Azure Firewall Manager vs Tufin Orchestration Suite comparison

Microsoft and Tufin are both solutions in the Firewall Security Management category. Microsoft is ranked #12 with an average rating of 9.3, while Tufin is ranked #2 with an average rating of 8.0. Microsoft holds a 1.7% mindshare in Firewall Security Management, compared to Tufin’s 22.8% mindshare. Additionally, 100% of Microsoft users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 91% of Tufin users who would recommend it.

Azure Firewall Manager

Read 8 Azure Firewall Manager reviews

861 Views
534 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Tufin Orchestration Suite

Read 184 Tufin Orchestration Suite reviews

6,179 Views
5,746 Comparison Views

91% willing to recommend

Azure Firewall Manager

Tufin Orchestration Suite

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Nov 4, 2024

Tufin Orchestration Suite and Azure Firewall Manager are competing in network security management. The Tufin Orchestration Suite is favored for its comprehensive support, while Azure Firewall Manager is preferred for its scalability, making it ideal for cloud-focused enterprises.

Features: Tufin Orchestration Suite offers detailed network policy management, security compliance, and automation capabilities. It provides extensive visibility across hybrid networks and support for multiple vendors. Azure Firewall Manager delivers integrated security controls directly within Azure, facilitating high scalability and simplified management. It provides a seamless experience for Azure cloud users.

Room for Improvement: Tufin could enhance scalability to better accommodate diverse environments and improve integration with cloud-native applications. There's a need for more streamlined automation features and user interface improvements. Azure Firewall Manager could expand its feature set beyond the Azure ecosystem and improve multi-cloud support. It might also enhance the granularity of its security policies and offer more customizable deployment options.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Tufin Orchestration Suite is recognized for its detailed deployment instructions and robust customer support, aiding users throughout the implementation process. Azure Firewall Manager offers streamlined deployment directly within Azure, providing efficiency for users already in the Azure ecosystem, along with readily available guides and support.

Pricing and ROI: Tufin Orchestration Suite requires a larger upfront investment, offering considerable ROI through enhanced network visibility and policy control. Azure Firewall Manager aligns with Azure’s flexible pricing models, delivering cost efficiency and value over time, especially for businesses committed to Azure infrastructure. Azure's pricing model may better suit dynamic cloud strategies.

To learn more, read our detailed Azure Firewall Manager vs. Tufin Orchestration Suite Report (Updated: July 2025).

Buyer's Guide

Azure Firewall Manager vs. Tufin Orchestration Suite

July 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 865,295 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Azure Firewall Manager

Ranking in Firewall Security Management

12th

Average Rating

8.6

Reviews Sentiment

6.8

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Microsoft Security Suite (28th)

Tufin Orchestration Suite

Ranking in Firewall Security Management

2nd

Average Rating

8.0

Reviews Sentiment

7.2

Number of Reviews

184

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of August 2025, in the Firewall Security Management category, the mindshare of Azure Firewall Manager is 1.7%, down from 2.4% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Tufin Orchestration Suite is 22.8%, up from 20.6% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Firewall Security Management

Featured Reviews

MuhammadShakeel

Senior System Engineer at Confiz Solutions

Manages multiple firewalls effortlessly but faces challenges with cost efficiency

Azure Firewall Manager is good most of the time, but it could be improved regarding cost. The cost is a significant concern because we are in a region where the dollar is not our default currency, and converting to dollars makes it very expensive. Microsoft should calculate and show the products in local currencies, such as PKR or Bangladesh currency, and also introduce Indian currency similarly for Pakistan. The technical support could be improved. When a resource is assigned, that resource should follow the ticket and respond swiftly, including sending an email to inform me that an agent has been assigned. I still find myself waiting for an agent to connect with me and resolve my issues. I have not been integrating Azure Firewall Manager with Azure Virtual WAN.

Read full review

MithatBulut

Network Security Engineer at TD SYNNEX

New employees can quickly grasp the various IPs, devices, and the network's logical and physical

Tufin is primarily used to orchestrate and manage network traffic and firewall devices. It is specifically useful for implementing firewall policies and handling requests from clients that require policy updates or changes Tufin simplifies understanding network topology. New employees can quickly…

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The solution has improved our organization with its firewall."

"It is easy to install and does not require any plugins for your browser."

"The tool's support is good."

"The most valuable feature of Azure Firewall Manager is the testing and configuration."

"Azure Firewall Manager centralizes network security management with a hub and spoke architecture."

"We are utilizing Azure Entra ID for group labeling, so Active Directory, or now it is Entra ID, securing our application for everyone who accesses it, and Azure Firewall Manager is definitely securing our projects and all its features are fine."

"The best feature of Azure Firewall Manager is that it is easy to maintain and configure."

"Azure Firewall Manager centralizes network security management with a hub and spoke architecture."

More Azure Firewall Manager pros

"We are able to stay compliant with many of the regulations."

"It has allowed us to be more efficient in our processing of firewall requests."

"We just got done with major audits. Tufin was able to provide information to give back to people, and say, "Hey, this is what I need to do, and what we're doing.""

"The most valuable feature are role and objects usage for individual objects and app usage."

"The APIs are the most valuable feature of this solution, as they facilitate integration with ServiceNow and other solutions."

"The most valuable feature of this solution is that it reduces both the time required and the number of errors when making changes."

"The reporting on offer is very good. Tufin makes nice reports."

"The visibility is huge. In order to figure out what was going on previously, we would have to pull stuff out of firewalls and put them in spreadsheets, then do sorts. Now, it's all right there in Tufin. We can write reports to look for what we need, ad hoc searches to find object groups, and know which firewalls are on. This was almost impossible to do previously."

More Tufin Orchestration Suite pros

Cons

"The tool's security features need to improve. It needs also to include a monitoring system for logs. It is also complicated to find a query on the Azure firewall."

"The price is okay. This said, the solution is certainly expensive in comparison with other cloud services."

"The cost is a significant concern because we are in a region where the dollar is not our default currency, and converting to dollars makes it very expensive."

"The solution can improve the integration with open-source tools."

"For Azure Firewall Manager, the learning curve for new people is a bit challenging, but the integration should be more straightforward for configuring a centralized system."

"The configuration and settings require substantial time for learning, particularly for new users."

"The configuration and settings require substantial time for learning, particularly for new users. Improvements in ease of configuration would benefit users significantly."

"There should be a simple one-click deployment for a firewall, rather than a set of setup instructions that include steps such as the DNS configuration, et cetera."

More Azure Firewall Manager cons

"Their pricing can be better. It is not very transparent."

"The pricing of the solution is rather expensive."

"I would like to see better report integration in this solution."

"We had a discussion in the Customer Advisory Board yesterday around use of SecureChange. We would like to have an opportunity for an engineer to choose if you want to make or take the policy which has been suggested by the designer functionality, making it more human readable or less human readable (more or less granular). This would be huge for the customers who are using SecureChange. They said this was one of their issues with it, especially for anything that was going into a regulator's or auditor's hands. The more human readable, the better that it would be, and this would definitely be applicable to our industry. It sounds like they are working on this issue, or they took the feedback, but that would be a big one for us in being able to make the jump to SecureChange."

"In the next release I would like to see better migration in the Cloud because that will allow more visibility in the network."

"There is room for improvement in the speed of Tufin. It is using so many of my VM resources and yet it is still a bit slow... Even though we are allocating 130 gigs of RAM, we still have to wait for a few minutes for a single report to be generated. Otherwise it would be a perfect tool."

"My worry with Tufin is that it cannot connect to Fortinet, which is what I want to do."

"The product that we have deployed for our main process gets bogged down in terms of its response. Maybe, we need to deploy a slightly smaller box. Eventually, we need to discuss this with Tufin is to see if we can move over to some sort of VM environment where we can add more processing power to it."

More Tufin Orchestration Suite cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The price of the solution is reasonable but it is reasonable for the features."

"The solution is certainly expensive in comparison with other cloud services."

"Tuffin is expensive, and we have to explain to our customers the benefit for them to purchase. If we explain the benefits in the correct way they do not mind the price. We typically do costing for the customer for three to five years. We make the general total cost of ownership at the beginning of a project for our customers."

"Its price is reasonable, but it could be lower. It has been cost-effective for us. We have a contract for three years."

"Pricing played a big part here... The customer had evaluated other products but, due to price as well as support, they chose Tufin."

"Our engineers are spending less time on manual processes: 20 to 30 hour plus."

"This solution helps us reduce the time it takes us to make changes. We're probably saving time by 25%."

"We have seen ROI in operational aspects, in terms of how long it takes to resolve incidences which arise."

"We have seen ROI just in the time savings and knowledge. Knowledge is power. Having the solution do it automatically for you without you doing the work is huge. If you are spending $50,000 a year, it could have cost you a $100,000 in man-hours without it, especially if you are working with a team.."

"There is a permanent license for devices, but it's not relative to a device itself. Once you purchase 10 licenses for virtual appliances or virtual context, you can put them into different virtual firewalls, but you can reuse these licenses for other devices if you don't need them for the old ones."

More Tufin Orchestration Suite pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Firewall Security Management solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

865,295 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

21%

Computer Software Company

18%

Manufacturing Company

Government

Financial Services Firm

17%

Computer Software Company

13%

Manufacturing Company

10%

Retailer

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about Azure Firewall Manager?

The most valuable feature of Azure Firewall Manager is the testing and configuration.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Azure Firewall Manager?

The pricing for Azure Firewall Manager seems okay compared to its good features. Although extra expenses are incurred for additional services, these are not directly related to the firewall, and th...

See all answers

What needs improvement with Azure Firewall Manager?

See all answers

What needs improvement with Tufin SecureCloud?

Tufin Orchestration Suite ( /products/tufin-orchestration-suite-reviews ) is not commonly used in Thailand due to a lack of local support, and many customers are switching to AlgoSec or other vendo...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Tufin SecureCloud?

I have primarily used Skybox and AlgoSec ( /products/algosec-reviews ). I have also interacted with FireMon for compiling. However, I am not currently working with ACA, and I don't have any project...

See all answers

What advice do you have for others considering Tufin SecureCloud?

There is potential for improvement in explaining the analytics in the dashboard for Tufin Orchestration Suite. Tufin Orchestration Suite does provide good monitoring; however, interpreting the grap...

See all answers

Comparisons

Azure Firewall vs Azure Firewall Manager

Compared 33% of the time

FortiGate Cloud-Native Firewall (FortiGate CNF) vs Azure Firewall Manager

Compared 27% of the time

Palo Alto Networks Panorama vs Azure Firewall Manager

Compared 13% of the time

AlgoSec vs Azure Firewall Manager

Compared 11% of the time

AWS Firewall Manager vs Azure Firewall Manager

Compared 9% of the time

More Azure Firewall Manager Competitors

AlgoSec vs Tufin Orchestration Suite

Compared 36% of the time

FireMon Security Manager vs Tufin Orchestration Suite

Compared 34% of the time

Skybox Security Suite vs Tufin Orchestration Suite

Compared 15% of the time

Palo Alto Networks Panorama vs Tufin Orchestration Suite

Compared 4% of the time

ManageEngine Firewall Analyzer vs Tufin Orchestration Suite

Compared 3% of the time

More Tufin Orchestration Suite Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Azure Firewall Manager

August 2025

Download Azure Firewall Manager product report

Buyer's Guide

Tufin Orchestration Suite

July 2025

Download Tufin Orchestration Suite product report

Also Known As

No data available

Tufin SecureCloud

Overview

Azure Firewall Manager is a security management service that provides central security policy and route management for cloud-based security perimeters.

To learn more about our solution, ask questions, and share feedback, join our Microsoft Security, Compliance and Identity Community.

Microsoft

Tufin enables organizations to automate their security policy visibility, risk management, provisioning and compliance across their multi-vendor, hybrid environment. Customers gain visibility and control across their network, ensure continuous compliance with security standards and embed security enforcement into workflows and development pipelines.

Tufin

Sample Customers

Information Not Available

3M, AT&T, Blue Cross Blue Shield, BNP Parabas, ConocoPhillips, Deutsche Bank, GE, IBM, Pfizer, United States Postal Service

Buyer's Guide

Azure Firewall Manager vs. Tufin Orchestration Suite

July 2025

Free Report: Azure Firewall Manager vs. Tufin Orchestration Suite

Find out what your peers are saying about Azure Firewall Manager vs. Tufin Orchestration Suite and other solutions. Updated: July 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

865,295 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Azure Firewall Manager vs. Tufin Orchestration Suite report.

See our list of best Firewall Security Management vendors.

We monitor all Firewall Security Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.