Carbonite Server vs Veeam Agent for Linux [EOL] comparison

"The solution is very stable."

"It seems reliable and easy to use."

"It does not slow down your computer or use a lot of resources as it works."

"Technical support handled all our issues quickly and effectively."

"I find the BMR/image and the recovery pieces are valuable."

"The solution is a free engine to help work with the container."

"Easy verification of things is the most valuable feature."

"The efficiency and convenience are excellent."

"It's stable and reliable."

"Veeam Agent for Linux's most valuable feature is the compatibility with virtual machines, such as VMware."

"The user interface is good."

"The ease of use for the graphical interface and the ease of installation are the most valuable features of this solution."

"The initial setup and deployment are easy. It's straightforward."

"The most valuable feature is the ability to pick up individual files."

"The technical support is good."

"The flexibility and user-friendliness of Veeam make it very IT operations-friendly."

"The only thing that I would like to see improved is related to marketing. Currently, it is very difficult to find the right paper and stuff for me. Their marketing department should provide better information because currently, it is very difficult to find information on the internet. It was bought over by OpenText, and you won't be able to find a lot of information about this solution on their site. They should also provide training facilities for commercial purposes. Some of my colleagues recently went for pilot training, and they were technical. If I want to get trained, the training has to be more commercial. Currently, there is no such training for users like me."

"The stability has room for improvement."

"It could be a little bit easier or faster to be able to access data files without having to download anything."

"The support for object storage isn't quite there yet. Its public cloud support can be improved. I would love to see the public cloud support for object storage, and it would be great, but what I always hear from the folks at Carbonite is that in a lot of cases, it directly competes with their cloud offering. So, I don't know when or where that will go or if that will go anywhere, but we are hopeful to see something. The dashboard is a little outdated. If they gave it a facelift and put some better design around their dashboard, that would be tremendous. I generally care less about the visual aesthetics of an application as long as it does what it needed to do, which is true in the case of this solution. We also have the Microsoft 365 platform. Because they're two separate platforms, I have to log in to my Microsoft platform to manage it, and I have to log into my Carbonite server backup platform to manage it. Having these two coexist together in one management console is really what we're looking for, but we went for it knowing this. We also knew that there would be some integration coming down the road. So, we're again hoping to see some of that coming in 2021."

"In the next release I would like to see an improvement in the auto failover option."

"The Hyper-V backup has room for improvement."

"They do not yet have USB recovery but they are adding it in coming releases."

"I would like to be able to install Veeam directly to Linux instead of having to go through a Windows server."

"It has no cloud backup feature. You can't back up anywhere outside of your local network."

"In terms of the physical environment, I'd like them to integrate it with other kinds of solutions. We don't just work with Microsoft or Linux, but other kinds of infrastructure data as well."

"It's scalable, but it's not scalable on every platform."

"One problem in Veeam Agent for Linux is that you can't use your license for all your machines because you don't have a virtual machine, so if you're going to add machines and scale, you'd need to pay extra."

"In the next version, I would like to see an increase in the locations online. I have found that other products have good pickup location."

"The price of Veeam Agent for Linux could be reduced."

"We are currently waiting for the continuous backup process."

"The pricing is between $120 and $150 per year."

"Its price is reasonable."

"We pay 9,000 dollars per year for our license."

"The solution is open source."

"There's the principal license for Veeam Agent for Linux, and then you need to buy additional licenses for your machines."

"We have purchased a license to use Veeam Agent for Linux and the additional support. The overall cost of Veeam Agent for Linux is expensive."

"It's a subscription based license, which is started on a yearly basis. Currently the licensing is split between three editions: standard, enterprise, and enterprise plus. As long as you check the comparison between the additions and make sure that you have what you need, there are no extra costs with Veeam."

"Licensing costs are monthly."

"The costing is very competitive."

"The solution is rather expensive and I think the price is too high."

"Price-wise it's good."

"Veeam Agent is one of the cheapest products in the market."