Cisco TelePresence vs ON24 Platform comparison

Cisco and ON24 are both solutions in the Virtual Meetings category. Cisco is ranked #9 with an average rating of 8.0, while ON24 is ranked #26. Cisco holds a 3.4% mindshare in VM, compared to ON24’s 1.2% mindshare. Additionally, 85% of Cisco users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of ON24 users who would recommend it.

Cisco TelePresence

Read 9 Cisco TelePresence reviews

634 Views
318 Comparison Views

85% willing to recommend

ON24 Platform

Read 2 ON24 Platform reviews

179 Views
97 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Cisco TelePresence

ON24 Platform

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Feb 3, 2025

Cisco TelePresence and ON24 Platform are competing products in the communication solutions category. ON24 Platform seems to have the upper hand with its superior features like analytics and customization capabilities, which justify its higher cost despite Cisco's pricing advantage.

Features: Cisco TelePresence offers advanced video conferencing capabilities, high-definition video quality, and is ideal for lifelike meeting experiences. ON24 Platform provides interactive features, extensive integration options, especially for webinars and virtual events, creating a more engaging user experience.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: ON24 Platform has a cloud-based deployment model and streamlined setup procedures, offering quick implementation and comprehensive customer support. Cisco TelePresence involves a more complex physical setup due to hardware needs, supported by robust customer service.

Pricing and ROI: Cisco TelePresence demands a higher initial investment because of hardware requirements, offering long-term ROI through its reliability and minimal operational issues. ON24 Platform, though having a higher software licensing cost, delivers substantial ROI with detailed analytics and support for large-scale virtual events.

To learn more, read our detailed Cisco TelePresence vs. ON24 Platform Report (Updated: April 2025).

Buyer's Guide

Cisco TelePresence vs. ON24 Platform

April 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 849,963 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Cisco TelePresence

Ranking in Virtual Meetings

9th

Average Rating

8.2

Reviews Sentiment

7.4

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

ON24 Platform

Ranking in Virtual Meetings

26th

Average Rating

8.0

Reviews Sentiment

8.1

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Virtual Events Platforms (4th)

Mindshare comparison

As of May 2025, in the Virtual Meetings category, the mindshare of Cisco TelePresence is 3.4%, down from 4.1% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of ON24 Platform is 1.2%, up from 1.1% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Virtual Meetings

Featured Reviews

OSCAR DE LA PENA

Senior Solution Architect at Ricoh España, S.L.U.

One-click meeting access and seamless integration enhance video conferencing experience

Cisco TelePresence could improve the WebRTC connections, as they are quite slow. The end user experiences delays when using WebRTC, sometimes taking one minute or more to receive a connection. This issue is mainly due to Cisco taking a long time to download and start the WebRTC client on their devices. Ensuring it is embedded in the device could help.

Read full review

reviewer1337886

Multimedia Production Manager at a legal firm with 5,001-10,000 employees

Easy setup and an a la carte pricing model

The solution needs a more modern interface. One of our biggest complaints is that we don't have the ability to dynamically push our interface to participants. Adobe Connect is an older technology, but it allows us to push our own layout and design to participants. One of the solution's strengths is that it's web-only but that is also a weakness. It is not a software solution but is browser-based which has its advantages and disadvantages. Zoom has become such a force that its ease of use surpasses ON24.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"We have a dual screen option to enable video and content sharing."

"TelePresence allows our customers to have a quick meeting while traveling and still be effective. It saves time and money."

"It was stable. So, I would rate the stability a ten out of ten."

"PresenterTrack cameras improve the meeting experience."

"The configuration is a valuable."

"Cisco is a leader in video conferencing solutions because they apply the latest technologies to their devices and services, such as artificial intelligence and versatile functionalities."

"The speaker tracker feature in Cisco Telepresence is highly valuable, especially the ability to track multiple participants and change focus during meetings."

"The SpeakerTrack feature is the most valuable feature."

More Cisco TelePresence pros

"Friendly user interface and simple navigation."

"The solution works well with third-party integrations."

Cons

"I was in touch with one of our clients and they mentioned that they would like to have a holographic video conferencing. It would be great if that feature would be added."

"The price of Cisco TelePresence overall should be reduced."

"The calling features can be improved."

"MX800 comes only with one available DVI port. A few more HDMI ports will improve the system's capability."

"Cisco TelePresence could improve the WebRTC connections, as they are quite slow."

"The tool is expensive."

"Cisco TelePresence could improve its integration capabilities."

"I would rate my experience with the initial setup a three out of ten, with ten being expensive. It was complex with badges and certificates. Too crazy."

"Bandwidth optimization could be increased."

"The solution needs a more modern interface."

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The price of Cisco Telepresence is high, especially in Brazil. However, the quality of the product justifies the cost."

"We used high definition, 1080p, but again, it required license purchases. For example, with three licenses (TP licenses), each allowing one 1080p screen, if I had six participants, I'd need to lower the resolution to 720p or lower to accommodate more participants. More licenses meant more cost."

"I will rate the tool's pricing an eight out of ten."

"Cisco TelePresence license is expensive and should be reduced. There is only a cost for the license and it is annually."

"The pricing is expensive, therefore I rate it an eight out of ten."

"We paid $1,800 for five webinars, which is the standard fee. If you require support there is a $300 additional fee, extra attendees is an additional fee, integration is an additional fee, etc. All these extras could add on another $2,500 which was not in our budget."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Virtual Meetings solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

849,963 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Government

13%

University

13%

Financial Services Firm

12%

Computer Software Company

11%

Financial Services Firm

14%

Computer Software Company

14%

Legal Firm

Insurance Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

No data available

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about Cisco TelePresence?

It was stable. So, I would rate the stability a ten out of ten.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Cisco TelePresence?

See all answers

What advice do you have for others considering Cisco TelePresence?

Cisco is a leader in video conferencing solutions because they apply the latest technologies to their devices and services, such as artificial intelligence and versatile functionalities. Security i...

See all answers

Ask a question

Earn 20 points

Comparisons

Webex vs Cisco TelePresence

Compared 31% of the time

Polycom RealPresence Clariti vs Cisco TelePresence

Compared 24% of the time

Cisco Meeting Server vs Cisco TelePresence

Compared 23% of the time

Polycom RealPresence Desktop vs Cisco TelePresence

Compared 23% of the time

More Cisco TelePresence Competitors

Zoom vs ON24 Platform

Compared 100% of the time

More ON24 Platform Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Virtual Meetings

April 2025

Download Cisco TelePresence product report

Buyer's Guide

Virtual Meetings

April 2025

Download ON24 Platform product report

Also Known As

TelePresence

No data available

Overview

Cisco TelePresence Server brings multiparty video to unified communications deployments. Its flexible video, audio, and content-sharing capabilities allow users to participate in video conferences with multiple parties. Users can easily create, launch, and join meetings using standards-based video endpoints. Or their mobile devices or Cisco WebEx clients. Or even third-party video endpoints. The server provides high-quality, standards-based video conferencing for mobile, desktop, and room systems.

Cisco

Experiences Centered Around Your Audience

The ON24 Platform gives you a single place to build, manage, analyze, measure and optimize all of your audiences’ experiences.

Data-Driven
Extract behavioral insights to qualify leads and accelerate deals.

Scalable
Centralize the development, sharing and reuse of your best content.

Global
Broadcast, repurpose and translate content across multiple regions.

Integrated
Seamlessly connect and transfer data with other business software.

Customizable
Control every aspect of the audience experience, data capture and reporting.

Ease-of-Use
Simplify content creation with intuitive, drag-and-drop functionality.

ON24

Sample Customers

Afni, AGCO, Bellevue, Came Group, Children's Hospital of Orange County (CHOC Children's), Del Papa Distributing, Instituto Zaldivar, ING Bank, Moffitt Cancer Center, Park Nicollet, Pentana Solutions Australia, San Jose State University, Sub-Zero Wolf, Transwestern and Metropolis Investment Holdings, Vital Images

IBM, Zendesk, Salesforce, Linkedin, Intel

Buyer's Guide

Cisco TelePresence vs. ON24 Platform

April 2025

Free Report: Cisco TelePresence vs. ON24 Platform

Find out what your peers are saying about Cisco TelePresence vs. ON24 Platform and other solutions. Updated: April 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

849,963 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Cisco TelePresence vs. ON24 Platform report.

See our list of best Virtual Meetings vendors.

We monitor all Virtual Meetings reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.