Azure NetApp Files vs Pure Storage Evergreen One comparison

NetApp and Pure Storage are both solutions in the Cloud Storage category. NetApp is ranked #9 with an average rating of 7.3, while Pure Storage is ranked #15 with an average rating of 9.0. NetApp holds a 7.0% mindshare in CS, compared to Pure Storage’s 2.0% mindshare. Additionally, 88% of NetApp users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of Pure Storage users who would recommend it.

Azure NetApp Files

Read 17 Azure NetApp Files reviews

2,365 Views
1,159 Comparison Views

88% willing to recommend

Pure Storage Evergreen One

Read 4 Pure Storage Evergreen One reviews

698 Views
202 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Azure NetApp Files

Pure Storage Evergreen One

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Sep 17, 2024

Azure NetApp Files and Pure Storage Evergreen One both offer high-performance data storage solutions. Users report higher satisfaction with the scalability and integration options of Azure NetApp Files. However, Pure Storage Evergreen One is seen as offering superior data reduction and efficiency features, valued despite its higher cost.

Features: Azure NetApp Files is praised for its seamless integration with Azure services, robust performance, and scalability. Pure Storage Evergreen One is noted for its effective data redundancy, data reduction, and efficiency.

Room for Improvement: Users of Azure NetApp Files suggest needing more cost-effective pricing structures, enhanced support options, and better documentation. Pure Storage Evergreen One users wish for improvements in the upgrade processes, reporting features, and the simplification of the interface.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Azure NetApp Files offers straightforward deployment within the Azure ecosystem but receives mixed feedback on customer support responsiveness. Pure Storage Evergreen One is commended for its proactive support but has a more complex initial deployment process.

Pricing and ROI: Azure NetApp Files users find the setup costs to align well with their budget, though ROI is seen as average. Pure Storage Evergreen One has higher initial costs but delivers a better ROI through data reduction savings.

To learn more, read our detailed Azure NetApp Files vs. Pure Storage Evergreen One Report (Updated: September 2025).

Buyer's Guide

Azure NetApp Files vs. Pure Storage Evergreen One

September 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 869,566 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Azure NetApp Files

Ranking in Cloud Storage

9th

Average Rating

8.0

Reviews Sentiment

7.4

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Cloud Migration (8th), Public Cloud Storage Services (11th)

Pure Storage Evergreen One

Ranking in Cloud Storage

15th

Average Rating

9.0

Reviews Sentiment

7.6

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

File and Object Storage (14th), Managed Cloud Services (2nd)

Mindshare comparison

As of October 2025, in the Cloud Storage category, the mindshare of Azure NetApp Files is 7.0%, down from 9.4% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Pure Storage Evergreen One is 2.0%, up from 0.4% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Cloud Storage Market Share Distribution
Product	Market Share (%)
Azure NetApp Files	7.0%
Pure Storage Evergreen One	2.0%
Other	91.0%

Cloud Storage

Featured Reviews

AjayKumar13

Cloud/Data/Database Manager at a government with 10,001+ employees

Fast, reliable, and helps meet our SLAs

The most valuable feature is that the sixty-terabyte database snapshot can be done in less than two to three minutes. It is faster. It is quicker. It is reliable. You don't need to take the snapshot. Snapshots are compressed. It doesn't take storage from the back end. It takes three minutes to do sixty terabytes of the database. You don't have to go to the tape and store it outside, which takes hours and hours. It also uses a lot less of the storage. It's very easy to restore or copy the snapshots to other locations for disaster recovery. There are a lot of benefits. In terms of the snapshot's rapid restore capability, we were testing the load of performance testing, and we needed to rebuild the DR site. If I need to rebuild the DR for a standby database, it takes sixty terabytes to copy onto the another site, which will take at least a day. Now, the snapshot is easy. We just copy the snapshots, and then we do the cross-region application. The snapshots came along with that, and that's where we were able to build the DR site within a few hours rather than days. All together, instead of a four-day process, instead of a day.

Read full review

Michael-Daniel

Virtual Storage Administrator at Coast

Exceptional speed improves performance with short and long-term storage

We are using it in-house for our data center to run all of our VMware environment and our VDI environment on. Infrastructure consumption, as well as short-term and long-term storage, is included The speed of the product is quite a bit better in performance than the previous environment we were…

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The availability is good, meaning downtime or network issues rarely occur. The system also offers flexibility, allowing for increases in data volume, IOPS, and other capabilities without requiring downtime, which is a strong point. Based on the money spent, we can get performance improvements and high availability."

"It's elastic, so it scales with our demands. We can start small, then with the addition of customer loads, we can expand on-the-fly without the need to reprovision something."

"The most valuable feature of this solution is its flexibility."

"The most valuable features of the solution is replication to another region and the performance. The solution is stable. The solution is scalable. The initial setup is straightforward."

"I think the easiest part is, when you do a comparison, it is the throughput versus the cost. And it's much easier to set up."

"This solution definitely makes us more efficient in being able to provide storage quickly to our customers in the Azure Cloud."

"Since we have NetApp's internally, we use the SnapMirror predominantly for this process in the cloud which is beneficial."

"The critical features of this solution are SnapMirror for replication, data protection, and SnapLock."

More Azure NetApp Files pros

"The speed of the product is quite a bit better in performance than the previous peer environment we were running on, and it seems to have a better feature set."

"We have snapshots. We put snapshots on disks, and we can save information. In the case of ransomware, everything is in the snapshot. We have a snapshot lock on it, so it's safe."

"The speed of the product is quite a bit better in performance than the previous environment we were running on, and it seems to have a better feature set."

"The Evergreen program is excellent, and the pricing is quite reasonable. My friends who work there are doing very well and consistently achieving strong results. Like any company, they experience occasional downturns but perform impressively overall."

"Pure Storage has the highest Net Promoter Score in the market."

Cons

"I don’t like the solution’s configuration and support."

"The main hurdle in promoting this solution is the price. Its price definitely requires an improvement. It is more expensive than other options, so customers go for a cheaper option."

"The pricing definitely needs to be improved."

"The initial setup was not straightforward. We had help from the NetApp team."

"I would like to see multi-zone redundancy so that I don't have to worry about it. I just back up my data to that one SMB share and I know that it's replicated to a different region."

"The main area for improvement is in the support ticket system. Since it's a SaaS platform, support tickets are managed by Microsoft or NetApp backend. This can sometimes lead to cross-functional challenges for organizations."

"Azure NetApp Files is expensive."

"The solution needs to improve it's ABS environment."

More Azure NetApp Files cons

"To me, I think it's a little expensive. Then again, you get what you pay for."

"Many customers report that the starting price is quite high. However, the overall total cost of ownership can be reduced over time due to features like the Evergreen architecture, which allows savings through less management and environmental benefits."

"It would be nice to have support in Swedish."

"I'm not sure if any improvements are needed."

"The only potential drawback is that Pure Storage might be overkill if you don't need microsecond response times."

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The performance has improved by about 30 percent."

"This solution is very expensive compared to the alternatives."

"It is expensive in small environments, which could be better. The reason is the four terabyte minimum. A one terabyte minimum would be better."

"The licensing fees for this solution vary, ranging from a single shelf to a full suite."

"The pricing depends on your scaling and consumption."

"Our pricing has not been determined because we are still waiting on additional features."

"In the cloud, pricing depends on how you manage it. It's not necessarily cheap, but it's all about optimizing charges and showing the cost back. So, it's more about managing the expenses rather than being inherently expensive or cheap."

"The price of Azure NetApp Files could be better."

More Azure NetApp Files pricing and cost advice

"The pricing is very good."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Cloud Storage solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

869,566 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Computer Software Company

13%

Manufacturing Company

13%

Financial Services Firm

13%

Construction Company

Financial Services Firm

19%

Manufacturing Company

15%

Retailer

10%

Healthcare Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	4
Midsize Enterprise	2
Large Enterprise	13

No data available

Questions from the Community

How does Azure NetApp Files compare to NetApp ONTAP?

Azure NetApp Files is a Microsoft Azure file storage service built on NetApp technology. The platform combines the file capabilities of Azure and NetApp to move critical file-based applications to ...

See all answers

What do you like most about Azure NetApp Files?

The availability is good, meaning downtime or network issues rarely occur. The system also offers flexibility, allowing for increases in data volume, IOPS, and other capabilities without requiring ...

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Azure NetApp Files?

It is expensive, especially with NetApp Ultra Storage.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Pure Storage Evergreen One?

Initially, the starting price is high, but over time, due to reduced management needs and environmental savings, the total cost of ownership decreases.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Pure Storage Evergreen One?

Many customers report that the starting price is quite high. However, the overall total cost of ownership can be reduced over time due to features like the Evergreen ( /products/evergreen-reviews )...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Pure Storage Evergreen One?

I am not a user of Pure Storage Evergreen One ( /products/pure-storage-evergreen-one-reviews ). I manage this brand in a technology company to distribute the product. I am working in a reseller bus...

See all answers

Comparisons

Microsoft Azure File Storage vs Azure NetApp Files

Compared 27% of the time

NetApp Cloud Volumes ONTAP vs Azure NetApp Files

Compared 24% of the time

Amazon EFS (Elastic File System) vs Azure NetApp Files

Compared 7% of the time

Nasuni vs Azure NetApp Files

Compared 7% of the time

Amazon FSx vs Azure NetApp Files

Compared 7% of the time

More Azure NetApp Files Competitors

HPE GreenLake vs Pure Storage Evergreen One

Compared 30% of the time

Dell APEX vs Pure Storage Evergreen One

Compared 28% of the time

Amazon EBS (Elastic Block Store) vs Pure Storage Evergreen One

Compared 11% of the time

NetApp Keystone vs Pure Storage Evergreen One

Compared 10% of the time

Object First Ootbi vs Pure Storage Evergreen One

Compared 8% of the time

More Pure Storage Evergreen One Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Azure NetApp Files

October 2025

Download Azure NetApp Files product report

Buyer's Guide

Cloud Storage

September 2025

Download Pure Storage Evergreen One product report

Also Known As

NetApp ANF, ANF

No data available

Overview

Azure NetApp Files offers flexibility, speed, and tight Active Directory integration, making it versatile. Its scalability, rapid response time, and replication capabilities like SnapMirror enhance its value, along with SEC compliance through SnapLock and efficient database management.

Azure NetApp Files is a robust service for unstructured data storage within Microsoft Azure and on-premises environments. It supports NFS and CIFS protocol testing, SQL backups, SAP virtualization, Azure Virtual Desktop, and event collection. This service facilitates seamless provisioning, non-disruptive resizing, and fast snapshots for disaster recovery. Known for high availability and cost-effective throughput, its ease of use and security make it preferred by users. Issues with high pricing and support highlight areas for enhancement, alongside desires for expanded regional availability, better security, and integration with diverse solutions.

What are the key features of Azure NetApp Files?

Flexibility: Supports diverse applications with robust Active Directory integration.
Scalability: Easily adjusts to increased performance demands.
Fast Snapshotting: Enhances disaster recovery capabilities.
SnapMirror: Provides effective replication features.
SnapLock: Ensures SEC compliance.

What benefits and ROI should users look for?

High Availability: Delivers reliable performance.
Cost-effective Throughput: Balances performance with expenditure.
Ease of Use: Simplifies data management tasks.
Non-disruptive Resizing: Facilitates seamless storage adjustments.
Enhanced Security: Protects sensitive data effectively.

In educational contexts, Azure NetApp Files shines by offering seamless data handling and high IOPS performance, supporting high-demand environments like research facilities. For enterprises, it aids legacy system migrations and optimizes virtual environments while enhancing data protection and file share performance.

NetApp

The Pure Storage Evergreen Portfolio offers a range of subscription-based storage solutions tailored to diverse data storage, management, and cost needs. Providing unmatched choice and flexibility, it offers multiple subscription models to align with varying requirements and budgets while leveraging Pure Storage's proven Evergreen Architecture for non-disruptive upgrades and futureproofing. The portfolio includes three specific programs: Evergreen//One, a hybrid cloud storage solution with guaranteed SLA; Evergreen//Flex, offering subscription-based ownership with flexible payment structures; and Evergreen//Forever, providing ongoing hardware and software upgrades for traditional storage purchases, simplifying ownership and eliminating the need for frequent hardware replacements.

Pure Storage

Sample Customers

SAP, Restaurant Magic

1. Aetna 2. Adobe 3. ADP 4. Aflac 5. Allstate 6. Amazon 7. American Express 8. American Greetings 9. Ameriprise Financial 10. ATT 11. Autodesk 12. Bank of America 13. Barclay's 14. Baxter International 15. Berkshire Hathaway 16. BlackRock 17. Boeing 18. Bristol-Myers Squibb 19. Capital One 20. Caterpillar 21. Citigroup 22. Coca-Cola 23. Comcast2 4. ConocoPhillips 25. Constellation Brands 26. CVS Health 27. Dell 28. Disney 29. Dominion Energy 30. Eli Lilly and Company 31. Equinix 32. ExxonMobil

Buyer's Guide

Azure NetApp Files vs. Pure Storage Evergreen One

September 2025

Free Report: Azure NetApp Files vs. Pure Storage Evergreen One

Find out what your peers are saying about Azure NetApp Files vs. Pure Storage Evergreen One and other solutions. Updated: September 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

869,566 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Azure NetApp Files vs. Pure Storage Evergreen One report.

See our list of best Cloud Storage vendors.

We monitor all Cloud Storage reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.