BlueJeans Meetings [EOL] vs TeamViewer comparison

Why PeerSpot?

Verizon and TeamViewer are both solutions in the Virtual Meetings category. Additionally, 100% of Verizon users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 93% of TeamViewer users who would recommend it.

BlueJeans Meetings [EOL]

Read 4 BlueJeans Meetings [EOL] reviews

100% willing to recommend

TeamViewer

Read 110 TeamViewer reviews

15,447 Views
3,553 Comparison Views

93% willing to recommend

BlueJeans Meetings [EOL]

TeamViewer

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Mar 19, 2026

TeamViewer Business and BlueJeans Meetings [EOL] compete in remote collaboration and communication. TeamViewer Business has an edge with its pricing and support experience, whereas BlueJeans Meetings [EOL] shines with its advanced feature set and superior video quality.

Features: TeamViewer Business offers remote access, secure connections, and session recording, excelling in troubleshooting and secure communications. BlueJeans Meetings [EOL] stands out with high-quality video conferencing, seamless integration options, and comprehensive collaboration tools that enhance meeting experiences.

Room for Improvement: TeamViewer Business could improve its feature set by enhancing video conferencing capabilities, offering more integration options, and refining its user interface for greater ease of use. BlueJeans Meetings [EOL] needs to address its product phase-out, offer better pricing structures, and enhance customer support options to alleviate concerns around long-term viability.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: TeamViewer Business is known for easy deployment with extensive support options, suitable for diverse business environments. Despite seamless setup, BlueJeans Meetings [EOL]'s end-of-life status raises concerns about long-term support, although its setup process and initial guidance are well-rated.

Pricing and ROI: TeamViewer Business offers competitive pricing with clear ROI benefits for businesses prioritizing remote management and support, maintaining attractiveness due to its ongoing development without phase-out concerns. BlueJeans Meetings [EOL] justifies its higher cost with advanced features but faces compromised investment returns due to its discontinuation.

To learn more, read our detailed Virtual Meetings Report (Updated: September 2026).

Buyer's Guide

Virtual Meetings

September 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 913,924 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

BlueJeans Meetings [EOL]

Average Rating

8.8

Reviews Sentiment

7.9

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

TeamViewer

Average Rating

8.6

Reviews Sentiment

6.8

Number of Reviews

110

Ranking in other categories

Virtual Meetings (2nd), Remote Access (1st), Remote Monitoring and Management (RMM) (3rd)

Featured Reviews

Saurabh Srivastav

Solutions Architect-Hybrid Cloud and Automation at Red Hat

Accommodates large meetings with up to 500 participants, and I find it pretty intuitive and user-friendly

As per company policy, most internal meetings happen through Google Meet, but for large-scale meetings with more than 500 participants, we use BlueJeans Meetings. It's more like a broadcast meeting platform, which Google Meet doesn't allow The main advantage is the ability to host large meetings…

Read full review

Shubham-Agarwal

Manager - Projects at Cognizant

Remote access has cut critical issue resolution time and supports faster production troubleshooting

Perhaps on the UI side of TeamViewer because we are connecting to different remote desktop connections or remote server connections. Whenever we are working on one of the production issues and we open multiple connections, it is very hectic or confusing to jump from one server to another server. Perhaps on the UI side, if they can improve something related to the view sessions or which session is connected to which remote server, that would be helpful. Perhaps something related to the authentication because it should have a proper authentication mechanism. Every developer should not access TeamViewer or the remote desktop by using TeamViewer. We always have a proper authentication or multifactor authentication mechanism in place, so only those on on-call support or P1 support at that time can access the remote server, but not anyone else. I chose nine out of 10 because sometimes we face the session timeout issue. Suppose during the production support, we connect to one of the remote servers, and if it is idle for approximately 10 or 15 minutes, the session timeout happens. We have to follow the same authentication mechanism to connect to the remote server again. During the session timeout, it delays our process or the troubleshooting steps, which is the reason I have given nine out of 10 instead of 10.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"BlueJeans Meetings is very easy to set up; it is integrated with Outlook and you just have to select your participants for it to automatically populate the main body of your email."

"The main advantage is the ability to host large meetings with up to 500 participants. The sound quality is also better on BlueJeans. I find it pretty intuitive and user-friendly."

"It is really easy and there are no complicated graphics or icons. It is simple and has an intuitive design. It's user-friendly over anything else I have used."

"The quality of both audio and video is good."

"BlueJeans is a very good tool, and I have never experienced quality issues with the voice or video."

"It is available in all flavors. You can use it in the browser, and you can use it on an Android phone for which a BlueJeans app is available. I use an Android phone, so I only know about Android. So, you can join a meeting from the application installed on your phone or from the mobile browser, or you can use it from a laptop or a PC."

"This solution is straightforward to use."

"It's pretty easy to use. Just key in an ID and password and connect. For meetings, just enter the meeting ID and connect."

"This solution has been really useful when doing product installations and needing assistance."

"Quite literally, without TeamViewer's capabilities, we wouldn't be able to run our business."

"The technical support of TeamViewer is excellent; in case we raise an issue, then support is great."

"The most valuable features of I use TeamViewer are the ease of access and frequent updates."

"It's feature-rich and easy to use."

"I find the mouse control and the ability to click for them very effective. I can move the mouse and click on buttons as if sitting at their computer. These are the basic features I use most often in the solution. There are tricker features that I don't use much because I don't need them frequently. Overall, it's a great tool for helping others with their computer issues without traveling to their location or another building."

More TeamViewer pros

Cons

"Its cost is very high. If you sell it in India, which is a price-conscious market, the prices should be as per the market competition. You cannot charge the rates that are applicable in the US. They should tailor it to the local market. It should be in line with what the competition is offering."

"I haven't had any big challenges. The annotation feature should be improved. So if I need to mark something or point something out, it's there, but it's not that user friendly. Other than that it's fine. In terms of collaboration, I think there could be some improvement."

"Screen sharing is available but there is no feature for remote access, to take control of another machine."

"BlueJeans doesn't allow as much customization of your background in a video call, so that could be improved."

"It becomes complicated to switch from one monitor to another for different windows."

"I would like it to have the ability to stay connected for longer times."

"Quick User Switching has a very nasty tendency to render the screen output unstable."

"TeamViewer could improve by having support for other operating systems, such as Linux."

"Sometimes we'll have a device in the field, and I'll click on remote control and it says "Can't authenticate." I'll double click in a different part of the TeamViewer interface and it'll say "Can't authenticate." Then I'll do it a third time and it connects. It's possible that it's just bad luck. It's also very possible that it's some bug within TeamViewer..."

"The security could improve in TeamViewer."

"TeamViewer is expensive, and you get a limited number of connections for your money."

"TeamViewer can improve by making the interface more user-friendly. It looks very basic, they can make it more modern and easy to use."

More TeamViewer cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"I once tried buying it for myself, but it was very costly. It is quite expensive as compared to other solutions. With BlueJeans, there are carrier charges if you call the toll-free number. The customer doesn't pay for the call, but the buyer or the subscriber of BlueJeans has to pay for it. That is where BlueJeans becomes very costly, and that is where Google, Microsoft Teams, and Zoom are very helpful because you don't have to pay these charges."

"We are using the free version of TeamViewer."

"It does what I need it to do but I think it's expensive. It wasn't easy for me to get approval from the company to get it... It's costing us about $700 a year, per license."

"The price was cheaper than what we were previously paying. At the time that we went with TeamViewer, we were using ShareConnect. The TeamViewer package was about half the cost and able to have a bigger number of users."

"I rate pricing a ten on a scale from one to ten, where one is low and ten is high. There are no additional costs attached to the licensing of the solution."

"TeamViewer is very pricey. You have to sign up for a yearly subscription."

"TeamViewer pricing is reasonable... The simultaneous controller licensing model of TeamViewer - compared to LogMeIn’s controlled Host licensing model - seems to benefit us so far. We’re currently saving about 30 percent on licensing cost... The savings from licensing have been eaten up by the soft costs involved in dealing with and working around TeamViewer’s deficiencies in allowing granular control by multiple controllers, and the issues with the various settings that are missing on the macOS Host."

"We are using the free version of TeamViewer."

"TeamViewer's price is cheaper than some other similar solutions. We have licenses for our users."

More TeamViewer pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Virtual Meetings solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

913,924 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

No data available

Manufacturing Company

11%

Construction Company

10%

Outsourcing Company

Computer Software Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

No data available

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	44
Midsize Enterprise	37
Large Enterprise	39

Questions from the Community

Ask a question

Earn 20 points

Should I choose Teamviewer Tensor over the regular Teamviewer?

The number one advantage of TeamViewer for me is its ease of use, specifically as it relates to the client side. By far, one of its best features is the remote access it provides. I can control som...

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for TeamViewer?

The pricing, setup cost, and licensing for TeamViewer Business are relatively very competitive and cost-effective.

See all answers

What needs improvement with TeamViewer?

I believe latency can be optimized, and security control sometimes goes over the top and feels excessive. Virus scanning while file sharing is not provided, which is a concern as we frequently depl...

See all answers

Comparisons

Cisco TelePresence vs BlueJeans Meetings [EOL]

Compared 23% of the time

LifeSize vs BlueJeans Meetings [EOL]

Compared 14% of the time

Fuze vs BlueJeans Meetings [EOL]

Compared 12% of the time

GoToMeeting vs BlueJeans Meetings [EOL]

Compared 12% of the time

More BlueJeans Meetings [EOL] Competitors

BeyondTrust Remote Support vs TeamViewer

Compared 6% of the time

Microsoft Remote Desktop Services vs TeamViewer

Compared 4% of the time

LogMeIn Rescue vs TeamViewer

Compared 3% of the time

ScreenConnect vs TeamViewer

Compared 3% of the time

LogMeIn Pro vs TeamViewer

Compared 3% of the time

More TeamViewer Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Virtual Meetings

September 2026

Download BlueJeans Meetings [EOL] product report

Buyer's Guide

TeamViewer

August 2026

Download TeamViewer product report

Also Known As

BlueJeans Network

TeamViewer Tensor

Overview

BlueJeans Meetings [EOL] offered a versatile conferencing experience for businesses, featuring seamless integration and advanced capabilities for professional communication.

BlueJeans Meetings [EOL] was known for enhancing virtual collaboration. It enabled companies to conduct efficient meetings with robust support for audio, video, and content sharing. Benefiting from extensive compatibility across platforms, it was adaptable to different technological setups within enterprises.

What are the key features of BlueJeans Meetings [EOL]?

Cross-Platform Compatibility: Accessible on various devices ensuring flexibility.
HD Video and Audio: Provides crisp and clear conferencing quality.
Content Sharing: Facilitates easy sharing of documents and presentations.
Integration: Seamlessly connects with tools like Microsoft Teams and Slack.

What should users consider in reviews for ROI?

Enhanced Productivity: Simplifies meeting setups and participation.
Cost-Efficiency: Streamlined communication reducing travel expenses.
Reliable Security: Provides secure communication channels.
Customer Support: Access to responsive and helpful technical assistance.

In industries such as healthcare and education, BlueJeans Meetings [EOL] was instrumental in supporting remote consultations and virtual classrooms. It promoted effective engagement between professionals and clients, highlighting its adaptability to diverse professional requirements.

Verizon

TeamViewer offers a license type mainly for small teams, focusing on remote connectivity solutions. It includes TeamViewer Remote and TeamViewer Tensor, catering to both small businesses and large enterprises with specialized needs.

TeamViewer Business isn't standalone but a primary license for small teams. Its remote connectivity suite includes TeamViewer Remote and TeamViewer Tensor, the latter offering enhanced features for enterprises. It enables secure, high-speed remote access, collaboration, and troubleshooting. Major users suggest aligning product descriptions and improvement in interfaces and user experiences.

What are the key features of TeamViewer?

High-speed and secure remote access: Fast connections with strong security measures.
Robust collaboration tools: Enhances team productivity remotely.
Screen sharing: Easy display sharing for presentations and meetings.
Session recording: Documentation and review of remote sessions.
Easy integration: Seamless compatibility with other platforms and tools.

What benefits do users highlight?

Improved workflow: Streamlines processes and reduces downtime.
Efficient troubleshooting: Quick resolutions to technical issues.
Compliance assurance: Meets necessary security standards and regulations.
Time and resource savings: Minimizes the need for physical presence and travel.

Organizations use TeamViewer for remote desktop connectivity to manage and solve IT issues. It allows technical support, collaboration, and training with real-time assistance and secure access. By enabling remote support for employees and customers, it ensures efficient issue resolution across industries, such as healthcare, finance, and education.

TeamViewer

Sample Customers

Criteo, Seattle Children's Hospital, The Wharton School, Wikia, Telit, Epilepsy, NENW, IPENZ, Medanta, Mphasis, Royal Academy of Dance, Wharton, Red Hat, HKS Architects, Forum of the Future, Commonfund

Porsche Informatik, Philips, DHL, Intel, Motorola, Microsoft, IBM, Siemens, Fujitsu, American Red Cross

Find out what your peers are saying about Zoom Video Communications, TeamViewer, Microsoft and others in Virtual Meetings. Updated: September 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

913,924 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our list of best Virtual Meetings vendors.

We monitor all Virtual Meetings reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.