Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

AWS WAF vs Radware Bot Manager comparison

 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive Summary

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

ROI

Sentiment score
6.9
AWS WAF enhances security and cost efficiency by integrating with AWS, reducing the need for additional security personnel.
Sentiment score
7.6
Radware Bot Manager reduces costs, improves uptime, and delivers a 30% ROI with significant time and financial savings.
With AWS WAF, it is easier for us to block unwanted malicious DDoS attacks and threats from coming into our web application.
DevOps Engineer at a tech vendor with 1,001-5,000 employees
For us as the enterprise, it literally shows the impact on technical resources and also the egress data from Cloud services such as AWS and Azure has come down significantly.
Senior Cyber Security Specialist Architect at a tech consulting company with 11-50 employees
Radware Bot Manager is invaluable to us, and we have seen around a thirty percent return on investment, particularly in terms of time savings.
IT Engineer at a comms service provider with 51-200 employees
 

Customer Service

Sentiment score
6.7
AWS WAF support receives mixed reviews, praised for responsiveness and expertise, yet criticized for cost and inconsistent communication.
Sentiment score
8.2
Radware Bot Manager excels in customer support with high satisfaction, rapid responses, and effective integration of user feedback.
They reach out when you send them a ticket, and within 24 hours or less, someone is able to get back to you to solve your problem.
DevOps Engineer at a tech vendor with 1,001-5,000 employees
Resolving issues can take time because the support personnel may lack product expertise, leading to delays.
Security Engineer at a computer software company with 1,001-5,000 employees
I rate it ten out of ten because of their prompt availability and assistance whenever issues arise, especially in relation to false positives and other adjustments.
IT Engineer at a comms service provider with 51-200 employees
I would rate the technical support from Radware Bot Manager a nine on a scale of one to ten.
Senior Cyber Security Specialist Architect at a tech consulting company with 11-50 employees
 

Scalability Issues

Sentiment score
7.8
AWS WAF excels in scalability and auto-scaling, efficiently handling traffic for businesses of all sizes, though improvements are possible.
Sentiment score
8.8
Radware Bot Manager provides outstanding scalability and seamless integration, outperforming competitors with top-rated capability and effortless expansion options.
AWS WAF does scale in the sense that it is fully managed and has automatic scaling.
DevOps Engineer at a tech vendor with 1,001-5,000 employees
I rate its scalability ten out of ten.
IT Engineer at a comms service provider with 51-200 employees
 

Stability Issues

Sentiment score
8.3
AWS WAF is highly rated for stability due to reliable performance, strong protection, and effective redundancy features.
Sentiment score
8.5
Radware Bot Manager is praised for its reliability and stability, rarely experiencing downtime and earning high user ratings.
Since it protects web applications from common attacks such as SQL injection and XSS, it is very stable.
DevOps Engineer at a tech vendor with 1,001-5,000 employees
We faced issues with AWS WAF when writing the custom rules.
Infrastructure Lead at Danat Fz LLC
In terms of reliability, I would rate AWS WAF about six out of ten due to the need for improved signature sets.
Security Engineer at a computer software company with 1,001-5,000 employees
Downtime, bugs, or glitches are not prominently mentioned as issues.
IT Engineer at a comms service provider with 51-200 employees
 

Room For Improvement

AWS WAF requires improved integration, usability, security features, and flexible pricing to better support global users and services.
Radware Bot Manager could improve through better reporting, seamless integrations, enhanced automation, reduced false positives, and simplified setup.
Compared to firewalls, WAFs generally provide limited stateful analysis capabilities.
Security Engineer at a computer software company with 1,001-5,000 employees
If there are scripts in the requests, we should be able to filter those requests to see if there are any scripts running from them.
Infrastructure Lead at Danat Fz LLC
Features like bot protection or DDoS mitigation, available with other WAF vendors, do not come natively with AWS WAF.
Security Analyst at M2P Fintech
Maybe people who are new to it, or haven't used anything similar before, might say that the configuration is a bit difficult unless you're a technical person who understands the flow or the URL environment.
Senior Cyber Security Specialist Architect at a tech consulting company with 11-50 employees
Radware Bot Manager has instances of false positives where legitimate activities are mistakenly detected as attacks.
IT Engineer at a comms service provider with 51-200 employees
 

Setup Cost

AWS WAF offers cost-effective, pay-as-you-go pricing, starting at $5 monthly, valued for integration with AWS services.
Radware Bot Manager offers fair pricing for enterprises, though smaller organizations may struggle with costs and exchange rate issues.
The licensing cost for AWS WAF is just pay-as-you-go; it is a service-based model.
Infrastructure Lead at Danat Fz LLC
Due to our status as an AWS shop, AWS WAF is cost-effective for us, and we benefit from discounts due to our extensive use of AWS services.
Security Engineer at a computer software company with 1,001-5,000 employees
Radware's pricing is generally expensive.
IT Engineer at a comms service provider with 51-200 employees
My experience with the pricing and setup costs for Radware Bot Manager shows that the setup costs were almost nothing because we made use of the trial manager.
Senior Cyber Security Specialist Architect at a tech consulting company with 11-50 employees
 

Valuable Features

AWS WAF offers threat blocking, scalability, automation, and seamless integration, enhancing security and performance with easy deployment and affordability.
Radware Bot Manager offers AI-driven bot mitigation, integration with Cloud WAF, and user-friendly features for comprehensive security enhancement.
The biggest benefit of AWS WAF for us is to filter malicious requests, so we can protect our environment and application from malicious actors.
Infrastructure Lead at Danat Fz LLC
It has also helped to improve the posture of our application, prevent all DDoS attacks, and unnecessary traffic and SQL injection that is reducing the performance of our application.
DevOps Engineer at a tech vendor with 1,001-5,000 employees
I switched from other vendors to prioritize AWS WAF for better control within our infrastructure.
Security Analyst at M2P Fintech
Since implementing Radware Bot Manager, we've seen fewer attacks and improved the ability to distinguish between bot attacks and legitimate traffic.
IT Engineer at a comms service provider with 51-200 employees
The best features of Radware Bot Manager, as a client, include the reporting because it is easy to understand, easy to read, and easy to get developers or system engineers to understand what they need to implement to secure either a web form or an API, anything similar to that.
Senior Cyber Security Specialist Architect at a tech consulting company with 11-50 employees
 

Categories and Ranking

AWS WAF
Average Rating
8.0
Reviews Sentiment
7.0
Number of Reviews
61
Ranking in other categories
Web Application Firewall (WAF) (3rd)
Radware Bot Manager
Average Rating
9.0
Reviews Sentiment
7.6
Number of Reviews
11
Ranking in other categories
Bot Management (5th)
 

Mindshare comparison

While both are Security Services solutions, they serve different purposes. AWS WAF is designed for Web Application Firewall (WAF) and holds a mindshare of 5.8%, down 11.0% compared to last year.
Radware Bot Manager, on the other hand, focuses on Bot Management, holds 4.1% mindshare, down 4.4% since last year.
Web Application Firewall (WAF) Market Share Distribution
ProductMarket Share (%)
AWS WAF5.8%
Fortinet FortiWeb8.1%
F5 Advanced WAF7.8%
Other78.3%
Web Application Firewall (WAF)
Bot Management Market Share Distribution
ProductMarket Share (%)
Radware Bot Manager4.1%
Akamai Bot Manager14.7%
Imperva Application Security Platform13.1%
Other68.1%
Bot Management
 

Featured Reviews

Azam S M - PeerSpot reviewer
Infrastructure Lead at Danat Fz LLC
Has successfully filtered malicious traffic and allowed country-specific access controls
For improvement in AWS WAF, we can have better monitoring. One of the things that should be improved in AWS WAF is the monitoring; we need to identify the requests and where they are coming from. If it's a bot, we should differentiate the requests, whether they are automated or not. The way we see it now is just mentioned as a percentage from bots and actual users, which should include proper graphs and detailed information. We also need a feature where we can filter specific requests. If there are scripts in the requests, we should be able to filter those requests to see if there are any scripts running from them.
HI
IT Engineer at a comms service provider with 51-200 employees
Support team excels in managing bot detection with agile solutions
When looking at Radware Bot Manager, I noticed instances of false positives where legitimate activities were mistakenly detected as attacks. However, our team has weekly calls with Radware to address and filter out these issues. The reports can be a bit complicated, but Radware assists us in managing the reporting aspect.
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Web Application Firewall (WAF) solutions are best for your needs.
880,954 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Financial Services Firm
15%
Computer Software Company
13%
Manufacturing Company
9%
Government
6%
Media Company
15%
Comms Service Provider
13%
Financial Services Firm
9%
Computer Software Company
7%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
By reviewers
Company SizeCount
Small Business22
Midsize Enterprise12
Large Enterprise26
By reviewers
Company SizeCount
Small Business6
Midsize Enterprise3
Large Enterprise2
 

Questions from the Community

What are the limitations of AWS WAF vs alternative WAFs?
Hi Varun, I have had experienced with several WAF deployments and deep technical assessments of the following: 1. Imperva WAF 2. F5 WAF 3. Polarisec Cloud WAF Typical limitations on cloud WAF is t...
How does AWS WAF compare to Microsoft Azure Application Gateway?
Our organization ran comparison tests to determine whether Amazon’s Web Service Web Application Firewall or Microsoft Azure Application Gateway web application firewall software was the better fit ...
What do you like most about AWS WAF?
The most valuable feature of AWS WAF is its highly configurable rules system.
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Radware Bot Manager?
My experience with the pricing and setup costs for Radware Bot Manager shows that the setup costs were almost nothing because we made use of the trial manager. I just added our IP addresses and DNS...
What needs improvement with Radware Bot Manager?
I don't know how Radware Bot Manager can be improved; when I used it, it fulfilled my requirements. Maybe people who are new to it, or haven't used anything similar before, might say that the confi...
What is your primary use case for Radware Bot Manager?
The typical use cases for Radware Bot Manager involve ensuring that web scraping and data exfiltration is not that easy, and also identifying source IP addresses or which users are doing the scraping.
 

Also Known As

AWS Web Application Firewall
ShieldSquare, ShieldSquare Bot Mitigation and Bot Management
 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

eVitamins, 9Splay, Senao International
Pearson, Zulily, Purch, Groupe PSA, Yellow Pages, Axel Springer, Dorman, Penske, SeLoger.com, trovaprezzi.it
Find out what your peers are saying about Fortinet, F5, Amazon Web Services (AWS) and others in Web Application Firewall (WAF). Updated: January 2026.
880,954 professionals have used our research since 2012.