No more typing reviews! Try our Samantha, our new voice AI agent.

Box vs Sharepoint 2010 on Windows server 2012r2-24x7 comparison

 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive Summary

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

ROI

Sentiment score
6.6
Organizations using Box report efficiency in file management, reduced compliance risks, and notable returns despite some awaiting detailed calculations.
Sentiment score
8.7
Organizations achieve enhanced productivity, collaboration, and cost-effectiveness with SharePoint 2010, improving document management and streamlining processes.
I have seen a return on investment as it has eliminated using different tools among different teams, leading to harmonization, simplification, and improved collaboration.
Team Lead at Target
I have seen a return on investment as I have been involved in each department to help automate at least one paperwork, even though I do not have exact numbers or specific metrics to share.
Group IT Director at Premier Group
 

Customer Service

Sentiment score
5.2
Box customer service is generally praised, but users want improved response times and frontline expertise for better experiences.
Sentiment score
8.3
Sharepoint 2010 customer service on Windows server 2012r2 is praised for its 24x7 responsiveness and effectiveness, despite being an older version.
They got good results and everything is working, so it turned out okay.
Application Developer at El Camino Hospital
The customer support for Sharepoint 2010 on Windows server 2012r2-24x7 is very responsive and proactive.
Team Lead at Target
 

Scalability Issues

Sentiment score
7.7
Box offers strong scalability and performance for large organizations, but some limitations appear in enterprise-level deployments and large file handling.
Sentiment score
8.7
SharePoint 2010 on Windows Server 2012r2-24x7 excels in scalability and performance, efficiently supporting dynamic organizational growth and demands.
I am uncertain about its effectiveness at an enterprise level, where SharePoint might be preferred.
Consultant at a tech vendor with 51-200 employees
We did not have any problem scaling Sharepoint 2010 on Windows server 2012r2-24x7.
Application Developer at El Camino Hospital
Sharepoint 2010 on Windows server 2012r2-24x7 is very scalable because it has continued to handle my organization's growth efficiently.
Team Lead at Target
 

Stability Issues

Sentiment score
7.9
Box is highly stable and secure, with minimal outages, though users seek improvements in upload speed.
Sentiment score
9.2
SharePoint 2010 on Windows Server 2012r2-24x7 is praised for stability and reliability, ensuring strong uptime with minimal downtime.
Box was very stable and did not have any latency issues.
Consultant at a tech vendor with 51-200 employees
 

Room For Improvement

Box needs improved sync, search, file management, security, integration, interface, performance, permissions, API, pricing, and data recovery.
SharePoint 2010 needs offline improvements, better UI, integration, customization, documentation, and enhanced features for user and performance needs.
To open and see who is accessing the document now and see my movements across the document or the file we are sharing together.
Senior Projects Manager at Tech-hub
Collaborative editing was challenging if multiple people were in a document at once.
Consultant at a tech vendor with 51-200 employees
Microsoft should have better documentation, better help, and better how-to guides, even for the simple things.
Application Developer at El Camino Hospital
Sharepoint 2010 on Windows server 2012r2-24x7 can be improved with configuration that is simple without becoming complex and does not depend heavily on the IT department.
Team Lead at Target
I found that while it provides flexibility through Sharepoint Designer for creating workflows, there are limitations where I have to write code rather than using the GUI itself.
Group IT Director at Premier Group
 

Setup Cost

Box pricing is initially steep but offers excellent value, with discounts and free versions available for businesses and education.
SharePoint 2010 is cost-effective for enterprises, offering competitive pricing and licensing suitable for budget-conscious organizations.
I found the pricing reasonable because when I was working for an IBM partner, Box was free for us.
Senior Projects Manager at Tech-hub
 

Valuable Features

Box provides secure file sharing, collaboration, advanced security, and seamless Microsoft integration, making it ideal for organizations.
SharePoint 2010 enhances collaboration and efficiency with robust security, easy integration, workflow automation, and user-friendly features.
Box had a very easy-to-use search feature and a good user interface on its website, which was faster and better than SharePoint.
Consultant at a tech vendor with 51-200 employees
I find the synchronization feature most valuable in Box. When I use multiple devices, it syncs them together and gives excellent results.
Senior Projects Manager at Tech-hub
The workflows that connect Outlook, Sharepoint 2010 on Windows server 2012r2-24x7, and OneDrive among others allow me to manage multiple actions for all these tools.
Team Lead at Target
I am not sure how we would share some of these resources as easily with another solution, especially being able to control who can access what at different levels and who can edit which files, who can upload, and who can see different things.
Application Developer at El Camino Hospital
The workflow feature specifically helped my team by not only improving efficiency but also impacting our costs, as it saved on printer, paper, and ink consumption while allowing managers to approve requests from anywhere at any time.
Group IT Director at Premier Group
 

Categories and Ranking

Box
Ranking in Enterprise Content Management
10th
Average Rating
8.4
Reviews Sentiment
7.0
Number of Reviews
42
Ranking in other categories
Cloud Storage (12th), Digital Asset Management (6th), Document Management Software (6th), Content Collaboration Platforms (9th)
Sharepoint 2010 on Windows ...
Ranking in Enterprise Content Management
17th
Average Rating
8.4
Reviews Sentiment
7.7
Number of Reviews
3
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
 

Mindshare comparison

As of May 2026, in the Enterprise Content Management category, the mindshare of Box is 3.8%, up from 3.7% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Sharepoint 2010 on Windows server 2012r2-24x7 is 0.3%. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Enterprise Content Management Mindshare Distribution
ProductMindshare (%)
Box3.8%
Sharepoint 2010 on Windows server 2012r2-24x70.3%
Other95.9%
Enterprise Content Management
 

Featured Reviews

Ahmed Rashad - PeerSpot reviewer
Senior Projects Manager at Tech-hub
Team collaboration has improved through shared access and real-time synchronization
I find the synchronization feature most valuable in Box. When I use multiple devices, it syncs them together and gives excellent results. I can assess the benefits of Box's file sharing. Box's integration with third-party apps is valuable, especially with Outlook. Box has helped my team's productivity by being very helpful with team collaboration when we are sharing certain shared documents between us. I mostly value Box's automation capabilities. They have helped optimize my business processes by saving time for sharing or sending files between the team. This gives us a shared workspace to work together on the same document or the same ideas. Box's security features have helped my organization meet compliance needs.
Catherine Melody - PeerSpot reviewer
Team Lead at Target
Collaborative workflows have reduced emails and improve secure document management
The best features Sharepoint 2010 on Windows server 2012r2-24x7 offers include permission management, contact groups, version history, and integration with other Microsoft tools. Of those features, I find the integration with the Microsoft tools most valuable on a daily basis. The workflows that connect Outlook, Sharepoint 2010 on Windows server 2012r2-24x7, and OneDrive among others allow me to manage multiple actions for all these tools, which seems wonderful to me. It allows a super necessary and simple expansion to be able to automate tasks that used to be performed manually on a daily basis. It certainly contributes to efficiency and time-saving.
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Enterprise Content Management solutions are best for your needs.
894,738 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Financial Services Firm
12%
Manufacturing Company
8%
Government
6%
Healthcare Company
6%
Construction Company
53%
Financial Services Firm
10%
Comms Service Provider
6%
Manufacturing Company
6%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
By reviewers
Company SizeCount
Small Business18
Midsize Enterprise10
Large Enterprise30
By reviewers
Company SizeCount
Small Business1
Midsize Enterprise1
Large Enterprise11
 

Questions from the Community

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Box?
I found the pricing reasonable because when I was working for an IBM partner, Box was free for us. We did not go to payment and other matters like this.
What needs improvement with Box?
I believe Box has a lot of features that put it in a good rank among the file-sharing apps. I would like to see features for online collaboration between team members in the future, to open and see...
What is your primary use case for Box?
I use Box, Delphi, and IBM FileNet. I worked for a software company as a project manager, and this experience includes FileNet. I also used Delphi for programming work. I am familiar enough with Bo...
What needs improvement with Sharepoint 2010 on Windows server 2012r2-24x7?
Sharepoint 2010 on Windows server 2012r2-24x7 can be improved with configuration that is simple without becoming complex and does not depend heavily on the IT department. I find that sometimes it r...
What is your primary use case for Sharepoint 2010 on Windows server 2012r2-24x7?
My main use case for Sharepoint 2010 on Windows server 2012r2-24x7 is that it serves as a great collaboration tool. Sharepoint 2010 on Windows server 2012r2-24x7 is being used for document manageme...
What advice do you have for others considering Sharepoint 2010 on Windows server 2012r2-24x7?
I appreciate the user-friendly and intuitive interface of Sharepoint 2010 on Windows server 2012r2-24x7. My advice to others looking into using Sharepoint 2010 on Windows server 2012r2-24x7 is that...
 

Comparisons

No data available
 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

GE, Toyota, P&G, Caterpillar, Flex, Schneider Electric, Sally Beauty, Eurostar, AstraZeneca, AirBnB, Whirlpool, Wake Forest School of Medicine, Nationwide, Aeropostale etc
Information Not Available
Find out what your peers are saying about Microsoft, IBM, Adobe and others in Enterprise Content Management. Updated: April 2026.
894,738 professionals have used our research since 2012.