Jenkins vs VMware Tanzu Platform comparison

Jenkins and Broadcom are both solutions in the Build Automation category. Jenkins is ranked #4 with an average rating of 8.1, while Broadcom is ranked #14 with an average rating of 8.7. Jenkins holds a 7.3% mindshare in BA, compared to Broadcom’s 2.3% mindshare. Additionally, 88% of Jenkins users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of Broadcom users who would recommend it.

Jenkins

Read 92 Jenkins reviews

3,520 Views
3,414 Comparison Views

88% willing to recommend

VMware Tanzu Platform

Read 23 VMware Tanzu Platform reviews

7,253 Views
580 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Jenkins

VMware Tanzu Platform

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Dec 28, 2025

Jenkins and VMware Tanzu Platform compete in the CI/CD and cloud-native application management category. Jenkins has an advantage due to its extensive open-source community and plugin ecosystem, while VMware Tanzu leads in integration with VMware's own products.

Features: Jenkins is known for its extensive plugin ecosystem, robust community support, and flexibility in integrating with third-party tools. It offers strong support for its CI/CD capabilities. VMware Tanzu Platform excels in integrating with VMware products like vSphere and efficiently managing Kubernetes clusters. Its seamless integration with VMware’s infrastructure stands out.

Room for Improvement: Jenkins could improve its plugin stability, user interface, and integration with cloud services. Enhancing plugin documentation and streamlining would be beneficial. VMware Tanzu could improve its integration with non-VMware products, networking controls, and application-level tracing. Pricing is also a concern following VMware's acquisition by Broadcom.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Jenkins is easy to deploy on-premises due to its open-source nature, but it lacks official support, relying on community help. VMware Tanzu offers robust hybrid cloud deployments with official support, though this comes at a higher cost. VMware Tanzu users often benefit from the official support, unlike the community-reliant model of Jenkins.

Pricing and ROI: Jenkins provides significant ROI as a free, open-source tool, leading to cost savings, relying mainly on self-support and custom solutions. VMware Tanzu, while offering extensive features, involves more expensive subscription costs and generally targets larger enterprises by bundling with other VMware products.

To learn more, read our detailed Jenkins vs. VMware Tanzu Platform Report (Updated: March 2026).

Buyer's Guide

Jenkins vs. VMware Tanzu Platform

March 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 884,933 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Jenkins

Ranking in Build Automation

4th

Average Rating

8.0

Reviews Sentiment

7.0

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

VMware Tanzu Platform

Ranking in Build Automation

14th

Average Rating

8.0

Reviews Sentiment

6.6

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

PaaS Clouds (12th), Cloud Management (25th), Development Platforms (3rd), Container Management (6th), Service Mesh (7th), Agile and DevOps Services (3rd)

Mindshare comparison

As of March 2026, in the Build Automation category, the mindshare of Jenkins is 7.3%, down from 10.7% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of VMware Tanzu Platform is 2.3%, up from 0.9% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Build Automation Mindshare Distribution
Product	Mindshare (%)
Jenkins	7.3%
VMware Tanzu Platform	2.3%
Other	90.4%

Build Automation

Featured Reviews

Mahdi Mallaki

Senior Devops Engineer at a tech vendor with 10,001+ employees

Has a community of plugin providers but needs improvement in Kubernetes integration

Integrating Jenkins with other tools or solutions has presented some challenges. For instance, when attempting to integrate Jenkins with Kubernetes, I encountered numerous errors, which took several days to resolve. In Jenkins, adding a feature typically involves incorporating the repository feature separately. Jenkins lacks built-in Git repository functionality, necessitating an external Git repository to store Jenkins manifests. In contrast, GitLab offers an integrated Git repository and pipeline runner, streamlining the process. One improvement for Jenkins could be integrating a Git server, simplifying the management of CI/CD pipelines. Currently, with Jenkins, modifying pipeline manifests requires navigating to a separate Git repository. In GitLab, however, manifest changes can be made directly within the repository.

Read full review

ErmiasGirma

Cloud Infrastructure Engineer at Safaricom Ethiopia plc

Has supported container-based deployments and improved infrastructure visibility through monitoring tools

Aria Operations, formerly known as VMware vRealize Operations, has been renamed to vROps. We are currently using this for monitoring purposes. For orchestration, we are using VCD to automate Telco Cloud. VCD is an automation tool, and we are also using VMware Tanzu Platform for the Kubernetes environment, alongside TKG, Tanzu Kubernetes Grid. These are also other solutions for the Tanzu Kubernetes environment. For Telco Cloud, we are using it to automate our company's operations, which is for a telecom company. We are familiar with these products, especially vCenter, ESXi, VCD, vCF, and vROps. It is very easy to integrate applications when we deploy vCenter and ESXi since we can enable vSphere with Tanzu feature. We can build namespaces and provide application developers the platform to deploy their applications on pods within containerization. We can easily manage, pull results, and create containers efficiently, making it a simple way to handle applications. We provide namespace labels for application developers, and we can manage their resources along with other aspects easily. Regarding security, we use many tools such as CDX and LDAP, AD for integrating our Kubernetes cluster with the developer teams. We can manage roles and permissions simply. It is very straightforward to integrate with EDX and other third-party tools, Active Directory, to the Kubernetes cluster, allowing easy access and management.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"It's very useful when you want to automate different processes from beginning to end."

"The simplicity of Jenkins and the evolving ecosystem of Jenkins are most valuable. Today, you do not have to write a pipeline from scratch. The library functionality of Jenkins helps you to bring all those in ready-made, and you also get the best practices for them. That is a great feature of Jenkins, and that is why it is being used significantly."

"The automated elements are easy to use and you can put them into your server."

"For business needs, Jenkins is the most relevant choice because it can be self-hosted, the price is good, it’s robust, and requires almost no effort for maintenance."

"Jenkins optimizes the CI/CD process, enhances automation, and ensures efficiency and management of our build and deployment pipeline."

"The most valuable feature of Jenkins is its continuous deployment. We can deploy to multi-cluster and multi-regions in the cloud."

"Has a good interface, is reliable and saves time."

"The deployment of traditional Jenkins is easy."

More Jenkins pros

"The valuable feature I have found to be the management of Kubernetes clusters in a private cloud or public clouds, such as Azure or Google Cloud Platform."

"We feel very good about these features."

"Defining security metrics has proven beneficial for customers in maintaining a safe environment."

"The initial setup is easy."

"A feature we find valuable is that other products can also be integrated with Mission Control. This means that we can see the status of specific clusters, as well as view the monitoring application logs all from one point."

"There are a lot of services available in VMware Tanzu Application Service, such as databases and application servers. You have everything you need in one application and you do not need to search outside of the solution."

"The most valuable feature of VMware Tanzu Mission Control is the management functionality of the cluster life cycle. Additionally, the solution integrates well with other vendors, such as Velero for backups and Sonobuoy for compliance. Additionally, it works well in multi-cluster environments."

"It definitely gives the end customer a good overview and perspective of running applications in terms of overall workload footprint. TMC provides a very detailed description of your cloud-native application in the form of graphical visualization."

More VMware Tanzu Platform pros

Cons

"Jenkins takes a long time to create archive files."

"Pipelines are still young and promising. But this part still has some room for improvement."

"Polish for the user interface, stability of plugins beyond the very most commonly used ones."

"The product should provide more visualization as to how many pipelines are performing and how many builds are happening. It should also integrate with Kubernetes and OpenShift."

"Its schedule builds need improvement. It should have scheduling features in the platform rather than using external plug-ins."

"Performance-wise. This needs to be improved. Not only performance-wise, some functionality or some features can be added to Jenkins."

"Integrating Jenkins with other tools or solutions has presented some challenges. For instance, when attempting to integrate Jenkins with Kubernetes, I encountered numerous errors, which took several days to resolve. In Jenkins, adding a feature typically involves incorporating the repository feature separately. Jenkins lacks built-in Git repository functionality, necessitating an external Git repository to store Jenkins manifests."

"Some plugins have critical bugs and are not able to be used."

More Jenkins cons

"Customers have noticed a considerable price increase after VMware's acquisition by Broadcom."

"The solution could improve by having better integration with other solutions such as HPE."

"I would like to see additional support for things outside of Cloud Foundry."

"The infrastructure is quite challenging."

"The solution is currently focused on VMware infrastructure and I would like to see more options made available."

"Addressing the high upfront costs could improve the product. Implementing a subscription-based model with tiered service options could make it more accessible to a broader range of customers."

"The implementation is not easy, it is very complex and can take a day or two to complete."

"LYNX is a managed cluster solution that takes care of specific details within a cluster, such as sequences or services. I haven't seen this feature in Tanzu Mission Control."

More VMware Tanzu Platform cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"Jenkins is open source."

"We are using the freeware version of Jenkins."

"Jenkins is open source and free."

"The open-source version is free, but small companies would not be able to afford the cloud-based version."

"It's free software with a big community behind it, which is very good."

"We use the tool's open-source version which is free. There is an enterprise version which is expensive but comes with better support."

"There is no cost. It is open source."

"It is an open source."

More Jenkins pricing and cost advice

"Since we were at a large data center, the price might not have been a concern for us."

"The product is not expensive, but it is not cheap."

"There are different licenses available. You have to upgrade your license if you want to scale the solution more."

"The license for VMware Tanzu Application Service is expensive. The license should be cheaper."

"The price of VMware Tanzu Mission Control is greater than that of Red Hat's competitor solution"

"The least expensive licensing cost for VMware is around $350 per core."

"VMware Tanzu Mission Control is cheaper than Red Hat OpenShift."

"One of our Spanish customers told us that VMware Tanzu Service Mesh is a very expensive product for their data center."

More VMware Tanzu Platform pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Build Automation solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

884,933 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Comparison Review

it_user184734

Systems Administrator at Facebook

Jan 22, 2015

I generally find TeamCity a lot more intuitive than Jenkins.

Moving to TeamCity from Jenkins At work, we’re slowly migrating from Jenkins to TeamCity in the hope of ending some of our recurring problems with continuous integration. My use of Jenkins prior to this job has been almost strictly on a personal basis, although I pretty much only use Travis…

Read full review

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

17%

Manufacturing Company

15%

Computer Software Company

Government

Financial Services Firm

15%

Computer Software Company

11%

Manufacturing Company

10%

Government

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	28
Midsize Enterprise	15
Large Enterprise	57

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	10
Midsize Enterprise	3
Large Enterprise	10

Questions from the Community

How does Tekton compare with Jenkins?

When you are evaluating tools for automating your own GitOps-based CI/CD workflow, it is important to keep your requirements and use cases in mind. Tekton deployment is complex and it is not very e...

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Jenkins?

Jenkins is used in many companies to save money, especially within R&D divisions, by avoiding the expenses of proprietary tools.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Jenkins?

I do not have any notes for improvement.

See all answers

Which is better - OpenShift Container Platform or VMware Tanzu Mission Control?

Red Hat Openshift is ideal for organizations using microservices and cloud environments. I like that the platform is auto-scalable, which saves overhead time for developers. I think Openshift can b...

See all answers

What do you like most about VMware Tanzu Mission Control?

It definitely gives the end customer a good overview and perspective of running applications in terms of overall workload footprint. TMC provides a very detailed description of your cloud-native ap...

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for VMware Tanzu Mission Control?

The price of VMware Tanzu Mission Control is greater than that of Red Hat's competitor solution. I would rate the pricing of VMware Tanzu Mission Control as four out of ten.

See all answers

Comparisons

GitLab vs Jenkins

Compared 11% of the time

TeamCity vs Jenkins

Compared 6% of the time

Harness vs Jenkins

Compared 5% of the time

Bazel vs Jenkins

Compared 5% of the time

CircleCI vs Jenkins

Compared 3% of the time

More Jenkins Competitors

Rancher Labs vs VMware Tanzu Platform

Compared 8% of the time

Kubernetes vs VMware Tanzu Platform

Compared 7% of the time

Red Hat OpenShift vs VMware Tanzu Platform

Compared 6% of the time

Nutanix Kubernetes Platform (NKP) vs VMware Tanzu Platform

Compared 6% of the time

Docker vs VMware Tanzu Platform

Compared 5% of the time

More VMware Tanzu Platform Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Jenkins

March 2026

Download Jenkins product report

Buyer's Guide

VMware Tanzu Platform

February 2026

Download VMware Tanzu Platform product report

Also Known As

No data available

Tanzu Application Catalog, Application Platform, Application Service, Hub, Mission Control, Service Mesh, Build Service, Concourse for VMware Tanzu

Overview

Jenkins is an award-winning application that monitors executions of repeated jobs, such as building a software project or jobs run by cron.

Jenkins

VMware Tanzu Platform is designed for cloud-native development and management of Kubernetes, CI/CD processes, microservices, and containerized workloads. It supports deployments both on cloud and on-premises, providing centralized management via Mission Control.

VMware Tanzu Platform offers seamless integration with vSphere, ESX, and vSAN, supporting centralized cluster management and lifecycle management. The platform provides a GUI for monitoring CI/CD pipelines and network policies, enhancing multi-tenancy and Day 2 operations. Users can easily manage Kubernetes clusters, monitor applications, and integrate with tools such as GitHub, GitLab, Cloud Foundry, and Azure. It ensures compliance and security for service providers, financial institutions, and businesses.

What are the key features of VMware Tanzu Platform?

Integration with vSphere, ESX, and vSAN: Enhances compatibility and flexibility.
Seamless Cluster Management: Centralized control over Kubernetes clusters.
CI/CD Pipelines and Network Policies: Simplifies monitoring and management.
Multi-tenancy Support: Facilitates resource sharing among multiple users.
Comprehensive Lifecycle Management: Streamlines deployment and scalability.
Observability Platform: Provides enhanced visibility and control.

What benefits and ROI should users look for in VMware Tanzu Platform reviews?

Centralized Management: Simplifies operations and reduces manual effort.
Enhanced Compliance and Security: Meets regulatory requirements.
Flexibility in Deployment: Supports both cloud and on-premises options.
Seamless Integration: Works with multiple vendors and tools.
Developer-Friendly Environment: Improves productivity and innovation.

Industries such as financial institutions, service providers, and businesses requiring rigorous compliance and security deploy VMware Tanzu Platform. These entities benefit from centralized management, streamlined DevOps processes, and integrated tools, enhancing their capabilities in cloud-native developments and containerized workloads.

Broadcom

Sample Customers

Airial, Clarus Financial Technology, cubetutor, Metawidget, mysocio, namma, silverpeas, Sokkva, So Rave, tagzbox

Verizon, Cerner, Zipcar, Avarteq

Buyer's Guide

Jenkins vs. VMware Tanzu Platform

March 2026

Free Report: Jenkins vs. VMware Tanzu Platform

Find out what your peers are saying about Jenkins vs. VMware Tanzu Platform and other solutions. Updated: March 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

884,933 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Jenkins vs. VMware Tanzu Platform report.

See our list of best Build Automation vendors.

We monitor all Build Automation reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.