We performed a comparison between Cisco Meraki Wireless LAN and Ruckus Wireless WAN based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about HPE Aruba Networking, Cisco, Ruckus and others in Wireless LAN."It provides private network access, helping us protect our company’s devices."
"The AI capabilities of Mist Wireless are superior to other OEMs."
"The simplicity is great."
"The most useful feature of Juniper Wireless AP is the reporting Marvis."
"The solution is stable."
"The artificial intelligence feature is very good."
"The most valuable feature of Juniper Wireless Access Points (AP Series) is the ability to troubleshoot ports on the network. Additionally, when there is an update on the APs they are able to reboot quickly reducing downtime. Other solutions have a longer downtime when updates are done."
"The most valuable feature of Juniper Mist is the Virtual Network Assistant, powered by artificial intelligence."
"The most important feature is flexibility."
"The most valuable features are the management tools, including monitoring and reporting."
"The big draw is the ease of installation. It's easy to manage, and it's easy to implement."
"The ability to manage it remotely is the most valuable. If it has an internet connection, you can get to it. It is a great product for remote clinics. We kind of thought about doing this kind of standalone technology. Meraki is easy to manage. From a management perspective, it is the easiest to use, especially in the cloud. I like Meraki. I even have it in my home."
"It has good security with its Layer 7 protections."
"The network security the solution provides is its most valuable aspect."
"The solution is very stable. It is a very manageable and secure system."
"Its management is most valuable. It is the major feature of Meraki."
"Tech support is good."
"The solution is suitable for many types of environments, such as small businesses."
"It's highly scalable as long as the licenses are in place. You can expand it easily."
"We found the technical support to be helpful."
"The product is very user-friendly."
"The initial setup of Ruckus Wireless WAN is very easy."
"The actual wireless access points themselves are very powerful."
"Wireless six is the most valuable feature of this solution right now. It has supported the most recent laptop model."
"I need a bit more time with it before criticizing the features."
"Juniper Wireless AP can improve by continually improving its reporting and integration with other systems."
"There is room for improvement in terms of support and installation."
"If you want to do more specific stuff, it's a bit limited."
"The product should include adaptive Wi-Fi to show a more accurate location."
"They should include SD-WAN features to it."
"The pricing should be made cheaper."
"Juniper Mist Wireless Access Points’ support services need improvement."
"The wireless infrastructure scalability has room for improvement."
"Documentation could be improved, but everything else has been spot-on."
"The licensing model is a terrible idea."
"Concern when there are a number of concurrent users."
"Integration with the corporate LAN where Catalyst products are installed is a major challenge."
"It is super expensive for what you get. I just wish it was less expensive."
"It is not a very stable solution."
"The licensing isn't very customer-centric. They may have improved it, but previously, if you forgot to pay on a certain day, your service would be shut off."
"Ruckus Wireless WAN we have a lot of component shortages in the world. This has impacted deliveries. We have large back orders of the solution."
"The solution could be more stable."
"In Cisco, there is a configuration where it automatically switches from the 2.4 GHz to 5.2 GHz frequency. But with Ruckus, usually, we need to manually define whether we want to use the 2.4 GHz or 5.2 GHz."
"The controller could be made less complicated, so those who are less technically sound can maintain it."
"I have some friends who have not heard of Ruckus, but are aware of other competitors."
"Ruckus Wireless WAN needs to improve its pricing."
"There is a significant issue with wireless functionality in Apple devices, particularly during video calls."
"They could include a firewall feature in the next release but even there it's not really necessary"
More Juniper Mist Wireless Access Points Pricing and Cost Advice →
Cisco Meraki Wireless LAN is ranked 4th in Wireless LAN with 115 reviews while Ruckus Wireless WAN is ranked 2nd in Wireless WAN with 45 reviews. Cisco Meraki Wireless LAN is rated 8.2, while Ruckus Wireless WAN is rated 8.2. The top reviewer of Cisco Meraki Wireless LAN writes "Offers good mobility, stability and scalability ". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Ruckus Wireless WAN writes " Offers robust outdoor connectivity, but signal strength and support need improvement". Cisco Meraki Wireless LAN is most compared with Aruba Wireless, Ubiquiti Wireless, Mist AI and Cloud, Ruckus Wireless and Cisco Wireless, whereas Ruckus Wireless WAN is most compared with Ubiquiti Wireless, Cambium Networks Wireless WAN and HPE Wireless WAN.
We monitor all Wireless LAN reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
