We performed a comparison between Opinnate and Tufin Orchestration Suite based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about AlgoSec, Tufin, Palo Alto Networks and others in Firewall Security Management."The platform is easy to deploy and maintain."
"Version upgrades can be done quickly."
"The APIs are the most valuable feature of this solution, as they facilitate integration with ServiceNow and other solutions."
"The automation because it is saving a lot of work, time, and effort required to do all of our manual work. The change impact analysis is pretty good, and with the automation, it takes care of a lot of things which we would be doing manually."
"The features I have found most valuable are its capability to check on the firewall and the routers. Afterwards it checks out all the configs, checks the vulnerabilities, checks the risks - it checks everything that may end up causing our router to be compromised. At the end it recommendations what we should do."
"The most valuable feature is the compliance check and the recommendations that it makes."
"The Topology Map, which feeds into our SecureChange - the latter being an automation platform - there's a lot of synergy between the two."
"The best feature for me is being able to look up objects within all of our policies, because we have a little over 12,000 rules and over 30,000 objects. When one person says, 'Hey, where's my server?' I can just go to Tufin and say, 'Hey, where is that server?' and very quickly it tells you where it is, what policy it's on. That is a life saver."
"Our engineers save quite a bit of time that was previously spent on manual processes."
"I like the deployment and management of this solution."
"The product's web page view is very basic. They could add new features to it."
"PDF format is not available for Alert Composer."
"The initial setup was time consuming."
"Their pricing can be better. It is not very transparent."
"I would really like to see a new UI for SecureChange. SecureTrack 2.0 has quite an improvement in the UI and it flows more smoothly. The current SecureTrack and SecureChange are a little blocky, and sometimes loading a tab or a page is required to refresh information. Whereas in SecureTrack 2.0, they're starting to improve on that."
"We actually had a key issue, which was a bug, that the development team didn't want to fix. We escalated it, then it got fixed. So, the management level seems very responsive at least, but at a support level, they are just regular support people and not outstanding."
"In the next release I would like to see better migration in the Cloud because that will allow more visibility in the network."
"There was some complexity during the initial setup"
"I would like to see an improved reporting model that can be flexible for us to generate our own reports. The data's already there."
"The change workflow process is flexible and customizable to some extent, but there is room for improvement. In some cases, we've found it difficult to get the exact thing which we were looking for. Then, we end up having to go and do the thing manually."
Opinnate is ranked 13th in Firewall Security Management with 2 reviews while Tufin Orchestration Suite is ranked 2nd in Firewall Security Management with 180 reviews. Opinnate is rated 10.0, while Tufin Orchestration Suite is rated 8.0. The top reviewer of Opinnate writes "Good support, nice interface, and simple to upgrade". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Tufin Orchestration Suite writes "A flexible, very secure solution that works well in Layer 2 environments". Opinnate is most compared with , whereas Tufin Orchestration Suite is most compared with AlgoSec, FireMon Security Manager, Skybox Security Suite, Palo Alto Networks Panorama and RedSeal.
See our list of best Firewall Security Management vendors.
We monitor all Firewall Security Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
