Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

Broadcom Merchant Risk Analytics vs IBM Safer Payments comparison

 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive Summary

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Categories and Ranking

Broadcom Merchant Risk Anal...
Ranking in Fraud Detection and Prevention
37th
Average Rating
0.0
Number of Reviews
0
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
IBM Safer Payments
Ranking in Fraud Detection and Prevention
5th
Average Rating
8.0
Reviews Sentiment
7.1
Number of Reviews
2
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
 

Mindshare comparison

As of December 2025, in the Fraud Detection and Prevention category, the mindshare of Broadcom Merchant Risk Analytics is 1.3%, up from 0.1% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of IBM Safer Payments is 2.8%, down from 4.4% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Fraud Detection and Prevention Market Share Distribution
ProductMarket Share (%)
IBM Safer Payments2.8%
Broadcom Merchant Risk Analytics1.3%
Other95.9%
Fraud Detection and Prevention
 

Featured Reviews

Use Broadcom Merchant Risk Analytics?
Leave a review
TA
Business Technology Services at Habib Bank Ltd.
Real-time fraud prevention empowers effective decision-making
The features of IBM Safer Payments that I found most valuable are the "what if" scenarios. I find "what if" scenarios very valuable for my use cases because it's easier to simulate the rules that one would want to set up and see what the outcome would be beforehand; it doesn't take too much rework or effort. I have used the transaction scoring feature of IBM Safer Payments. IBM Safer Payments adaptive machine learning models are still under review for improving the accuracy of fraud detection over time; it's not yet been fully realized because the more data you have, the better it is. Currently, the data is being populated, and it's too early to make definitive conclusions. The ability to process large volumes of transactions in real-time for my organization is very important; that will become even more important once we are doing real-time monitoring and scoring. I have benefited from the comprehensive reporting and visualization tools offered by IBM Safer Payments; they are lovely. These tools have assisted in optimizing my fraud prevention strategies because we are still building on a few things, but once you have a 360 view of the customer's transactional history, it's easier to build in rules for flagging anything that comes out of the ordinary, whether it's in terms of the number of transactions, the volume of the transactions, the location of the transactions, or all of them together. It brings in a lot of visibility into the transactional history and patterns for each customer.
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Fraud Detection and Prevention solutions are best for your needs.
879,259 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
No data available
Financial Services Firm
44%
Computer Software Company
12%
Manufacturing Company
6%
Media Company
4%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
No data available
No data available
 

Questions from the Community

Ask a question
Earn 20 points
What needs improvement with IBM Safer Payments?
I haven't looked at IBM Safer Payments in that detail, so I wouldn't be able to answer what areas need to be improved or enhanced. I would suggest improving the integration because given that IBM S...
What is your primary use case for IBM Safer Payments?
My usual use cases for IBM Safer Payments involved real-time fraud monitoring of near real-time, not real-time, near real-time fraud monitoring on debit and credit cards, as well as mobile and inte...
 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

Westchester County, First Horizon, Intellinet, Invercap
Borgun
Find out what your peers are saying about ThreatMetrix, NICE, BioCatch and others in Fraud Detection and Prevention. Updated: December 2025.
879,259 professionals have used our research since 2012.