BMC AMI DevX vs Perforce Delphix comparison

BMC and Perforce are both solutions in the Test Data Management category. BMC is ranked #6 with an average rating of 7.7, while Perforce is ranked #1 with an average rating of 7.8. BMC holds a 10.8% mindshare in TDM, compared to Perforce’s 22.8% mindshare. Additionally, 90% of BMC users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 79% of Perforce users who would recommend it.

BMC AMI DevX

Read 19 BMC AMI DevX reviews

4,427 Views
354 Comparison Views

90% willing to recommend

Perforce Delphix

Read 17 Perforce Delphix reviews

3,372 Views
1,315 Comparison Views

79% willing to recommend

BMC AMI DevX

Perforce Delphix

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Dec 14, 2025

Perforce Delphix and BMC AMI DevX compete in data management and mainframe development sectors. Delphix excels in data management capabilities, while BMC leads in mainframe development tools.

Features: Delphix offers virtualization, VDB provisioning, and advanced data masking, providing significant storage efficiency and rapid data access. Its support for diverse data sources enhances flexibility in managing sensitive data. BMC AMI DevX excels with robust debugging capabilities, comprehensive code management, and seamless integration features valuable for mainframe developers.

Room for Improvement: Delphix needs enhanced cross-platform capabilities, better reporting, and a refined user interface for improved usability. Expanding integration with CI/CD pipelines would benefit users. BMC AMI DevX could improve ease of use, supporting Eclipse integration and better installation documentation, addressing user adoption issues.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Delphix provides flexible deployment options, supporting hybrid cloud and on-premises environments, and is highly praised for its proactive and effective customer support. BMC operates primarily on-premises with limited cloud integrations. Both offer responsive technical support, though Delphix is slightly preferred for comprehensive assistance.

Pricing and ROI: Delphix generally has higher upfront costs but offers significant storage savings and efficiency gains for a strong ROI if effectively deployed. BMC AMI DevX provides competitive and varied pricing models like seat-based licensing. Both solutions offer substantial cost savings, with users noting Delphix's storage ROI and BMC's licensing benefits in enterprise agreements.

To learn more, read our detailed BMC AMI DevX vs. Perforce Delphix Report (Updated: December 2025).

Buyer's Guide

BMC AMI DevX vs. Perforce Delphix

December 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 879,768 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

BMC AMI DevX

Ranking in Test Data Management

6th

Ranking in Data Masking

7th

Average Rating

8.0

Reviews Sentiment

7.2

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Software Configuration Management (1st), Debugging (6th), Database Development and Management (17th), Mainframe Application Development (1st), Mainframe Testing Tools (1st)

Perforce Delphix

Ranking in Test Data Management

1st

Ranking in Data Masking

2nd

Average Rating

8.0

Reviews Sentiment

7.4

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Copy Data Management (1st)

Mindshare comparison

As of January 2026, in the Test Data Management category, the mindshare of BMC AMI DevX is 10.8%, up from 3.6% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Perforce Delphix is 22.8%, down from 30.0% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Test Data Management Market Share Distribution
Product	Market Share (%)
Perforce Delphix	22.8%
BMC AMI DevX	10.8%
Other	66.4%

Test Data Management

Featured Reviews

Brian Westerman

Director of R&D at Syzygy Inc.

Helps to make mainframe data management process easier and saves manhours

We plan to replace BMC Compuware File-AID due to its price. Two years back, we paid 11,000 dollars. However, the current price is 27,900 dollars. The price has increased to at least eight times its initial cost. We would need to pay around 60,000 dollars to have all three products together. We also encountered issues during version updates.

Read full review

reviewer2775900

DevOps Engineer at a tech vendor with 5,001-10,000 employees

User access has been managed efficiently and coding tasks are streamlined through secure workflows

Perhaps you should focus mostly on Identity Access Management for Perforce, as the market is heading toward IAM, and it has become mandatory. Additionally, based on my experience, I would suggest trying to use a decentralized approach similar to Git, where when a user clones the repository, it becomes their own repository. This decentralized method is what Git is doing right now, and implementing it might help the company. If you take a decentralized approach to the repository, it would be easier for users. Additionally, implementing Identity Access Management aligned with current cybersecurity tools in the market might also help the company. Focusing in that direction would be beneficial.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"We had parallel development before, but the way ISPW implements it is better. It has more control and oversight of the process, whereas before, it was like the Wild West. Everybody could have their own package with their own version of the component in it... ISPW is constantly aware of it. It notifies when someone else is using or has a different version of that component."

"It helps our staff work by speeding up their documentation process."

"I like the ability that it has to format copy books in a presentable manner. So, you will be able to see the starting offset in length of each field within the layout."

"The most valuable feature of Topaz is Xpediter. It's more flexible than Xpediter through MVS."

"One of the features that the developers like is that they can retrieve what they need with the tool. They don't have to go through some process or request something be done by another team. They can get the programs they need, compile them, retrieve the JCL and alter the JCL if they need to, and put these programs wherever they need to go for their testing."

"It's a modernized development portal and helps reduce the learning curve for younger people coming in to work on the platform,"

"Test data management capabilities are good."

"I have worked with DB2's great features in the last five years. The IDAA feature transformed the vision of warehousing, business analytics, and big data at my bank. Besides the mainframe, I saw that this solution was evolutionary. It gives real-time information."

More BMC AMI DevX pros

"Delphix can do data masking in any format. Not many solutions can do that."

"It's really easy to install."

"Delphix interfaces are simple to use and very user friendly."

"The most valuable feature is VDB provisioning."

"Data being available anytime is a life changer."

"The performance offered by the product, its price, and its ability to handle structured and unstructured data were good when compared to the other products in the market."

"It is a stable solution."

"The most valuable feature is creating virtual databases."

More Perforce Delphix pros

Cons

"I'm waiting to see what 19.2 for Topaz looks like, but I have a problem with the JES Explorer right now. It limits you to a certain prefix for job names and there are some groups that have multiple prefixes that they'd like to see all at once in their job names, because of how they work in a group. And they can't see that in the JES Explorer."

"DB2 is a hard tool to grasp. It's hard for users to learn how to use it. It's not easy to see how it works."

"It would be good if the vendors would work together or at least have some collaboration between them, so they would know what would work and what wouldn't work. Right now, the way things are working, they're relying on the customer to make everything work."

"We plan to replace BMC Compuware File-AID due to its price. Two years back, we paid 11,000 dollars. However, the current price is 27,900 dollars. The price has increased to at least eight times its initial cost. We would need to pay around 60,000 dollars to have all three products together. We also encountered issues during version updates."

"The solution could be improved by being better integrated with the open world. In the next release, I would like to have the ability to work in an open environment whilst remaining integrated with the legacy environment."

"When you're setting up the parameters for how ISPW will work in your shop, there are a lot of questions that have to be answered... BMC Compuware should have more in-depth explanations about what the choices in each question mean. If you pick A, what does that mean has to happen? What does that impact? If you pick B, what does that mean? What does that impact?"

"Technical support has gotten better over the years, though there's always room for improvement."

"It's not as intuitive as it should be. In terms of navigation, there is a large training curve for using it. For a millennial it might be better, if they're used to Eclipse. But coming from a non-Eclipse environment and using Eclipse, though I have experience with Eclipse, it might be cumbersome."

More BMC AMI DevX cons

"It is hard to answer whether I would advise someone to use Perforce because the market has moved far ahead of Perforce."

"As a commercial model, it's very good. However, maybe it would be nice for Delphix to integrate with some other platforms."

"The solution’s self-service portal must be more interactive and user-friendly."

"It would be good if any CI/CD and DevOps-aligned feature could be triggered through the DevOps pipeline."

"Delphix could be improved with better usability and an agentless option."

"Delphix is a strong solution for virtualization, but it's not strong enough for creating data, so we have to use another solution for creating new data."

"When it comes to unstructured and structured data, if Delphix can comply with the requirements for most of the structured data, it would be good, especially if it can include the data scanning part."

"The solution's price needs improvement."

More Perforce Delphix cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"It has saved our developers time and effort when working on documentation, which is now more readable and fluent."

"The price point is great."

"The only thing I would mention related to the licensing and/or the pricing, is that they have some visualization features in there that are licensed by concurrent users. We're starting to trip up on that. We're looking to probably increase the number of concurrent licenses that we have. But those types of licensing strategies, where they license by concurrent users or the number of seats is confusing for some people. They don't understand why it works sometimes and doesn't work other times."

"In general, Compuware tools are very competitive."

"In terms of pricing, there isn't an extra charge for the parts of it we use. It comes with the licenses we purchased for other products, so no complaints there. The licensing is built in with the other products that you purchase from Compuware."

"I like the seat-based licensing much more than MSU-based licensing, and that the cost has been competitive."

"The solution's pricing was reasonable and lower than one million."

"I would say the price is a little high but affordable for our needs."

"Delphix's pricing is affordable."

"It is an expensive solution."

"The product is a little bit expensive."

"I rate the product price seven to eight on a scale of one to ten, where one is the low price, and ten is the high price."

"The cost is $370K annually for the Delphix Masking Engine and Delphix Virtualization Engine."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Test Data Management solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

879,768 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

34%

Insurance Company

12%

Manufacturing Company

Government

Financial Services Firm

28%

Manufacturing Company

Insurance Company

Computer Software Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	6
Large Enterprise	16

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	10
Midsize Enterprise	2
Large Enterprise	12

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about Compuware File-AID?

The product has made our mainframe data management process easier. It has helped us save manhours. The tool's most valuable feature is the ability to edit tape files. Its ability to clone files is ...

See all answers

What needs improvement with Compuware File-AID?

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Compuware File-AID?

We use the solution clone test files.

See all answers

What do you like most about Delphix?

The performance offered by the product, its price, and its ability to handle structured and unstructured data were good when compared to the other products in the market.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Delphix?

It is hard for me to remember the pricing, setup cost, or licensing for Perforce. I think the licensing was based on user count. I felt the pricing was a little higher at that time, which is what I...

See all answers

What needs improvement with Delphix?

See all answers

Comparisons

Endevor vs BMC AMI DevX

Compared 20% of the time

IBM File Manager vs BMC AMI DevX

Compared 11% of the time

InterTest vs BMC AMI DevX

Compared 7% of the time

IBM Debug for z/OS vs BMC AMI DevX

Compared 6% of the time

Rocket ChangeMan ZMF (formerly a Micro Focus product) vs BMC AMI DevX

Compared 5% of the time

More BMC AMI DevX Competitors

Informatica Test Data Management (TDM) vs Perforce Delphix

Compared 13% of the time

Broadcom Test Data Manager vs Perforce Delphix

Compared 10% of the time

Accelario TDM vs Perforce Delphix

Compared 8% of the time

Rubrik vs Perforce Delphix

Compared 7% of the time

Dell AppSync vs Perforce Delphix

Compared 2% of the time

More Perforce Delphix Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

BMC AMI DevX

January 2026

Download BMC AMI DevX product report

Buyer's Guide

Perforce Delphix

December 2025

Download Perforce Delphix product report

Also Known As

File-AID, Data for Db2, Code Debug, Data Studio, Workbench for Eclipse, Code Pipeline

No data available

Overview

BMC AMI DevX is a comprehensive solution enhancing code management and testing efficiency. It offers debugging capabilities within financial applications and integrates data management seamlessly, serving major banking sectors with reliable performance.

AMI DevX is tailored for banking industries, optimizing application debugging in COBOL and enhancing data handling in robust financial systems. It simplifies mainframe data management with real-time insights, improving efficiency through editing and cloning functionalities. The tool's integration with Compuware File-AID for IMS and DB2 ensures streamlined development processes. Challenges include a steep DB2 learning curve and initial setup complexities, with technical support inconsistencies and steep pricing impacting affordability. Despite this, its valuable features significantly support large banking operations.

What features make BMC AMI DevX valuable?

Line-by-Line Code Debugging: Allows precise identification and rectification of issues.
Variable Change & Line Skipping: Flexibility in testing without recompiling.
Database-Independent Testing: No need for loading databases during testing.
Real-Time Data Insights: Enhances decision-making with immediate information.
Data Warehousing & Analytics: Facilitates comprehensive data analysis.
Integration & Formatting: Streamlines development by simplifying data processes.

What benefits should users look for in reviews?

Improved Efficiency: Streamline data management and editing capabilities.
Robust Debugging: Effective in both online and batch COBOL program debugging.
Enhanced Financial Application Support: Superior handling in grants and loans applications.
Comprehensive Testing: Enables creation of clone test files for thorough testing.

In large banking sectors, BMC AMI DevX is integral for grants and loans-related applications. Its robust nature supports financial systems, offering debugging for COBOL, updating data in Compuware File-AID for IMS, and integrating DB2. Users implement this for exceptional data management and application reliability.

BMC

Perforce Delphix automates compliant data management for DevOps, providing data masking and virtualization to quickly integrate data into diverse cloud environments, balancing innovation speed with quality and compliance.

Businesses leveraging Perforce Delphix efficiently automate test data management and CI/CD processes while maintaining data privacy and security. This platform offers integrated data masking and virtualization, enabling rapid deployment of compliant data in non-production environments. Users benefit from its capacity to deliver secure data for various applications, swiftly recover from disruptions, and manage data in large-scale settings, enhancing development scenarios with synthetic and live data operations. Its flexible system reduces storage demands and facilitates environment rewinds through snapshots.

What are the key features?

Virtualization and Snapshot Capabilities: Enable time-point rollbacks and efficient VDB provisioning.
Data Masking: Enhances data privacy through robust masking functions.
Efficient Cloning: Simplifies data management with quick database creation and distribution.
User-Friendly Interface: Facilitates ease of data handling and management.

What benefits and ROI should be considered?

Storage Efficiency: Reduces storage needs and streamlines data accessibility.
Rapid Deployment: Accelerates compliant data integration and management.
Business Continuity: Supports swift recovery from data disruptions, ensuring operational stability.
Data Security: Prioritizes privacy with comprehensive masking and secure data operations.

In industries requiring quick data access and management, Perforce Delphix is instrumental in developing test data scenarios. Companies use its powerful data integration and compliance capabilities to manage extensive data environments efficiently, supporting modern database operations with reliable data virtualization, automated masking, and continuous updates to keep pace with dynamic project demands.

Perforce

Sample Customers

Helvetia, The IMT Group, Hapag-Lloyd, Royal Bank of Canada, Chunghwa Telecom

Alberta Blue Cross, Fastweb, SABMiller, California Insurance Guarantee Association (CIGA), Molina Healthcare, AT&T, Nike, Facebook, eBay, Comcast, IBM, HP, Intel, Avaya, BNP Paribas, P&B, Toyota, Walmart, Best Western, Directv, JPMorganChase, Verizon, Bank of the West, Fannie Mae

Buyer's Guide

BMC AMI DevX vs. Perforce Delphix

December 2025

Free Report: BMC AMI DevX vs. Perforce Delphix

Find out what your peers are saying about BMC AMI DevX vs. Perforce Delphix and other solutions. Updated: December 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

879,768 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our BMC AMI DevX vs. Perforce Delphix report.

See our list of best Test Data Management vendors and best Data Masking vendors.

We monitor all Test Data Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.