We performed a comparison between Azure Cost Management and ScienceLogic based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about IBM, Microsoft, VMware and others in Cloud Cost Management."Azure Cost Management is user-friendly compared to other competitors."
"The most valuable features of Azure Cost Management are the ability to set standards or tagging policies and initiatives. You can achieve higher cost optimization."
"The most valuable feature of Azure Cost Management is cost optimization."
"The tool helps with budgeting and reporting. It notifies us whenever we cross the threshold."
"The resource forecasting feature is invaluable. Secondly, the ability to drill down to the regional and resource level is incredibly helpful for pinpointing where my costs are accruing."
"We use Azure DevOps, and the product helps us understand the cost with the help of the Azure DevOps center."
"Microsoft's technical support is good."
"The interface is good, and it's easy to manage."
"One of the valuable features is rapid dashboards."
"The best feature is the highly flexible graphs."
"Power packs."
"I'm satisfied with ScienceLogicfor for what they can offer today because they can offer both serverless connectivity and agent connectivity."
"The solution provides good infra-monitoring features."
"Best feature of all is detailed monitoring of services, processes, ports and SSL certificates and or web content."
"It is simple."
"Its ITSM and EMS combination is really amazing. There is no need to purchase two products, one for ITSM and a second for EMS/NMS."
"The forecasting model can improve Azure Cost Management."
"Improved integration with other solutions could definitely be beneficial."
"We have encountered delays in support."
"The solution could improve its APIs to access the customer application."
"It would be beneficial if Azure Cost Management could automatically generate budget rules using AI insights, eliminating the need for manual configuration."
"Azure Cost Management should be made cheaper."
"The solution could use automatic emailing. That would help improve the product a lot, at least for our purposes."
"The product's licensing cost could be improved."
"There are often bugs in new releases."
"It was challenging onboarding users."
"They need a little more self-service."
"The product is not user-friendly."
"ScienceLogic could improve the implementation, it could be made easier."
"ScienceLogic does not have application monitoring. We definitely need something integrated within ScienceLogic to monitor applications so that we don't have to rely on monitoring tools to monitor other applications. At least the ones that are market leaders, such as SAP, Oracle, and others."
"They should add CLI command modes and scripts for high performance."
"They should improve database issues in HA and Failover mode, and provide documentation for all users , even if they are not customers."
Azure Cost Management is ranked 2nd in Cloud Cost Management with 41 reviews while ScienceLogic is ranked 13th in IT Infrastructure Monitoring with 41 reviews. Azure Cost Management is rated 8.0, while ScienceLogic is rated 8.6. The top reviewer of Azure Cost Management writes "A good, but limited cost information solution with strong analytics but requiring more flexibility in its reporting functionality". On the other hand, the top reviewer of ScienceLogic writes "Great integrations, power flow, and good support". Azure Cost Management is most compared with IBM Turbonomic, VMware Aria Cost powered by CloudHealth, AWS Savings Plans, Cloudability and Zabbix, whereas ScienceLogic is most compared with Dynatrace, LogicMonitor, SolarWinds NPM, Datadog and Zabbix.
We monitor all Cloud Cost Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.