AWS Outposts vs VMware Cloud Foundation comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Amazon Web Services (AWS) Logo
3,623 views|1,926 comparisons
100% willing to recommend
VMware Logo
3,195 views|2,167 comparisons
92% willing to recommend
Comparison Buyer's Guide
Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between AWS Outposts and VMware Cloud Foundation based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out in this report how the two Hybrid Cloud Computing Platforms solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI.
To learn more, read our detailed AWS Outposts vs. VMware Cloud Foundation Report (Updated: March 2024).
767,995 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Featured Review
Quotes From Members
We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use.
Here are some excerpts of what they said:
Pros
"The most valuable aspect is that it comes in a rack form factor which makes it incredibly easy to use and deploy various AWS services.""Outposts allows you to isolate your private environment from the public cloud provider while enabling almost all the features that are available on public cloud services. That is the beauty of this service. It's an infrastructure that you can put in your data center and seamlessly connect to the public cloud.""The most valuable aspect is its ability to provide interfaces for events.""If you compare with the full bundle of these services, you can see the difference. This is enough for these locations in private data centers. Because the main reasons why the customers want to have it on their side are for the low latency and the security of their critical data.""I think the keys to success for the solution is the easy-to-use user interface and the fact that the development team really likes the platform.""AWS Outposts brings native AWS services, infrastructure, and API to our on-premises data center or co-location facilities."

More AWS Outposts Pros →

"The most valuable area is the ECS environment which includes many features.""The solution is very stable.""The DSR feature is valuable because we have internal clustering, and these features are good for us.""The most valuable aspect of VMware Cloud Foundation is you can manage everything from area.""The initial setup is straightforward and easy.""I'm able to deploy many platforms like AWS, Google Cloud, Oracle, and Azure on VMware.""You can use VMware Cloud Foundation with hyper-converge.""The most valuable features in VMware Cloud Foundation are life cycle management and ease of use."

More VMware Cloud Foundation Pros →

Cons
"The pricing model needs improvement because right now it's very expensive. All of these solutions are very expensive and it prevents other customers or owners of data centers from buying it.""Outposts supports elastic coordinator services, but not elastic container services, which is the native service for containers in AWS. That is something missing in this product.""It would be beneficial to have the option for capacity expansion.""Also, it would be beneficial if AWS allowed for more granular and customizable pricing options.""The platform needs to spend more time investing in strengthening its governance and information tools and consider the real needs of its customers.""Depending on the installation process, we have found some bugs and issues with the solution when the same platform is not used."

More AWS Outposts Cons →

"From a stability perspective, there may be some issues.""The solution is quite expensive.""We would like the ability to write to both sites at the same time, in a synchronous fashion.""The customization has room for improvement.""Working on features that could include the capability to migrate workflows from non-VMware environments would be highly beneficial.""The pricing could be a bit less expensive.""Life cycle management is an area for improvement.""They should provide integration with Azure VMware Solution."

More VMware Cloud Foundation Cons →

Pricing and Cost Advice
  • "The pricing of Outposts needs to be evaluated from the standpoint of what's cost-effective at your company: How are you going to use it? How much money will it save for your products or applications? Is it worth it? I would say it's probably too expensive for small or medium-sized companies. However, big companies might find it to be highly cost-effective depending on their respective cloud strategies."
  • "While the longer-term pricing is suitable for enterprise contracts, it can be on the higher side, especially when organizations don't utilize all the services included in the bundles."
  • "AWS Outposts is a cheap solution."
  • More AWS Outposts Pricing and Cost Advice →

  • "This solutuion can be expensive for small and medium-sized companies."
  • "The pricing can be more competitive."
  • "The licensing is expensive compared with Hyper V and Unitech's platform."
  • "If our customer has the option to buy a server for $4,000 or $5,000, but VMware asks for two-person licensing $7,000 to $8,000, which is more than the hardware price. So sometimes, the customer cannot pay for it because it's too expensive."
  • "There is an annual license required to use the solution."
  • "VMware Cloud Foundation is overpriced, but I think we get what we pay for."
  • "The price of VMware Cloud Foundation is a bit high. However, it comes with a lot of useful features and can handle a lot of operational complexity. Overall the price can be seen as being fair for what it offers."
  • "The pricing of VMware Cloud Foundation could improve, it is expensive."
  • More VMware Cloud Foundation Pricing and Cost Advice →

    report
    Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Hybrid Cloud Computing Platforms solutions are best for your needs.
    767,995 professionals have used our research since 2012.
    Questions from the Community
    Top Answer:AWS Outposts brings native AWS services, infrastructure, and API to our on-premises data center or co-location facilities.
    Top Answer:Depending on the installation process, we have found some bugs and issues with the solution when the same platform is not used.
    Top Answer:AWS Outposts requires a network connection to AWS for management purposes. It can be connected via AWS Direct Connect or VPN. The solution can be configured with one or more availability zones that… more »
    Top Answer:VMware Cloud Foundation provides us with the vSphere dashboard through which we can manage, monitor, schedule, and spin up your virtual machines. We can manage, monitor, and get reports of your… more »
    Top Answer:Cost is a big factor. Clients want a reduced price. Ease of use is definitely there – the VMware interface is user-friendly. But cost is a challenge when convincing clients, especially for large… more »
    Ranking
    Views
    3,623
    Comparisons
    1,926
    Reviews
    4
    Average Words per Review
    643
    Rating
    8.8
    Views
    3,195
    Comparisons
    2,167
    Reviews
    13
    Average Words per Review
    545
    Rating
    8.2
    Comparisons
    Learn More
    Overview

    AWS Outposts bring native AWS services, infrastructure, and operating models to virtually any data center, co-location space, or on-premises facility. You can use the same APIs, the same tools, the same hardware, and the same functionality across on-premises and the cloud to deliver a truly consistent hybrid experience. Outposts can be used to support workloads that need to remain on-premises due to low latency or local data processing needs.

    VMware Cloud Foundation makes it easy to deploy and run a hybrid cloud. VMware Cloud Foundation provides integrated cloud infrastructure (compute, storage, networking, and security) and cloud management services to run enterprise applications in both private and public environments.

    Sample Customers
    Philips, Morningstar
    ricoh, dell technologies, sky
    Top Industries
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Educational Organization16%
    Computer Software Company13%
    Financial Services Firm8%
    Manufacturing Company8%
    REVIEWERS
    Comms Service Provider33%
    Computer Software Company33%
    Financial Services Firm8%
    Retailer8%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Computer Software Company17%
    Government9%
    Financial Services Firm8%
    Manufacturing Company7%
    Company Size
    REVIEWERS
    Small Business14%
    Large Enterprise86%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business17%
    Midsize Enterprise10%
    Large Enterprise73%
    REVIEWERS
    Small Business26%
    Midsize Enterprise4%
    Large Enterprise70%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business20%
    Midsize Enterprise12%
    Large Enterprise67%
    Buyer's Guide
    AWS Outposts vs. VMware Cloud Foundation
    March 2024
    Find out what your peers are saying about AWS Outposts vs. VMware Cloud Foundation and other solutions. Updated: March 2024.
    767,995 professionals have used our research since 2012.

    AWS Outposts is ranked 4th in Hybrid Cloud Computing Platforms with 6 reviews while VMware Cloud Foundation is ranked 2nd in Hybrid Cloud Computing Platforms with 23 reviews. AWS Outposts is rated 8.6, while VMware Cloud Foundation is rated 8.4. The top reviewer of AWS Outposts writes "Has the ability to provide interfaces for events and allows you to work both offline and online". On the other hand, the top reviewer of VMware Cloud Foundation writes "Reliable with good hyper-converged sizing flexibility and an automated setup". AWS Outposts is most compared with Azure Stack, Google Anthos and Nutanix Cloud Clusters (NC2), whereas VMware Cloud Foundation is most compared with Azure Stack, Nutanix Cloud Clusters (NC2), Google Anthos and Nutanix Cloud Infrastructure (NCI). See our AWS Outposts vs. VMware Cloud Foundation report.

    See our list of best Hybrid Cloud Computing Platforms vendors.

    We monitor all Hybrid Cloud Computing Platforms reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.