Which is better - Meraki MX or Cisco ASA Firewall?


Content Manager at PeerSpot (formerly IT Central Station)
  • 2
  • 672
PeerSpot user
2 Answers
Real User
Top 5
Nov 8, 2021

Cisco Adaptive Security Appliance (ASA) software is the operating software for the Cisco ASA suite. It supports network security and firewall options. We researched both Meraki and ASA. We liked that ASA provides a solid VPN setup and integrates with other Cisco security offerings.

Cisco ASA is great for routing and accessing remote office locations via the remote VPN. We also liked the high availability and customizable nating (Network Access Translation). It is very reliable and easy to use. You can easily configure a site-to-site VPN to connect multiple sites. The support is great - they respond 24/7/365 and there is a lot of documentation available.

The downside is that ASAs are aging. Therefore, Cisco ASAs are best suited to small businesses. If you need something affordable that gets the job done, ASA is a good option.

We chose Cisco Meraki, because, in our opinion, it is a step forward from ASA. The level of security and intrusion detection is great, and because it is cloud-based, it is easy to change the configuration without downtime. Logging is very comprehensive, and management is very simple.

The best feature is content filtering with granular control. Cisco Meraki offers advanced malware protection, including traffic shaping. Another feature we really like is that you can pre-configure devices before they arrive at the installation.

It doesn’t work with DMVPN, which is a downside. Another feature that could use some improvement is reporting, which is not real-time. The price can get expensive but if you can afford it, a full-stack Cisco Meraki system does a great job keeping your network secure.


If you want a robust but basic firewall, ASA is your best choice. Cisco Meraki is a better choice if you are looking for a next-generation firewall with advanced security features and easy management.

Product comparison that may be of interest to you
IT Adviser/Manager with 51-200 employees
Real User
Top 20
Nov 24, 2021

Meraki is designed for zero deployments and no in-house firewall specialist personnel. Best to secure Networks like remote offices, branches or home offices. Also to protect Internet Access (your computer accesses the internet).

Cisco ASA is more of a professional firewall, not only protecting internet access but also providing security for publishing services like web servers, data centers, central services. They will need a specialist to install and support them. Therefore offer much more sophisticated protection features.

So you can't really compare these solutions, as they are targeting different markets.

You might compare Cisco to Sophos, but again, these are different protection solutions, one for network protection, the other for client protection. If you look only at the firewall part, you miss a lot in the total protection approach with Sophos.

Find out what your peers are saying about Cisco Secure Firewall vs. Meraki MX and other solutions. Updated: September 2023.
734,678 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Related Questions
User at FirewallCustomer
Aug 12, 2023
Hello peers,  I am currently researching both Meraki MX and Firewalla. Which solution do you prefer and why? Can you please provide a comparison based on their features? Thank you for your help.
reviewer2248338 - PeerSpot reviewer
User at IDC Corporate
Aug 1, 2023
Hello peers,  I work for a large computer software company. I am currently researching Palo Alto Networks and its products. How do Palo Alto Networks' security features compare to other security vendors like Cisco? Thank you for your help.
See 1 answer
Information Security Manager at a financial services firm with 501-1,000 employees
Aug 1, 2023
We did a head-to-head comparison and live tested 2 pretty beefy models from each company.  Palo absolutely blew Cisco out of the water.  There is a major difference in a company focused on firewalls first and then migrating into complementary security technologies to integrate them to make a comprehensive security ecosystem vs another company saying they are doing the same thing, but actually just piecemealing things together.  Palo has some issues, too.  But their product offerings are top-notch, their roadmap is cutting edge, and overall they are building a security ecosystem that actually functions and isn't mainly marketing and sales material.  It works!
Product Comparisons
Download Free Report
Download our FREE report comparing Cisco Secure Firewall and Meraki MX based on reviews, features, and more! Updated: September 2023.
734,678 professionals have used our research since 2012.