Bitdefender GravityZone Extended Detection and Response (XDR) vs CylanceOPTICS comparison

Bitdefender GravityZone Extended Detection and Response (XDR) vs. CylanceOPTICS

Download the complete report

Helped 885,311 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Net...

Mindshare comparison

As of March 2026, in the Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR) category, the mindshare of Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks is 3.4%, down from 4.0% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Bitdefender GravityZone Extended Detection and Response (XDR) is 0.7%, up from 0.3% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of CylanceOPTICS is 0.6%, up from 0.2% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR) Mindshare Distribution
Product	Mindshare (%)
Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks	3.4%
Bitdefender GravityZone Extended Detection and Response (XDR)	0.7%
CylanceOPTICS	0.6%
Other	95.3%

Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR)

Featured Reviews

ABHISHEK_SINGH

Senior Process Expert at A.P. Moller - Maersk

Gained full visibility and streamlined threat detection through behavior-based insights and AI integration

Initially, we got to have a lot of false positives when we onboarded, but nowadays it's quite smooth. We have fine-tuned our security policies and allowed different levels of policies to get rid of those false positives. Currently, we are getting a fairly good amount of incidents that are not false positives or benign, but actionable items. The process is streamlined. In the initial days, the operations used to get involved in a lot of benign and other activities, but now the process is streamlined. We are leveraging the auto-detection and remediation plans. The operations teams are now more involved in other business roles as well, not just looking into the logs and fetching out what's happening there. They have fixed a lot of things. Initially, they didn't have IAC code drift detection, cloud posture management, or security posture management, but they have those now. They purchased different vendors and did a merger with that. They have now Prisma Cloud that gets integrated and now they are working with Cortex Cloud. Everything that was negative has now been addressed, and the product altogether looks to be in a very better and mature shape now. Currently, it's more or less detecting the workloads with AI-based best practices. Since most organizations are consuming AI agents and other things, we are looking forward to seeing what other feature enhancements Palo Alto can support in that.

Read full review

reviewer2165952

Company Advisor

Automated protection has reduced our management time and keeps all client environments consistently secure

Reporting in Bitdefender GravityZone Extended Detection and Response (XDR) could be improved. It has some reporting in it, but it's a little cumbersome to work with, so the reporting that is there could be improved. The analytics dashboards of Bitdefender GravityZone Extended Detection and Response (XDR) are quite useful, and they are nice in that we can see an overview very quickly and drill down into specific issues or specific clients. The dashboards are quite good, though it would be nice if we had the same with automated reports. It would be much more useful for us to have that via email or having a report. The only downside that we find is that the product is a little bit slow.

Read full review

GauthamVakapalli

Account Manager at Teksalah

Provides reliable threat detection and response but requires better regional support

One improvement I suggest for CylanceOPTICS is more robust marketing efforts from their side. Many customers gravitate towards popular EDRs like CrowdStrike or Sophos, largely due to better marketing, despite BlackBerry Cylance being a superior product. The lack of marketing from distributors or vendors is a critical area where they are falling short. Apart from marketing, it would be beneficial for CylanceOPTICS to establish a dedicated team in GCC since I coordinate with the UK team to handle support. Whenever a ticket is raised by one of our customers, we have to wait for responses which can take a whole day due to the time zone differences, and a local team could expedite this process. In terms of scalability, CylanceOPTICS is indeed easy to scale, but one issue I face is related to visibility; while it is scalable, the security teams struggle with limited visibility as we need to gather data from multiple sources.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"It has absolutely improved the way our organization functions, we are more secure, it is giving us more peace of mind, and it has found malicious activity happening on our endpoints that probably would not have been detected if we didn't have it."

"Palo Alto is the best security solution in the market."

"Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks should be a stable solution."

"Threat identification and detection are the most valuable features of this solution."

"We have a complete overview of all our PCs and it's very easy to handle and to use the interface."

"Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks has helped lighten the load of our security analysts because it was the major tool that we were using and the one we utilized most."

"Has great threat detection capabilities."

"From a single pane of glass, you can easily manage all of your endpoints."

More Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks pros

"The threat detection rates are exceptionally good, better than most of the competition."

"The solution has best-in-breed technology and scores very highly on efficacy rates."

"The best thing about Bitdefender is that it has got top-notch features and it is not tied to specific countries like some other antivirus tools."

"We moved from Sophos antivirus to Bitdefender GravityZone Extended Detection and Response (XDR), and ever since then, we've been very happy with the product."

"Bitdefender GravityZone Ultra Plus is highly stable."

"I find Bitdefender GravityZone Ultra Plus to be a pretty good solution for the mid-level market, specifically for organizations with up to two hundred fifty users. I like that it is an averagely priced solution. It also has a straightforward installation that can be completed within three to five minutes. Its technical support is also good enough."

"We are using Bitdefender GravityZone Ultra Plus for the threat protection and security of our network."

"The quarantine computer functionality is very good for me."

More Bitdefender GravityZone Extended Detection and Response (XDR) pros

"Cylance seems to be able to meet our customers' requirements for the time being."

"You can use the solution to query certain things."

"Cylance is not a signature-based protection solution and instead works proactively using AI and ML models to patrol for malicious behavior."

"The most valuable part of this solution is that it is advanced technology, as Cylance is an engine that is not a signature-based antivirus protection solution but is based on AI and ML models and could really not be more proactive in the way it works."

"The most valuable feature is the ability to respond to zero-day and unknown threats."

"It automatically blocks the threats, helping us investigate if they harm the environment."

"One of the main use cases for CylanceOPTICS is endpoint detection and response, which even works without internet, unlike some other solutions."

"The solution is pretty stable; it's pretty rock solid."

More CylanceOPTICS pros

Cons

"Every 30 or 40 days, there's a new version and we need to go and make sure our customer's laptops are upgraded."

"There's room for improvement with Mac device installations, which can be challenging."

"There is also no recovery feature; if some endpoint is under attack there must be the possibility of recovering it or restoring it to a normal state."

"For Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks, if I had to point out improvements, I would say the UI is still somewhat difficult for beginners."

"Initially, we got to have a lot of false positives when we onboarded, but nowadays it's quite smooth."

"It would be better if they could educate the customers more. Some sort of seminars and roadshows will help educate the customers and show what the product can do. The price could be better. It would also help if they had a team for deployment and support."

"Cortex XDR could be improved with more GUI features."

"Currently, if you use Palo Alto endpoint protection as the only solution it's very complicated to remove pre-existing threats."

More Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks cons

"Detection and response is a disadvantage that could be improved."

"Some customers would like additional features that aren't available through the current GravityZone platform."

"The solution must improve its management features."

"Adding a feature like Data Loss Prevention would be beneficial."

"Reporting in Bitdefender GravityZone Extended Detection and Response (XDR) could be improved."

"I would like automatic issue fixing for users without needing to physically open the PC. I'd prefer updates and fixes from the cloud to avoid headaches and save time."

"The solution seems to be pretty amateur for an EDR solution, and it should be more in sync in terms of features, with solutions such as FireEye and SentinelOne."

"Some customers would like additional features that aren't available through the current GravityZone platform. Some feedback has been about the deletion of other software not going smoothly during the installation of Bitdefender, particularly the removal of previous software like Sophos."

More Bitdefender GravityZone Extended Detection and Response (XDR) cons

"The support is inadequate because their technical people are not supportive. Since the support is not based in India, there are numerous issues."

"The reporting is very weak and not very good at all."

"The tools are ineffective. It flags a lot of things. To give you an example, it detected Google Chrome and blocked the user's access to it. That it mistook for malicious, which turned out to be a false positive."

"Our customers would like to see more automation with respect to how threats are handled once they have been detected."

"CylanceOPTICS could benefit from more granular control in the timeline-building process. Ideally, users would be able to drill deeper into the analysis rather than have the machine dictate the direction."

"The product's technical support is slow."

"It takes more time to investigate or dig up and understand what's going on."

More CylanceOPTICS cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks is quite an expensive solution."

"Compared to CrowdStrike, Cortex XDR is an expensive solution."

"It has reasonable pricing for the use cases it provides to the company."

"The pricing seems fair, and I do like the licensing model. You use wherever they are, and it is elastic."

"The tool's price is moderate."

"Traps pays for itself within the first 16 months of a three-year subscription. This is attributed to OPEX savings, as security teams spent less time trying to identify and isolate malware for analysis as a result of a reduction in malware incidents, false positives, and breach avoidance."

"We pay about $50,000 USD per year for a bundle that includes Cortex XDR."

"The pricing is okay, although direct support can be expensive."

More Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks pricing and cost advice

"We have purchased licenses for the use of Bitdefender GravityZone Ultra Plus. The price of the solution is reasonable but could be better."

"Bitdefender GravityZone Ultra Plus is pretty average, meaning it's not cheaper, but it's pretty good. It has average pricing."

"The pricing for CylanceOPTICS is very good; I would rate it around a nine on a scale of one to ten, with ten being the lowest. It's one of the most affordable options I've seen."

"CylanceOPTICS is probably priced equal to other EDRs in the market."

"I would rate the pricing a three out of five."

"We pay for the number of endpoints we have and that is about it. On a monthly basis, the licensing cost is $55 per user."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR) solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

885,311 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Construction Company

13%

Manufacturing Company

Computer Software Company

Financial Services Firm

Comms Service Provider

13%

Construction Company

13%

University

Computer Software Company

Healthcare Company

11%

Manufacturing Company

10%

Construction Company

Financial Services Firm

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	44
Midsize Enterprise	20
Large Enterprise	47

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	6
Large Enterprise	1

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	7
Midsize Enterprise	2
Large Enterprise	4

Questions from the Community

Cortex XDR by Palo Alto vs. Sentinel One

Cortex XDR by Palo Alto vs. SentinelOne SentinelOne offers very detailed specifics with regard to risks or attacks. ...

Comparing CrowdStrike Falcon to Cortex XDR (Palo Alto)

Cortex XDR by Palo Alto vs. CrowdStrike Falcon Both Cortex XDR and Crowd Strike Falcon offer cloud-based solutions th...

How is Cortex XDR compared with Microsoft Defender?

Microsoft Defender for Endpoint is a cloud-delivered endpoint security solution. The tool reduces the attack surface,...

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Bitdefender GravityZone Ultra Plus?

The pricing and licensing of Bitdefender GravityZone Extended Detection and Response (XDR) is reasonable. We moved fr...

What needs improvement with Bitdefender GravityZone Ultra Plus?

Reporting in Bitdefender GravityZone Extended Detection and Response (XDR) could be improved. It has some reporting i...

What is your primary use case for Bitdefender GravityZone Ultra Plus?

Our customers typically use Bitdefender GravityZone Extended Detection and Response (XDR) primarily as an antivirus s...

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Blackberry Optics?

In terms of cost, I find CylanceOPTICS to be reasonable; it's not overly expensive, nor is it at the lower end of the...

What needs improvement with Blackberry Optics?

One improvement I suggest for CylanceOPTICS is more robust marketing efforts from their side. Many customers gravitat...

What is your primary use case for Blackberry Optics?

One of the main use cases for CylanceOPTICS is endpoint detection and response, which even works without internet, un...

Microsoft Defender for Endpoint vs Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks

Comparisons

Compared 9% of the time

SentinelOne Singularity Complete vs Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks

Compared 6% of the time

CrowdStrike Falcon vs Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks

Compared 4% of the time

Cortex XSIAM vs Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks

Compared 4% of the time

Symantec Endpoint Security vs Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks

Compared 3% of the time

More Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks Competitors

Darktrace vs Bitdefender GravityZone Extended Detection and Response (XDR)

Compared 11% of the time

TrendAI Vision One vs Bitdefender GravityZone Extended Detection and Response (XDR)

Compared 7% of the time

Huntress Managed ITDR vs Bitdefender GravityZone Extended Detection and Response (XDR)

Compared 6% of the time

Kaspersky Endpoint Detection and Response Expert vs Bitdefender GravityZone Extended Detection and Response (XDR)

Compared 5% of the time

Wazuh vs Bitdefender GravityZone Extended Detection and Response (XDR)

Compared 5% of the time

More Bitdefender GravityZone Extended Detection and Response (XDR) Competitors

CrowdStrike Falcon vs CylanceOPTICS

Compared 12% of the time

Cisco Secure Endpoint vs CylanceOPTICS

Compared 9% of the time

Rapid7 InsightIDR vs CylanceOPTICS

Compared 8% of the time

Microsoft Defender for Endpoint vs CylanceOPTICS

Compared 8% of the time

Kaspersky Endpoint Security for Business vs CylanceOPTICS

Compared 5% of the time

More CylanceOPTICS Competitors

Product Reports

Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks

Download Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks product report

Bitdefender GravityZone Extended Detection and Response (XDR)

Download Bitdefender GravityZone Extended Detection and Response (XDR) product report

Bitdefender GravityZone Extended Detection and Response (XDR) report

CylanceOPTICS

Download CylanceOPTICS product report

Also Known As

Cyvera, Cortex XDR, Palo Alto Networks Traps

GravityZone Ultra Plus

No data available

Overview

Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks provides advanced threat detection with AI-driven endpoint protection and seamless integration, ensuring multi-layered security and automatic threat response.

Cortex XDR is designed to safeguard endpoints against malware and suspicious activities. It offers advanced threat detection and response capabilities using behavioral analysis, AI, and machine learning. It seamlessly integrates with security infrastructures, providing endpoint security, firewall integration, and enhanced visibility in both cloud-based and on-premises environments.

What are the key features of Cortex XDR?

Advanced Threat Detection: Uses AI and machine learning for proactive threat identification.
Multi-layered Security: Combines various security measures for comprehensive protection.
Endpoint Protection: Safeguards against malware and exploits.
Behavioral Analysis: Monitors suspicious activity for early detection.
Automatic Threat Response: Automates responses to neutralize threats.

What benefits should users expect?

Ease of Use: Simplifies security management with intuitive design.
Resource Efficiency: Minimizes impact on system resources.
Integration Capabilities: Works well with existing security setups.
Reduced Analyst Workload: Automates processes to decrease manual intervention.

Organizations in diverse sectors deploy Cortex XDR to protect against malware, leveraging its advanced threat detection capabilities. Its integration with existing security infrastructures appeals to those seeking comprehensive protection in both cloud and on-premises environments, providing enhanced visibility and threat intelligence.

Palo Alto Networks

Bitdefender GravityZone XDR enhances network security via advanced threat detection, offers centralized incident response, and comprehensive endpoint protection. Users value the user-friendly interface, robust analytics, and streamlined management, significantly boosting organizational efficiency and productivity.

Bitdefender

Our cloud-native BlackBerry® Optics provide visibility, on-device threat detection and remediation across your organization. In milliseconds. And our EDR approach effectively and efficiently hunts threats while eliminating response latency. It’s the difference between a minor security event—and one that’s widespread and uncontrolled.

BlackBerry

Sample Customers

CBI Health Group, University Honda, VakifBank

Archdiocese, Northstar, SeSa, W&W Informatik, Yamaha Motor Europe

Cerdant, Washoe County School District

Bitdefender GravityZone Extended Detection and Response (XDR) vs. CylanceOPTICS