CA App Synthetic Monitor vs Catchpoint comparison

Why PeerSpot?

Broadcom and Catchpoint are both solutions in the Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability category. Broadcom is ranked #74, while Catchpoint is ranked #13 with an average rating of 8.4. Broadcom holds a 0.6% mindshare in APM, compared to Catchpoint’s 0.9% mindshare. Additionally, 66% of Broadcom users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of Catchpoint users who would recommend it.

CA App Synthetic Monitor

Read 3 CA App Synthetic Monitor reviews

1,884 Views
1,865 Comparison Views

66% willing to recommend

Catchpoint

Read 24 Catchpoint reviews

6,016 Views
3,309 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

CA App Synthetic Monitor

Catchpoint

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Jul 24, 2024

Catchpoint and CA App Synthetic Monitor compete in the performance monitoring solutions category. Catchpoint seems to have the upper hand with its detailed monitoring capabilities and comprehensive visibility, while CA App Synthetic Monitor stands out for its ease of setup and integration features.

Features: Catchpoint offers robust monitoring capabilities, granular data, and real-time analytics. CA App Synthetic Monitor provides straightforward integration, user-friendly alert systems, and flexibility in monitoring various environments.

Room for Improvement: Catchpoint needs enhancements in reporting functionality, expanding integration options, and better user interface customization. CA App Synthetic Monitor should improve historical data analysis, advanced customization for reports, and overall data analytics.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Catchpoint's deployment is quick but may require technical expertise. Users praise its customer service and support. CA App Synthetic Monitor has an easy deployment process with minimal setup time, and users commend its responsive customer service.

Pricing and ROI: Catchpoint is a premium product with a higher setup cost but delivers significant ROI due to its advanced features. CA App Synthetic Monitor is more cost-effective, with lower setup costs and satisfactory ROI, though it may lack some of Catchpoint's advanced capabilities.

To learn more, read our detailed CA App Synthetic Monitor vs. Catchpoint Report (Updated: September 2026).

Buyer's Guide

CA App Synthetic Monitor vs. Catchpoint

September 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 915,341 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

CA App Synthetic Monitor

Ranking in Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability

74th

Average Rating

7.0

Reviews Sentiment

5.9

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Catchpoint

Ranking in Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability

13th

Average Rating

8.4

Reviews Sentiment

6.6

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Network Monitoring Software (12th), Cloud Monitoring Software (11th), Digital Experience Monitoring (DEM) (4th)

Mindshare comparison

As of October 2026, in the Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability category, the mindshare of CA App Synthetic Monitor is 0.6%, up from 0.3% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Catchpoint is 0.9%, up from 0.6% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability Mindshare Distribution
Product	Mindshare (%)
Catchpoint	0.9%
CA App Synthetic Monitor	0.6%
Other	98.5%

Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability

Featured Reviews

reviewer2286675

System Administrator at a tech services company with 11-50 employees

A reliable solution for SSL offloading and to encrypt outside traffic

If you are responsible for monitoring the logs in F5, it isn't very easy. The format is complicated compared to different vendors. For example, Fortinet and Cisco have feasible formats for sending and fetching logs. Suppose I'm monitoring the logs and everything, and when I am retrieving logs from F5, I want to know whether it is regular traffic or any abnormality is happening. The logs itself is not user-friendly. It may not give you a clear way of what's happening. You have to go through different websites and work on it. You have to waste so much time on it.

Read full review

reviewer2867268

Observability Architect at a financial services firm with 10,001+ employees

Proactive synthetic monitoring has reduced major incidents and provides global user experience insights

One thing that is not available is the multi-factor authentication feature concerning monitoring any applications. If an application depends upon MFA for its login flow, Catchpoint doesn't have the ability to bypass or monitor that flow for multi-factor authentication. This is one area where I would like to see improvement in the tool because many applications nowadays use multi-factor authentication, and Catchpoint does lag a bit in providing the end-to-end synthetic observability for applications dependent on MFA. This is one of the major areas needing improvement. Otherwise, Catchpoint has been one of the greatest tools in the synthetic monitoring or digital experience monitoring space, and I don't see anything else right now, but MFA is something that certainly needs some improvement.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"Each had strengths in one area or another, but CA covered the majority of our needs end-to-end."

"From our experience, it really helps managers in measuring application SLAs and viewing historical performance data."

"The most valuable features of Catchpoint are basically the transaction monitors on the API and UI."

"Catchpoint helped us establish that something is in a provider network, so we could tell our customers to check their internet provider because the traffic is not getting to us. You need to be gentle when you tell them that, but the fact that we could do it was crucial."

"Catchpoint has impacted my organization positively by speeding up the process in detecting issues much earlier, even before the business reaches out."

"The product's most valuable feature is the ability to identify and troubleshoot network issues."

"Catchpoint is actually catching issues before customers see them, since it's checking the sites every five minutes or even every minute, via the APIs."

"The solution offers three different ways of slicing data to look for abnormalities."

"Catchpoint has positively impacted my organization because we have supported multiple customers and handled many escalations before they became critical issues."

"One of the features, the scatter plot, is very useful. It shows red dots wherever there are issues."

More Catchpoint pros

Cons

"Pricing makes little sense. We had examples where it would be cheaper to have two basic accounts than one intermediate."

"The RBMS component is limited as you can only record using Internet Explorer."

"A room for improvement in Catchpoint is that it lacks an automated page updating feature."

"For some larger workflows, I think the product could improve in a few areas."

"One thing that is not available is the multi-factor authentication feature concerning monitoring any applications."

"The price and licensing are very, very high. They have to come down on the pricing to match with the industry standard."

"It would be great if Catchpoint could incorporate its alerting system instead of relying on separate tools like ServiceNow."

"One improvement for Catchpoint is the detail analysis logs that we struggle to find within the tool."

"We would like the script creation feature of this solution to be improved, as it currently requires a complicated manual process to update the scripts."

More Catchpoint cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

Information not available

"In terms of licensing fees, I believe they were slightly higher."

"The pricing is based on consumption and works on a point scale. For example, let's say I want to look at www.google.com, and I'm going to test it to see if it's there. It will bring back all this data that tells me how long it took to connect and how long it took to get the first byte. It will list all the resources on the page, showing that they all work and there are no broken links. It brings that data back. That test has an assigned point value depending on what you decide to extract from that test. If all I do is check to see whether it's available, it might be one point. I don't know the exact point values off-hand. This is just an example."

"The solution's pricing is comparable to the last tool we were using."

"The price and licensing are very, very high. They have to come down on the pricing to match with the industry standard."

"The solution's pricing varies based on services and licensing models."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

915,341 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

No data available

Financial Services Firm

15%

Outsourcing Company

12%

Construction Company

10%

Comms Service Provider

10%

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

No data available

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	7
Midsize Enterprise	1
Large Enterprise	22

Questions from the Community

Ask a question

Earn 20 points

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Catchpoint?

My experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing has been great. There is always a need to negotiate a bit more to get the best cost for the licenses we plan to buy. We expect better costs fro...

See all answers

What needs improvement with Catchpoint?

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Catchpoint?

My main use cases for Catchpoint are synthetic monitoring and transactions monitoring for different applications. We have a lot of critical tier zero applications where there is a need to have synt...

See all answers

Comparisons

Splunk AppDynamics vs CA App Synthetic Monitor

Compared 20% of the time

OpenText SiteScope vs CA App Synthetic Monitor

Compared 14% of the time

LogicMonitor vs CA App Synthetic Monitor

Compared 10% of the time

BMC TrueSight vs CA App Synthetic Monitor

Compared 6% of the time

IDERA Precise vs CA App Synthetic Monitor

Compared 6% of the time

More CA App Synthetic Monitor Competitors

Dynatrace vs Catchpoint

Compared 7% of the time

ThousandEyes vs Catchpoint

Compared 6% of the time

New Relic vs Catchpoint

Compared 5% of the time

AppNeta by Broadcom vs Catchpoint

Compared 4% of the time

SolarWinds Pingdom vs Catchpoint

Compared 4% of the time

More Catchpoint Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability

September 2026

Download CA App Synthetic Monitor product report

Buyer's Guide

Catchpoint

October 2026

Download Catchpoint product report

Also Known As

CA ASM

No data available

Overview

CA App Synthetic Monitor provides proactive monitoring of web applications and services to ensure performance and availability. It allows businesses to identify and resolve problems before they impact users.

By simulating user interactions and analyzing application performance, CA App Synthetic Monitor enables businesses to maintain optimal service levels. This cloud-based solution offers a comprehensive view of application health through real-time monitoring and alerts, facilitating quick identification of performance bottlenecks and outages. It helps IT teams enhance user experience by predicting potential issues and optimizing resource allocation. Its flexibility and scalability cater to a range of business needs.

What are key features of CA App Synthetic Monitor?

Real-Time Monitoring: Continuous monitoring of web applications to detect issues quickly.
Global Reach: Simulate user transactions from multiple locations worldwide.
Custom Alerts: Set up customized alerts for specific performance thresholds.
Detailed Reporting: Access in-depth analysis of application performance metrics.
Scalability: Easily scalable to match growing business demands.

What benefits or ROI should users expect?

Improved User Experience: By identifying issues early, end-users encounter fewer disruptions.
Cost Efficiency: Reduces downtime-related costs through early detection and resolution.
Enhanced Reliability: Ensures application reliability and reduces service outages.
Time Saving: Automates performance checks to save time for IT teams.

Industries such as e-commerce, finance, and IT services implement CA App Synthetic Monitor to ensure their software systems remain performant under various conditions. For e-commerce, it assures checkout processes run smoothly. Financial sectors use it to guarantee secure and reliable transaction handling. IT services leverage its capabilities to maintain service level agreements, ensuring customer satisfaction in digital interactions.

Broadcom

Catchpoint is a robust monitoring solution offering synthetic and real user monitoring, network performance analysis, and root cause identification. It enhances response times, reduces downtime, and improves user experience through advanced features and support.

Catchpoint provides comprehensive monitoring capabilities that ensure application availability and improve user experience. By delivering synthetic and real user monitoring, API tracking, and cloud network performance insights, it enables companies to diagnose issues, maintain service reliability, and anticipate problems. Organizations can effectively simulate user actions, monitor endpoints, and obtain actionable insights for diverse applications and websites, supporting seamless digital transactions.

What are the key features of Catchpoint?

Synthetic and Real User Monitoring: Offers comprehensive insights into performance and user interactions.
Root Cause Analysis: Identifies issues quickly to minimize downtime and improve service reliability.
Customizable Dashboards: Provides tailored views for performance metrics and test results.
Alert Notifications: Keeps teams informed of potential issues with timely alerts.
Network Performance Monitoring: Tracks cloud and local network performance for optimal operation.

What benefits and ROI should users expect?

Cost Savings: Optimizes performance to reduce operational costs and enhance ROI.
Improved SLA Management: Helps maintain service level agreements with reduced false alerts.
Enhanced User Experience: Delivers consistent and responsive applications to users.
Operational Efficiency: Automates processes for minimizing manual intervention.

Catchpoint is implemented across industries for proactive performance monitoring, ensuring digital platform reliability and superior user experience. Its tools enable companies to track application availability and network performance, utilizing global coverage to deliver crucial insights for decision-making processes.

Catchpoint

Sample Customers

Lexmark

Information Not Available

Buyer's Guide

CA App Synthetic Monitor vs. Catchpoint

September 2026

Free Report: CA App Synthetic Monitor vs. Catchpoint

Find out what your peers are saying about CA App Synthetic Monitor vs. Catchpoint and other solutions. Updated: September 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

915,341 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our CA App Synthetic Monitor vs. Catchpoint report.

See our list of best Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability vendors.

We monitor all Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.