We performed a comparison between Azure Data Factory and Microsoft Azure Synapse Analytics based on our users’ reviews in four categories. After reading all of the collected data, you can find our conclusion below.
Comparison Results: Both of these solutions are very dynamic, robust, stable, and very flexible. As they are both part of the Microsoft Azure ecosystem, they are both very popular and highly regarded. Many of our users feel Azure Data Factory is an easier solution to understand and get started with out of the box. Microsoft Azure Synapse Analytics is more diverse and works better with a varied amount of different areas and industries.
"For me, it was that there are dedicated connectors for different targets or sources, different data sources. For example, there is direct connector to Salesforce, Oracle Service Cloud, etcetera, and that was really helpful."
"I enjoy the ease of use for the backend JSON generator, the deployment solution, and the template management."
"For developers that are very accustomed to the Microsoft development studio, it's very easy for them to complete end-to-end data integration."
"One advantage of Azure Data Factory is that it's fast, unlike SSIS and other on-premise tools. It's also very convenient because it has multiple connectors. The availability of native connectors allows you to connect to several resources to analyze data streams."
"Data Factory's best features are connectivity with different tools and focusing data ingestion using pipeline copy data."
"The initial setup is very quick and easy."
"The data copy template is a valuable feature."
"It's extremely consistent."
"We've had a good experience with technical support in general."
"The most valuable feature of Microsoft Azure Synapse Analytics is the capabilities, and the integration with other Azure resources, such as Data Factory, Databricks, and Spark for data processing. The overall ability to compose the solution with other Azure resources is valuable."
"What I found most valuable in Microsoft Azure Synapse Analytics is that it's native only for Azure, so you get better performance and there's no issue. To explain further, many different types of data come, in particular, structured and unstructured data. For audit purposes, there's also unstructured data, so the most important aspect is that with Microsoft Azure Synapse Analytics, you have the capability of using both technologies, meaning that you can use or mix structured and unstructured data which is important. This can also be done in Hadoop, and on other platforms, so you have everything in one place. You don't have to worry about how to manage both structured and unstructured data and where to store information. With Microsoft Azure Synapse Analytics, you can take care of everything, particularly in Azure. The solution also provides you with many features apart from analytics, for example, storage which makes it better."
"Its seamless integration with Azure services is most valuable. If somebody wants to use all Azure services, it is the best solution."
"The platform has multiple valuable use cases. They include performance, compatibility, flexibility, and cost."
"They are available on the Cloud, and the platform is very intuitive."
"The most valuable feature of Microsoft Azure Synapse Analytics is its integration with the new legacy systems. Whatever application we want to integrate, we receive the reports based on the objects. The solution is easy to purchase from the cloud."
"The most valuable features of Microsoft Azure Synapse Analytics are its serverless flexibility and complete power have allowed me to explore various different use cases. While I am not an expert in the product, my experience in programming in Databricks has shown me that Microsoft's investments in Synapse could potentially lead to it becoming a complete replacement for Databricks in the future."
"There aren't many third-party extensions or plugins available in the solution."
"Data Factory's cost is too high."
"They require more detailed error reporting, data normalization tools, easier connectivity to other services, more data services, and greater compatibility with other commonly used schemas."
"Azure Data Factory can improve the transformation features. You have to do a lot of transformation activities. This is something that is just not fully covered. Additionally, the integration could improve for other tools, such as Azure Data Catalog."
"Some of the optimization techniques are not scalable."
"Some known bugs and issues with Azure Data Factory could be rectified."
"I have not found any real shortcomings within the product."
"The initial setup is not very straightforward."
"It needs strong support for social media, internet data, and native support for NoSQL."
"The only concern for us is the cost part. When it comes to the implementation and the support and maintenance, we see high-cost implications."
"Microsoft Azure Synapse Analytics's pricing could be reduced."
"There is a limit on the number of concurrent queries to around 125 for Azure Synapse."
"An area for improvement in Microsoft Azure Synapse Analytics is its user interface. You can use it for analytical purposes, but its platform should be a little bit more user-friendly. Another small point for improvement in Microsoft Azure Synapse Analytics is its stability. It's good currently, but it could still be improved. Microsoft is combining different tools and technologies into one solution, so in the future, I'm expecting to see even more improvement in Microsoft Azure Synapse Analytics. An additional feature I'd like to see in the next version of Microsoft Azure Synapse Analytics is the drag-and-drop feature. If you're doing some integrations where you can write Scala or you have SPARK programming or SQL, or you're combining different programming, the process should be seamless, and you should be able to drag and drop in Microsoft Azure Synapse Analytics. When doing reporting in the solution, you should also be able to drag and drop. There should be connectors available and a drag-and-drop feature available in the user interface of Microsoft Azure Synapse Analytics, so you won't have to worry about how all processes would work together. You need to be able to drag and drop even from the backend, and having this feature will make the solution more user-friendly."
"I am very sure that there are areas in need of improvement, but I can't recall what they are off the top of my head."
"The security performance and cost are the two things that needs improvement."
"Synapse Analytics' performance slows down if you don't get your distribution right because it gets queued and goes into a single node."
More Microsoft Azure Synapse Analytics Pricing and Cost Advice →
Azure Data Factory is ranked 3rd in Cloud Data Warehouse with 81 reviews while Microsoft Azure Synapse Analytics is ranked 2nd in Cloud Data Warehouse with 85 reviews. Azure Data Factory is rated 8.0, while Microsoft Azure Synapse Analytics is rated 7.8. The top reviewer of Azure Data Factory writes "The data factory agent is quite good but pricing needs to be more transparent". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Microsoft Azure Synapse Analytics writes "No competitors provide the entire solution to one place ". Azure Data Factory is most compared with Informatica PowerCenter, Informatica Cloud Data Integration, Alteryx Designer, Snowflake and IBM InfoSphere DataStage, whereas Microsoft Azure Synapse Analytics is most compared with SAP BW4HANA, Snowflake, Oracle Autonomous Data Warehouse, Teradata and Amazon Redshift. See our Azure Data Factory vs. Microsoft Azure Synapse Analytics report.
See our list of best Cloud Data Warehouse vendors.
We monitor all Cloud Data Warehouse reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
I know you're looking for someone who's done research for you but realize that's actually something people get paid to do.
That said, what you're asking about is a mix of quite different tools when you throw KNIME in the mix. I don't know that tool but sounds like its for specific purpose and it's not an Azure tool. Realize there's endless ETL tools out there. I've used about 1/2 dozen in my career. I currently use both ADF and SSIS. I only use ADF when I have to as it's overly complicated to do version management and deal with ARM templates and is very very slow in comparison to SSIS. ADF can however be a good orchestrator for running SSIS - there's an Azure/PaaS version of SSIS called SSIS-IR that can run from ADF. Synapse Analytics pipelines which is actually ADF technology but stripped down. And now there's Fabric Data Factory which is again ADF but even more stripped down. Fabric is also bleeding edge.
ADF has been around for long time now. Anything Azure is cloud based and integrates with Azure services. KNIME is not that. I advise first on understanding fundamental requirements such as, what are the skill levels of your staff with ETL? Are you an Azure shop? What kind of data volumes are you talking about? What sources do you need to connect to (that's a biggy because not all tools talk to all sources!) What are you trying to do - build a datamart or EDW or just copy some data from a source or ? Do you use PowerBI? These will help drive what kind of tool you're looking for. If you want SAAS like as possible tool due to minimal requirements, low data volumes and low staff expertise and starting from scratch, I'd give Fabric a try especially if you want low tech and already into the Power platform. Hope that helps
I believe Synapse is not an ETL tool. ADF is one optional ETL tool for a Synapse Data warehouse.. What Are the Top ETL Tools for Azure Data Warehouse? | Integrate.io
I'd like to step back and pose a bigger option. You see, ETL means making a copy of data you have already. Have you considered a data fabric or mesh, where the data is used where it lies now? Consider this if your data is already used by some systems, but you need to do a more comprehensive analysis of it.
I always want to reduce the replication of databases. The concept of build yet another database to "replace" all the others rarely works out that way. I'd rather beef up the origination system, or use a replica than build a huge portfolio of ETL programs and an army of ops, data governance, and system support to keep them in sync.
Finally, if you really need an ETL tool, i.e. copies of all that data... look for existing talent in your staff. Otherwise, expect to hire some people experienced with the new tool that can advise on design and development and mentor existing staff.
A couple of questions before starting the feature comparison: i. Are you fine with an open-source solution? ii. Any specific reason you have listed ADF? iii. Who will be using these tools and how much learning curve is involved within the team? iv. What kind of data you are dealing with? v. Is data privacy an important factor? vi. Are you looking for only a cloud-based solution or open to a hybrid solution also? vii. What is the maturity level of the team when it comes to working on the cloud ........ These are just a few of the many questions basis which we do self-assessment or measure our preparedness. Let me know if you need more insights. Happy to help!!