No more typing reviews! Try our Samantha, our new voice AI agent.

Bitdefender MDR vs Huntress Managed EDR comparison

Why PeerSpot?
 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive SummaryUpdated on Jun 3, 2026

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Categories and Ranking

Bitdefender MDR
Ranking in Managed Detection and Response (MDR)
16th
Average Rating
8.8
Reviews Sentiment
7.2
Number of Reviews
11
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
Huntress Managed EDR
Ranking in Managed Detection and Response (MDR)
3rd
Average Rating
9.2
Reviews Sentiment
7.4
Number of Reviews
78
Ranking in other categories
Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR) (6th)
 

Mindshare comparison

As of November 2026, in the Managed Detection and Response (MDR) category, the mindshare of Bitdefender MDR is 1.8%, down from 2.5% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Huntress Managed EDR is 4.1%, down from 9.0% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Managed Detection and Response (MDR) Mindshare Distribution
ProductMindshare (%)
Huntress Managed EDR4.1%
Bitdefender MDR1.8%
Other94.1%
Managed Detection and Response (MDR)
 

Featured Reviews

Jörg Köhler - PeerSpot reviewer
Owner at AvalisNT AG
Efficient email security and link scanning streamline network protection
One area for improvement is the user-friendliness of the UI. It is not intuitive to manage policies as I have to go through several pages to find necessary information. Additionally, the profile management for scanning and protection profiles is clumsy and could be more straightforward. There should be some simplification in changing profiles due to performance issues.
Adam Knubley - PeerSpot reviewer
Head Of IT at EA Gibson, Shipbrokers
Managed detection has improved visibility and response but still needs broader integrations
The best features Huntress Managed EDR offers do not really include any other features outside what other providers are doing; it was more about integrating with other tools that we already had with them. I find it easy to use Huntress Managed EDR; we don't operate within Huntress Managed EDR portal for EDR but have it work on our Defender data and through SIEM, which means we use a different interface and a different kind of portal to manage it. My impression of Huntress Managed EDR's ability to detect persistent footholds on our endpoints is adequate. I have the threat containment feature turned on, but we haven't seen any usage of it yet. I make use of Huntress Managed EDR's ability to automatically remediate low-severity threats; this automatic remediation affects my workload and security by purely blocking people trying to install applications, thereby stopping people from creating a bigger attack surface. The availability of Huntress Managed EDR for all major operating systems does not affect my organization's cybersecurity strategy.

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Pros

"It has a very good cloud console that's easy to use and install."
"We find it extremely effective. We probably have over 500 endpoints, and we have not had any reports of viruses since we have installed it. It is very reliable."
"A user cannot uninstall or disable the tool from their systems. It has ransomware blocking and zero-day threat protection. The tool also alerts us whenever a system or device has been compromised. It has a web control feature to manage website categories."
"The main thing I like about it is it's got all the features I need."
"The most valuable features include email security and web URL scanning, particularly the link scanning aspect."
"If you're looking at an enterprise with centralized control, you can actually push the policies to all your clients' endpoints easily across VPNs."
"Customer service and support are very good."
"Everything is pointing up for them."
"In comparison to other solutions I've used or evaluated, Huntress Managed EDR offers a friendly user experience, whereas other EDRs require learning from scratch and can either be complicated or not optimal for SMBs."
"After deploying Huntress Managed EDR, it took no time to start improving my organization's security."
"Huntress Managed EDR fits our needs in the SMB market perfectly, especially targeting the cultural sector within the Netherlands, as it provides a cost-effective SOC SIEM solution with a clear product line and transparent pricing that allows us to maintain decent margins while keeping costs low for our end customers."
"I think Huntress Managed EDR is an excellent solution for SMBs because it provides strong endpoint protection without the complexity found in many enterprise security products while being easy to deploy and manage."
"Huntress Managed EDR has positively impacted my organization because I can confidently tell clients that I am offering a best-in-class, state-of-the-art MDR solution incorporated within my offerings."
"The most valuable aspect of Huntress is its 24/7 SOC service."
"It is a ten out of ten in terms of ease of use."
"Huntress has improved our security significantly by 90 percent."
 

Cons

"We need more updates as there are always more threats coming."
"The throughput and the response time can always be better, but there's already a solution out there."
"The lack of integration with Microsoft Outlook is a significant drawback."
"Bitdefender MDR consumes too many resources during scanning which further affects developers' productivity."
"Bitdefender needs to probably position this product and create more awareness among people because a lot of companies use products like CrowdStrike, which is doing pretty well."
"They're doing a really good job. The throughput and the response time can always be better, but there's already a solution out there. It depends on how much and what tier you want to be a part of. The way they're designed is that if you pay for it, you can have a turnaround time in a very short amount of time. If you don't pay for it, your response time is going to be a little bit less. That can always be improved, no matter what tier you're on. It could be in terms of tech support, or it could also be things like getting the reports and getting the summary back from the labs. When something is detected, what did it all entail? There are a lot of those things. It's not all in one, but all of those are different branches."
"One area for improvement is the user-friendliness of the UI. It is not intuitive to manage policies as I have to go through several pages to find necessary information."
"One area for improvement is the user-friendliness of the UI."
"The solution's UI is an area with certain shortcomings that need improvement."
"It would be ideal if they could create some incentives to help more partners get clients to onboard it."
"One thing they could improve is evolving from an EDR to an MDR, like Blackpoint. This transition would enable automatic remediation of anything that looks dangerous, including within Microsoft 365."
"I would like the API to be a little better. They are getting there."
"Huntress Managed EDR can be improved by adding more integrations and general capabilities while looking at other competitors and effectively either copying them or creating a better version of what our competitors are offering."
"We have been working on it, but their Rio agent has been having some issues trying to repair itself."
"Other products are a little more flashy and might have a little more marketing prowess because they have such a huge amount of information and they have security maps and threat portals and all sorts of features that we don't necessarily find to help security, but they do help those products when you're showing them to clients."
"The integration with Autotask could be improved."
 

Pricing and Cost Advice

"As far as pricing is concerned, I would rate them not expensive, not cheap."
"It varies based on the number of licenses."
"I would rate the tool's pricing a four out of ten."
"I know it is based on the volume and size and also on different multi-year agreements. There are different discounts applied, but I can't really speak about the specifics."
"Bitdefender fit well for customers with about 50 to 200 users. The price point is great, and you get a lot of bang for your buck."
"I believe Huntress Managed EDR is fairly priced. The value I get from it in terms of peace of mind justifies the expense. You can justify it as a business expense."
"The pricing is competitive, in line with Huntress's offerings, and aligns well with our business model."
"Huntress is an easy sell to clients because it does all the heavy lifting. Sometimes, they will buck a little at the price because they want a free antivirus or EDR. We tell them that we use Huntress on all our machines. That is our standard process for all the machines we roll out. When we give that advice, people are pretty willing to say okay."
"The Huntress pricing is an excellent value for what the product provides."
"It is very fair. I started at $2.50 and now I am at $3.50. When I signed up, I thought it was too cheap. It now reflects the price. It is very fair. I do not think you can find anything better."
"Huntress has a favourable pricing structure, and I appreciate the cost-effectiveness compared to previous solutions."
"I rate the product's price a five or six on a scale of one to ten, where one is cheap, and ten is expensive since it is a fairly priced product."
"The pricing model for Huntress is similar to competitors and is charged per endpoint."
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Managed Detection and Response (MDR) solutions are best for your needs.
920,929 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Manufacturing Company
11%
Computer Software Company
10%
Outsourcing Company
9%
Retailer
7%
Computer Software Company
10%
Manufacturing Company
9%
Comms Service Provider
8%
Outsourcing Company
8%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
By reviewers
Company SizeCount
Small Business9
Large Enterprise2
By reviewers
Company SizeCount
Small Business74
Midsize Enterprise6
Large Enterprise5
 

Questions from the Community

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Bitdefender MDR?
The product is on the lower price range compared to competitors. However, there are additional licenses for every add-on, which increases the cost gradually. Despite this, it remains below average ...
What needs improvement with Bitdefender MDR?
One area for improvement is the user-friendliness of the UI. It is not intuitive to manage policies as I have to go through several pages to find necessary information. Additionally, the profile ma...
What is your primary use case for Bitdefender MDR?
The primary use case is the protection of an internal network for one of my customers. It includes covering anti-malware and email scans. The email security is also performed through Daemon.
What needs improvement with Huntress?
Improvements for Huntress Managed EDR could include better integration with ticket systems, as the biggest problem seems to be that every new feature comes with an additional cost. As for needed im...
What is your primary use case for Huntress?
Huntress Managed EDR is part of our security package for all our managed service customers. When using Huntress Managed EDR, it serves as our primary security detection tool, and it feeds directly ...
What advice do you have for others considering Huntress?
I rate Huntress Managed EDR a 10 out of 10. I chose 10 for Huntress Managed EDR because it is pretty much the vendor support and responsiveness that sets it apart, and it is essentially how we comp...
 

Also Known As

Bitdefender Managed Detection and Response
No data available
 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

Northstar, SeSa, Greenman-Pederson, TUI Benelux
Information Not Available
Find out what your peers are saying about Bitdefender MDR vs. Huntress Managed EDR and other solutions. Updated: September 2026.
920,929 professionals have used our research since 2012.