Cisco Meraki Wireless LAN and SonicWall SonicWave Access Points compete in the WLAN market. Although Cisco Meraki is usually favored for pricing and support, SonicWall leads in features, making it valuable for some deployments.
Features: Cisco Meraki's strengths include cloud-based management, seamless hardware integration, and solid security measures. SonicWall SonicWave Access Points highlight advanced threat detection, multi-user MIMO technology, and a robust security suite.
Room for Improvement: Cisco Meraki could improve by offering more flexible customization options, enhancing performance in large-scale deployments, and expanding analytics capabilities. SonicWall may benefit from streamlining the management interface, improving scalability, and increasing support for multi-vendor environments.
Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Cisco Meraki's cloud-based deployment and responsive support streamline implementation, favoring quicker setups. SonicWall, while requiring more configuration, provides detailed support with a focus on security queries.
Pricing and ROI: Cisco Meraki involves higher initial costs but offers scalable models for solid ROI via efficiency. SonicWall offers lower setup costs and security-focused features that may lead to favorable long-term ROI, depending on budget versus long-term needs.
SonicWall SonicWave series wireless access points (APs) combine high-performance IEEE 802.11ac Wave 2 wireless technology with flexible deployment options. These APs can be managed via the cloud using SonicWall WiFi Cloud Manager (WCM) or through SonicWall's industry-leading next-generation firewalls.
We monitor all Wireless LAN reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
