

Check Point Security Management and Logpoint compete in the cybersecurity solutions category, offering distinct advantages for tech buyers. According to user reviews, Check Point seems to have the upper hand with its comprehensive feature set despite Logpoint's competitive pricing.
Features: Check Point Security Management features advanced security controls, flexibility, and integration capabilities, highly valued for managing complex environments. Logpoint is recognized for its intuitive search capabilities, effective threat detection, and strong analytical features, providing users an edge in handling threats efficiently.
Room for Improvement: Users suggest Check Point Security Management should enhance reporting functionalities, simplify policy management, and streamline integrations. Logpoint could improve scalability, graphical user interface efficiency, and expand its feature set for broader applicability. User feedback highlights specific areas needing refinement for both solutions, with Check Point facing greater expectations in integration.
Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Check Point Security Management is noted for its straightforward deployment process and supportive customer service, offering ease of use. Logpoint's user-friendly installation process is complemented by strong customer support, making it a viable choice for users prioritizing support quality.
Pricing and ROI: Check Point Security Management involves moderate setup costs, with users noting a proven ROI over time, validating its investment. Logpoint offers competitive initial pricing and facilitates quick ROI owing to its efficacy in threat detection and analysis, making it an attractive option for cost-conscious buyers.
I have seen a strong ROI from using Check Point Security Management through unified policy management, reduced misconfigurations, and faster incident response.
The time to resolve issues is very much better now with Check Point Security Management.
I have seen a hundred percent return on investment with Check Point Security Management.
When we face technical issues, they are ready to help us.
Customer support for Check Point Security Management is excellent
We have partner support that helps us mitigate vulnerabilities reported by our infrastructure team.
Logpoint's customer support is not sufficient with only one engineer in the US.
The technical support for Logpoint is very good, and I would rate it as nine out of ten.
I recommend a submission to Logpoint because I worked with it before.
It can be a multi-domain Security Management server and can manage large or segmented environments with multiple domains or customers.
When you upgrade multiple times, you leave many files that are useless. They are dated, so it's always better to create a new machine every few versions, for example, three or four major versions.
The scalability of Check Point Security Management is excellent.
It is web-based and accommodates the expansion of our organization.
Logpoint is scalable and capable of expanding.
Check Point Security Management is really stable, and I have not experienced any downtime or issues with reliability except for when we do upgrades.
The SmartConsole used to administrate the security management is somewhat unstable.
Check Point Security Management is very stable in my experience, ensuring that our operations run smoothly without interruptions.
I have received reports indicating glitches and downtimes with Logpoint.
When the logs are too heavy for the security management server, the CPU spike will be high, causing our management day-to-day activity to lag or become difficult.
Refining reports and automation capabilities to make it more intuitive and scalable for diverse enterprise environments could improve Check Point Security Management.
Engaging role-based access control is essential; granular permissions for more flexible RBAC will allow the organization to delegate tasks.
Dealing with foreign entities for support was a challenge, leading us to switch providers due to lack of adequate support.
Logpoint needs to be cloud-native, as currently, it is not.
Logpoint's UEBA is a weak point, while Exabeam's UEBA has extra AI through automation.
Since we are using it extensively, we get significant discounts during procurement.
Licensing is quite expensive.
We pay on a three-year base.
I rate the pricing at eight, suggesting it's relatively good or affordable.
Check Point Security Management has positively impacted my organization by providing centralized control, allowing us to manage all security policies and gateways from a single console, reducing complexity and saving time.
After deploying Check Point Security Management, we improved our productivity by integrating all devices into a single console instead of managing separate log-ins for each branch's gateways, making our admin team's tasks easier.
The monitoring is exceptional as it provides consolidated logs, signals, and any alerts that come from the security gateway in real time.
The UEBA enables us to monitor at the device level, and SOAR provides playbooks and templates that we can modify and incorporate into the platform.
It effectively facilitates logging and log storage and assists in security event management by ingesting security events.
The most valuable feature, which is endpoint security, is included in Logpoint, and an extra feature is the integration.
| Product | Mindshare (%) |
|---|---|
| Check Point Security Management | 1.0% |
| Logpoint | 1.1% |
| Other | 97.9% |

| Company Size | Count |
|---|---|
| Small Business | 54 |
| Midsize Enterprise | 32 |
| Large Enterprise | 43 |
| Company Size | Count |
|---|---|
| Small Business | 18 |
| Midsize Enterprise | 3 |
| Large Enterprise | 4 |
Check Point Security Management offers centralized policy control, a unified console, and role-based access. It simplifies security operations through automation, real-time monitoring, and integration capabilities, ensuring efficient management across multiple environments.
Users leverage Check Point Security Management for streamlined configuration and consistent security enforcement. The platform's scalability and flexibility suit diverse environments, including cloud and on-premise settings, enabling efficient firewall and security gateway management. Real-time monitoring and logging capabilities facilitate swift incident response and comprehensive oversight.
What are the key features of Check Point Security Management?Check Point Security Management is widely implemented across industries such as finance, healthcare, and telecommunications. These sectors require stringent security protocols and benefit from real-time monitoring and comprehensive threat prevention capabilities it provides. Organizations use it to manage and enforce security measures, ensuring secure data transmission and infrastructure protection.
Logpoint offers a robust SIEM system tailored for compliance with regulations like PCI DSS and GDPR, enhancing security monitoring and enabling efficient incident response.
Logpoint strengthens cybersecurity by offering essential tools for log collection, security monitoring, and forensic analysis. Its features include an intuitive dashboard, a powerful correlation engine, and extensive third-party integrations, making it a versatile asset for security operations centers. Despite its advantages, areas for improvement include ransomware protection, cloud-native deployment, and more flexible pricing. Improvements in features like SOAR and UEBA functionality can boost its competitiveness.
What are the most important features of Logpoint?Many organizations utilize Logpoint across industries as part of their security infrastructure. It supports standard compliance, orchestrating incident responses and security threat monitoring. Logpoint empowers businesses by integrating and correlating security data, improving cybersecurity posture in varied environments.
We monitor all Log Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.