Make and CloudBees are competing products in the automation and CI/CD space. Make leads in ease of integration and user-friendliness, while CloudBees offers advanced features suitable for enterprise environments.
Features: Make stands out with its flexibility and drag-and-drop interface, offering extensive integrations and significant time savings. Its low-code platform enables quick adaptation across platforms and efficient automation. CloudBees features scalable architecture with advanced security and a wide range of DevOps tool integrations, providing robust pipeline orchestration and deployment management solutions.
Room for Improvement: Make could enhance security documentation, refine its pricing strategy, and improve login processes. Clearly addressing data security and competitive pricing could boost its appeal. CloudBees could streamline plugin management and user authentication, and improve monitoring of licenses and user activities to better track critical metrics.
Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Make supports public and private deployments with responsive customer support praised for its efficiency. CloudBees offers a broad deployment range including private clouds, with robust enterprise support, although service may depend on vendor priorities.
Pricing and ROI: Make is cost-effective, enhancing productivity with significant time savings, offering high ROI. It provides value at a competitive price. CloudBees, although priced higher, delivers substantial enterprise benefits, highlighting ROI in managing large pipelines and deployment efficiency.
I have indeed seen a return on investment as it has saved us hundreds of hours in repetitive tasks, streamlining our follow-up to the leads that we are generating.
I implemented a booking system for my client that previously required data to be entered directly into Google Sheets and reminders to be sent manually; using Make, they have saved about 50% of their time, which equals one labor resource, translating to a significant amount of money saved.
With that extra time each month, I could focus more on sales and upscaling my business, so it is really worth it.
We have escalated a few issues that we faced during some integrations, and we received reasonable responses from Make support.
They were doing the best job for my use cases and my problems.
When I had a problem during the pricing payment, the customer support handled it very well.
When you have an error, it is very hard to do error handling and debugging.
Make's scalability is very good, and if the pricing were lower, I could scale a lot more.
Whenever a new task comes to mind, I think about automating it with Make, which is good.
The deployment can take a couple of hours or a couple of minutes.
If possible, we could sort the logs so we can get the exact error on one page.
There should be clarity about whether the data is secure while passing through these automations or integrations created within Make.
I would love to have more detailed logs, step-by-step error tracing, and better visualization of failed executions, as I think it would improve the user experience significantly.
The lagging problem needs to be solved.
Licensing was affordable.
I found a solution that allows me to use Make almost for free, just using the Docker on-premises.
It's cost-effective and it's pocket-friendly.
The integration part is good. We can use multiple things by integrating with CI/CD pipelines, and this is very feasible for us.
Make has positively impacted my organization by enabling us to solve use cases for hundreds of clients across hundreds of different platforms, providing the customization capabilities to automate accounting and invoicing processes that save dozens of man-hours a month, and allowing us to build custom churn, retention, and engagement costs that have driven a 30% reduction in churn.
Instead of spending several days implementing and testing API integrations inside our FastAPI back end, I was able to build the workflows in a few hours using Make.
The task that I would complete in a span of one day is completed in a matter of minutes by using Make.
| Product | Mindshare (%) |
|---|---|
| Make | 0.7% |
| CloudBees | 0.5% |
| Other | 98.8% |
| Company Size | Count |
|---|---|
| Small Business | 1 |
| Midsize Enterprise | 3 |
| Large Enterprise | 18 |
| Company Size | Count |
|---|---|
| Small Business | 14 |
| Midsize Enterprise | 1 |
| Large Enterprise | 6 |
CloudBees provides a highly scalable and secure platform that supports seamless integration and automation across multiple environments. It excels in managing Jenkins instances and offers flexible deployment options, enhancing efficiency for large teams.
CloudBees is recognized for its integration with Jenkins, SonarQube, and Ansible, allowing companies to leverage its robust automation capabilities for continuous integration and deployment. With its strong support for Docker and Kubernetes, teams benefit from streamlined code management and operational efficiency. Its scalable architecture, real-time feedback, and premium vendor support help manage large-scale applications and microservices. Despite its strengths, users report challenges with pipeline setup, service availability, and GUI accessibility, which suggest room for improvement in these areas.
What are the key features of CloudBees?
What benefits should users expect in reviews?
In tech and software industries, companies implement CloudBees for managing complex CI/CD pipelines. Its integration with DevOps tools facilitates automation and workflow optimization. Industries with large teams managing thousands of microservices use CloudBees to maintain high availability, streamline processes, and ensure security compliance, driving efficient production workflows.
Make is a robust automation platform that streamlines workflows, connecting apps to enhance productivity. Tailored for tech-savvy users, it offers dynamic automation solutions that optimize processes and facilitate seamless integration of disparate systems.
At its core, Make empowers businesses to automate tasks through an intuitive builder with drag-and-drop capabilities. Ideal for professionals who need to integrate systems efficiently, it supports a wide range of applications, aiding in the creation of complex workflows without the need for extensive coding. Users value its adaptability, making it a popular choice for enhancing operational efficiency.
What features does Make offer?In industries like retail and technology, Make has become essential for automating inventory management, order processing, and customer relationship tasks. Companies leverage its capacity to connect multiple databases, CRM systems, and sales platforms, driving growth and operational excellence.
We monitor all AI Software Development reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
