CentraSite vs webMethods.io comparison

Software AG and IBM are both solutions in the API Management category. Software AG is ranked #29 with an average rating of 8.0, while IBM is ranked #11 with an average rating of 7.7. Software AG holds a 0.2% mindshare in APIM, compared to IBM’s 2.4% mindshare. Additionally, 100% of Software AG users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 94% of IBM users who would recommend it.

CentraSite

Read 1 CentraSite review

391 Views
172 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

webMethods.io

Read 94 webMethods.io reviews

9,029 Views
2,618 Comparison Views

94% willing to recommend

CentraSite

webMethods.io

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between CentraSite and webMethods.io based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out what your peers are saying about Microsoft, Amazon Web Services (AWS), Google and others in API Management.

To learn more, read our detailed API Management Report (Updated: February 2026).

Buyer's Guide

API Management

February 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 882,813 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

CentraSite

Ranking in API Management

29th

Average Rating

8.0

Reviews Sentiment

4.6

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

SOA Governance (4th)

webMethods.io

Ranking in API Management

11th

Average Rating

8.0

Reviews Sentiment

6.8

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Business-to-Business Middleware (5th), Enterprise Service Bus (ESB) (3rd), Managed File Transfer (MFT) (11th), Cloud Data Integration (10th), Integration Platform as a Service (iPaaS) (9th)

Mindshare comparison

As of February 2026, in the API Management category, the mindshare of CentraSite is 0.2%, up from 0.1% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of webMethods.io is 2.4%, up from 2.3% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

API Management Market Share Distribution
Product	Market Share (%)
webMethods.io	2.4%
CentraSite	0.2%
Other	97.4%

API Management

Featured Reviews

IsmailEl Dahshan

CEO at Exact Holding NV

Governance has streamlined service registry usage but deployment and integration still need work

I work with GraphQL, REST API, and SOAP services as well. API Connect works with GraphQL and can deploy GraphQL services. I also work with GraphQL in Software AG webMethods API Gateway. I'm working with DataPower. I have experience with IBM API Gateway, API Connect, Event Stream, and App Connect, the Cloud platform integration. I didn't involve DataPower with BPM before. I have used the webMethods API Gateway. I have used an open-source framework that is not a product for a specific vendor. I work with GraphQL in three different products: API Connect, the API Gateway of the webMethods Software AG, and the Java Spring framework. I work with CentraSite and also work with the Integration Server, webMethods Integration Server, and Universal Messaging. The governance is powerful. I can recommend CentraSite for any industry working with service registry and repositories. I would rate it eight out of ten. I have seven years of experience with IBM solutions and rate them nine or ten out of ten. I have one year of experience with webMethods and rate it eight out of ten. I have five years of experience with other solutions. The overall review rating for this product is seven.

Read full review

Yashraj Makwana

Developer at a hospitality company with 1,001-5,000 employees

Offers strong integration capabilities and reliable features but needs pricing and scaling improvements

Many things are evolving with the AI buzz in the market. What I would like to see improved or enhanced in webMethods.io in the future is that since webMethods.io is already under IBM, I think IBM will introduce and integrate AI into it. Additionally, regarding what webMethods.io can improve is the license cost. Other cloud players are also providing the same kind of functionality, such as AWS and Azure. webMethods.io is being installed on-premises, but AWS is providing it directly in the cloud. When comparing the license cost and request per minute cost, webMethods.io needs to address that. There are many competitors in the market for this.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The governance is powerful, and you can look up services very easily, which may reduce some development cycle time."

"It's obvious that the heart of the product lies here. It's comprised of all aspects of ESB (Enterprise Gateway, Adapter, TN, Java) and BPM (task, rules engine)."

"This solution has given us a competitive advantage because we have better automation and insight."

"The MFT component of webMethods, for example, is easy to set up and convenient to use. It handles files very efficiently and it is easy to automate tasks with complex schedules. Monitoring is centralized to MWS which can be used to monitor other products as well (Trading Networks, BPM, MFT, etc.)"

"The connectivity that the tool provides, along with the functionalities needed for our company's business, are some of the beneficial aspects of the product."

"In the API gateway, there is a new feature that allows us to filter logs within a payload. This has been a useful feature."

"webMethods Integration Server is an easy-to-use solution and does not require a lot of coding."

"Ease of implementation and flexibility to hold the business logic are the most valuable features."

"Application integrations are offered out-of-the-box, and that is extremely important to us. This is one of the main use cases that we have for it. It is about 60 to 70 percent of the workload in our application today."

More webMethods.io pros

Cons

"The setup is mild. It's not so simple and not very difficult. You can make it happen with some configuration, but it's not easy for non-professional people."

"On the monitoring side of things, the UI for monitoring could be improved. It's a bit cumbersome to work with."

"The price should be reduced to make it more affordable."

"Large file handling is pretty hard comparatively to other middleware tools."

"It could be more user-friendly."

"The deployment should be simplified."

"Documentation needs tuning. There is a lot of dependency with SoftwareAG. Even with the documentation at hand, you can struggle to implement scenarios without SAG’s help. By contrast, IBM’s documentation is self-explanatory, in my opinion."

"wM SAP Adapter User Guide - Example, like Message Broker setup was unclear, leading to issues during Testing and we had refer the internet forums to understand that there is a Message Broker Cleanup utility and that needs to be setup as well."

"I have noticed that webMethods ActiveTransfer has had problems when handling large files. For example, when we receive (and perform operations on) files that are larger than about 16 MB, the software starts losing performance."

More webMethods.io cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

Information not available

"It's a good deal for the money that we pay."

"This is not a cheap solution but, compared to other products such as those offered by IBM, the pricing is similar."

"It is expensive, but we reached a good agreement with the company. It is still a little bit expensive, but we got a better deal than the previous one."

"Based on our team discussions and feedback, it is pretty costly because they charge us for each transmission."

"I would like to see better pricing for the license."

"It is worth the cost."

"Always plan five years ahead and don’t jeopardize the quality of your project by dropping items from the bill of materials."

"Most of my clients would like the price of the solution to be reduced."

More webMethods.io pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which API Management solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

882,813 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

No data available

Manufacturing Company

14%

Financial Services Firm

11%

Computer Software Company

10%

Energy/Utilities Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

No data available

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	23
Midsize Enterprise	11
Large Enterprise	64

Questions from the Community

What needs improvement with CentraSite?

There is a big difference in deployment modules and different deployment scenarios. It can be adapted to any environment, not only finance or government. The deployment can be made for each data ce...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for CentraSite?

I implemented this hybrid integration platform for the finance sector at one of the big banks in Egypt. I used it inside the services exposed from the banking sector only, not for the asset managem...

See all answers

What advice do you have for others considering CentraSite?

See all answers

What do you like most about Built.io Flow?

The tool helps us to streamline data integration. Its BPM is very strong and powerful. The solution helps us manage digital transformation.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Built.io Flow?

webMethods.io is expensive. We have multiple components, and you need to pay for each of them.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Built.io Flow?

webMethods.io needs to incorporate ChatGPT to enhance user experience. It can offer a customized user experience.

See all answers

Comparisons

Oracle SOA Suite vs CentraSite

Compared 23% of the time

Actional vs CentraSite

Compared 20% of the time

More CentraSite Competitors

IBM Sterling B2B Integration Services vs webMethods.io

Compared 5% of the time

IBM Integration Bus vs webMethods.io

Compared 4% of the time

IBM App Connect vs webMethods.io

Compared 4% of the time

Apigee vs webMethods.io

Compared 4% of the time

Boomi iPaaS vs webMethods.io

Compared 3% of the time

More webMethods.io Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

SOA Governance

February 2026

Download CentraSite product report

Buyer's Guide

webMethods.io

January 2026

Download webMethods.io product report

Also Known As

No data available

Built.io Flow, webMethods Integration Server, webMethods Trading Networks, webMethods ActiveTransfer, webMethods.io API

Overview

CentraSite is an enterprise API catalog and SOA registry / repository and can provide a central, platform-indenpendent application for defining, describing and storing assets. It can help to catalog all services, APIs, business process and related assets, such as XML scheme and business rules.

Software AG

webMethods.io Integration is a powerful integration platform as a service (iPaaS) that provides a combination of capabilities offered by ESBs, data integration systems, API management tools, and B2B gateways.

IBM

Sample Customers

DigitalGlobe, Georgia Technology Authority, Oriflame, Ekurhuleni Metropolitan Municipality (EMM), BRFkredit, Saudi Telecom Company, HSBC Turkey, Orange UK, Telus Health Solutions

Cisco, Agralogics, Dreamforce, Cables & Sensors, Sacramento Kings

Find out what your peers are saying about Microsoft, Amazon Web Services (AWS), Google and others in API Management. Updated: February 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

882,813 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our list of best API Management vendors and best Cloud Data Integration vendors.

We monitor all API Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.