Tufin Orchestration Suite and Skybox Security Suite compete in the network security management space. Tufin Orchestration Suite seems to have the upper hand due to its flexibility in managing multi-vendor firewall environments and its comprehensive security policy management, whereas Skybox is highly regarded for its advanced vulnerability management capabilities.
Features: Tufin Orchestration Suite allows for seamless integration and central management of firewall policies, offering robust security policy management, real-time topology visualization, and advanced compliance auditing. Skybox Security Suite provides strong vulnerability management and comprehensive firewall assurance features, delivering valuable insights into network vulnerabilities and compliance, which aids in robust risk management and security policy enforcement.
Room for Improvement: Tufin Orchestration Suite could improve its reporting and automation functionalities, and better integrate with specific devices like Cisco ACI. Users also seek enhancements in UI design and network mapping. Skybox Security Suite would benefit from transitioning to a full web interface for easier access and offering richer network modeling capabilities, along with strengthened customer support and faster analysis speed.
Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Tufin Orchestration Suite is praised for its responsive and knowledgeable technical support, essential for navigating complex installations, though quicker escalation to advanced support levels is desired. Skybox Security Suite is commended for versatile deployment options across hybrid, on-premises, and public cloud environments, yet users express a need for improved support during critical issues in deployment and integration.
Pricing and ROI: Tufin Orchestration Suite is recognized for its high pricing, aligned with its premium offerings, making it a viable choice for large enterprises seeking comprehensive network management and time-saving automation. Although expensive, the ROI is evident in efficiency gains and resource management. Skybox Security Suite, while also premium-priced, is seen as cost-effective in vulnerability and compliance management, offering tangible ROI through its detailed analysis capabilities. Buyers should consider their specific requirements and budget when selecting between these solutions.
The Orchestration Suite saves time when implementing rules.
A significant issue was contacting support after hours on the weekends.
In recent years, they have stopped providing specialized engineering support.
The support team is effective; they connect to the network quickly and help resolve any issues that arise.
The team is eager to help in fixing issues.
One issue I faced with scalability was the transition from Skybox Security Suite's 6500 platform to the 7500 series due to licensing costs becoming prohibitive.
The lack of continued support and problematic licensing costs were also areas needing improvement.
It would be better if something more attractive or similar useful information found in AlgoSec was available.
Issues can arise in larger enterprises, particularly concerning policy-based forwarding and NAT traffic.
The analytics features of Tufin Orchestration Suite are challenging to use and require technical expertise, which is a concern as there is not much knowledge in this field in Thailand.
The design needs improvement, particularly in recognizing target devices and target files.
The pricing became prohibitive when transitioning between the 6500 and 7500 series models.
From a commercial perspective, AlgoSec is more expensive compared to Skybox Security Suite.
The pricing of Orchestration Suite is high, which is a point for improvement.
FireMon and Skybox are considered more cost-effective.
Tufin and AlgoSec are at the same level in terms of pricing.
The tool successfully helped in preventing vulnerabilities and breaches.
The most helpful feature is the firewall analyzer.
AlgoSec adds more value with its vulnerability control, which benefits organizations by reducing expenses associated with audits.
It offers automation capabilities that are very helpful, especially for network security orchestration and applying policies.
New employees can quickly grasp the various IPs, devices, and the network's logical and physical layout within a short period.
Skybox Security Suite provides comprehensive tools for network and firewall compliance, vulnerability management, and change management, with a focus on risk reduction and network optimization.
Skybox Security Suite supports over 130 vendors with massive scalability and seamless integration, notably with Nessus and Qualys. Its features include network path analysis and offline attack simulation, which enhance management effectiveness. Despite its robust offering, improvements are needed in its UI, web interface, reporting detail, and customization. Automation, orchestration, and device policy provisioning require better support, and integration with tools like Rapid7 could be improved. Enhancements in firewall configuration checks, cloud connectivity, pricing, and marketing awareness are also called for, alongside a transition from Java GUI to a consistent web-based system.
What Are Key Features of Skybox Security Suite?Skybox Security Suite is commonly used in industries requiring strict compliance like finance and healthcare. Firms employ it for firewall audits, enhancing network visibility, and managing configurations against standards such as PCI, ensuring security and policy compliance across expansive networks.
Tufin enables organizations to automate their security policy visibility, risk management, provisioning and compliance across their multi-vendor, hybrid environment. Customers gain visibility and control across their network, ensure continuous compliance with security standards and embed security enforcement into workflows and development pipelines.
We monitor all Firewall Security Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.