Basecamp vs Microsoft Project Server comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Basecamp Logo
436 views|315 comparisons
66% willing to recommend
Microsoft Logo
2,226 views|1,085 comparisons
85% willing to recommend
Comparison Buyer's Guide
Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between Basecamp and Microsoft Project Server based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out in this report how the two Project Portfolio Management solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI.
To learn more, read our detailed Basecamp vs. Microsoft Project Server Report (Updated: May 2023).
768,246 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Featured Review
Quotes From Members
We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use.
Here are some excerpts of what they said:
Pros
"The ability to network informally is great for communicating with colleagues.""The ease of use is valuable."

More Basecamp Pros →

"In the competitive landscape of project management and portfolio management solutions, Microsoft Project Server stands out significantly.""The most valuable features are the gantt charts. It's easy to use for me.""The solution, overall, is excellent for project planning.""We use Microsoft Project Server for project management.""It is well-established, reliable, and compatible.""I like being able to manage the capacity in terms of the resources. I also like being able to share documents and information between teams. It's the best solution for collaboration.""It is a scalable solution. We have been able to manage larger scale projects easily using this solution.""The usability is excellent."

More Microsoft Project Server Pros →

Cons
"The solution could be more user-friendly.""The product isn't easy to use. It's not very intuitive."

More Basecamp Cons →

"It would be useful if the solution allowed us to share files or project schedules. You may get that with the cloud version. However, it's not available on the on-premises versions.""It has to be more user-friendly. For instance, there should be some assistance, like when you go to certain sites, people pop up and say, "Can we help you? What are you looking for?" It's not interactive enough.""Collaboration within the tool is lacking when you compare it to online or cloud-based tools.""Permission management needs improvement.""The user interface looks quite old and needs to be improved.""The deployment aspect of the product is a bit tedious.""Work needs to be done on collaboration with SharePoint.""We want to expand to the local level where we lack strong IT expertise, we are considering making it more user-friendly."

More Microsoft Project Server Cons →

Pricing and Cost Advice
Information Not Available
  • "I think they need more flexibility with licensing, because there are preconceived ideas that don't allow as much flexibility with the various licenses."
  • "The licensing was procured before my involvement."
  • "It has features that cannot be bought by other rivals, so cost does not matter."
  • "It is on the expensive side."
  • "There is a licensing cost."
  • "There is an annual license required for this solution."
  • "I cannot comment on the price as I was not responsible for purchasing the solution."
  • "I'm not quite sure about the licensing costs. We're probably paying somewhere in the neighborhood of about 80,000 to 90,000 a year for our current on-prem because we handle our own licensing. As far as Project Online is concerned, we're still trying to get a good handle on that. It looks like it is going to be in a neighborhood of about 120,000 to 150,000 a year, but we're getting a lot more capability out of it."
  • More Microsoft Project Server Pricing and Cost Advice →

    report
    Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Project Portfolio Management solutions are best for your needs.
    768,246 professionals have used our research since 2012.
    Questions from the Community
    Top Answer:The licensing costs are approximately $900 annually. I rate the price a four out of ten, with one being cheap and ten being expensive.
    Top Answer:The recent update on the solution has made it a little bit complex. For example, to create a team and a project, there is a separate button that you need to click. Recently they updated it with only… more »
    Top Answer:The ability to track a project's progress using Microsoft Project Server is the most valuable aspect. It depends, especially when managing multiple projects.
    Top Answer:The solution is very expensive. It is a part of my enterprise database. I am paying a subscription for it. It doesn't cost for hardware but for other tools to use.
    Top Answer:Microsoft is going to integrate the Co-Pilot features into Microsoft Project. The AI feature is an additional feature. It can look at the plan and identify risks early on from any part of your… more »
    Ranking
    22nd
    Views
    436
    Comparisons
    315
    Reviews
    1
    Average Words per Review
    349
    Rating
    9.0
    Views
    2,226
    Comparisons
    1,085
    Reviews
    27
    Average Words per Review
    356
    Rating
    7.6
    Comparisons
    Also Known As
    MS Project Server
    Learn More
    Overview
    Basecamp is a web-based project-management tool developed by Basecamp and launched in 2004, with a new version being launched in 2012. Basecamp offers to-do lists, wiki-style web-based text documents, milestone management, file sharing, time tracking, and a messaging system. Basecamp Classic also offers integration with Basecamp's own Campfire product, and features APIs that are used by a host of web and mobile apps. Basecamp Classic's interface is available in different languages (e.g. Spanish, French, Italian, German, Finnish and Japanese). The newer version of Basecamp currently only supports English as the interface language.
    Microsoft Project Server 2013 is a flexible on-premises solution for project portfolio management (PPM) and everyday work. Team members, project participants, and business decision makers can get started, prioritize project portfolio investments and deliver the intended business value from virtually anywhere. Requires SharePoint 2013, sold separately.
    Sample Customers
    Ashland Addison Florist Co., Victory Auto Wreckers, Ideal Box Co., Hollymatic Corp.
    Magnachip, Gwinnett County Schools, CLEAResult, Medbit Oy, Intelbras S.A., ETS, CORE Construction, Keller Foundations
    Top Industries
    No Data Available
    REVIEWERS
    Computer Software Company21%
    Manufacturing Company15%
    Comms Service Provider13%
    Financial Services Firm10%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Computer Software Company14%
    Government11%
    Manufacturing Company9%
    Financial Services Firm7%
    Company Size
    No Data Available
    REVIEWERS
    Small Business33%
    Midsize Enterprise20%
    Large Enterprise48%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business19%
    Midsize Enterprise13%
    Large Enterprise67%
    Buyer's Guide
    Basecamp vs. Microsoft Project Server
    May 2023
    Find out what your peers are saying about Basecamp vs. Microsoft Project Server and other solutions. Updated: May 2023.
    768,246 professionals have used our research since 2012.

    Basecamp is ranked 22nd in Project Management Software with 3 reviews while Microsoft Project Server is ranked 6th in Project Portfolio Management with 55 reviews. Basecamp is rated 7.6, while Microsoft Project Server is rated 7.8. The top reviewer of Basecamp writes "Easy to navigate and good for communications but needs better documentation". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Microsoft Project Server writes "Provides holistic reporting and allows us to keep track of what's going on with projects". Basecamp is most compared with Planview Portfolios, Smartsheet, Jira and ServiceNow Strategic Portfolio Management, whereas Microsoft Project Server is most compared with Microsoft Project, ServiceNow Strategic Portfolio Management, Planisware, Oracle Primavera Portfolio Management and JIRA Portfolio. See our Basecamp vs. Microsoft Project Server report.

    See our list of best Project Portfolio Management vendors and best Project Management Software vendors.

    We monitor all Project Portfolio Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.