No more typing reviews! Try our Samantha, our new voice AI agent.

Celoxis vs Worxmate comparison

 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive SummaryUpdated on Jan 25, 2026

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Categories and Ranking

Celoxis
Ranking in Project Management Software
51st
Average Rating
10.0
Reviews Sentiment
7.4
Number of Reviews
1
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
Worxmate
Ranking in Project Management Software
92nd
Average Rating
0.0
Number of Reviews
0
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
 

Featured Reviews

Akos Szirmai - PeerSpot reviewer
Application Development Specialist at Field consulting Ltd.
A highly scalable tool that offers users the ability to use it for international projects
The most valuable feature of the solution is the functionality that it offers since the performance part is not so critical as you only use it to upload or download documents and create tasks. Celoxis is not used for very high transaction requirements. My company did not face any issues with Celoxis's performance. Celoxis was quite quick, and its functionality was rich, prompting my company to integrate it with many other project management features for which we previously used several other systems. Celoxis replaced and offered a product that was an integration of Excel and Microsoft Project into a single suite.
Use Worxmate?
Leave a review
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Project Management Software solutions are best for your needs.
885,444 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Comparisons

No data available
 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

KPMG, Thales, LG, HBO, Rolex, Fuji Xerox, Virgin Care, Singapore Post, Visicom, Snow Software, Route 2 Media, Interim Healthcare, eCom, UNCDF
Information Not Available
Find out what your peers are saying about Atlassian, monday.com, Microsoft and others in Project Management Software. Updated: March 2026.
885,444 professionals have used our research since 2012.