We performed a comparison between Check Point Harmony Endpoint and CyberArk Endpoint Privilege Manager based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP) solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."Fortinet has helped free up around 20 percent of our staff's time to help us out."
"The console is easy to read. I also like the scanning part and the ability to move assets from one to the other."
"Fortinet FortiEDR's firewalling, rule creation, monitoring, and inspection profiles are great."
"Ability to get forensics details and also memory exfiltration."
"The main thing is that I feel safe. Because the processes that have been used to get a handle on the attackers are much better than other competitors"
"Fortinet is very user-friendly for customers."
"The price is low and quite competitive with others."
"NGAV and EDR features are outstanding."
"It has improved the detection of malware."
"We love the reports and monitoring they provide."
"The zero-day threat prevention is excellent."
"The most important characteristic of our requirements was the implementation of disk encryption."
"The best thing is that it fits into all environments, which gives any organization a chance to use it intuitively without worrying about the nature of their industry."
"The license plans are also very nice and distributed - allowing for a separation between types of users with more basic or more advanced options."
"We're able to secure all endpoints and manage them from a single console."
"I have found the Zero phishing and IPS features the most useful in Check Point Harmony Endpoint. Additionally, threat emulation sandboxing is effective."
"The password rotation and the session recording are the most valuable features."
"The most valuable feature is that it does lifecycle management and that it will change to whatever the end target is."
"The solution is scalable."
"The department management aspect of the solution is the most valuable aspect."
"CyberArk Endpoint Privilege Manager is very easy to manage, which I like. The solution also has a dashboard where you can see which software is suspicious, which I find valuable."
"What sets CyberArk apart is its continuous innovation, staying ahead of the competition."
"I have always found that CyberArk is a very tight, foolproof product compared to most other products available."
"The most valuable feature is that their database is completely encrypted and protected with multiple layers."
"Cannot be used on mobile devices with a secure connection."
"To improve Fortinet, we need to see more features and technology areas at the endpoint level introduced."
"We've had a lot of false positives; things incorrectly flagged that require manual configuration to allow. Even worse, after we allow a legitimate program, it sometimes gets flagged again after an update. This has caused a lot of extra work for my team."
"Making the portal mobile friendly would be helpful when I am out of office."
"ZTNA can improve latency."
"The support needs improvement."
"We've encountered challenges during API deployment, occasionally resulting in unstable environments."
"The dashboard isn't easy to access and manage."
"It would be useful if you could also mark blocks as safe from a client. Now users always have to ask an admin to make exclusions."
"In terms of improvement, the ticketing system could be better. It is a little tricky to try to open a case and give it to an engineer."
"They should also add new functions such as threat hunting."
"A couple of times, we experienced some sales issues."
"For the future, I would like to see maybe a content-filtering emulation feature in Harmony Endpoint."
"Check Point users a pattern-based security module, which is something that can be improved."
"We need a higher maximum file size in the sandboxing feature."
"We use a couple of Check Point products, like SmartEvent, and SandBlast Agent is not really integrated into that. We haven't gotten the reports working yet. We are working with the account team and trying. As I said, it's still relatively new in terms of what we're trying to achieve."
"CyberArk Endpoint Privilege Manager is not suitable for the current situation because when you compare it to OTP, OTP is the strongest password solution. You can use it as a one-time password, but you have to log into the password manager itself and if you don't change your password, it will be the weakest link in the security. In OTP, you don't have that weakest link."
"The price of the solution should improve."
"The solution is very expensive."
"Technical support is slow to respond when we run into issues."
"The solution can be complex to use at times."
"The product's threat protection and defense capabilities need enhancement."
"CyberArk Endpoint Privilege Manager is a perfect solution, but CyberArk Endpoint Privilege Manager for Linux has many issues. Another area for improvement in CyberArk Endpoint Privilege Manager, specifically for Windows, is that there's no way for you to check credential theft from a text file, such as a notepad file."
"It cannot be on-prem. It is only cloud-based. Sometimes, that's a restriction in terms of usage."
More CyberArk Endpoint Privilege Manager Pricing and Cost Advice →
Check Point Harmony Endpoint is ranked 8th in Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP) with 102 reviews while CyberArk Endpoint Privilege Manager is ranked 6th in Privileged Access Management (PAM) with 27 reviews. Check Point Harmony Endpoint is rated 8.8, while CyberArk Endpoint Privilege Manager is rated 8.0. The top reviewer of Check Point Harmony Endpoint writes "Excellent anti-ransomware protection, zero-day phishing protection, and web browsing filtering". On the other hand, the top reviewer of CyberArk Endpoint Privilege Manager writes "Offers integrated solutions and expands its capabilities through strategic acquisitions". Check Point Harmony Endpoint is most compared with Microsoft Defender for Endpoint, CrowdStrike Falcon, Kaspersky Endpoint Security for Business and SentinelOne Singularity Complete, whereas CyberArk Endpoint Privilege Manager is most compared with BeyondTrust Endpoint Privilege Management, Microsoft Defender for Endpoint, CrowdStrike Falcon, CyberArk Privileged Access Manager and Tanium. See our Check Point Harmony Endpoint vs. CyberArk Endpoint Privilege Manager report.
We monitor all Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.