Bitdefender Sandbox Analyzer vs ThreatLocker Zero Trust Endpoint Protection Platform comparison

Bitdefender Sandbox Analyzer vs. ThreatLocker Zero Trust Endpoint Protection Platform

Download the complete report

Helped 879,422 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Bitdefender Sandbox Analyzer

Ranking in Advanced Threat Protection (ATP)

30th

Average Rating

9.0

Reviews Sentiment

7.4

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

ThreatLocker Zero Trust End...

Ranking in Advanced Threat Protection (ATP)

6th

Average Rating

9.2

Reviews Sentiment

7.4

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Network Access Control (NAC) (4th), Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP) (6th), Application Control (1st), ZTNA (4th), Ransomware Protection (1st)

Mindshare comparison

As of January 2026, in the Advanced Threat Protection (ATP) category, the mindshare of Bitdefender Sandbox Analyzer is 1.3%, up from 0.9% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of ThreatLocker Zero Trust Endpoint Protection Platform is 2.7%, up from 1.9% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Advanced Threat Protection (ATP) Market Share Distribution
Product	Market Share (%)
ThreatLocker Zero Trust Endpoint Protection Platform	2.7%
Bitdefender Sandbox Analyzer	1.3%
Other	96.0%

Advanced Threat Protection (ATP)

Featured Reviews

Basawaraj Vastrad

Technical Director at BD Software Distribution Pvt Ltd

Automated and manual threat analysis provides deep insights for potential threat remediation

The most valuable features of Bitdefender Sandbox Analyzer include manual and auto-submission. The sandbox analyzer provides a combination of technologies including machine learning-based technologies. Network analytics is performed, and the tool analyzes using threat feeds. Manual and automated submissions allow suspicious files or URLs to be analyzed thoroughly, providing deep insights for further investigation. This information is crucial for making informed decisions on remediating potential threats.

Read full review

Charles Loveland

Supervisor, Client Security at a consultancy with 11-50 employees

World-class support and highly effective for application control and elevation

Their product is solid. I have a hard time complaining much about it because when we do find little things, they are usually interface-related or related to things that would be nice to have. Their idea portal, unlike so many other vendors we deal with, shows movement. At least four to eight features of ThreatLocker exist because I made a request in the last five years, and it became a feature of the actual product. When it comes to improvements, we moved the product as customers, and we got to move the product by making suggestions. They seem to be very reactive to it, so there is not a whole lot that they actively need to change right now. It is one of those situations where when we run into something that would be nice to have, it happens. They make it work.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The solution is useful in the event of a gray file or grayware, as there are certain files users may download of which we know little about."

"Sandbox Analyzer is easy to use. It's simple to drill down into the data. In a lot of the competing products, an extremely informed end-user can do battle with the tools provided, but in today's market, end-users have less and less time to try and keep up. The CSAW alerts come out every day, and they're huge. Adobe did a master patch last Thursday and another one a few days later."

"Bitdefender has shown fantastic stability over the past eight years with no major incidents reported."

"I like the fact that it works pretty well. It can be a little aggressive at times, but I'd rather have it be a little bit aggressive than not catch what it's supposed to catch. We've been running that platform for about five years, and we've not really had any viruses or malware get through. It's also easy to set up, and it's easy to manage."

"It is easy to use, and there is a lot of automation. So, users don't need to worry about that."

"The application whitelisting feature allows us to block and manage approved applications effectively. It ensures that no one can install an application on our systems unless it is approved by me, which is very efficient."

"The interface is clean and well-organized, making it simple to navigate and find what we need."

"ThreatLocker stands out because they understand application whitelisting and elevation controls deeply, addressing real issues effectively."

"ThreatLocker Zero Trust Endpoint Protection Platform has helped us protect our environments and have more meaningful requests for access as well as meaningful logging for response."

"The application management on any workstation with the solution is valuable. I find it valuable that it indicates whether the software is part of our pre-approved list, adding a nice layer of protection. It works great because people cannot just install or download any app from the web."

"What sets ThreatLocker apart from competitors offering similar solutions is ringfencing. The ringfencing controls, along with the application elevation features, keep it out of the user's line of sight while still protecting them."

"Being able to protect and trust nothing by default, known as zero trust, is the most important feature to me."

"I would rate it a ten out of ten."

More ThreatLocker Zero Trust Endpoint Protection Platform pros

Cons

"One area that needs improvement in Bitdefender Sandbox Analyzer is the addition of an asset management feature."

"We propose the on-premises solution to most of our customers, for which we must provide a license, although no such request accompanies customers who want a cloud-based solution."

"We would like to see the time it takes for the sandbox to analyze a file reduced from its ten or fifteen minute duration to five."

"It does everything we need. We haven't been able to throw anything at it that it couldn't handle."

"It would be better if there were real-time alerts. The whole suite, unlike most anti-virus consoles that just ping you when there's an infection or something, for some inexplicable reason, Bitdefender doesn't do that. The most you could do is get an hourly email, or maybe if there's an outbreak that affects 30% of our machines, it sends me an email. There's no real-time alert to say, "Hey, so-and-so literally 30 seconds ago just had this happen on their machine." Real-time reporting would be a huge improvement. All in all, it's a pretty nice product, generally speaking. They do a pretty good job. They can pretty much go toe to toe with just about anybody. But it's that kind of real-time nature. I've not had occasion to use the EDR portion to actually try and do any kind of custom scripting to drill into things that are going on at the endpoints. But my understanding from reading comments of others is that it's not particularly flexible in that regard to be able to do things like that."

"It should be more secure. There should be more protection, especially for non-signature-based malware. It works fine for non-signature-based malware, but I expect it to become a bit more advanced to be able to cope with future or upcoming environments."

"The support could be quicker. There are times when there is a delay in getting a response. This is problematic when immediate attention is needed."

"Their product is solid. I have a hard time complaining much about it because when we do find little things, they are usually interface-related or related to things that would be nice to have."

"The reporting could be improved."

"There could be options for handling a bulk amount of machines simultaneously."

"We identified several areas that we would like to see improved."

"When I first came on board, it was trickier to learn."

"It's very annoying to uninstall. You have to go into the online control panel and disable tampering for a device before it'll let you uninstall it without complaining really loudly."

"It has not reduced helpdesk tickets. It has probably increased them by blocking applications and doing its job, resulting in people raising more tickets to know why they cannot use certain things."

More ThreatLocker Zero Trust Endpoint Protection Platform cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"You need a license to a certain extent. You need to pay for advanced features. For corporate accounts, it isn't is really a problem, but pricing is an important thing for many companies."

"I think it's probably less expensive than something like CrowdStrike. We got a really good deal because it was literally their year-end, and they were trying to close all the sales for the week. So we bought a three-year contract from them. It roughly ended up costing me somewhere around $17 for an endpoint per year. It was really quite a nice pricing. I've talked to other folks where they got CrowdStrike, and it's like $60 for an endpoint for a year. It does, and they can be pretty aggressive if you're dealing with them directly, and I have. So no complaints there."

"So far, it has been great. I have no complaints. Of course, everybody wishes it was cheaper."

"The price of ThreatLocker Allowlisting is reasonable in the market, but it is not fantastic."

"The pricing is pretty fair, considering other solutions. Licensing-wise, it did not take long."

"The pricing works fine for me. It's very reasonably priced."

"We have encountered a few challenges regarding pricing, contract renewals, and additions. As we explored adding features like Cyber Hero, it proved to be an increased expense for our clients. This was primarily a mistake on our part due to how we initially priced it to clients."

"Considering what this product does, ThreatLocker is very well-priced, if not too nicely priced for the customer."

"We have not had any real issues with the pricing. As they have added more features, due to the way our contracts are structured with our customers, we have had to hold off on adopting the new features because they do add costs."

"The pricing is reasonable and normal. I do not have any problems with the cost."

More ThreatLocker Zero Trust Endpoint Protection Platform pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Advanced Threat Protection (ATP) solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

879,422 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

No data available

Computer Software Company

25%

Retailer

Manufacturing Company

Financial Services Firm

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

No data available

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	32
Midsize Enterprise	4
Large Enterprise	3

Questions from the Community

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Bitdefender Sandbox Analyzer?

Cost is not an additional burden since Bitdefender Sandbox Analyzer is offered as a bundle with other Bitdefender solutions. It does not carry additional costs like other companies who charge extra.

What needs improvement with Bitdefender Sandbox Analyzer?

One area that needs improvement in Bitdefender Sandbox Analyzer is the addition of an asset management feature. Currently, it is not part of the solution and could be beneficial in future updates.

What is your primary use case for Bitdefender Sandbox Analyzer?

I use Bitdefender Sandbox Analyzer ( /products/bitdefender-sandbox-analyzer-reviews ) mostly whenever there is any suspicious event or incident occurring. Bitdefender automatically submits it to th...

What do you like most about ThreatLocker Allowlisting?

The interface is clean and well-organized, making it simple to navigate and find what we need.

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for ThreatLocker Allowlisting?

Pricing, setup costs, and licensing have been pretty accessible and manageable. It was not too expensive to get started, especially at a small scale for a smaller MSP. It is very accessible, easy t...

What needs improvement with ThreatLocker Allowlisting?

Going with the theme of ThreatLocker Zero Trust Endpoint Protection Platform being a one-stop shop where they have just about everything, and they have a really good product stack as is. However, t...

Microsoft Defender for Office 365 vs Bitdefender Sandbox Analyzer

Comparisons

Compared 44% of the time

Proofpoint Targeted Attack Protection vs Bitdefender Sandbox Analyzer

Compared 28% of the time

IRONSCALES vs Bitdefender Sandbox Analyzer

Compared 28% of the time

More Bitdefender Sandbox Analyzer Competitors

CrowdStrike Falcon vs ThreatLocker Zero Trust Endpoint Protection Platform

Compared 10% of the time

Airlock Digital Application Control vs ThreatLocker Zero Trust Endpoint Protection Platform

Compared 8% of the time

Microsoft Defender for Endpoint vs ThreatLocker Zero Trust Endpoint Protection Platform

Compared 6% of the time

ManageEngine Application Control Plus vs ThreatLocker Zero Trust Endpoint Protection Platform

Compared 5% of the time

Ivanti Application Control vs ThreatLocker Zero Trust Endpoint Protection Platform

Compared 4% of the time

More ThreatLocker Zero Trust Endpoint Protection Platform Competitors

Product Reports

Advanced Threat Protection (ATP)

Download Bitdefender Sandbox Analyzer product report

ThreatLocker Zero Trust Endpoint Protection Platform

Download ThreatLocker Zero Trust Endpoint Protection Platform product report

ThreatLocker Zero Trust Endpoint Protection Platform report

Also Known As

No data available

Protect, Allowlisting, Network Control, Ringfencing

Overview

Bitdefender Sandbox Analyzer is a security solution that enhances the organization posture against sophisticated or targeted attacks through advanced detection and reporting capabilities of elusive, persistent threats that try to penetrate your network.

Bitdefender

ThreatLocker Zero Trust Endpoint Protection Platform empowers organizations with application control, selective elevation, and ring-fencing to enhance security and prevent unauthorized access.

ThreatLocker provides comprehensive security management using application allowlisting to ensure only approved software operates across servers and workstations. The platform's centralized management simplifies security processes by consolidating multiple tools, and its robust capabilities align with zero-trust strategies by actively blocking unauthorized applications and ensuring compliance. Users note intuitive features such as mobile access, helpful training resources, and responsive support, which effectively reduce operational costs and help desk inquiries. The managed service providers prefer ThreatLocker to maintain network integrity by preventing malicious scripts and unauthorized access attempts. However, users identify room for growth in training and support flexibility, the interface, and certain technical challenges like network saturation from policy updates.

What are the most important features?

Application Control: Ensures only approved applications can be executed, minimizing security risks.
Selective Elevation: Provides granular control over application permissions without compromising security.
Ring-Fencing: Isolates applications to limit possible damage from compromised software.
Comprehensive Blocking: Blocks unauthorized applications, supporting zero-trust strategies.
Centralized Management: Offers a unified platform for managing security tools efficiently.

What benefits should users look for in reviews?

Intuitive Interface: Simplifies complex security processes, making them manageable for non-expert users.
Reduced Operational Costs: Minimizes resource expenditure through effective security management.
Enhanced Security: Provides robust protection against unauthorized access and malicious scripts.
Responsive Support: Offers quick and effective assistance to minimize downtime and issues.

Organizations utilize ThreatLocker for application allowlisting, ensuring only authorized software operates to prevent unauthorized access efficiently. Deployed across servers and workstations, its features support zero-trust principles and are favored by managed service providers for application management and network integrity.

ThreatLocker

Sample Customers

Archdiocese, Northstar, SeSa, W&W Informatik, Yamaha Motor Europe

Information Not Available

Bitdefender Sandbox Analyzer vs. ThreatLocker Zero Trust Endpoint Protection Platform