agents for better information retrieval from hypervisors. We implemented configurations, ensuring consistency across hosts and VMs. We also utilized Ansible or YAML files to automate password upgrades during patching activities and database management, showcasing our customization efforts for improvement. For future releases, it would be beneficial if Apache enhanced CloudStack by integrating alerting systems directly. We've had instances where hypervisors experienced overloads without prior alerts, so proactive alerts within the tool would better prepare us for addressing issues swiftly, preventing disruption in business operations. A portal summarizing system metrics alongside alert capabilities would greatly enhance our operational efficiency.

Read full review

Duy AnhMai

Product Owner at Heineken

Integrated data storage has supported large teams and simplified connections with other tools

The speed and performance are satisfactory to me, and overall everything meets my needs. I do not have specific improvements in mind that Microsoft Azure portal needs to implement. Regarding AI products, I am uncertain about their capabilities. Both Microsoft Azure portal and AWS offer similar AI deployment options. Currently, my organization does not use AI products in Microsoft Azure portal or another cloud platform, so I cannot comment further on this aspect.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"It works, and pretty much always has. Reliability and support for enterprise features, with a multi-tenant interface, makes CloudStack a very compelling solution."

"CloudStack is our private IaaS cloud which helps us manage resource usage in our company and it is also a great PoC environment."

"Cloud computing has improved the way our organization functions."

"Valuable features include that it is a user-friendly portal, VPN P2S and S2S possibilities, and it's easy to manage accounts and limits."

"You can use a single API to get things done, rather than multiple APIs on multiple modules."

"Killer features for me were: support for many hypervisors, ability to match business logic, "everything in one box," available APIs."

"We had a relevant reduction of bureaucracy tasks."

"The initial implementation process was quite good."

More CloudStack pros

"My personal opinion is that the ecosystem of Microsoft is very large, and I can use many platforms related to Microsoft, such as Microsoft Power Platform, which makes it easy to integrate with other Microsoft-related platforms."

Cons

"The absence of the feature, deploy an instance from a snapshot, is the weak point of the platform. It is a feature that everyone needs nowadays."

"A technology upgrade is one item which could be improved upon a lot."

"I think CloudStack needs to promote itself better, since I believe it a better solution than OpenStack."

"The absence of the feature, deploy an instance from a snapshot, is the weak point of the platform."

"The product has evolved a lot since the first versions in which it was very complicated to do version updates, and had various problems."

"The product does not have an easily implementable payment gateway."

"CS has very descriptive logging, and every time I faced issues and asked for help, I didn’t get any reply from the community. Reason? Its quite obvious. CS runs on specific environments, unique to each case. So, unless it is a functional issue of CS, nobody can help you. All issues were resolved by myself going through logs. This is another reason why you need smart enough people to manage it. Engineers must have knowledge of hypervisors and understand how CS interacts with them."

"I think that container technology in CloudStack is an area that needs to be improved."

More CloudStack cons

"When comparing Microsoft Azure portal with AWS, the cost of Microsoft Azure is higher than AWS."

Pricing and Cost Advice

"There is no license, so the product is free unless you are buying professional technical support services."

"As far as I know, CS is still free of charge. If you want to pay some money, Citrix Cloud Platform is based on CS, I think. As for hypervisors – everything as usual, you need to pay for VMware and vCenter. As for XenServer, recently they changed the free feature list, so you may need to pay some money to get useful features like XenMotion."

"It is a 100% open-source solution needing just an Apache license. Also, there are no hidden fees to be paid."

"CloudStack is an open-source product."

"CloudStack is an open source solution, so you don't need to pay anything for it. When our company develops something specially for CloudStack, it is donated to the Apache Software Foundation and provided to anyone that wants to use it."

"The solution is open-source and free."

"Give an effort to planning. If possible, contract a specialized consultant company for the initial setup and knowledge transfer."

"The Apache CloudStack is open source, so you do not have licenses to purchase."

Information not available

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Cloud Management solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

885,837 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Computer Software Company

12%

Educational Organization

Manufacturing Company

Comms Service Provider

No data available

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	13
Midsize Enterprise	6
Large Enterprise	12

No data available

Questions from the Community

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for CloudStack?

CloudStack is open-source, so there is no cost apart from learning. Billing solutions, if outsourced, come at a moderate cost.

See all answers

What needs improvement with CloudStack?

Enhancements for CloudStack can focus on integrating more hypervisors, as mentioned regarding current features. We're working on a new feature that will allow for certain limited functions, but ove...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for CloudStack?

My usual use cases for CloudStack involve an AWS style private cloud or public cloud. I can deploy an AWS style cloud using the open source tool that is CloudStack. The use case depends on the cust...

See all answers

What needs improvement with Microsoft Azure portal?

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Microsoft Azure portal?

I use Microsoft Azure portal primarily for storage and data storage purposes. I have been using Microsoft Azure portal for about three years. At Heineken Vietnam and Heineken Global, we always use ...

See all answers

What advice do you have for others considering Microsoft Azure portal?

Microsoft Azure portal is acceptable to me, and I believe other cloud options such as AWS or Google Cloud are comparable. Both Microsoft Azure portal and AWS offer similar AI deployment capabilitie...

See all answers

Comparisons

OpenNebula vs CloudStack

Compared 19% of the time

VMware Aria Automation vs CloudStack

Compared 7% of the time

Sangfor HCI - Hyper Converged Infrastructure vs CloudStack

Compared 6% of the time

Turbo360 (Formerly Serverless360) vs CloudStack

Compared 5% of the time

Flexera Cloud Management Platform (CMP) vs CloudStack

Compared 4% of the time

More CloudStack Competitors

No data available

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

CloudStack

April 2026

Download CloudStack product report

Buyer's Guide

Cloud Management

March 2026

Download Microsoft Azure portal product report

Also Known As

Vmops, Cloud.com

No data available

Overview

Apache CloudStack is open source software designed to deploy and manage large networks of virtual machines, as a highly available, highly scalable Infrastructure as a Service (IaaS) cloud computing platform.

Apache

Microsoft Azure portal provides a comprehensive cloud computing service that enables users to manage, build, and deploy applications with seamless integration and scalability, supporting an array of use cases across multiple industries.

Azure portal delivers a robust platform for IT professionals and developers to access a wide range of services through a centralized, user-friendly interface. This cloud service emphasizes flexibility and governance, allowing users to customize and automate processes, scale resources as needed, and maintain a high level of security. As a result, it caters to those needing efficient management of cloud environments, streamlined workflows, and increased productivity with powerful analytics and monitoring tools.

What features does Microsoft Azure portal offer?

Resource Management: Unified dashboard for managing all Azure resources effectively.
Custom Dashboards: Personalized views to access frequently used resources and metrics.
Integrated Development Tools: Built-in support for popular development frameworks.
Security & Compliance: Advanced security features to protect data and applications.
Scalability: Easily scale resources and adapt to changes in demand.

What are the benefits or ROI to consider?

Cost Efficiency: Pay-as-you-go pricing model minimizes unnecessary costs.
Enhanced Productivity: Streamlined operations save time and resources.
Improved Security: Regular updates and compliance standards ensure data protection.
Flexibility: Supports diverse workloads and IT configurations.

In industries like healthcare, Azure portal supports secure data management and interoperability. In finance, it enhances compliance and risk management. For retail sectors, it offers scalability to handle fluctuations in demand. Azure portal is implemented to meet specific industry challenges with tailored solutions.

Microsoft

Sample Customers

GreenQloud, Exoscale, TomTom, ASG, PC Extreme, ISWest, Grid'5000

Information Not Available

Find out what your peers are saying about Nutanix, Broadcom, IBM and others in Cloud Management. Updated: March 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

885,837 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our list of best Cloud Management vendors.

We monitor all Cloud Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.