"Azure Monitor is useful because of the useful application insights and telemetry, such as metrics and logs."
"Data exporting is easy, and this tool works seamlessly with other solutions. It's a stable and low-priced solution."
"The feature that I found most valuable in Azure Monitor is its monitoring abilities. With Azure Monitor, you are able to monitor all of your cloud resources across multiple subscriptions in one dashboard and create solution-specific alerts that can trigger an email to the team responsible for that specific solution."
"One of the most useful aspects of this solution is the out-of-the-box functionality on all areas, especially on Application Insights, zero instrumentation, and artificial intelligence for event correlation."
"Azure Monitor is very stable."
"Provides an overview and high-level information."
"The most valuable features of Azure Monitor are the login analytics workspace and we can write any kind of custom queries in order to receive the data that is inserted into the login analytics workspace, diagnostic settings, et cetera."
"The solution works well overall. It's easy to implement and simple to use."
"VM monitoring is pretty good showing good visualizations of how VMs are operating within the context of all the VMs running on the same hypervisor."
"The stability of the Micro Focus Voltage SiteScope is good."
"Infrastructure monitoring is the most valuable feature."
"In my opinion, they should improve the overall user experience, especially when it comes to indexing and searching collective logs."
"Azure Monitor could improve network performance monitoring and make it more advanced."
"Azure Monitor could improve the visualization aspect and integrate better with other third-party services."
"I'd like the solution to do more around vulnerability assessment. It's lacking in the product right now."
"This solution could be improved with more out-of-the-box functionalities and artificial intelligence to complete event correlation."
"Setting up this solution is complex. It's also missing the functionality of assigning alerts."
"This solution has fewer features than some of its competitors, so adding more features to it would make it better."
"Lacks information including details related to where problems lie."
"I would be very interested in having transaction traceability included in the product, to give us a better view of what is really going wrong in a particular method and action."
"The lack of an agent means that remote monitoring requires multiple firewall ports to be opened."
"Micro Focus Voltage SiteScope could improve by adding more features, such as cloud, APM, and DevOps monitoring."
Azure Monitor is ranked 7th in Application Performance Management (APM) with 9 reviews while Micro Focus SiteScope is ranked 41st in Application Performance Management (APM) with 3 reviews. Azure Monitor is rated 7.6, while Micro Focus SiteScope is rated 6.0. The top reviewer of Azure Monitor writes "Low-priced and stable tool for data export and visualization, but has very few features". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Micro Focus SiteScope writes "Offers agentless monitoring, is easy to configure and reduces downtime". Azure Monitor is most compared with Datadog, Splunk, Dynatrace, New Relic APM and SolarWinds Server and Application Monitor, whereas Micro Focus SiteScope is most compared with Dynatrace, Splunk, AppDynamics, SCOM and SolarWinds AppOptics. See our Azure Monitor vs. Micro Focus SiteScope report.
See our list of best Application Performance Management (APM) vendors.
We monitor all Application Performance Management (APM) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
