Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

Azure Network Watcher vs DX Unified Infrastructure Management comparison

Microsoft and Broadcom are both solutions in the Network Monitoring Software category. Microsoft is ranked #41 with an average rating of 8.7, while Broadcom is ranked #70. Microsoft holds a 0.5% mindshare in NMS, compared to Broadcom’s 0.7% mindshare. Additionally, 92% of Microsoft users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 92% of Broadcom users who would recommend it.
Azure Network Watcher
Read 13 Azure Network Watcher reviews
  • 846 Views
  • 804 Comparison Views
92% willing to recommend
DX Unified Infrastructure M...
Read 120 DX Unified Infrastructure Management reviews
  • 2,955 Views
  • 1,507 Comparison Views
92% willing to recommend
 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report
Executive SummaryUpdated on Oct 10, 2024

DX Unified Infrastructure Management and Azure Network Watcher compete in the network monitoring and management space. Azure Network Watcher holds a slight advantage due to its better cloud-native capabilities and centralized insights, making it more appealing for large-scale environments.

Features: DX Unified Infrastructure Management offers ease of deployment, comprehensive monitoring, and effective device categorization. It includes out-of-the-box probes and automated deployment, making it accessible even for beginners. Azure Network Watcher provides strong support for cloud-native applications, packet capture capabilities, and centralized data insights to handle large-scale network monitoring within Azure environments.

Room for Improvement: DX Unified Infrastructure Management needs improvements in reporting capabilities, multi-tenancy support, and cloud compatibility. It also faces challenges in the initial setup and inconsistent customer support. Azure Network Watcher should enhance its documentation, setup ease, and built-in application support. Users desire more comprehensive data capture tools and improved visualization features for better updates and troubleshooting.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: DX Unified Infrastructure Management is suitable for hybrid and on-premises environments, with complex initial setups and mixed reviews on technical support. Users experience delays and uneven responsiveness in customer service. Azure Network Watcher benefits from Azure's direct integration but faces challenges with initial configuration and requires enhanced user support and clearer deployment guidance.

Pricing and ROI: DX Unified Infrastructure Management is a costly option, reflecting its robust feature set, but offers potential savings in long-term ROI due to efficient monitoring. Azure Network Watcher, with more accessible pricing, suits larger enterprises better due to complex features and integration with the Azure ecosystem. Users find it affordable with a favorable cost-to-benefit ratio.

DOWNLOAD THE COMPLETE REPORT
To learn more, read our detailed Azure Network Watcher vs. DX Unified Infrastructure Management Report (Updated: December 2025).
Buyer's Guide
Azure Network Watcher vs. DX Unified Infrastructure Management
December 2025
Download the complete report
Helped 881,176 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Categories and Ranking

Azure Network Watcher
Ranking in Network Monitoring Software
41st
Average Rating
8.0
Reviews Sentiment
5.9
Number of Reviews
13
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
DX Unified Infrastructure M...
Ranking in Network Monitoring Software
70th
Average Rating
8.2
Reviews Sentiment
6.8
Number of Reviews
120
Ranking in other categories
Server Monitoring (23rd), IT Infrastructure Monitoring (49th), Cloud Monitoring Software (42nd), AIOps (25th)
 

Mindshare comparison

As of January 2026, in the Network Monitoring Software category, the mindshare of Azure Network Watcher is 0.5%, up from 0.4% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of DX Unified Infrastructure Management is 0.7%, up from 0.4% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Network Monitoring Software Market Share Distribution
ProductMarket Share (%)
Azure Network Watcher0.5%
DX Unified Infrastructure Management0.7%
Other98.8%
Network Monitoring Software
 

Featured Reviews

Bijoyendra Roychowdhury - PeerSpot reviewer
Bijoyendra Roychowdhury
Program Manager at a consultancy with 10,001+ employees
Network monitoring provides comprehensive analytics while the interface requires further development
The quality of Azure Network Watcher is quite good in terms of the in-depth analysis you can create from these matrices. There are other monitoring tools such as New Relic, AppDynamics, and Dynatrace which provide very detailed network tracing. Cloud providers such as Azure or AWS do not have that kind of GUI-based capability at this point, but using PowerShell or Python, you can develop it yourself. From the GUI perspective, it still needs to evolve in terms of quality and standard, though overall, it is quite good for troubleshooting. Regarding areas for improvement, when comparing to other network tools beyond Azure Monitor or Azure Network Watcher, those tools can identify single failed packets. This level of granularity is not currently possible with cloud providers as they only go to a certain level rather than the granular level needed for deep troubleshooting, though they do provide hints with available matrices.
Read full review
ON
Kc Njokuoma
Solution Architect at SA Consulting
Helps us provide visibility into network performance, capacity planning, and cost analysis
Better support and more accessible resources are crucial. Customers have expressed that support is not as flexible, and it is difficult to obtain necessary information quickly. Customers would benefit from improved training material for integration with other products. The solution's pricing is high and needs to be reconsidered, and the technical support should improve to provide more accessible and open information.
Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Pros

"The stability is very good. I rate it a ten out of ten."
"The most valuable feature of Azure Network Watcher is using the gateways with the connections. The monitoring is useful for the logs and application insights into the data. The traffic filtering issues when it comes to deploying those applications are helpful."
"The solution is good for monitoring device behavior."
"I like the visibility."
"What I like most about Azure Network Watcher is that it's focused more on the architecture. I also like that it has a packet capture feature that tells you how the packet travels and whether it's exiting Azure, etc."
"The solution is stable."
"It provides good visibility."
"The most valuable feature of Azure Network Watcher is the cloud-native application firewall. It is helpful for securing databases."
More Azure Network Watcher pros
"Monitoring infrastructure and business applications are the most valuable features."
"It reduced cycles for a lot of quick out-of-the-box functionality. It also allowed us to get away from being stuck in SNMP, VTP V2, based off of agent deployment."
"It is reliable when it comes to monitoring."
"It is easy to implement but requires good planning."
"DX UIM is scalable."
"Probe packages and probe deployment."
"I can use the Drag and Drop feature to build dashboards within minutes."
"The number of probes available. Out of the box, I believe about 200 probes are available. And, if there's a probe that is not available, you can write one. You can also go to the communities and suggest, and based on demand, CA will write one for you."
More DX Unified Infrastructure Management pros
 

Cons

"Azure Network Watcher could improve by having other built-in applications. For example, an application to log activities for in and outbound traffic."
"The initial setup and deployment could be improved to be simplified."
"The solution could improve by limiting the need to clarify the logs. When the clarification is minimized, it is better for everyone involved."
"Azure is good, however, the Fortinet GUI is more intuitive and I like it more than anything else."
"Technical support from Microsoft needs significant improvement compared to other product vendors."
"There are some occasional downtimes, but these were based on Azure-specific issues."
"The initial setup and initial learning curve could be improved to be easier."
"I would like to see in the future if we can troubleshoot as a firewall because it is equipment as a network player and some diagnostics."
More Azure Network Watcher cons
"There is also room for improvement in the reporting. It is not really good enough, according to our customers. So what we now usually do is use Power BI to get them the kinds of reports they want."
"DX UIM's reporting and customization need to be improved."
"Within this product there are individual probes, and each of these probes doesn't always necessarily output the same kind of information into our database. So when we try to collect what's called QoS data, from one probe we might get a ton of information, lots of good stuff that we can use in our database, but then from another probe, we might not get so much or we might not be able to pull the things that we want to."
"​We want to see more investment in the UI and the dashboard."
"The dashboards need to be improved."
"There should be wider coverage of storage infrastructure."
"Customers have expressed that support is not as flexible, and it is difficult to obtain necessary information quickly."
"I would like to see auditability. We've built our own audit functionality to ensure that every CI has the desired model configuration applied to it. And we run that on a daily basis. If that became part of the product, I think it might be a little bit less intensive in terms of resource, because we're doing it with scripts."
More DX Unified Infrastructure Management cons
 

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The price of the solution is reasonable."
"Azure Network Watcher is a little bit expensive."
"Price-wise, I have no information on how much Azure Network Watcher costs."
"The pricing is good. It's not too expensive."
"This product is expensive compared to other vendors (SolarWinds, ManageEngine)."
"Pricing for DX Unified Infrastructure Management isn't cheap at all. It's a complex tool, so you have to pay more. No one is happy with a large bill to pay, but if it's a complex product and you designed a complex solution to be monitored, it'll be your fault that you need to buy an expensive product, and that would be implicit in the design of DX Unified Infrastructure Management. Monitoring is just a small part of it. Sometimes you have to pay a significant amount of money for a complex yet very good solution."
"Reasonable setup cost and licensing prices."
"The product-price ratio is better than other brands such as Fortinet or SonicWall."
"The license cost depends on the number of probes and robots."
"CAD $400,000 annually."
report
See which vendors are best for you
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Network Monitoring Software solutions are best for your needs.
See recommendations
881,176 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Financial Services Firm
17%
Government
11%
University
8%
Comms Service Provider
7%
Financial Services Firm
15%
Performing Arts
13%
Manufacturing Company
9%
Media Company
6%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
By reviewers
Company SizeCount
Small Business6
Large Enterprise7
By reviewers
Company SizeCount
Small Business29
Midsize Enterprise20
Large Enterprise80
 

Questions from the Community

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Azure Network Watcher?
Azure Network Watcher is affordable from the perspective of basic costing. It doesn't cost too much at this point unless you are requesting customizable detailed matrices. For the default configura...
See all answers
What needs improvement with Azure Network Watcher?
The quality of Azure Network Watcher is quite good in terms of the in-depth analysis you can create from these matrices. There are other monitoring tools such as New Relic, AppDynamics, and Dynatra...
See all answers
What is your primary use case for Azure Network Watcher?
The purpose of using Azure Network Watcher is to observe the network flow logs during any kind of troubleshooting. If there is any performance issue or latency issue over the network, we check the ...
See all answers
What is your primary use case for DX Infrastructure Manager?
We are an integrating company that offers DX Unified Infrastructure Management to customers. We help them set it up, do the integration, and provide support. Our end customers include financial ins...
See all answers
What advice do you have for others considering DX Infrastructure Manager?
I would recommend DX Unified Infrastructure Management to others as it is a good and reliable solution. I would rate it nine out of ten due to its robust functionality and capability to support inf...
See all answers
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for DX Infrastructure Manager?
The pricing of DX Unified Infrastructure Management is high and often a concern for customers. The cost is higher compared to other Original Equipment Manufacturers (OEMs), which is feedback we hav...
See all answers
 

Comparisons

Kentik vs Azure Network Watcher Logo
Kentik vs Azure Network Watcher
Compared 27% of the time
Nmap vs Azure Network Watcher Logo
Nmap vs Azure Network Watcher
Compared 16% of the time
ThousandEyes vs Azure Network Watcher Logo
ThousandEyes vs Azure Network Watcher
Compared 8% of the time
Plixer Scrutinizer vs Azure Network Watcher Logo
Plixer Scrutinizer vs Azure Network Watcher
Compared 8% of the time
ExtraHop Reveal(x) for IT Operations vs Azure Network Watcher Logo
ExtraHop Reveal(x) for IT Operations vs Azure Network Watcher
Compared 7% of the time
More Azure Network Watcher Competitors
Fortra's Network Server Suite vs DX Unified Infrastructure Management Logo
Fortra's Network Server Suite vs DX Unified Infrastructure Management
Compared 6% of the time
NetCrunch vs DX Unified Infrastructure Management Logo
NetCrunch vs DX Unified Infrastructure Management
Compared 4% of the time
Goliath Performance Monitor vs DX Unified Infrastructure Management Logo
Goliath Performance Monitor vs DX Unified Infrastructure Management
Compared 4% of the time
Ixia Hawkeye vs DX Unified Infrastructure Management Logo
Ixia Hawkeye vs DX Unified Infrastructure Management
Compared 3% of the time
SelectStar vs DX Unified Infrastructure Management Logo
SelectStar vs DX Unified Infrastructure Management
Compared 3% of the time
More DX Unified Infrastructure Management Competitors
 

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide
Azure Network Watcher
January 2026
Azure Network Watcher reportDownload Azure Network Watcher product report
Buyer's Guide
DX Unified Infrastructure Management
January 2026
DX Unified Infrastructure Management reportDownload DX Unified Infrastructure Management product report
 

Also Known As

No data available
DX Infrastructure Manager, DX Infrastructure Manager for Z Systems and CA UIM for zSystems, CA UIM (DX Infrastructure Manager), CA Nimsoft Monitor, CA UIM, DX Infrastructure Manager
 

Overview

Azure Network Watcher is a comprehensive network monitoring and diagnostic service offered by Microsoft Azure. It provides a range of tools and capabilities to help users monitor, diagnose, and gain insights into their Azure network infrastructure. With Network Watcher, users can capture and analyze network traffic, monitor network performance, troubleshoot connectivity issues, and gain visibility into network topology. It also offers features like packet capture, flow logs, connection monitoring, and VPN diagnostics to ensure the smooth operation of Azure networks. Network Watcher enables users to proactively identify and resolve network issues, optimize network performance, and enhance the overall reliability and security of their Azure network environment.

Microsoft

DX Unified Infrastructure Management is the only solution that provides an open architecture, full-stack observability and zero-touch configuration for monitoring traditional data center, public cloud, and hybrid infrastructure environments.

Designed to ensure an optimal end-user experience, this solution provides a modern HTML5 operations console that makes it easy and fast for today’s IT teams to implement, use, and scale – leading to faster time to value.

Broadcom
 

Sample Customers

Information Not Available
CBNCloud, IIJ Global Singapore, AT&S, AXSOS, Aozora Bank, HCL Technologies, IntelliNet, Securex
Buyer's Guide
Azure Network Watcher vs. DX Unified Infrastructure Management
December 2025
Free Report: Azure Network Watcher vs. DX Unified Infrastructure Management
Find out what your peers are saying about Azure Network Watcher vs. DX Unified Infrastructure Management and other solutions. Updated: December 2025.
DOWNLOAD NOW
881,176 professionals have used our research since 2012.
See our Azure Network Watcher vs. DX Unified Infrastructure Management report.
See our list of best Network Monitoring Software vendors.

We monitor all Network Monitoring Software reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.