Check Point NGFW vs Meraki MX comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Cisco Logo
99,561 views|66,518 comparisons
Check Point Logo
27,159 views|18,906 comparisons
Cisco Logo
36,182 views|29,267 comparisons
Comparison Buyer's Guide
Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between Check Point NGFW and Meraki MX based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out in this report how the two Firewalls solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI.
To learn more, read our detailed Check Point NGFW vs. Meraki MX Report (Updated: November 2022).
655,465 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Featured Review
Quotes From Members
We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use.
Here are some excerpts of what they said:
Pros
"The ASDM (Adaptive Security Device Manager) which is the graphical user interface, works out, and Cisco keeps it current.""The integration of network and workload micro-segmentation helps a lot to provide unified segmentation policies across east-west and north-south traffic. One concrete example is with Cisco ACI for the data center. Not only are we doing what is called a service graph on the ACI to make sure that we can filter traffic east-west between two endpoints in the same network, but when we go north-south or east-west, we can then leverage what we have on the network with SGTs on Cisco ISE. Once you build your matrix, it is very easy to filter in and out on east-west or north-south traffic.""The CLI is the most valuable feature. This solution is very flexible and offers different functionality including firewalls and VPN connectivity.""The remote access, VPN, and ACL features are valuable. We are using role-based access for individuals.""IPS and Snort are very important because they also differentiate Cisco from other vendors and competitors.""The high-availability and remote VPN features are most valuable.""It's very stable and mature.""The most valuable feature is the anti-malware protection. It protects the endpoints on my network."

More Cisco Secure Firewall Pros →

"It is always on the top of the list of best firewall solutions.""The firewall and IPS are the most valuable features of the solution.""A stable solution with multiple interfaces""The sales, pre-sales, professional services, and tech support are all very nice.""Only allows authorized connections and prevents vulnerabilities in a network.""The small business hardware device was powerful and easy to set up.""Configuration and deploying are easy.""Provides very good performance."

More Check Point NGFW Pros →

"I think cloud management is key. The cloud management and support are the two things that make the product great.""Easy to deploy with a simple configuration.""What I like best about Meraki MX is that it's easy to deploy remotely. The product works. It has automatic updates. I also like that Meraki MX is a brilliant device. You turn it on, stick the key in there, activate it, and then you're done. Meraki MX does what my customers need at the end of the day, so I also like that.""Point-to-point VPNs can dynamically follow IP changes with no need for static IPs.""To me, the analytics feature is one of the most valuable in Meraki MX. I also find that it has good usability as it's cloud-based. Another valuable feature of Meraki MX is that it's simple to use and it's user-friendly.""MX is easy to manage, configure and install.""Its ease of configuration and management is very useful for us and for other companies that don't have an onsite IT person. It is easy to configure and easy to manage. It is easy to configure the VPN with the Auto VPN feature.""They have very good technical support and I have relied heavily on them."

More Meraki MX Pros →

Cons
"When you make any changes, irrespective of whether they are big or small, Firepower takes too much time. It is very time-consuming. Even for small changes, you have to wait for 60 seconds or maybe more, which is not good. Similarly, when you have many IPS rules and policies, it slows down, and there is an impact on its performance.""The virtual firewalls don't work very well with Cisco AnyConnect.""In the future, I would like to be able to use an IP phone over a VPN connection.""I think they need to review their whole UI because it feels like it was created by a whole bunch of different teams of developers who didn't fully talk to each other. The net policy screen is just a mess. It should look like the firewall policy screen, and they should both act the same, but they don't. I feel like it's two different buildings or programming, who don't talk to each other, and that really annoys me.""The initial setup could be simplified, as it can be complex for new users.""One thing that we really would have loved to have was policy-based routing. We had a lot of connections, and sometimes, we would have liked to change the routing depending on the policies, but it was lacking this capability. We also wanted application filtering and DNS filtering.""If they want to add better features to the current Cisco ASA, they can start by increasing the encryption. That is the only thing they need to improve.""I would like to see the inclusion of a protocol that can be used to protect databases."

More Cisco Secure Firewall Cons →

"Some features, like the VPN, antispam, data loss prevention, etc., are managed in an external console. In the future, I'd like all features in the same console, in one place, where we can see and configure all features.""Although very efficient, the product could be developed in a way that does not take a lot more system resources.""The pricing could be better.""We would like to see constant improvement in anti-malware functionality and anti-threat protection.""While the solution is good, we wish to have something that is a bit better, as the threats have evolved over time.""The routing rules and some more network settings should be listed on the Check Point Smart Console instead of GAIA Web GUI.""Potential improvements could be made around simplifying VPN functionality and configuration.""The interface could be better."

More Check Point NGFW Cons →

"Meraki MX firewalls are great for small to medium-sized businesses, but other solutions are better for enterprise-sized companies.""You cannot use switching behaviors as you see on the Meraki switch.""It would be nice if the different services, including the SIEM SOC and endpoint detection and response (EDR) were integrated into one, so that I don't have to go to different vendors for different services.""When we do API integrations with Meraki, they have always been hard as well as tedious to build. The data that we want out of the API integrations has been only recently available. Six months ago, it was hard to get someone to build something correctly or useful with Meraki APIs. Recently, they have made more data available on the API, but it is just a start. They need to do more.""They need to improve the link between Meraki and Active Directory.""MX can only be managed via a web interface, but I'm accustomed to using a CLI or a graphical interface. I would also like to see more reporting features. It doesn't provide enough information for me to know precisely about some clients.""We had minor issues with Meraki MX. We had a couple of RMAs, so that could be an area for improvement, but in terms of how the RMAs went, the turnaround time and getting those back into redeployment were quick. Another area for improvement in Meraki MX is that when you're scaling for multiple locations, you need to use the same model, but the model you'd need is only available for a short time. The specific model you require could be out of stock, or Meraki isn't making that model anymore, so Meraki should improve that.""Meraki has some hidden features and information that is only privy to their engineers. If that information became available to us, then it would improve our ease of management, and we would be able to make certain adjustments instead of having to go to them."

More Meraki MX Cons →

Pricing and Cost Advice
  • "If we compare it with FortiGate and the co-existing ASA, FortiGate is better in price."
  • "They seem to be at the top end in terms of pricing, but they are worth the price. They are probably a little bit lower than Palo Alto. If the customers are relying on Cisco products and they are thinking more in terms of scaling to another layer in a year, it is pretty much in a good price range."
  • "We're using the smart license for this firewall. The models that we have require licensing for remote access."
  • "There are licensing costs."
  • "I just bought it off the shelf, and I'm using it with my previous one, so I have not spent that much."
  • "The price is fair. It's not the cheapest, but it's not bad."
  • "For me, personally, as an individual, Cisco Firepower NGFW Firewall is expensive."
  • "The product is very expensive."
  • More Cisco Secure Firewall Pricing and Cost Advice →

  • "The pricing is good. It is less than Palo Alto's firewalls. Check Point has the same features as Palo Alto, but the licensing and cost of these firewalls are not too expensive. It is one of the best firewalls in the market in this range."
  • "I think that the pricing is different for every organization."
  • "The cost of the pricing and licensing are okay. They are giving me a good product as far as I know. It is more expensive than Cisco, but cheaper than Palo Alto, which is fine. It has many good features, so it deserves a good price as well."
  • "They sell it in one box. In that one box, they sell Antivirus and Threat Prevention. They have everything, so we are not required to purchase additional IPS hardware for it."
  • "It is more expensive than Cisco ASA but cheaper than Palo Alto."
  • "Each blade requires that you have a license."
  • "The price of Check Point is lower than Palo Alto but higher than Cisco ASA."
  • "The price of this product is not too costly and you do not need to pay for all of the features."
  • More Check Point NGFW Pricing and Cost Advice →

  • "Its licensing cost could be better."
  • "The price could be lower, but compared to the TCO of other products, it's not really that expensive."
  • "Like any Cisco product, the license is really expensive for small business clients. It needs to be cheaper. If you look it up, you might go, "That doesn't make any sense.""
  • "We just have to pay for the product and the license. We have a license for three years, and it is renewed every three years. It costs $1,200 for three years for one endpoint. Meraki had a good promotion for remote workers or remote workforce. The discount is very good. This promotion continues till the next fiscal year of Cisco."
  • "​Other content filtering solutions that I have used had more bells and whistles, but given the cost, complexity, and management overhead, I am very pleased with Meraki’s solution."
  • "I think the price is comparable with other solutions of the same kind. Depending on the use case it could be cheaper or more expensive, I think it offers good value."
  • "The price of Meraki MX is between $8 and $1,200. Additionally, we typically purchase a three-year enterprise license, and we pay approximately $899 and mark it up a bit."
  • "The pricing for Meraki MX is all right, but as the hardware needs to be licensed, the cost depends on the complexity of the device and the term. Pricing could be $100 to $10,000 yearly or even more for a more complex device."
  • More Meraki MX Pricing and Cost Advice →

    report
    Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Firewalls solutions are best for your needs.
    655,465 professionals have used our research since 2012.
    Questions from the Community
    Top Answer: When you compare these firewalls you can identify them with different features, advantages, practices and… more »
    Top Answer:One of our favorite things about Fortinet Fortigate is that you can deploy on the cloud or on premises. Fortinet… more »
    Top Answer:It is easy to integrate Cisco ASA with other Cisco products and also other NAC solutions. When you understand the Cisco… more »
    Top Answer:I have experience on both from Disti and channel experience. Please find below my comments (nothing new as such)… more »
    Top Answer:Azure Firewall is easy to use and provides excellent support. Valuable features include integration into the overall… more »
    Top Answer:The central management console has helped with segregation, where planned interventions with management consoles do not… more »
    Top Answer:We have Meraki Mx devices now, we are looking to replace them. But that is because the Meraki MX platform lacks SSL… more »
    Top Answer: Cisco Adaptive Security Appliance (ASA) software is the operating software for the Cisco ASA suite. It supports… more »
    Top Answer:Meraki equipment requires a current license in order to operate. This also gets you hardware replacement and tech… more »
    Comparisons
    Also Known As
    Cisco ASA Firewall, Cisco Adaptive Security Appliance (ASA) Firewall, Cisco ASA NGFW, Cisco ASA, Adaptive Security Appliance, ASA, Cisco Sourcefire Firewalls, Cisco ASAv, Cisco Firepower NGFW Firewall
    Check Point NG Firewall, Check Point Next Generation Firewall
    MX64, MX64W, MX84, MX100, MX400, MX600
    Learn More
    Overview

    The Cisco Secure Firewall portfolio delivers greater protections for your network against an increasingly evolving and complex set of threats. With Cisco, you’re investing in a foundation for security that is both agile and integrated- leading to the strongest security posture available today and tomorrow.

      From your data center, branch offices, cloud environments, and everywhere in between, you can leverage the power of Cisco to turn your existing network infrastructure into an extension of your firewall solution, resulting in world class security controls everywhere you need them.

      Investing in a Secure Firewall appliance today gives you robust protections against even the most sophisticated threats without compromising performance when inspecting encrypted traffic. Further, integrations with other Cisco and 3rd party solutions provides you with a broad and deep portfolio of security products, all working together to correlate previously disconnected events, eliminate noise, and stop threats faster.

      Check Point NGFW is a next generation firewall that enables safe usage of internet applications by blocking malicious applications and unblocking safe applications. Check Point NGFW, which uses deep packet inspection to identify and control applications, has features such as application and user control and integrated intrusion prevention (IPS), as well as more advanced malware prevention capabilities like sandboxing.

      Check Point NGFW includes 23 firewall models optimized for running all threat prevention technologies simultaneously, including full SSL traffic inspection, without compromising on security or performance.

      Benefits of Check Point's Next Generation Firewall

      • Robust security: Check Point NGFW delivers the best possible threat prevention with SandBlast Zero Day protection. The SandBlast protection agent constantly inspects passing network traffic for exploits and vulnerabilities. Suspicious files are then emulated in a virtual sandbox in order to detect and report malicious behavior.

      • Security at hyperscale: On-demand hyperscale threat prevention performance provides cloud level expansion and resiliency on premises.

      • Unified management: Check Point's SmartConsole makes it easy to manage and configure network security environments and policies. With the SmartConsole, users can manage all the firewall gateways and access logs and install databases from one location. Unified management control across the network increases the efficiency of security operations and reduces IT costs.
      • Continuous logging: Check Point NGFW’s Threat Management feature detects vulnerabilities and logs them. Using the logged data, users can easily create and implement efficient security policies.

      • Remote access: The remote access VPN provides a seamless connection for remote users.

      Check Point NGFW is suitable for organizations of all sizes, from small businesses to larger enterprises.

      Reviews from Real Users

      Check Point NGFW stands out among its competitors for a number of reasons. Two major ones are its intrusion prevention feature as well as its centralized management, which makes it very easy to deploy firewall policies to many firewalls with one click.

      Shivani J., a network security administrator, writes, "Check Point has a lot of features. The ones I love are the antivirus, intrusion prevention, and data loss prevention."

      G., a network administrator at Secretaría de Finanzas de Aguascalientes, writes, “Within the organization, the inspection of packages has given us great help in detecting traffic that may be a threat to the institution. The configuration of policies has allowed us to maintain control of access and users for each institution that is incorporated into our headquarters.”

      Arun J., a senior network engineer, notes, “The nicest feature is the centralized management of multiple firewalls. With the centralized management, we can easily use and operate multiple firewalls as well as create a diagram of them.”

      Cisco Meraki MX appliances are next-generation firewalls with all the advanced security services needed for today’s IT security. The appliances are ideal for organizations considering a unified threat management (UTM) solution for branch offices, data centers, distributed sites, or campuses. Since Meraki MX is 100% cloud-managed, installation and remote management are simple and zero-touch.

      Meraki MX’s hardware and virtual appliances are configurable in Microsoft Azure, Amazon Web Services (AWS), and Google Cloud Platform, and private cloud support is offered through Cisco NFVIS and Alibaba Cloud.

      Organizations of all sizes and across all industries rely on Meraki MX to deliver secure connectivity to hub locations or multi-cloud environments, as well as application quality of experience (QoE) through advanced analytics with machine learning.

      Cisco Meraki’s advanced QoE analytics offers:

      • End-to-end health of web applications at a glance across the LAN, WAN, and application server.
      • Autonomous machine-learned smart application thresholds applied to identify true anomalies that are based on past behavioral patterns.
      • Ability to monitor the health of all MX WAN links across an entire organization.
      • Ability to detail hop-by-hop VoIP performance analysis across all uplinks.

      Cisco Meraki’s SD-WAN offers:

      The Meraki MX’s SD-WAN is unique in that it can be easily extended to deliver optimized access to resources in public and private cloud environments with virtual MX appliances. Its SD-WAN lowers operational costs and improves the performance of remotely-accessed resources. Users can ensure the availability of the apps and services their employees use most through dynamic path selection, policy-based routing, support for application-layer profiles, and VPN.

      Meraki MX offers industry-leading cloud management that has template-based settings which can scale easily from small deployments to tens of thousands of devices. It features an intuitive web-based dashboard for managing mobile devices, united firewalls, switching, and wireless LAN. Users can also benefit from role-based administration, configurable email alerts for a variety of important events, and easily auditable change logs. Meraki MX is capable of producing summary reports with device, user, and application details archived in the cloud.

      Meraki MX Key Features

      MX has a robust suite of network services in an all-in-one device, which saves you money by eliminating the need for multiple appliances. These services include:

      • SD-WAN capabilities
      • SNORT®-based intrusion detection and prevention
      • Layer 7 fingerprinting
      • Web caching
      • Application-based firewalling
      • Anti-malware
      • Geo-based firewalling
      • Content filtering
      • Site-to-site auto VPN and client VPN
      • Web search filtering
      • Cisco Advanced Malware Protection (AMP)
      • 4G cellular failover
      • Dynamic path selection
      • Web application health and VoIP health

      Reviews from Real Users

      Meraki MX stands out among its competitors for a number of reasons. Two major ones are its easy management and its ability to be accessed remotely. Below is some feedback from PeerSpot users who are currently using Meraki MX as their firewall security solution.

      Craig B., a central services engineer at Liberty Technology, writes, “The web console for managing everything keeps everything on Meraki and keeps us from going somewhere else. It is why I think a lot of people like Meraki. Comparing it to SonicWall or even a different Cisco firewall, like traditional ASAs, managing Meraki is a thousand times easier because of fluidity. You don't have to rebuild a table just to change one rule. It's much more readable for a human.”

      Edgardo C., an IT director, notes,”By using the VPN, we can connect remotely. We have two offices, and we could connect them through the VPN. We could establish a network between two sites, and that has improved and increased communication and productivity. Our remote site is able to access the server remotely.”

      Offer
      Learn more about Cisco Secure Firewall
      Learn more about Check Point NGFW
      Learn more about Meraki MX
      Sample Customers
      There are more than one million Adaptive Security Appliances deployed globally. Top customers include First American Financial Corp., Genzyme, Frankfurt Airport, Hansgrohe SE, Rio Olympics, The French Laundry, Rackspace, and City of Tomorrow.
      Control Southern, Optimal Media
      Hyatt, ONS
      Top Industries
      REVIEWERS
      Financial Services Firm16%
      Comms Service Provider13%
      Computer Software Company9%
      Government8%
      VISITORS READING REVIEWS
      Comms Service Provider20%
      Computer Software Company19%
      Government7%
      Educational Organization5%
      REVIEWERS
      Financial Services Firm25%
      Computer Software Company15%
      Comms Service Provider8%
      Government6%
      VISITORS READING REVIEWS
      Computer Software Company19%
      Comms Service Provider18%
      Financial Services Firm8%
      Government7%
      REVIEWERS
      Comms Service Provider26%
      Computer Software Company9%
      Pharma/Biotech Company9%
      Consumer Goods Company9%
      VISITORS READING REVIEWS
      Computer Software Company19%
      Comms Service Provider17%
      Government6%
      Retailer5%
      Company Size
      REVIEWERS
      Small Business36%
      Midsize Enterprise24%
      Large Enterprise40%
      VISITORS READING REVIEWS
      Small Business28%
      Midsize Enterprise19%
      Large Enterprise53%
      REVIEWERS
      Small Business28%
      Midsize Enterprise19%
      Large Enterprise53%
      VISITORS READING REVIEWS
      Small Business24%
      Midsize Enterprise20%
      Large Enterprise56%
      REVIEWERS
      Small Business60%
      Midsize Enterprise23%
      Large Enterprise17%
      VISITORS READING REVIEWS
      Small Business36%
      Midsize Enterprise18%
      Large Enterprise46%
      Buyer's Guide
      Check Point NGFW vs. Meraki MX
      November 2022
      Find out what your peers are saying about Check Point NGFW vs. Meraki MX and other solutions. Updated: November 2022.
      655,465 professionals have used our research since 2012.

      Check Point NGFW is ranked 4th in Firewalls with 160 reviews while Meraki MX is ranked 2nd in Unified Threat Management (UTM) with 13 reviews. Check Point NGFW is rated 9.0, while Meraki MX is rated 8.8. The top reviewer of Check Point NGFW writes "Centrally managed, good antivirus and attack prevention capabilities, knowledgeable support". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Meraki MX writes "Makes it easy to stay on top of everything for security". Check Point NGFW is most compared with Fortinet FortiGate, Palo Alto Networks NG Firewalls, Azure Firewall, pfSense and Sophos XG, whereas Meraki MX is most compared with Fortinet FortiGate, Palo Alto Networks NG Firewalls, Sophos XG, SonicWall NSa and Zyxel Unified Security Gateway. See our Check Point NGFW vs. Meraki MX report.

      We monitor all Firewalls reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.