Celoxis vs Planview Portfolios comparison

Why PeerSpot?

Celoxis and Planview are both solutions in the Project Management Software category. Additionally, 100% of Celoxis users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 91% of Planview users who would recommend it.

Celoxis

Read 1 Celoxis review

911 Views
802 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Planview Portfolios

Read 71 Planview Portfolios reviews

8,029 Views
3,372 Comparison Views

91% willing to recommend

Celoxis

Planview Portfolios

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between Celoxis and Planview Portfolios based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out what your peers are saying about Atlassian, monday.com, Asana and others in Project Management Software.

To learn more, read our detailed Project Management Software Report (Updated: August 2026).

Buyer's Guide

Project Management Software

August 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 913,806 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Celoxis

Average Rating

10.0

Reviews Sentiment

7.4

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Project Management Software (75th)

Planview Portfolios

Average Rating

8.0

Reviews Sentiment

6.8

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Enterprise Architecture Management (8th), Project Portfolio Management (4th)

Featured Reviews

Akos Szirmai

Application Development Specialist at Field consulting Ltd.

A highly scalable tool that offers users the ability to use it for international projects

The most valuable feature of the solution is the functionality that it offers since the performance part is not so critical as you only use it to upload or download documents and create tasks. Celoxis is not used for very high transaction requirements. My company did not face any issues with Celoxis's performance. Celoxis was quite quick, and its functionality was rich, prompting my company to integrate it with many other project management features for which we previously used several other systems. Celoxis replaced and offered a product that was an integration of Excel and Microsoft Project into a single suite.

Read full review

Monabi Kingsley

Project Manager at 3M

Centralized planning has improved resource visibility and supports data‑driven financial decisions

The best features Planview Portfolios offers are visibility enhancement, robust system performance, and comprehensive resource management. This enhanced visibility in Planview Portfolios ensures that all users can easily track progress, identify bottlenecks, and make informed decisions to optimize workflow efficiency. When discussing robust system performance, the system's robust performance in meeting our various work requirements effectively and efficiently stands out. It is very stable and reliable, contributing to a seamless user experience, which enables users to focus on their tasks without disruptions. I also love the financial breakdown, planning and prioritization, and attribute collection on projects in Planview Portfolios. Planview Portfolios has positively impacted my organization since I started using it. It has enabled me to gain insights into the full scope of work consuming resources. I am able to know where the resources are being consumed more, especially which resources are consuming the most. I have been able to leverage resources management and resource time reporting, which enabled the generation of $90 million in annual revenue through labor billing to customers.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"Celoxis is scalable in terms of the number of users or the number of projects that the product can handle. Even the storage that is available for a project is scalable in Celoxis."

"Planview has helped connect funding and strategic outcomes with work execution. That is the key use that we have for it. We use it to validate the work that we're doing and the funding that we need. The difference between the previous version and current version for us would be the ICPM and the way it gives us different scenarios. We can go in and build that out."

"Its view into resource capacity and availability helps us to manage work. In reporting, we use this facility to help with resource capacity and availability. It also helps to see how much we are using. We derive that information from the work and resource management screen. That is very helpful."

"We really like the tool and a lot of the possibilities that are there."

"Once you get a good grasp of the principles of Planview, it is a really powerful tool."

"Against those two key criteria during the implementation process, Planview outperformed the others at the time."

"The flexibility on offer is very helpful in meeting the organization's needs."

"Enterprise One provides a variety of types of resource assignments for assigning work to people, and it also allows program managers to group work together and see the resource demands and cost at a consolidated level."

"Enterprise One has been exactly what we need."

More Planview Portfolios pros

Cons

"One feature in Celoxis that is quite hard to understand and set up is its access management part."

"It would be great to see Planview incorporate agile interfacing/methods in it. Like CA Clarity and other leading PPM tools – Planview should enhance or develop the interfaces to ingrate with other market leading Agile tools."

"User information and resource information in Planview Portfolios are separate."

"We've been using it for a while, so it's about maturity. It's about being able to build out things in Agile groups and teams and some of that. Then really trying to drive into the direction of Lean Portfolio Management and more Agile program management, I think is where we're heading."

"It is not an end-user-friendly product, and that's really the biggest thing."

"My experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing reveals that the cost is a bit not affordable for a small organization, but for medium and large enterprises, I would say it is very cost-effective and affordable."

"Its ability to create summary reports across multiple projects is very limited. In terms of the out-of-the-box reporting for summary reports, the reporting that we typically leverage is around forecasting for resources, timesheets, and actuals, and just looking at what is the capacity. There is no real summary of what work is being done and how work is being accomplished. So, what we typically do is that we get a copy of the data files from Enterprise One daily, and then we have a team that manages the data mod outside of Enterprise One. They use data from Enterprise One as well as other additional sources to provide the reporting that we share with the management. So, we leverage a lot of Enterprise One data for reporting, but we don't use the reporting capabilities within Enterprise One. So, reporting can be improved, and they could help us make more customized reporting. I know it is very configurable out of the box, but we have to leverage an outside data mod that pulls in a lot of data from Enterprise One. So, the reporting function, and being able to customize reports, is the area that could be very beneficial."

"I think that the user interface needs some getting used to. It's not immediately intuitive. That's potentially room for improvement. I think also that an organization needs to have good support from some senior management to get something like Planview established."

"When it comes to reporting there are some challenges with integration."

More Planview Portfolios cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"Though I am unsure, I guess that my company pays around 20 to 25 USD every month for every user."

"We have several hundred licenses. It costs us several hundred thousand dollars a year."

"We have unlimited licenses for all of our functionalities. Since we went global, we went with that model."

"Planview is a little pricey. From a licensing perspective, for just a simple timesheet user who does nothing in the system but reports time, the licensing is a little pricey, but you have to look at it from what it is that you get. We have 6,000 users, and I don't manage the system at all. I just have to do add them to the system. The servers, maintenance, OS levels, security patching for the OS, and all other things are not something that we maintain. So, you have to look at it from an operational perspective. It is not just the product itself. A holistic view has to be taken when you look at the product and how you're going to support it. I would have to hire an entire operation staff to bring it in-house, and at the end of the day, that might cost me more."

"With the costs, they were very understanding. Knowing that we were an existing customer, they were very much willing to work with us to make sure that we were able to transition to Enterprise One from PPM Pro."

"The licensing part is a bit costly in comparison with the other available PPM tools."

"Our licensing costs are about a quarter of a million dollars per year."

"We have portfolio managers, resource managers, project managers, and time reporting licenses. These are the licenses that we have."

"Our licensing fees are approximately $50,000 USD annually."

More Planview Portfolios pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Project Management Software solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

913,806 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

No data available

Manufacturing Company

15%

Financial Services Firm

10%

Construction Company

10%

Outsourcing Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

No data available

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	2
Midsize Enterprise	4
Large Enterprise	66

Questions from the Community

Ask a question

Earn 20 points

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Planview Portfolios?

My experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing has been that Planview Portfolios is one of the best and a very cost-effective tool.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Planview Portfolios?

Planview Portfolios can be improved as the user interface defaults to the last opened portfolio, which can waste a lot of time loading a large portfolio if that is not what I need at that moment. J...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Planview Portfolios?

My main use case for Planview Portfolios is to ensure governance and decision auditability by incorporating embedded workflows, approval management, and key document retention supporting a single c...

See all answers

Comparisons

Easy Projects vs Celoxis

Compared 37% of the time

Smartsheet vs Celoxis

Compared 35% of the time

More Celoxis Competitors

Broadcom Clarity vs Planview Portfolios

Compared 8% of the time

OpenText Project and Portfolio Management vs Planview Portfolios

Compared 5% of the time

Microsoft Project Server vs Planview Portfolios

Compared 4% of the time

Planview PPM Pro vs Planview Portfolios

Compared 4% of the time

MEGA HOPEX vs Planview Portfolios

Compared 3% of the time

More Planview Portfolios Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Project Management Software

August 2026

Download Celoxis product report

Buyer's Guide

Planview Portfolios

September 2026

Download Planview Portfolios product report

Also Known As

No data available

Planview Enterprise One, Troux

Overview

Celoxis is recognized for its comprehensive project management capabilities tailored for teams seeking efficiency in planning, tracking, and collaboration. It offers versatile solutions for project managers to streamline processes and enhance productivity.

Renowned for its robust functionality, Celoxis allows precise project scheduling, extensive customization, and real-time reporting. Optimized for dynamic environments, it effectively manages resources and time with integrated budgeting tools. Known for scalability, Celoxis supports teams by addressing the complexities of task management and deadlines, ensuring strategic alignment with corporate objectives.

What are the most important features of Celoxis?

Advanced Scheduling: Allows for detailed task dependencies and project timelines.
Customizable Dashboards: Provides personalized views with tailored widgets and data insights.
Time Tracking: Facilitates accurate logging and analysis of team hours and productivity.
Resource Management: Optimizes workload distribution to maximize efficiency across projects.
Robust Reporting: Delivers real-time analytics aiding in informed decision-making.

What benefits or ROI should users consider?

Cost Efficiency: Streamlines processes to reduce unnecessary expenditures.
Increased Productivity: Automates tasks to allow focus on strategic initiatives.
Improved Collaboration: Fosters teamwork through integrated communication tools.
Enhanced Decision Making: Provides data-driven insights for strategic planning.

Celoxis finds applicability across sectors such as IT, construction, and consulting, offering tailored solutions to manage project lifecycles and enhance operational effectiveness. Its flexibility allows adoption in diverse industries, aligning with unique operational goals.

Celoxis

Planview Portfolios empowers executives, finance, and portfolio leaders by enhancing strategic investments, improving market responsiveness, and connecting strategy and execution for optimal visibility.

Planview Portfolios offers comprehensive strategic and project portfolio management to organizations. Automating and scaling these processes, it enhances speed-to-value, aligns strategic objectives with execution, and connects business and technology planning for optimal funding and resource capacity. Users gain end-to-end visibility, track progress, and improve decision-making by utilizing integrated financial and capacity planning.

What key features does Planview Portfolios offer?

Strategic Alignment: Aligns objectives and OKRs with execution to ensure strategic goals are met.
End-to-End Visibility: Tracks performance across the organization to support timely decision-making.
Dynamic Planning and Funding: Utilizes scenario modeling for flexible strategic investment funding.
Flexible Capacity Planning: Balances programs and staffing levels against available capacity.
Connected Technology Strategy: Aligns technology investments with strategic digital initiatives.
Adaptive Program Management: Manages dependencies, risk, and progress through integrated planning.

What benefits can users find in reviews of Planview Portfolios?

Workflow Efficiency: Enhances efficiency by minimizing bottlenecks and optimizing execution.
Improved Decision-Making: Provides comprehensive insights for better informed strategic decisions.
Financial Insights: Offers detailed financial tracking across projects for greater transparency.
Organizational Agility: Increases productivity and adaptability through a unified platform.

Planview Portfolios is implemented across projects in industries requiring strategic planning, resource allocation, and financial tracking. Organizations manage project lifecycle and integration with ERP systems on a centralized platform, utilizing customizable workflows and reporting tools to enhance efficiency and streamline team processes.

Planview

Sample Customers

KPMG, Thales, LG, HBO, Rolex, Fuji Xerox, Virgin Care, Singapore Post, Visicom, Snow Software, Route 2 Media, Interim Healthcare, eCom, UNCDF

UPS, NatWest, Ingram Micro, Canadian Tire, Viessmann, Volvo, NASCO, UNESCO

Buyer's Guide

Project Management Software

August 2026

Download Free Report

Find out what your peers are saying about Atlassian, monday.com, Asana and others in Project Management Software. Updated: August 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

913,806 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our list of best Project Management Software vendors.

We monitor all Project Management Software reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.