Axiom Team vs Devo comparison

Read 26 Devo reviews

6,972 Views
3,625 Comparison Views

92% willing to recommend

Axiom Team

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between Axiom Team and Devo based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out in this report how the two Log Management solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI.

To learn more, read our detailed Axiom Team vs. Devo Report (Updated: August 2026).

Download the complete report

Axiom Team vs. Devo

August 2026

Helped 909,153 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Axiom Team

Ranking in Log Management

42nd

Average Rating

8.6

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Data Observability (9th)

Devo

Ranking in Log Management

18th

Average Rating

8.4

Reviews Sentiment

6.5

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Security Information and Event Management (SIEM) (18th), IT Operations Analytics (7th), AIOps (13th)

Mindshare comparison

As of August 2026, in the Log Management category, the mindshare of Axiom Team is 0.4%, up from 0.0% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Devo is 1.4%, up from 0.6% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Log Management Mindshare Distribution
Product	Mindshare (%)
Devo	1.4%
Axiom Team	0.4%
Other	98.2%

Log Management

Featured Reviews

reviewer2783832

Programmer 1 at a manufacturing company with 10,001+ employees

Logging has reduced costs and now provides fast queries and dashboards for lambda troubleshooting

Axiom Team excels at querying, with a query language that makes it very easy to assemble queries. The platform also makes it simple to create dashboards from logs. Axiom Team dashboards are used to monitor execution time, pricing, and errors. Axiom Team has positively impacted the organization by greatly reducing logging costs.

Read full review

Usama Khan

Team Lead SOC at a tech services company with 51-200 employees

Advanced threat hunting has improved SOC visibility and now supports faster incident response

Devo can improve in how its connectors enhance integration with third-party tools. Devo's architecture works by having you deploy a relay server in the data center of the client side and Devo SIEM is basically on the AWS cloud. There are specific ports which are enabled on the relay server, which are 514 and 13000, 13151, 152. However, when we talk about databases and custom integrations, there are not default ports in the relay server. No default ports are defined. For JDBC drivers, the port number is 1433, but it is not in the relay server. You have to add it manually. For Oracle RDBMS, the port is 1521, and it is also not there by default. I would appreciate more third-party integrations including Fortinet and others. Machine learning models can also be improved. Playbooks in the SOAR can also be improved. Regarding playbooks for automation, we utilize playbooks for automation in SOAR for automated IOC blocking on a firewall, on a web application firewall, on DNS security, etc. The only option for us to run the playbook is to schedule the job for it. However, if I want to manually run the playbook, there is no option for doing so. This needs improvement.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"Axiom Team has positively impacted my organization mainly in terms of cost, as we have reduced our logging cost by approximately half."

"Axiom Team has positively impacted the organization by greatly reducing logging costs."

"Devo has improved our visibility, log management efficiency, and investigation capabilities positively."

"The querying and the log-retention capabilities are pretty powerful. Those provide some of the biggest value-add for us."

"Even if it's a relatively technical tool or platform, it's very intuitive and graphical. It's very appealing in terms of the user interface. The UI has a graphically interface with the raw data in a table. The table can be as big as you want it, depending on your use case. You can easily get a report combining your data, along with calculations and graphical dashboards. You don't need a lot of training, because the UI is relatively very intuitive."

"Overall, I have no issues with it and my guys love it."

"The most useful feature for us, because of some of the issues we had previously, was the simplicity of log integrations. It's much easier with this platform to integrate log sources that might not have standard logging and things like that."

"It is a joy to partner and be able to work with this kind of system."

"Devo's speed and performance allows us to query in real-time and keep up with what is actually happening on the network, then respond effectively to events."

"One of the biggest features of the UI is that you see the actual code of what you're doing in the graphical user interface, in a little window on the side. Whatever you're doing, you see the code, what's happening. And you can really quickly switch between using the GUI and using the code. That's really useful."

More Devo pros

Cons

"Axiom Team can be improved by ingesting logs faster, if possible."

"The biggest area with room for improvement in Devo is the Security Operations module that just isn't there yet. That goes back to building out how they're going to do content and larger correlation and aggregation of data across multiple things, as well as natively ingesting CTI to create rule sets."

"The overall performance of extraction could be a lot faster, but that's a common problem in this space in general. Also, the stock or default alerting and detecting options could definitely be broader and more all-encompassing. The fact that they're not is why we had to write all our own alerts."

"One improvement area for Devo could be simplifying some configuration and improving the onboarding for new analysts because it is quite complex for fresher or new analysts who are handling Devo."

"One major area for improvement for Devo... is to provide more capabilities around pre-built monitoring."

"We only use the core functionality and one of the reasons for this is that their security operation center needs improvement."

"It's stable but it's not extremely stable."

"The cost is a little higher compared to other tools such as DataDog or Elasticsearch, so they could work on reducing costs."

"Where Devo has room for improvement is the data ingestion and parsing. We tend to have to work with the Devo support team to bring on and ingest new sources of data."

More Devo cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

Information not available

"It's very competitive. That was also a primary draw for us. Some of the licensing models with solutions like Splunk and Sentinel were attractive upfront, but there were so many micro-charges and services we would've had to add on to make them what we wanted. We had to include things like SOAR and extended capabilities, whereas all those capabilities are completely included with the Devo platform. I haven't seen any additional fee."

"It's a per gigabyte cost for ingestion of data. For every gigabyte that you ingest, it's whatever you negotiated your price for. Compared to other contracts that we've had for cloud providers, it's significantly less."

"Pricing is based on the number of gigabytes of ingestion by volume, and it's on a 30-day average. If you go over one day, that's not a big deal as long as the average is what you expected it to be."

"Devo was very cost-competitive... Devo did come with that 400 days of hot data, and that was not the case with other products."

"I'm not involved in the financial aspect, but I think the licensing costs are similar to other solutions. If all the solutions have a similar cost, Devo provides more for the money."

"Devo is a hosted or subscription-based solution, whereas before, we purchased QRadar, so we owned it and just had to pay a maintenance fee. We've encountered this with some other products, too, where we went over to subscription-based. Our thought process is that with subscription based, the provider hosts and maintains the tool, and it's offsite. That comes with some additional fees, but we were able to convince our upper management it was worth the price. We used to pay under 10k a year for maintenance, and now we're paying ten times that. It was a relatively tough sell to our management, but I wonder if we have a choice anymore; this is where the market is."

"Devo is definitely cheaper than Splunk. There's no doubt about that. The value from Devo is good. It's definitely more valuable to me than QRadar or LogRhythm or any of the old, traditional SIEMs."

"I like the pricing very much. They keep it simple. It is a single price based on data ingested, and they do it on an average. If you get a spike of data that flows in, they will not stick it to you or charge you for that. They are very fair about that."

More Devo pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Log Management solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

909,153 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Construction Company

29%

Comms Service Provider

Financial Services Firm

Outsourcing Company

Financial Services Firm

15%

Construction Company

10%

Outsourcing Company

Manufacturing Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

No data available

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	10
Midsize Enterprise	5
Large Enterprise	12

Questions from the Community

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Axiom Team?

Pricing, setup cost, and licensing experience are not available due to lack of access to billing information.

What needs improvement with Axiom Team?

Axiom Team can be improved by ingesting logs faster, if possible.

What is your primary use case for Axiom Team?

Axiom Team is primarily used for logging Lambda functions and searching through those logs. When issues arise, the function logs are examined to determine what went wrong, and Axiom Team effectivel...

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Devo?

The pricing of the product is reasonable if we compare it with other Gartner leading products like Splunk, LogRhythm, Microsoft Sentinel, Google SecOps. Its licensing model is basically on per-day ...

What needs improvement with Devo?

What is your primary use case for Devo?

I am using Devo myself. Basically, I work at an MSSP, and we provide services to the organization for Security Operation Centers. In our Security Operation Center, we provide the service of SIEM vi...

Better Stack vs Axiom Team

Comparisons

Compared 24% of the time

Datadog vs Axiom Team

Compared 23% of the time

syslog-ng by One Identity vs Axiom Team

Compared 12% of the time

Datadog Services vs Axiom Team

Compared 11% of the time

Grafana Loki vs Axiom Team

Compared 7% of the time

More Axiom Team Competitors

Splunk Enterprise Security vs Devo

Compared 8% of the time

LogRhythm SIEM vs Devo

Compared 7% of the time

New Relic vs Devo

Compared 4% of the time

IBM Security QRadar vs Devo

Compared 3% of the time

Datadog vs Devo

Compared 3% of the time

More Devo Competitors

Product Reports

Download Axiom Team product report

Log Management

July 2026

Download Devo product report

August 2026

Overview

Axiom Team provides data-driven solutions optimized for business efficiency, empowering users to make informed decisions with actionable insights and seamless collaboration.

Specializing in effective data management, Axiom Team delivers a comprehensive platform with tools designed to streamline operations and enhance analytical capabilities. Its user-friendly approach enables businesses to harness data effectively, fostering a collaborative environment where teams can thrive. Axiom Team stands out in the market with its robust features, ensuring businesses are well-equipped to tackle complex challenges and tap into emerging opportunities.

What are the most important features of Axiom Team?

Data Integration: Connects with multiple data sources for a unified view.
Collaborative Tools: Facilitates teamwork with shared workspaces and communication aids.
Advanced Analytics: Provides sophisticated tools for data analysis and visualization.
Customizable Dashboards: Tailors the experience to meet unique business requirements.
Automated Reporting: Generates reports automatically, saving time and resources.

What benefits and ROI should be expected from Axiom Team?

Enhanced Decision-Making: Informs strategic choices with data insights.
Increased Productivity: Streamlines processes to save time and labor.
Cost Efficiency: Reduces operational costs through optimized workflows.
Scalability: Supports business growth with adaptable solutions.
Improved Collaboration: Strengthens team dynamics and information sharing.

Axiom Team finds applications across industries such as finance, healthcare, and retail, adapting to the unique demands of each sector. In finance, it aids in risk management and performance monitoring. Healthcare organizations use it for patient data management and operational efficiency. Retailers benefit from insights into consumer behavior and inventory management, showcasing its versatility and industry-specific applications.

Axiom

Devo offers powerful visual analytics, real-time data querying, and log integration capabilities within a cloud-native, multi-tenant architecture, supporting extended data retention ideal for long-term analysis and compliance.

Devo is recognized for its Activeboards, which facilitate visual analytics. High-speed search capabilities and real-time analytics enable efficient data manipulation and querying. Its multi-tenant architecture supports effective data segregation and customization tailored to distinct business needs, enhancing its value for handling complex log integrations. With extended data retention of 400 days and a cloud-native architecture, Devo is a robust platform for long-term analysis and compliance requirements. Though opportunities exist to improve browser stability on large searches, SOAR integrations, and its parser capabilities, Devo remains essential for incident response and security monitoring, offering centralized data storage and analysis.

What are Devo's most important features?

Activeboards: Facilitate visual analytics and data exploration.
High-Speed Search: Enables fast data querying and manipulation.
Real-Time Analytics: Supports instant insights and decision-making.
Multi-Tenant Architecture: Allows effective data segregation and customization.
Extended Data Retention: Offers 400-day log retention for compliance and analysis.
Complex Log Integration: Handles intricate data sources effortlessly.

What benefits and ROI should organizations look for in reviews?

Visual Insights: Enhance understanding through interactive dashboards.
Performance Efficiency: Saves time with high-speed data search and real-time results.
Customization Flexibility: Fits specific business requirements with multi-tenant architecture.
Long-Term Compliance: Ensures alignment with extended data retention needs.
Centralized Monitoring: Enables comprehensive incident response and security monitoring.

Devo is extensively used in industries focused on incident response and digital forensics, centralizing data for security monitoring across hybrid environments. Organizations benefit from its ability to store and analyze aggregated logs, creating alerts and dashboards to enhance visibility for network and endpoint activities in multi-domain settings.

Sample Customers

Information Not Available

United States Air Force, Rubrik, SentinelOne, Critical Start, NHL, Panda Security, Telefonica, CaixaBank, OpenText, IGT, OneMain Financial, SurveyMonkey, FanDuel, H&R Block, Ulta Beauty, Manulife, Moneylion, Chime Bank, Magna International, American Express Global Business Travel