Camunda vs OpenText AppWorks comparison

Camunda and OpenText are both solutions in the Business Process Management (BPM) category. Camunda is ranked #1 with an average rating of 8.3, while OpenText is ranked #20 with an average rating of 7.7. Camunda holds a 20.9% mindshare in BPM, compared to OpenText’s 0.5% mindshare. Additionally, 89% of Camunda users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of OpenText users who would recommend it.

Camunda

Read 77 Camunda reviews

21,240 Views
14,235 Comparison Views

89% willing to recommend

OpenText AppWorks

Read 10 OpenText AppWorks reviews

343 Views
217 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Camunda

OpenText AppWorks

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Mar 9, 2025

Camunda and OpenText AppWorks are competitive business process management solutions. Camunda appears to have the upper hand with its flexibility and cost-effectiveness through its open-source approach, reducing development times while maintaining robust features.

Features: Camunda is known for its open-source flexibility, robust BPMN and DMN modeling capabilities, and active community support. It offers enterprise features like process instance history and heatmap analysis. OpenText AppWorks excels in integration and process optimization, offering strong system interaction capabilities and comprehensive monitoring.

Room for Improvement: Camunda could enhance its user interface and strengthen documentation and support resources for non-technical users, as well as improve licensing models for better integration. OpenText AppWorks could benefit from improved mobile compatibility, performance enhancements, and a more competitive pricing structure.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Camunda provides flexible deployment options including on-premises and hybrid cloud, with commendable community and documentation support, though its customer service could be enhanced. OpenText AppWorks also offers diverse deployment modes, supported by a dedicated technical team.

Pricing and ROI: Camunda's open-source model is cost-effective, with additional enterprise options for advanced features. It is generally viewed as a more affordable solution. OpenText AppWorks offers various pricing tiers based on user and license requirements, requiring negotiation for favorable terms. Both products report positive ROI with tangible cost savings and efficiency improvements.

To learn more, read our detailed Camunda vs. OpenText AppWorks Report (Updated: April 2025).

Buyer's Guide

Camunda vs. OpenText AppWorks

April 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 849,686 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Camunda

Ranking in Business Process Management (BPM)

1st

Average Rating

8.2

Reviews Sentiment

7.0

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Business Process Design (1st), Process Automation (1st)

OpenText AppWorks

Ranking in Business Process Management (BPM)

20th

Average Rating

7.8

Reviews Sentiment

6.7

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of May 2025, in the Business Process Management (BPM) category, the mindshare of Camunda is 20.9%, down from 21.1% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of OpenText AppWorks is 0.5%, up from 0.3% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Business Process Management (BPM)

Featured Reviews

FABIO NAGAO

Chief Technology Officer at Looplex SA

Reduces costs with hardware abstraction and simplifies scaling

There is an issue where, in some situations, I need to scale up by observing both CPU and memory usage of containers, yet under the current options available at Amazon, this is not possible. I have to choose between monitoring CPU or memory to scale my solution. Not every software is built for deployment as a container service, although the current architecture trend is changing this.

Read full review

Senthil Natarajan

Chief Operating Officer at a outsourcing company with 51-200 employees

The solution enables automation of supply chain and invoice processing with comprehensive integration and workflow capabilities

The main valuable features of OpenText AppWorks ( /products/opentext-appworks-reviews ) are the BPM ( /products/informatica-intelligent-data-management-cloud-idmc-reviews ) modules. There is the standard BPM ( /products/informatica-intelligent-data-management-cloud-idmc-reviews ) modeler and a case modeler. These are two strong features from the workflow layer. Additionally, the integration capability of the solution is beneficial. With these features, we are able to use OpenText AppWorks for automating supply-chain-related problems, vendor process automations, and invoice automations. We have built almost twenty-plus types of solutions and implemented around three hundred fifty-plus implementations. The solution also allows us to integrate it with our ERP ( /categories/erp ) system.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"We like the idea of working with Cawemo because it enables us to keep on working, remotely or not. It allows us to collaborate between areas. It's easy to model and easy to use"

"The Camunda BPMN Platform is very flexible and gives several options to deploy and scale it."

"I can use any other tools to create services and the UI, and then use them together with the Camunda BPMN engine."

"I love that Camunda is a very developer-friendly platform, and my customers have evaluated the pricing as reasonable."

"The flexibility is great."

"It is very user-friendly compared to IBM BPM. It's much simpler – it's more streamlined. That means even non-technical departments can use it."

"It allows me to present or to demonstrate the business process flow, visually, without having to resort to PowerPoint, Visio, or other products."

"We are documenting all of the processors and VPN. Then we are sharing it with our business users."

More Camunda pros

"From a business perspective, the most valuable aspect lies in the optimization of processes."

"The good part of OpenText AppWorks is that all of its components are together in one platform, including integration capability, UI capability, and workflow capability."

"OpenText AppWorks has standard features such as system-to-system and human-to-human integrations, but what I find most valuable in the solution is its monitoring feature that tells you more about your processes, how to restart and how to stop each process, etc."

"The monitoring aspect is highly valuable, as it offers an exceptional capability to track every minute of action performed by a business user in the global context."

"We've automated several processes, including purchase requisition to purchase orders, RFQ processes, vendor onboarding, project budgeting, and business case creation. The recent versions of OpenText AppWorks, especially those incorporating low-code functionalities, have had a significant positive impact. In some cases, we've observed a remarkable reduction in development time, ranging from 50 to 75 percent. The MTP model and life cycle have facilitated rapid development cycles."

"AppWorks is a very quick development platform with low-coding capability and strong integration with third-party systems."

"We really appreciate the process automation and how can you create human tasks as one of your processes."

"Its customer support is reliable and easy to approach."

More OpenText AppWorks pros

Cons

"I would also like a very easy to use form builder."

"Without a proper frontend, the business cannot effectively use the platform."

"Would be helpful if there were additional out-of-the-box activities."

"The support definitely can be improved. Apart from that, the language should be extendable to other platforms. If I want to write, I'll run a different platform, like Python code on top of it, or COBOL code on top of it, and it should support those languages."

"The initial set up could be simplified, it's complex."

"It has a Postgres database at the backend, and it is very difficult to scale if you increase the number of processes running. We did hit some barriers. We were able to overcome them, but it was a problem. Camunda has another product called Camunda Cloud, which supposedly doesn't have the same scalability problems, but we are not using Camunda Cloud because the set of features is smaller than Camunda On-Premises. So, its scalability can be improved. Because it has a single database, it is more difficult to scale if you have a huge success."

"The business model could be easier to understand."

"Initial setup can be quite complex."

More Camunda cons

"From an enterprise point, their pricing is a little bit crazy because they don't have a SaaS model."

"The crucial missing element is the archival function."

"A room for improvement in OpenText AppWorks is its user interface. It should have mobile compatibility because right now, you still have to make two applications with a user interface for Android and a user interface for iOS, so if OpenText AppWorks can provide one UI that can be used across all devices, that would make the solution better. An additional feature I'd like to see in the next release of OpenText AppWorks is a better UI in terms of the look and feel. Another feature I'd like to see in the next version of the solution is mobile compatibility because, at the moment, you have to make your application mobile-ready or compatible with mobile devices because there's no provision for it in OpenText AppWorks."

"The solution needs to continue to enhance the low-coding feature within the product itself."

"AppWorks could be improved by including BPM simulation."

"There could be some improvements with the low code design part. It could be more customizable and more user friendly."

"The integration could improve."

"OpenText AppWork's low-code capabilities can be enhanced by integrating them with AI offerings like Aviator."

More OpenText AppWorks cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"We are using the community version. There is no licensing cost."

"The price of the solution is reasonable."

"The cost of this solution is better than some competing products."

"There is an open-source version available, that in its core features (workflow and decision engine, modeler) is exactly the same as in the enterprise version."

"We use Camunda's community edition, which is free."

"We pay for the license of this solution annually."

"Its price is decent. Everything is included in the license. The Community version is also good to start with. We are using the Community version."

"Camunda is much cheaper."

More Camunda pricing and cost advice

"AppWorks is pretty expensive."

"The licensing cost varies based on several factors, such as the size of the customer and the domain URL."

"The price is on the higher side."

"There is a user-based perpetual license."

"Pricing for OpenText AppWorks, specifically in the Indian market, is reasonable, but I'm not aware if it's still reasonable outside of India. The licensing cost is based on the number of licenses and the number of users. OpenText AppWorks has different licensing options."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Business Process Management (BPM) solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

849,686 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

27%

Computer Software Company

14%

Government

Manufacturing Company

Financial Services Firm

12%

Computer Software Company

10%

Insurance Company

10%

Retailer

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

Questions from the Community

How does Bonita compare with Camunda Platform?

One of the things we like best about Bonita is that you can create without coding - it is a low-code platform. With Bonita, you can build the entire mechanism using the GUI, it’s that simple. You c...

See all answers

Which do you prefer - Appian or Camunda Platform?

Appian is fast when building simple to medium solutions. This solution offers simple drag-and-drop functionality with easy plug-and-play options. The initial setup was seamless and very easy to imp...

See all answers

Which would you choose - Camunda Platform or Apache Airflow?

Camunda Platform allows for visual demonstration and presentation of business process flows. The flexible Java-based option was a big win for us and allows for the integration of microservices very...

See all answers

What do you like most about OpenText AppWorks?

We've automated several processes, including purchase requisition to purchase orders, RFQ processes, vendor onboarding, project budgeting, and business case creation. The recent versions of OpenTex...

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for OpenText AppWorks?

From an enterprise point, their pricing is a little bit crazy because they don't have a SaaS model. They have to go with a perpetual model, which makes it look crazy initially. But over a period, i...

See all answers

What needs improvement with OpenText AppWorks?

They can improve the UI capability. Recently, they launched a low-code platform, called entity modeling, which they can enhance further. It would be beneficial if OpenText ( /products/data-express-...

See all answers

Comparisons

Apache Airflow vs Camunda

Compared 11% of the time

Flowable vs Camunda

Compared 10% of the time

Bizagi vs Camunda

Compared 8% of the time

Temporal vs Camunda

Compared 8% of the time

IBM BPM vs Camunda

Compared 7% of the time

More Camunda Competitors

Appian vs OpenText AppWorks

Compared 18% of the time

ServiceNow Now Platform vs OpenText AppWorks

Compared 14% of the time

OutSystems vs OpenText AppWorks

Compared 12% of the time

Pega Platform vs OpenText AppWorks

Compared 11% of the time

Mendix vs OpenText AppWorks

Compared 11% of the time

More OpenText AppWorks Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Camunda

April 2025

Download Camunda product report

Buyer's Guide

OpenText AppWorks

April 2025

Download OpenText AppWorks product report

Also Known As

Camunda BPM

No data available

Overview

Camunda enables organizations to orchestrate processes across people, systems, and devices to continuously overcome complexity and increase efficiency. A common visual language enables seamless collaboration between business and IT teams to design, automate, and improve end-to-end processes with the required speed, scale, and resilience to remain competitive. Hundreds of enterprises such as Atlassian, ING, and Vodafone orchestrate business-critical processes with Camunda to accelerate digital transformation. To learn more visit camunda.com.

Camunda

OpenText Appworks. AppWorks is OpenText's Enterprise Application Development and Management platform. It allows you to quickly and easily build purpose-specific apps for the enterprise using the web technologies such as HTML5, CSS3 and JavaScript. These apps can connect to the OpenText EIM Suite using RESTful API.

OpenText

Sample Customers

24 Hour Fitness, Accruent, AT&T Inc., Atlassian, CSS Insurance, Deutsche Telekom, Generali, Provinzial NordWest Insurance Services, Swisscom AG, U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, VHV Group, Zalando

Red Deer County, DHFL Pramerica Life Insurance, Bangkok Airways, PBS, CIZ (Netherlands Ministry of Health), The Dutch Ministry of Defence, Mercer

Buyer's Guide

Camunda vs. OpenText AppWorks

April 2025

Free Report: Camunda vs. OpenText AppWorks

Find out what your peers are saying about Camunda vs. OpenText AppWorks and other solutions. Updated: April 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

849,686 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Camunda vs. OpenText AppWorks report.

See our list of best Business Process Management (BPM) vendors.

We monitor all Business Process Management (BPM) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.