AWS Security Hub vs ManageEngine Log360 comparison

The compared Amazon Web Services (AWS) and ManageEngine solutions aren't in the same category. Amazon Web Services (AWS) is ranked #16 in CSPM , with an average rating of 7.6, and holds a 3.9% mindshare in the category. ManageEngine is ranked #16 in Log Management , with an average rating of 8.6, and holds a 1.2% mindshare. Additionally, 89% of Amazon Web Services (AWS) users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 75% of ManageEngine users who would recommend it.

AWS Security Hub

Read 26 AWS Security Hub reviews

7,113 Views
3,130 Comparison Views

89% willing to recommend

ManageEngine Log360

Read 19 ManageEngine Log360 reviews

3,152 Views
1,860 Comparison Views

75% willing to recommend

AWS Security Hub

ManageEngine Log360

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Sep 18, 2024

ManageEngine Log360 and AWS Security Hub are both powerful solutions for security and information event management. While AWS Security Hub is recognized for its comprehensive features, user reviews indicate that ManageEngine Log360 excels in pricing and support, making it a worthy competitor.

Features: ManageEngine Log360 is praised for its centralized log management, user activity monitoring, and compliance reporting. AWS Security Hub stands out with automated security checks, event logging across AWS solutions, and integration with third-party tools.

Room for Improvement: Users of ManageEngine Log360 often cite a need for better integration with non-native tools and improved scalability options. AWS Security Hub users suggest enhancing the depth of reports and simplifying initial setup processes.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: ManageEngine Log360 receives positive feedback for its intuitive setup process and responsive customer support. Conversely, AWS Security Hub, while comprehensive, can be more complex to deploy, but users appreciate the detailed documentation and community support.

Pricing and ROI: ManageEngine Log360 is often highlighted for its cost-effectiveness, with user reviews noting high ROI due to lower setup costs and straightforward licensing structures. AWS Security Hub's pricing can be higher, yet users find value in its extensive features and seamless AWS integration.

To learn more, read our detailed AWS Security Hub vs. ManageEngine Log360 Report (Updated: October 2024).

Buyer's Guide

AWS Security Hub vs. ManageEngine Log360

October 2024

Download the complete report

Helped 879,711 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

AWS Security Hub

Average Rating

7.6

Reviews Sentiment

6.5

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Security Orchestration Automation and Response (SOAR) (6th), Cloud Security Posture Management (CSPM) (16th)

ManageEngine Log360

Average Rating

7.6

Reviews Sentiment

6.8

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Log Management (16th), Security Information and Event Management (SIEM) (13th), User Entity Behavior Analytics (UEBA) (11th)

Mindshare comparison

While both are Security Software solutions, they serve different purposes. AWS Security Hub is designed for Cloud Security Posture Management (CSPM) and holds a mindshare of 3.9%, down 4.6% compared to last year.
ManageEngine Log360, on the other hand, focuses on Log Management, holds 1.2% mindshare, up 1.0% since last year.

Cloud Security Posture Management (CSPM) Market Share Distribution
Product	Market Share (%)
AWS Security Hub	3.9%
Wiz	16.6%
Prisma Cloud by Palo Alto Networks	9.6%
Other	69.9%

Cloud Security Posture Management (CSPM)

Log Management Market Share Distribution
Product	Market Share (%)
ManageEngine Log360	1.2%
Wazuh	9.4%
Splunk Enterprise Security	7.1%
Other	82.3%

Log Management

Featured Reviews

Karthik Ekambaram

Director at Scybers

Has helped identify misconfigurations and prioritize risks but lacks multi-cloud support and deeper integration features

AWS Security Hub cannot scale up to multiple different cloud environments; it only works for AWS. There are other products in the market for CSPM that can give you multi-cloud environment misconfigurations, even Microsoft for that matter. Regarding the integration of AWS Security Hub with third-party tools, I am not certain whether we can integrate them, but there is no need to do so. However, AWS Security Hub cannot integrate with other cloud providers, so it only supports the AWS environment. The compliance checks within AWS Security Hub are good, but we don't use them much. We utilize compliance frameworks such as CIS compliance frameworks and ISO 27017 framework, which are beneficial, but it can improve in other areas too, such as including NIST and other frameworks beyond just ISO and CIS. Improvements can be applicable for scalability, particularly on integration with multi-cloud environments, and compliance frameworks can be added for more variety as well. The unified dashboard in AWS Security Hub is adequate; I cannot say it is exceptional, but the content available in the dashboards is satisfactory for now.

Read full review

Md Abdul Hakim

System Engineer at Corporate Projukti Limited

Integration capabilities impress while room for improvement exists in cloud compatibility

1. Enhanced Cloud Integration Current Gap: Log360 lacks native integration with Microsoft Intune and cloud-based Active Directory (Azure AD), limiting visibility for organizations transitioning to hybrid or fully cloud environments. Requested Improvements: Direct Intune Log Collection: Ability to ingest and correlate logs from Intune-managed devices to monitor compliance, device health, and security policies. Azure AD Deep Integration: Support for Azure AD audit logs, conditional access events, and identity protection alerts to provide end-to-end visibility. Cloud Workload Monitoring: Extend coverage to SaaS applications (e.g., Microsoft 365, AWS, GCP) for unified threat detection. Why It Matters: Many clients have migrated from on-prem AD to cloud-first setups this year. Without cloud-native log collection, critical security events (e.g., rogue Intune policies or Azure AD breaches) go unmonitored. 2. Improved Automation and Response Current Gap: Limited automated remediation (e.g., auto-isolating compromised devices) forces manual intervention. Requested Features: Playbook Automation: Pre-built workflows to auto-resolve common issues (e.g., disabling users after brute-force attacks). SOAR Integration: APIs to connect with SIEM/SOAR platforms (e.g., Splunk, Palo Alto Cortex) for escalated threat response.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"Cloudposse is a valuable feature as it guarantees my security."

"The advantage is that it is cloud-native, and we do not need to install agents or sensors to find findings."

"AWS Security Hub has very good integration features. It allows for AWS native services integration, and it helps us to integrate some of the services outside of AWS. They have partners, such as Amazon Preferred Network Partners (APN). If you have different security tools around APN, we can integrate those findings with AWS Security Hub reducing the need to refer to different portals or different UIs. You can have AWS Security Hub act as a single common go-to dashboard."

"AWS Security Hub can check your infrastructure against multiple compliance frameworks. You can turn on or off specific frameworks based on your needs."

"AWS Security Hub's unified dashboard does help streamline my process of identifying vulnerabilities, but we don't use Inspector."

"I find all of the features to be highly valuable."

"Finding out if your infrastructure is secure is a valuable feature."

"I really like the seamless integration with the AWS account structure. It can even be made mandatory as part of the landing zone. These are great features. And there's a single pane of glass for the entire account."

More AWS Security Hub pros

"The solution could be improved by including XDR, remediation and Sandbox."

"You can have all of the logs from servers to network and it gets sent out to the correct owners. This is very helpful."

"The most valuable features for us are the application logs monitoring and the dashboard, which provides a single-pane view of all the ongoing activities."

"My main objective for using ManageEngine Log360 is its powerful and real-time capabilities for managing security and other tasks efficiently."

"We haven't had any stability issues."

"ManageEngine Log360 could integrate with all systems, making it possible to integrate everything to the central location, which made it a useful and necessary tool."

"The Sharecon feature is the most valuable."

"ManageEngine Log360 is a comprehensive solution, including event log analysis for Microsoft 365."

More ManageEngine Log360 pros

Cons

"The user interface, graphs, and dashboards of the solution could improve in the future. They are not very sophisticated and could use an update."

"The solution will only give you insight if you have configure rule enabled. It should work more like Prisma Cloud and Dome9 which have a better approach."

"The solution lacks self-sufficiency."

"The support must be quicker."

"There is room for improvement in implementing AI capabilities. It would be beneficial for Security Hub to implement preventative measures and to directly apply recommendations instead of just suggesting them."

"Security Hub is currently not worth investing in, as it requires more configurations and integration with other services to work effectively."

"One aspect that could be improved in the solution is its adaptability to different markets and geopolitical restrictions. In certain regions like Thailand, specific services from certain countries or providers, such as AWS or Azure, might be limited or blocked. It also needs improvement in would require configuring the solution more adaptable to AWS infrastructure and function."

More AWS Security Hub cons

"The solution needs to improve hub storage. It should integrate AI and ML capabilities."

"On the PostgreSQL side, it was not parsing much, which required a lot of manual work."

"Their technical support should be improved."

"The support needs improvement."

"It is not expensive compared to other solutions."

"Log360 currently cannot gather information from Intune logs or cloud-integrated systems."

"The graphical interface could be made easier to use when you are connecting to different network equipment."

"There is room for improvement, especially in the reporting aspect. The reports are not as good as those in Splunk."

More ManageEngine Log360 cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"There are multiple subscription models, like yearly, monthly, and packaged."

"The price of the solution is not very competitive but it is reasonable."

"The pricing is fine. It is not an expensive tool."

"The price of AWS Security Hub is average compared to other solutions."

"AWS Security Hub's pricing is pretty reasonable."

"The cost is based on the number of compliances, core checks, and services required, and for more than 10,000 recommendations, the charge is just one dollar."

"Security Hub is not an expensive solution."

"AWS Security Hub is not an expensive tool. I would consider it to be a cheap solution. AWS Security Hub follows the PAYG pricing model, meaning you will have to pay for whatever you use."

"Affordable pricing is provided by the solution."

"Its pricing is definitely huge compared to some of the other SIEMs. Its price should be improved."

"My client has a yearly license. I think the cost is not expensive compared to that of other SIEMs, given the service it is providing."

"There is a cost for each feature used."

"ManageEngine Log360 is expensive compared to other products."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Cloud Security Posture Management (CSPM) solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

879,711 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Comparison Review

it_user186927

Director of Operations at a comms service provider with 10,001+ employees

Feb 16, 2015

Cybereason vs. Interset vs. SQRRL

Capture DB - they all use NoSQL db and hence solve the ad hoc query and 'go back in time' problem with current best of breed SIEM and DLP solutions that rely on real time analysis of incoming logs (and don't store them). This means deeper and quicker iterative threat analysis and assessment…

Read full review

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Computer Software Company

12%

Financial Services Firm

12%

Manufacturing Company

10%

Government

Computer Software Company

12%

Manufacturing Company

Comms Service Provider

Healthcare Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	10
Midsize Enterprise	5
Large Enterprise	12

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	14
Midsize Enterprise	2
Large Enterprise	2

Questions from the Community

Which is better - Azure Sentinel or AWS Security Hub?

We like that Azure Sentinel does not require as much maintenance as legacy SIEMs that are on-premises. Azure Sentinel is auto-scaling - you will not have to worry about performance impact, you will...

See all answers

What do you like most about AWS Security Hub?

The most valuable features of the solution are the scanning of all the cloud environments and most of the compliances available in the cloud.

See all answers

What needs improvement with AWS Security Hub?

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for ManageEngine Log360?

The price is suitable from a perspective of different pricing options. We already have an ongoing project where some features analytics can be escaped, and companies can manage their budgets carefu...

See all answers

What needs improvement with ManageEngine Log360?

ManageEngine Log360 could provide more in-depth insights, particularly in reporting. Some other solutions provide deeper insights into issues, especially when generating reports. More detailed insi...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for ManageEngine Log360?

ManageEngine Log360 is being used for database monitoring and as a SIEM solution.

See all answers

Comparisons

Microsoft Sentinel vs AWS Security Hub

Compared 35% of the time

Wiz vs AWS Security Hub

Compared 9% of the time

Prisma Cloud by Palo Alto Networks vs AWS Security Hub

Compared 8% of the time

Microsoft Defender for Cloud vs AWS Security Hub

Compared 5% of the time

CrowdStrike Falcon Cloud Security vs AWS Security Hub

Compared 3% of the time

More AWS Security Hub Competitors

ManageEngine EventLog Analyzer vs ManageEngine Log360

Compared 18% of the time

Fortinet FortiSIEM vs ManageEngine Log360

Compared 12% of the time

Splunk Enterprise Security vs ManageEngine Log360

Compared 9% of the time

Wazuh vs ManageEngine Log360

Compared 6% of the time

SIEMStorm vs ManageEngine Log360

Compared 5% of the time

More ManageEngine Log360 Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

AWS Security Hub

January 2026

Download AWS Security Hub product report

Buyer's Guide

ManageEngine Log360

December 2025

Download ManageEngine Log360 product report

Also Known As

SQRRL

No data available

Overview

AWS Security Hub is a comprehensive security service that provides a centralized view of security alerts and compliance status across an AWS environment. It collects data from various AWS services, partner solutions, and AWS Marketplace products to provide a holistic view of security posture. With Security Hub, users can quickly identify and prioritize security issues, automate compliance checks, and streamline remediation efforts.

The service offers a range of features including continuous monitoring, threat intelligence integration, and customizable dashboards. It also provides automated insights and recommendations to help users improve their security posture. Security Hub integrates with other AWS services like Amazon GuardDuty, AWS Config, and AWS Macie to provide a unified security experience. Additionally, it supports integration with third-party security tools through its API, allowing users to leverage their existing security investments.

With its user-friendly interface and powerful capabilities, AWS Security Hub is a valuable tool for organizations looking to enhance their security and compliance posture in the cloud.

Amazon Web Services (AWS)

Log360 is your one-stop solution for all log management and network security challenges. It is an integrated solution that combines EventLog Analyzer and ADAudit Plus into a single console to help you manage your Active Directory auditing and network security easily.

ManageEngine

Sample Customers

Edmunds, Frame.io, GoDaddy, Realtor.com

First Mountain Bank, TRA, Citadel Group, OnPoint Financial Corp, Florida Dept. of Transportation

Buyer's Guide

AWS Security Hub vs. ManageEngine Log360

October 2024

Free Report: AWS Security Hub vs. ManageEngine Log360

Find out what your peers are saying about AWS Security Hub vs. ManageEngine Log360 and other solutions. Updated: October 2024.

DOWNLOAD NOW

879,711 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our AWS Security Hub vs. ManageEngine Log360 report.

We monitor all Cloud Security Posture Management (CSPM) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.