We performed a comparison between Checkmarx One and ESET Cloud Apps Protection based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Vulnerability Management solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."It is very useful because it fits our requirements. It is also easy to use. It is not complex, and we are satisfied with the results."
"The best thing about Checkmarx is the amount of vulnerabilities that it can find compared to other free tools."
"The SAST component was absolutely 100% stable."
"The main advantage of this solution is its centralized reporting functionality, which lets us track issues, then see and report on the priorities via a web portal."
"The most valuable features of Checkmarx are the SCA module and the code-checking module. Additionally, the solutions are explanatory and helpful."
"The solution improved the efficiency of our code security reviews. It helps tremendously because it finds hundreds of potential problems sometimes."
"The ability to track the vulnerabilities inside the code (origin and destination of weak variables or functions)."
"Less false positive errors as compared to any other solution."
"The most valuable features are the precision of detection and the level of customization of the policy."
"We are close to having 99% or 98% detection."
"Checkmarx has a slightly difficult compilation with the CI/CD pipeline."
"Checkmarx reports many false positives that we need to manually segregate and mark “Not exploitable”."
"The integration could improve by including, for example, DevSecOps."
"We would like to be able to run scans from our local system, rather than having to always connect to the product server, which is a longer process."
"Checkmarx could improve the speed of the scans."
"With Checkmarx, normally you need to use one tool for quality and you need to use another tool for security. I understand that Checkmarx is not in the parity space because it's totally different, but they could include some free features or recommendations too."
"As the solution becomes more complex and feature rich, it takes more time to debug and resolve problems. Feature-wise, we have no complaints, but Checkmarx becomes harder to maintain as the product becomes more complex. When I talk to support, it takes them longer to fix the problem than it used to."
"Updating and debugging of queries is not very convenient."
"It's not easy for an admin to check and decide if the email is good or not."
"The specific domain file for Apache needs to be well-defined."
Checkmarx One is ranked 11th in Vulnerability Management with 67 reviews while ESET Cloud Apps Protection is ranked 27th in Vulnerability Management with 2 reviews. Checkmarx One is rated 7.6, while ESET Cloud Apps Protection is rated 9.6. The top reviewer of Checkmarx One writes "The report function is a great, configurable asset but sometimes yields false positives". On the other hand, the top reviewer of ESET Cloud Apps Protection writes "Great protection, good privacy, and helpful support". Checkmarx One is most compared with SonarQube, Veracode, Fortify on Demand, Snyk and Coverity, whereas ESET Cloud Apps Protection is most compared with Fortinet FortiMail, Microsoft Exchange Online Protection (EOP) and Perception Point Advanced Email Security. See our Checkmarx One vs. ESET Cloud Apps Protection report.
See our list of best Vulnerability Management vendors.
We monitor all Vulnerability Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
