Bizagi vs OpenText AppWorks comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Bizagi Logo
6,336 views|5,562 comparisons
92% willing to recommend
OpenText Logo
361 views|202 comparisons
100% willing to recommend
Comparison Buyer's Guide
Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between Bizagi and OpenText AppWorks based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out in this report how the two Business Process Management (BPM) solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI.
To learn more, read our detailed Bizagi vs. OpenText AppWorks Report (Updated: April 2024).
770,428 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Featured Review
Quotes From Members
We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use.
Here are some excerpts of what they said:
Pros
"BPMN 2.0 compliance, while you model the processes, the system can detect your notation errors.""Agility, reverse engineering, customized portal web, help desk and user guides, easy deployment, simple to modify.""The main feature of Bizagi is the speed to which we can automate processes and how we can modify them without a strong impact on the end users.""The API is pretty straightforward.""In Bizagi, all of the features are valuable.""The product allowed users to connect with flow chart elements with ease.""This solution is easy to use and it is a good tool for process modeling.""The solution offers a free version of their product."

More Bizagi Pros →

"In terms of the scalability and the handling of complexity, the customers are satisfied, and we also have confidence in the solution to achieve whatever implementations are required.""AppWorks is a very quick development platform with low-coding capability and strong integration with third-party systems.""We've automated several processes, including purchase requisition to purchase orders, RFQ processes, vendor onboarding, project budgeting, and business case creation. The recent versions of OpenText AppWorks, especially those incorporating low-code functionalities, have had a significant positive impact. In some cases, we've observed a remarkable reduction in development time, ranging from 50 to 75 percent. The MTP model and life cycle have facilitated rapid development cycles.""OpenText AppWorks has standard features such as system-to-system and human-to-human integrations, but what I find most valuable in the solution is its monitoring feature that tells you more about your processes, how to restart and how to stop each process, etc.""One of the most useful features is the code is customizable, we can make it our own.""We really appreciate the process automation and how can you create human tasks as one of your processes.""From a business perspective, the most valuable aspect lies in the optimization of processes.""The monitoring aspect is highly valuable, as it offers an exceptional capability to track every minute of action performed by a business user in the global context."

More OpenText AppWorks Pros →

Cons
"In business process mapping, you have pools and dark pools. I don't see that Bizagi differentiates between a regular pool and a dark pool.""I don't know if it's a problem with my operating system or a Bizagi problem, but many times I see that when I try to connect different activities, they show up as not connected.""It works slowly on the cloud, sometimes.""I'm not really satisfied with the reporting aspect.""The product must make automation easier.""They should improve the migration process between major versions, from version 9 to 10, we had to redo our implementation.""Its performance needs to be improved. The main thing is that it is limited, especially in terms of the response times. When the processes become a bit large, it is very awkward to work with the Bizagi modeler. When you have already modeled but start to rearrange, it is quite a bit of an effort to change the stuff. When you rearrange lanes or have new structures, it goes rather squiggly up and down and so on, which could be improved. The visual outputs of the DIREPs of the process models are pixelated and have a bad image quality. It is a PNG or JPEG, and you cannot export it as a PDF. When you have rather large processes, you should be able to arrange them hierarchically. Currently, it is not supported. If you use sub-processes and inflate a process, suddenly the arrangement is totally different, and although you know the process, you have to look where is it now. You need a good understanding of the levels of your processes before you start in Bizagi. It can have automatic support for optimal presentation. In BPM, you should have it from the top left to the bottom right. However, in most cases, people don't know how they should arrange it. Therefore, it would be nice to have a suggestion system for different arrangements to be able to better present the process.""Its price can be improved. The price is high for the application as well as for maintaining and developing applications. When you develop, for example, a BPM, you need to pay a lot for Bizagi."

More Bizagi Cons →

"The solution needs to continue to enhance the low-coding feature within the product itself.""A room for improvement in OpenText AppWorks is its user interface. It should have mobile compatibility because right now, you still have to make two applications with a user interface for Android and a user interface for iOS, so if OpenText AppWorks can provide one UI that can be used across all devices, that would make the solution better. An additional feature I'd like to see in the next release of OpenText AppWorks is a better UI in terms of the look and feel. Another feature I'd like to see in the next version of the solution is mobile compatibility because, at the moment, you have to make your application mobile-ready or compatible with mobile devices because there's no provision for it in OpenText AppWorks.""There is room for improvement in the pricing structure.""AppWorks could be improved by including BPM simulation.""There could be some improvements with the low code design part. It could be more customizable and more user friendly.""OpenText AppWork's low-code capabilities can be enhanced by integrating them with AI offerings like Aviator.""The crucial missing element is the archival function.""The integration could improve."

More OpenText AppWorks Cons →

Pricing and Cost Advice
  • "Pricing is good value for money."
  • "For the prices, we didn't try a negotiations about licensing or pricing, but if i can say a word about this, I find Bizagi prices to be well thought out."
  • "The modeler itself is free. For the whole BPM suite, there are other options that may be better."
  • "It is on par with other BPM tools, but not as expensive as Pega nor Appian."
  • "If they can freeze the pricing in a contract, I advise them to do so."
  • "I think that its price is reasonable."
  • "This solution would be expensive for a company that has a lot of users."
  • "The Bizagi modeler can be downloaded free of charge."
  • More Bizagi Pricing and Cost Advice →

  • "There is a user-based perpetual license."
  • "AppWorks is pretty expensive."
  • "Pricing for OpenText AppWorks, specifically in the Indian market, is reasonable, but I'm not aware if it's still reasonable outside of India. The licensing cost is based on the number of licenses and the number of users. OpenText AppWorks has different licensing options."
  • "The price is on the higher side."
  • "The licensing cost varies based on several factors, such as the size of the customer and the domain URL."
  • More OpenText AppWorks Pricing and Cost Advice →

    report
    Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Business Process Management (BPM) solutions are best for your needs.
    770,428 professionals have used our research since 2012.
    Questions from the Community
    Top Answer:I have been using Bizagi with a major project for a state government agency for about four years now. It is pretty straightforward to load in files that are BPMN 2.0 compliant. The option to load… more »
    Top Answer:The natural notation is the best feature of Bizagi because it makes it compatible with other products.
    Top Answer:We've automated several processes, including purchase requisition to purchase orders, RFQ processes, vendor onboarding, project budgeting, and business case creation. The recent versions of OpenText… more »
    Top Answer:The licensing cost varies based on several factors, such as the size of the customer and the domain URL. There isn't a fixed cost, and it's determined after sharing relevant details with the OpenText… more »
    Top Answer:OpenText AppWork's low-code capabilities can be enhanced by integrating them with AI offerings like Aviator.
    Ranking
    Views
    6,336
    Comparisons
    5,562
    Reviews
    13
    Average Words per Review
    785
    Rating
    8.2
    Views
    361
    Comparisons
    202
    Reviews
    6
    Average Words per Review
    447
    Rating
    7.8
    Comparisons
    Camunda logo
    Compared 27% of the time.
    Visio logo
    Compared 14% of the time.
    Bonita logo
    Compared 6% of the time.
    Microsoft Power Apps logo
    Compared 6% of the time.
    ARIS BPA logo
    Compared 6% of the time.
    Learn More
    Overview

    Bizagi’s industry-leading low-code process automation platform connects people, applications, robots, and information. As the most business-friendly and flexible solution on the market, Bizagi enables true collaboration between business and IT, delivering faster adoption and success. Fuelled by a community of 1 million users, Bizagi powers over 1,000 organizations worldwide including Adidas, BAE Systems, and Old Mutual. For more information visit www.bizagi.com

    OpenText Appworks. AppWorks is OpenText's Enterprise Application Development and Management platform. It allows you to quickly and easily build purpose-specific apps for the enterprise using the web technologies such as HTML5, CSS3 and JavaScript. These apps can connect to the OpenText EIM Suite using RESTful API.

    Sample Customers
    adidas, Audi, BNP Paribas, Deutsche Post DHL & many more - 500+ customer globally.
    Red Deer County, DHFL Pramerica Life Insurance, Bangkok Airways, PBS, CIZ (Netherlands Ministry of Health), The Dutch Ministry of Defence, Mercer
    Top Industries
    REVIEWERS
    Government14%
    Retailer8%
    Financial Services Firm8%
    Recruiting/Hr Firm8%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Financial Services Firm13%
    Computer Software Company11%
    Educational Organization8%
    Comms Service Provider8%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Computer Software Company13%
    Government12%
    Insurance Company11%
    Financial Services Firm9%
    Company Size
    REVIEWERS
    Small Business50%
    Midsize Enterprise16%
    Large Enterprise34%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business23%
    Midsize Enterprise16%
    Large Enterprise61%
    REVIEWERS
    Small Business75%
    Large Enterprise25%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business22%
    Midsize Enterprise15%
    Large Enterprise63%
    Buyer's Guide
    Bizagi vs. OpenText AppWorks
    April 2024
    Find out what your peers are saying about Bizagi vs. OpenText AppWorks and other solutions. Updated: April 2024.
    770,428 professionals have used our research since 2012.

    Bizagi is ranked 7th in Business Process Management (BPM) with 78 reviews while OpenText AppWorks is ranked 16th in Business Process Management (BPM) with 8 reviews. Bizagi is rated 8.4, while OpenText AppWorks is rated 7.8. The top reviewer of Bizagi writes "A flexible, customizable solution that reduced time to market, but the UI and customer support could be better". On the other hand, the top reviewer of OpenText AppWorks writes "Automates processes like purchase requisition to purchase orders, RFQ processes, vendor onboarding, project budgeting, and business case creation". Bizagi is most compared with Camunda, Visio, Bonita, Microsoft Power Apps and ARIS BPA, whereas OpenText AppWorks is most compared with Microsoft Power Apps, Appian, ServiceNow Now Platform, OutSystems and Mendix. See our Bizagi vs. OpenText AppWorks report.

    See our list of best Business Process Management (BPM) vendors.

    We monitor all Business Process Management (BPM) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.