

Catchpoint and Sentry compete in the monitoring solutions category. Sentry has the upper hand due to its targeted error tracking features for developers and quick ROI.
Features: Catchpoint is known for its scalability, wide network reach, and comprehensive monitoring tools. Sentry stands out with detailed error tracking, quick issue identification, and developer-focused features.
Room for Improvement: Catchpoint can improve in the flexibility of custom dashboards, integration options, and user interface. Sentry needs better integrations with other tools, more customizable alerting options, and enhanced reporting capabilities.
Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Catchpoint users find the deployment streamlined but seek more intuitive configuration options. Sentry's installation is straightforward with comprehensive support, making it more favored in terms of ease of deployment.
Pricing and ROI: Catchpoint users see high setup costs but value the extensive monitoring capabilities it offers. Sentry users find the pricing fair, with quick ROI due to rapidly resolved errors and improved performance.
There have been fewer outages, and it is very easy to identify the issue of performance bottleneck through root cause analysis and insights.
Real-time monitoring of networks, websites, and apps gives insightful information which helps to make data-driven decisions.
We have seen a return on investment as we have fewer outages.
Catchpoint customer support is very helpful and proactive.
The customer support is always very friendly and responsive and always available twenty-four hours per day, seven days a week.
Customer support is available 24/7 and very proactive and responsive.
We have not contacted their technical support because everything is easy to set up under Sentry.
Catchpoint's scalability is great as it grows with my organization's needs and can handle those needs very well.
It has been easy to use and configure across multiple systems, each having several environments.
Catchpoint is stable as I have not experienced any lagging.
If we could receive similar data for the China market as we do for North America and Asia Pacific, this would be helpful.
Dashboard customization and UX should be improved.
I would also add that the script recorder needs some work due to an update by Google, deprecating the use of the current solution.
Integrations or single sign-on capability with Microsoft would be beneficial for securing all assets.
The cost is very effective and relatively competitive.
My experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing is that the cost was very cost-effective and affordable.
Catchpoint's price is very cost-effective, but I don't know if it might be out of budget for a smaller organization working on a tight budget.
Compared to New Relic, it provides the necessary features at a cheaper cost, especially since we moved infrastructure monitoring to Azure.
Synthetic monitoring and root cause analysis have helped my team by allowing root cause monitoring to help us understand where the threat is coming from, enabling us to catch the threat before it impacts our users.
The reduction in outages is notable, with a 60 to 70% increase in outages reduction.
With the help of Catchpoint, we are able to address issues before our customers. Our triage time has reduced. We are able to reduce outages and unwanted user incidents.
Real-time error tracking helps our Quality Assurance team easily identify the root causes of problems or bugs and promptly inform the developers about specific issues.
At this time, I focus on finding and fixing bugs.
Sentry provides real-time error tracking which is invaluable for identifying and resolving issues quickly.
| Product | Mindshare (%) |
|---|---|
| Sentry | 3.0% |
| Catchpoint | 0.8% |
| Other | 96.2% |

| Company Size | Count |
|---|---|
| Small Business | 5 |
| Midsize Enterprise | 1 |
| Large Enterprise | 12 |
| Company Size | Count |
|---|---|
| Small Business | 7 |
| Midsize Enterprise | 3 |
| Large Enterprise | 3 |
Catchpoint is the Internet Resilience Company™. The top online retailers, Global2000, CDNs, cloud service providers, and xSPs in the world rely on Catchpoint to increase their resilience by catching any issues in the Internet Stack before they impact their business. Catchpoint’s Internet Performance Monitoring (IPM) suite offers synthetics, RUM, performance optimization, high fidelity data and flexible visualizations with advanced analytics. It leverages thousands of global vantage points (including inside wireless networks, BGP, backbone, last mile, endpoint, enterprise, ISPs, and more) to provide unparalleled observability into anything that impacts your customers, workforce, networks, website performance, applications, and APIs.
Learn more at: https://www.catchpoint.com/
Sentry is a robust error management system known for real-time error tracking and integration with tools like Slack, GitLab, and Jira, benefiting those seeking comprehensive application performance insights.
Sentry offers a seamless platform to monitor errors in both front-end and back-end applications, providing real-time alerts and comprehensive event log context. With its integration capabilities, teams effectively track application metrics and access performance data without direct production access, ensuring enhanced reliability. Sentry's features such as event grouping and code trace logs linked to Git repositories highlight its utility in maintaining application efficiency. Enhanced security and regular updates make it a preferred choice over competitors. Despite some requests for improvements in automation and UI enhancements, Sentry remains invaluable for error management and application performance monitoring.
What are the key features of Sentry?In industries like technology, Sentry is crucial for monitoring errors in web applications, offering real-time alerts and performance tracking. It is frequently used in ETL processes to detect failures without direct developer access, benefiting teams who manage large-scale applications and databases efficiently.
We monitor all Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.