Azure Network Watcher vs DX Unified Infrastructure Management comparison

Microsoft and Broadcom are both solutions in the Network Monitoring Software category. Microsoft is ranked #42 with an average rating of 8.5, while Broadcom is ranked #57. Microsoft holds a 0.5% mindshare in NMS, compared to Broadcom’s 1.0% mindshare. Additionally, 92% of Microsoft users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 92% of Broadcom users who would recommend it.

Azure Network Watcher

Read 13 Azure Network Watcher reviews

1,676 Views
1,626 Comparison Views

92% willing to recommend

DX Unified Infrastructure M...

Read 120 DX Unified Infrastructure Management reviews

8,190 Views
4,341 Comparison Views

92% willing to recommend

Azure Network Watcher

DX Unified Infrastructure M...

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Oct 10, 2024

DX Unified Infrastructure Management and Azure Network Watcher compete in the network monitoring and management space. Azure Network Watcher holds a slight advantage due to its better cloud-native capabilities and centralized insights, making it more appealing for large-scale environments.

Features: DX Unified Infrastructure Management offers ease of deployment, comprehensive monitoring, and effective device categorization. It includes out-of-the-box probes and automated deployment, making it accessible even for beginners. Azure Network Watcher provides strong support for cloud-native applications, packet capture capabilities, and centralized data insights to handle large-scale network monitoring within Azure environments.

Room for Improvement: DX Unified Infrastructure Management needs improvements in reporting capabilities, multi-tenancy support, and cloud compatibility. It also faces challenges in the initial setup and inconsistent customer support. Azure Network Watcher should enhance its documentation, setup ease, and built-in application support. Users desire more comprehensive data capture tools and improved visualization features for better updates and troubleshooting.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: DX Unified Infrastructure Management is suitable for hybrid and on-premises environments, with complex initial setups and mixed reviews on technical support. Users experience delays and uneven responsiveness in customer service. Azure Network Watcher benefits from Azure's direct integration but faces challenges with initial configuration and requires enhanced user support and clearer deployment guidance.

Pricing and ROI: DX Unified Infrastructure Management is a costly option, reflecting its robust feature set, but offers potential savings in long-term ROI due to efficient monitoring. Azure Network Watcher, with more accessible pricing, suits larger enterprises better due to complex features and integration with the Azure ecosystem. Users find it affordable with a favorable cost-to-benefit ratio.

To learn more, read our detailed Azure Network Watcher vs. DX Unified Infrastructure Management Report (Updated: April 2026).

Buyer's Guide

Azure Network Watcher vs. DX Unified Infrastructure Management

April 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 894,807 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Azure Network Watcher

Ranking in Network Monitoring Software

42nd

Average Rating

8.0

Reviews Sentiment

5.9

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

DX Unified Infrastructure M...

Ranking in Network Monitoring Software

57th

Average Rating

8.2

Reviews Sentiment

6.8

Number of Reviews

120

Ranking in other categories

Server Monitoring (19th), IT Infrastructure Monitoring (45th), Cloud Monitoring Software (33rd), AIOps (24th)

Mindshare comparison

As of May 2026, in the Network Monitoring Software category, the mindshare of Azure Network Watcher is 0.5%, up from 0.4% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of DX Unified Infrastructure Management is 1.0%, up from 0.4% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Network Monitoring Software Mindshare Distribution
Product	Mindshare (%)
Azure Network Watcher	0.5%
DX Unified Infrastructure Management	1.0%
Other	98.5%

Network Monitoring Software

Featured Reviews

Bijoyendra Roychowdhury

Program Manager at a consultancy with 10,001+ employees

Network monitoring provides comprehensive analytics while the interface requires further development

The quality of Azure Network Watcher is quite good in terms of the in-depth analysis you can create from these matrices. There are other monitoring tools such as New Relic, AppDynamics, and Dynatrace which provide very detailed network tracing. Cloud providers such as Azure or AWS do not have that kind of GUI-based capability at this point, but using PowerShell or Python, you can develop it yourself. From the GUI perspective, it still needs to evolve in terms of quality and standard, though overall, it is quite good for troubleshooting. Regarding areas for improvement, when comparing to other network tools beyond Azure Monitor or Azure Network Watcher, those tools can identify single failed packets. This level of granularity is not currently possible with cloud providers as they only go to a certain level rather than the granular level needed for deep troubleshooting, though they do provide hints with available matrices.

Read full review

Kc Njokuoma

Solution Architect at SA Consulting

Helps us provide visibility into network performance, capacity planning, and cost analysis

Better support and more accessible resources are crucial. Customers have expressed that support is not as flexible, and it is difficult to obtain necessary information quickly. Customers would benefit from improved training material for integration with other products. The solution's pricing is high and needs to be reconsidered, and the technical support should improve to provide more accessible and open information.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"This will help the company or the administrator, by helping them see how the traffic moves, to make sure that no entities are having any communication issues or different endpoints with task issues."

"My advice to others looking into using Azure Network Watcher is to go for it, as you'll have the tool by default when you're subscribed to Azure VNet."

"The solution is stable, there are no bugs or glitches and it doesn't crash or freeze, it's reliable."

"The stability is very good. I rate it a ten out of ten."

"The most valuable feature of Azure Network Watcher is the cloud-native application firewall, which is helpful for securing databases."

"Azure Network Watcher provides valuable features based on your specific requirements and use cases, helping you monitor network bandwidth, throughput, data flow consumption, and control costs by giving insight into egress and ingress traffic, total input and output operations, bandwidth, and threats through IP identification."

"This is a stable system providing stable performance."

"The most valuable features I have found are typology, visualization, and capture."

More Azure Network Watcher pros

"We managed to convince our client to use CA UIM as it individually ensures monitoring of all the aspects of an application, be it processes, event logs, URLs, ping availability, server response time, log monitoring, database monitoring, clusters, and what not."

"The most valuable features are trending and analysis, and I also like the predictability of the systems, baselines, and that it can prevent an outage before it happens."

"With UIM, the ROI is way up there."

"We really like using the tools, we like all of the things that we've gotten out of the tool set, the ability to visualize, the ability to help our troubleshooting, the in depth analysis for our infrastructure teams and things like that."

"Easy admin functionality. You can quickly do all the admin functionality without reducing cycles."

"Having all of our information within one tool set; our alerts, our monitors, and the things that our operations team needs to function."

"The main feature for us is its flexibility with their message bus and their API to make it do what you need it to do, since everyone's different."

"There is nothing we can't monitor with this product and do so in a very easy and efficient manner."

More DX Unified Infrastructure Management pros

Cons

"Azure is good, however, the Fortinet GUI is more intuitive and I like it more than anything else."

"It's not the most friendly or straightforward to set up. I don't see the value versus the way you have to set it up at first."

"I still use Wireshark and Azure Network Watcher to get the required data. My team captures the traffic from Azure Network Watcher, downloads it, then imports that traffic into Wireshark to get more details on the number of hits and replies, for example. If you can do that on Azure Network Watcher and have Wireshark built-in, that would make Azure Network Watcher better. If Azure Network Watcher has that functionality where you won't need a third-party tool to get what you need, that would be helpful. I'm also expecting more from Azure Network Watcher. It's more complex than knowing how the IP flows from its source to the destination. The tool also needs more open-source features, such as having some built-in Wireshark that improves monitoring for customers. Sometimes, you encounter a VPN tunnel, network, or routing issue, but finding out more about the blockage is challenging. Is it one hundred percent an Azure issue? Is it a peer issue? You don't get complete information from Azure Network Watcher, so you must use other tools and depend on your strategies to resolve a specific issue. If more features could be added in the next release of Azure Network Watcher, specifically ones you can find on open-source tools, then that would be a plus point for the tool."

"Technical support from Microsoft needs significant improvement compared to other product vendors."

"I would like to see in the future if we can troubleshoot as a firewall because it is equipment as a network player and some diagnostics."

"The initial setup and initial learning curve could be improved to be easier."

"Sometimes, you encounter a VPN tunnel, network, or routing issue, but finding out more about the blockage is challenging."

"Azure is good, however, the Fortinet GUI is more intuitive and I like it more than anything else."

More Azure Network Watcher cons

"One of the things I would like to see an improvement on is the ability to do mass deployment."

"It needs more report capabilities; things that make it easier to find them. It needs a central, global, point of view for inventory."

"If there was a way to better harvest information from other sources to configure the components, it would make it easier to do."

"Technical support is OK. It varies depending on issues."

"Stability."

"We have products that we’re moving away from that have a better GUI and they’re 15 years old."

"We want to see more investment in the UI and the dashboard."

"Yes, we did encounter on some stability issues earlier."

More DX Unified Infrastructure Management cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The pricing is good. It's not too expensive."

"The price of the solution is reasonable."

"Price-wise, I have no information on how much Azure Network Watcher costs."

"Azure Network Watcher is a little bit expensive."

"CAD $400,000 annually."

"The product-price ratio is better than other brands such as Fortinet or SonicWall."

"The license cost depends on the number of probes and robots."

"This product is expensive compared to other vendors (SolarWinds, ManageEngine)."

"Pricing for DX Unified Infrastructure Management isn't cheap at all. It's a complex tool, so you have to pay more. No one is happy with a large bill to pay, but if it's a complex product and you designed a complex solution to be monitored, it'll be your fault that you need to buy an expensive product, and that would be implicit in the design of DX Unified Infrastructure Management. Monitoring is just a small part of it. Sometimes you have to pay a significant amount of money for a complex yet very good solution."

"Reasonable setup cost and licensing prices."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Network Monitoring Software solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

894,807 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

23%

Construction Company

10%

Government

Comms Service Provider

Financial Services Firm

20%

Construction Company

11%

Marketing Services Firm

Performing Arts

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	6
Large Enterprise	7

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	29
Midsize Enterprise	20
Large Enterprise	80

Questions from the Community

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Azure Network Watcher?

I do not have the exact setup cost information on hand, but it is available in the public Azure portal. You can access the calculator there to get detailed pricing information.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Azure Network Watcher?

The main area for improvement is AI-based features. Currently, many intelligent tools are coming from third parties, and Azure Network Watcher needs to improve in this area. The focus should be on ...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Azure Network Watcher?

Azure Network Watcher is used for monitoring network traffic. It provides insight into egress and ingress traffic, which helps determine whether consumption can be controlled. Most Azure services c...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for DX Infrastructure Manager?

We are an integrating company that offers DX Unified Infrastructure Management to customers. We help them set it up, do the integration, and provide support. Our end customers include financial ins...

See all answers

What advice do you have for others considering DX Infrastructure Manager?

I would recommend DX Unified Infrastructure Management to others as it is a good and reliable solution. I would rate it nine out of ten due to its robust functionality and capability to support inf...

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for DX Infrastructure Manager?

The pricing of DX Unified Infrastructure Management is high and often a concern for customers. The cost is higher compared to other Original Equipment Manufacturers (OEMs), which is feedback we hav...

See all answers

Comparisons

Kentik vs Azure Network Watcher

Compared 17% of the time

Nmap vs Azure Network Watcher

Compared 15% of the time

Ixia Network Taps vs Azure Network Watcher

Compared 7% of the time

PRTG Network Monitor vs Azure Network Watcher

Compared 7% of the time

Microsoft Network Monitor vs Azure Network Watcher

Compared 6% of the time

More Azure Network Watcher Competitors

ConnectWise RMM vs DX Unified Infrastructure Management

Compared 4% of the time

SolarWinds NPM vs DX Unified Infrastructure Management

Compared 4% of the time

Zabbix vs DX Unified Infrastructure Management

Compared 4% of the time

Nagios XI vs DX Unified Infrastructure Management

Compared 3% of the time

Fortra's Network Server Suite vs DX Unified Infrastructure Management

Compared 3% of the time

More DX Unified Infrastructure Management Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Azure Network Watcher

May 2026

Download Azure Network Watcher product report

Buyer's Guide

DX Unified Infrastructure Management

May 2026

DX Unified Infrastructure Management report

Download DX Unified Infrastructure Management product report

Also Known As

No data available

DX Infrastructure Manager, DX Infrastructure Manager for Z Systems and CA UIM for zSystems, CA UIM (DX Infrastructure Manager), CA Nimsoft Monitor, CA UIM, DX Infrastructure Manager

Overview

Azure Network Watcher provides advanced network monitoring capabilities including packet capture, cloud-native firewall, and traffic diagnosis, aiding in VPN troubleshooting and security enforcement with enhanced visibility and alerting features.

Azure Network Watcher is essential for monitoring, diagnosing, and analyzing network traffic. It efficiently handles VPN connection issues and enhances network security by capturing and analyzing traffic to assess performance or latency problems. The tool facilitates traffic flow control, security rule verification, and bandwidth monitoring. Users benefit from its capabilities in diagnosing service connections, offering insights into network activity, and identifying potential threats, crucial for maintaining compliance and efficient network management.

What are the key features of Azure Network Watcher?

Packet Capture: Enables detailed network traffic inspection to troubleshoot issues.
Cloud-Native Application Firewall: Provides enhanced protection for applications running in the cloud.
Traffic Monitoring: Allows for real-time analysis and troubleshooting of network traffic.
NSG Flow Logs & AI-Based Monitoring: Enhances flow control and threat detection.
Alerting & Threshold Configuration: Offers customizable alerts via Azure Monitor for proactive management.

What benefits can users look for in reviews?

Improved Network Security: Helps in identifying and mitigating threats efficiently.
Enhanced Visibility: Provides clear insights into network operations and potential issues.
Compliance Support: Assists in maintaining regulatory compliance with thorough monitoring capabilities.
Effective Bandwidth Management: Facilitates control and optimization of network bandwidth.

In industries like finance and healthcare, Azure Network Watcher is implemented to ensure robust security and compliance, crucial for safeguarding sensitive data. It aids retail and manufacturing sectors in optimizing network performance and maintaining seamless connectivity, supporting their digital infrastructure needs.

Microsoft

DX Unified Infrastructure Management offers scalable, easy deployment with flexible multi-tenancy and extensive monitoring capabilities for managed service providers.

DX Unified Infrastructure Management serves managed service providers by providing comprehensive infrastructure monitoring for servers, applications, networks, databases, cloud environments, and data centers. It features a Unified Monitoring Portal and predefined templates for enhanced usability. Robust reporting and alerting features provide critical insights while offering agent-based and agentless options to support diverse infrastructure requirements. The system's integration capabilities and application-level monitoring are key strengths, while a customizable framework allows for effective automation and probe management, consolidating data sources efficiently.

What are the key features of DX Unified Infrastructure Management?

Scalable Deployment: Accommodates extensive infrastructure with ease.
Multi-tenancy: Provides flexible, individualized management setups.
Probe Coverage: Supports extensive platform monitoring.
Unified Portal: Centralizes monitoring tasks.
Automation: Streamlines processes through customizable frameworks.

What benefits and ROI can users look for when evaluating DX Unified Infrastructure Management?

Comprehensive Monitoring: Strengthens infrastructure oversight.
Critical Insights: Enhances decision-making efficiency.
Broad Support: Meets diverse infrastructure needs.
Seamless Integration: Facilitates connected technology environments.
Scalability: Grows with user requirements.

Managed service providers and integrators implement DX Unified Infrastructure Management globally, engaging clients in regions like the US, Europe, South America, and Asia. They replace older systems like Nagios and Cacti for more modern infrastructure management. It is widely used for client infrastructure management with capabilities like URL monitoring and synthetic transactions, supported by a modern HTML5 UI. Faster adaptation to new technologies, improved web admin tools, optimization of reporting, and reduced manual tasks are continually addressed, enhancing system performance, particularly for Linux environments.

Broadcom

Sample Customers

Information Not Available

CBNCloud, IIJ Global Singapore, AT&S, AXSOS, Aozora Bank, HCL Technologies, IntelliNet, Securex

Buyer's Guide

Azure Network Watcher vs. DX Unified Infrastructure Management

April 2026

Free Report: Azure Network Watcher vs. DX Unified Infrastructure Management

Find out what your peers are saying about Azure Network Watcher vs. DX Unified Infrastructure Management and other solutions. Updated: April 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

894,807 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Azure Network Watcher vs. DX Unified Infrastructure Management report.

See our list of best Network Monitoring Software vendors.

We monitor all Network Monitoring Software reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.