CentraSite vs webMethods.io comparison

"The governance is powerful, and you can look up services very easily, which may reduce some development cycle time."

"The core product can be used not only for automatic file transfers between applications, but also as an Enterprise Service Bus (ESB)."

"My impression of webMethods.io's drag-and-drop interface to design workflows is actually amazing."

"It integrates well with various servers."

"I would say the core Web-based integrations work the best. They are the most efficient and robust implementations one can do with webMethods."

"The most valuable feature of the webMethods Integration Server is the built-in monitoring, auditing, RETS, and SOAP services."

"It is a bundled product stack for A2A and B2B usage. It is one of the best products which I have used during my integration career."

"WebMethods.io is a powerful tool, but it requires skilled people who can fully utilize its potential."

"The messaging part is the most valuable feature."

"The setup is mild. It's not so simple and not very difficult. You can make it happen with some configuration, but it's not easy for non-professional people."

"A while ago, they were hacked, and it took them a very long time to open their website again in order to download any service packs or any features. I don't know what they could do differently. I know that they were vulnerable, and there was some downtime, but because they were down, we were unable to download any potential service packs."

"Prices should be reduced, ideally by up to 30% for long-term customers like us."

"With respect to the API gateway, the runtime component, the stability after a new release is something that can be improved."

"The interface needs some work. It is not very user-friendly."

"Perhaps in the area of Microservices, where I think Trading Networks could benefit from some improvements."

"The installation process should be simplified for first time users and be made more user-friendly."

"I would like to see the price improve."

"Rules engine processes and BPM processes should be improved."

"Currently, the licensing solution for this product is pretty straightforward. The way that Software AG has moved in their licensing agreements is very understandable. It is very easy for you to see where things land. Like most vendors today, they are transaction based. Therefore, just having a good understanding of how many transactions that you are doing a year would be very wise. Luckily, there are opportunities to work with the vendor to get a good understanding of how many transactions you have and what is the right limit for you to fall under."

"Most of my clients would like the price of the solution to be reduced."

"Based on our team discussions and feedback, it is pretty costly because they charge us for each transmission."

"webMethods.io Integration's pricing is high and has yearly subscription costs."

"The price of webMethods Integration Server isn't that high from an enterprise context, but open-source ESB solutions will always be the cheapest."

"It is expensive, but we reached a good agreement with the company. It is still a little bit expensive, but we got a better deal than the previous one."

"Some who consider this solution often avoid it due to its high price."

"There is a license needed to use the webMethods Integration Server."