Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

Microsoft Azure vs VMware Cloud Foundation comparison

Microsoft and VMware are both solutions in the Infrastructure as a Service Clouds (IaaS) category. Microsoft is ranked #1 with an average rating of 8.4, while VMware is ranked #11 with an average rating of 8.3. Microsoft holds a 17.3% mindshare in ISI, compared to VMware’s 1.3% mindshare. Additionally, 96% of Microsoft users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 91% of VMware users who would recommend it.
Microsoft Azure
Read 316 Microsoft Azure reviews
  • 22,677 Views
  • 12,019 Comparison Views
96% willing to recommend
VMware Cloud Foundation
Read 31 VMware Cloud Foundation reviews
  • 2,871 Views
  • 660 Comparison Views
91% willing to recommend
 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report
Executive SummaryUpdated on Dec 16, 2024

Microsoft Azure and VMware Cloud Foundation are competitors in the cloud computing and virtualization market. Microsoft Azure appears to have an edge due to its extensive range of deployment options, programming language support, and seamless integration with Microsoft services.

Features: Microsoft Azure offers global deployment, support for various programming languages and frameworks, and Azure Active Directory for enhanced security. Its platform is known for scalability and efficient integration with Microsoft tools. VMware Cloud Foundation emphasizes management simplicity for data centers, offering streamlined lifecycle management and robust virtualization capabilities with an integrated infrastructure stack.

Room for Improvement: Microsoft Azure users often point to the need for simplified debugging, improved pricing clarity, and enhanced integration with non-Microsoft systems and security management. VMware Cloud Foundation could benefit from increased flexibility in integrations, easier lifecycle management processes, and reduced pricing to be more accessible to a wider range of businesses.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Microsoft Azure facilitates deployment with numerous templates and automation options but has variable technical support quality influenced by service tiers. VMware Cloud Foundation's deployment may seem complex initially due to its converged infrastructure needs but automates many configurations for smoother implementation. Its customer support is generally well-rated, though users desire faster response times.

Pricing and ROI: Microsoft Azure implements a pay-as-you-go pricing model, often seen as competitive but sometimes unpredictable due to licensing complexities. It is recognized for its cost-effectiveness in smaller environments. VMware Cloud Foundation involves higher upfront costs yet promises significant long-term savings over traditional infrastructures. Both solutions deliver robust ROI, with Azure favoring an OPEX approach and VMware focusing on hardware reduction efficiencies.

DOWNLOAD THE COMPLETE REPORT
To learn more, read our detailed Microsoft Azure vs. VMware Cloud Foundation Report (Updated: July 2025).
Buyer's Guide
Microsoft Azure vs. VMware Cloud Foundation
July 2025
Download the complete report
Helped 863,901 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

ROI

Sentiment score
7.2
Microsoft Azure saves costs and boosts efficiency with scalable cloud services, pay-as-you-go pricing, and reduced maintenance expenses.
Sentiment score
5.7
Users expect full ROI from VMware Cloud Foundation within two years, benefiting from 30-40% savings in time and stability.
The value for money is good, and Microsoft Azure has positively impacted our operational costs.
When we use Microsoft Azure, it provides enhanced security from our perspective, though I am not certain about the financial return on investment or benefits for our users as I do not have that information.
For more quotes and insights, download the Microsoft Azure report
VMware Cloud Foundation allows cost and time savings by quickly deploying infrastructure requests and integrating automatic ticketing and backup services.
In terms of ROI, although VMware Cloud Foundation is expensive, it saves time in most cases, which indirectly saves costs for users.
For more quotes and insights, download the VMware Cloud Foundation report
HM
FP
MH
Mangesh Parjane - PeerSpot reviewer
 

Customer Service

Sentiment score
6.5
Customer service is mixed; paid support is praised for responsiveness, while free options may face delays and complexity.
Sentiment score
6.9
VMware Cloud Foundation support receives mixed reviews, with praise for responsiveness but suggestions for improved speed, expertise, and qualifications.
The support from Microsoft Azure is good.
Regarding technical support from Microsoft, I find they are responsive and helpful, depending on which support package you're on.
I rate technical support as excellent because we have not experienced many problems when calling for assistance.
For more quotes and insights, download the Microsoft Azure report
There are times when support is unclear, and even VMware support personnel may lack familiarity with certain parts, causing difficulties.
Our technical support team is capable of providing support on the operating system side.
Support was reliable and responsive before the acquisition by Broadcom.
For more quotes and insights, download the VMware Cloud Foundation report
HM
JE
FP
Mangesh Parjane - PeerSpot reviewer
AA
MH
 

Scalability Issues

Sentiment score
7.8
Microsoft Azure excels in scalability and flexibility, supporting various workloads, though cost and limitations may concern some users.
Sentiment score
7.8
VMware Cloud Foundation scales well for diverse organizations but may face performance issues due to hardware and licensing constraints.
Microsoft Azure is not just one product; it is a platform with multiple products within Microsoft Azure, and I would say it is scalable and would rate it a nine.
The scalability of Microsoft Azure is excellent for growth and adaptation, depending on company requirements.
Scalability with Microsoft Azure is amazing, which is a primary reason for using cloud solutions.
For more quotes and insights, download the Microsoft Azure report
When more hosts are added, performance goes slow.
VMware Cloud Foundation supports scalability and company growth.
VMware Cloud Foundation is quite scalable, receiving a rating of eight and a half to nine out of ten.
For more quotes and insights, download the VMware Cloud Foundation report
JE
FP
KP
AA
MH
Mangesh Parjane - PeerSpot reviewer
 

Stability Issues

Sentiment score
7.8
Microsoft Azure is highly reliable and scalable, despite occasional outages; users confidently rate it high for stability and performance.
Sentiment score
7.9
VMware Cloud Foundation offers high stability with minimal glitches; it requires expertise for complex deployments and migration challenges.
Microsoft Azure is quite stable, but recent outages and security issues have slightly decreased my confidence.
For more quotes and insights, download the Microsoft Azure report
The stability of VMware Cloud Foundation is very high.
If one component fails to operate in a timely manner, the entire infrastructure can go down because everything is interconnected.
For more quotes and insights, download the VMware Cloud Foundation report
KP
AA
Mangesh Parjane - PeerSpot reviewer
 

Room For Improvement

Microsoft Azure needs pricing transparency, intuitive interface, improved support, better technical features, and refined management tools for users.
VMware Cloud Foundation needs improved integration, enhanced features, better support, simplified deployment, competitive pricing, and improved user experience.
Recent outages and security issues are also a concern, causing a decrease in confidence, especially when partnering with third-party companies.
The administrative side is suitable for technical people, but our finance and HR super users find it less user-friendly, as they prefer drag-and-drop features to build their own solutions without contacting IT.
There is still room for improvement in terms of pricing.
For more quotes and insights, download the Microsoft Azure report
VMware Broadcom needs to include auto resource allocation at the VM levels.
The maintenance cost has increased significantly, especially after Broadcom acquired VMware, with a shift from socket-based licensing to core-based licensing.
Each user needs deep knowledge of every aspect of virtualization.
For more quotes and insights, download the VMware Cloud Foundation report
KP
HM
JE
AA
MH
Mangesh Parjane - PeerSpot reviewer
 

Setup Cost

Microsoft Azure offers flexible, competitive pricing, yet complexity makes AWS and GCP potentially more cost-effective for enterprises.
VMware Cloud Foundation is costly but valued for its comprehensive features and reliability, despite recent price increases with core-based pricing.
Microsoft solutions might be cheaper than some services like AWS, but some solutions may be more expensive depending on the services compared.
Copilot is expensive based on recent pricing for our POC.
Regarding the pricing for Microsoft Azure services, I would rate our satisfaction as very good.
For more quotes and insights, download the Microsoft Azure report
The cost has become very high, especially after Broadcom's acquisition, altering the licensing model to a more expensive core-based system.
The price is quite higher than some other vendors.
VMware Cloud Foundation is quite expensive when compared to its competitors, but it does save time, which in turn saves money.
For more quotes and insights, download the VMware Cloud Foundation report
KP
HM
FP
MH
AA
Mangesh Parjane - PeerSpot reviewer
 

Valuable Features

Microsoft Azure offers flexibility, scalability, global presence, integration, security, ease of use, and cost-effectiveness for enhanced organizational infrastructure.
VMware Cloud Foundation provides automated, scalable, and cost-effective infrastructure management with seamless public cloud integration for enhanced deployment and monitoring.
Power BI, another feature of Azure, is extremely elegant and has robust features that support forecasting using R and Python.
Data integrations are particularly effective on Microsoft Azure, especially with our banner services that we automate through Power Automate.
Microsoft Azure's scalability feature obviously supports business growth by scaling with the growth of the business, which is great, and it also scales with your requirements and aligns with your data strategies.
For more quotes and insights, download the Microsoft Azure report
All features of VMware Cloud Foundation are valuable to us, as it covers every industry standard protocol and requirement protocol.
VMware Cloud Foundation allows for extensive customization, aligning with our customer requirements.
VMware Cloud Foundation is its ability to manage everything from a single console, including network, virtualization, and storage management.
For more quotes and insights, download the VMware Cloud Foundation report
KP
HM
JE
AA
MH
Mangesh Parjane - PeerSpot reviewer
 

Categories and Ranking

Microsoft Azure
Ranking in Infrastructure as a Service Clouds (IaaS)
1st
Average Rating
8.4
Reviews Sentiment
7.0
Number of Reviews
316
Ranking in other categories
PaaS Clouds (1st)
VMware Cloud Foundation
Ranking in Infrastructure as a Service Clouds (IaaS)
11th
Average Rating
8.4
Reviews Sentiment
6.8
Number of Reviews
31
Ranking in other categories
Hybrid Cloud Computing Platforms (3rd)
 

Mindshare comparison

As of July 2025, in the Infrastructure as a Service Clouds (IaaS) category, the mindshare of Microsoft Azure is 17.3%, down from 18.2% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of VMware Cloud Foundation is 1.3%, up from 0.6% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Infrastructure as a Service Clouds (IaaS)
 

Featured Reviews

Nicolas Chabrier - PeerSpot reviewer
Promotes clear, logical structures preventing impractical configurations and offers seamless integration
The only thing is regarding the management of multi-cloud environments. That's not really possible. So basically, it's wonderful if you manage Microsoft clearly and if you manage Microsoft Azure, but if you need to consume external services and have a global overview of all your consumption, it's not the case. Google, for instance, has tools that help you manage multiple environments, which makes sense because Google is really the cloud provider. So that's why they need to be compliant with the others. But for sure, Microsoft's approach is different, and it's wonderful when you're one hundred percent on Azure. But if you'd like to have something more of a multi-cloud strategy, that's a bit of a gap where they could improve.
Read full review
Mangesh Parjane - PeerSpot reviewer
Experience has improved centralized management through single console operations
There is room for improvement in how section updates are handled. The challenge lies in the difficulty of pinpointing issues when something goes wrong at a single stage. Also, each user needs deep knowledge of every aspect of virtualization, and the VMware personnel might not fully grasp aspects outside their expertise, requiring the involvement of other professionals.
Read full review
report
See which vendors are best for you
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Infrastructure as a Service Clouds (IaaS) solutions are best for your needs.
See recommendations
863,901 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Comparison Review

it_user8586 - PeerSpot reviewer
Aug 14, 2013
Amazon vs Rackspace vs Microsoft vs Google: Cloud Hosting Services Comparison
Amazon Web Services, Rackspace OpenStack, Microsoft Windows Azure and Google are the major cloud hosting and storage service providers. Athough Amazon is top of them and is oldest in cloud market, Rackspace, Microsoft and Google are giving tough competition to each other and to Amazon also for…
Read full review
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Financial Services Firm
14%
Computer Software Company
11%
Manufacturing Company
10%
University
6%
Computer Software Company
16%
Financial Services Firm
11%
Manufacturing Company
9%
Government
9%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
 

Questions from the Community

Which is preferable - IBM Public Cloud or Microsoft Azure?
IBM Public Cloud is IBM’s Platform-as-a-Service. It aims to provide organizations with a secure cloud environment to manage data and applications. One of the features we like is the cloud activity ...
See all answers
Which is better - SAP Cloud Platform or Microsoft Azure?
One of the best features of SAP Cloud Platform is that it is web-based and you can log in from anywhere in the world. SAP Cloud Platform is suitable for companies of any size; it works well with bo...
See all answers
How does Microsoft Azure compare to Google Firebase?
I would recommend Google Firebase instead of Microsoft Azure, simply for the array of features that it has to offer. In particular, the Firebase library grants you access to a shared data structure...
See all answers
What do you like most about VMware Cloud Foundation?
VMware Cloud Foundation provides us with the vSphere dashboard through which we can manage, monitor, schedule, and spin up your virtual machines. We can manage, monitor, and get reports of your inf...
See all answers
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for VMware Cloud Foundation?
I'm not involved in sales, so I have no specific information about pricing. However, I've heard it's not a cheap product, but the cost includes very good support.
See all answers
What needs improvement with VMware Cloud Foundation?
VMware Cloud Foundation is complex, and there are always updates regarding security features, accessibility, and the user interface. Making changes isn't simple because there are a lot of tables to...
See all answers
 

Comparisons

Alibaba Cloud vs Microsoft Azure Logo
Alibaba Cloud vs Microsoft Azure
Compared 12% of the time
Pivotal Cloud Foundry vs Microsoft Azure Logo
Pivotal Cloud Foundry vs Microsoft Azure
Compared 10% of the time
Red Hat OpenShift vs Microsoft Azure Logo
Red Hat OpenShift vs Microsoft Azure
Compared 9% of the time
Amazon AWS vs Microsoft Azure Logo
Amazon AWS vs Microsoft Azure
Compared 8% of the time
SAP Cloud Platform vs Microsoft Azure Logo
SAP Cloud Platform vs Microsoft Azure
Compared 8% of the time
More Microsoft Azure Competitors
Azure Stack vs VMware Cloud Foundation Logo
Azure Stack vs VMware Cloud Foundation
Compared 47% of the time
Nutanix Cloud Clusters (NC2) vs VMware Cloud Foundation Logo
Nutanix Cloud Clusters (NC2) vs VMware Cloud Foundation
Compared 12% of the time
Nutanix Cloud Infrastructure (NCI) vs VMware Cloud Foundation Logo
Nutanix Cloud Infrastructure (NCI) vs VMware Cloud Foundation
Compared 10% of the time
AWS Outposts vs VMware Cloud Foundation Logo
AWS Outposts vs VMware Cloud Foundation
Compared 10% of the time
Red Hat OpenShift vs VMware Cloud Foundation Logo
Red Hat OpenShift vs VMware Cloud Foundation
Compared 5% of the time
More VMware Cloud Foundation Competitors
 

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide
Microsoft Azure
July 2025
Microsoft Azure reportDownload Microsoft Azure product report
Buyer's Guide
VMware Cloud Foundation
July 2025
VMware Cloud Foundation reportDownload VMware Cloud Foundation product report
 

Also Known As

Windows Azure, Azure, MS Azure
No data available
 

Overview

Microsoft Azure integrates services and offers flexibility, ensuring compatibility with diverse environments. Its scalability, security, and cost-efficient features enhance deployment and management, making it ideal for infrastructure services and application hosting.

Azure provides a comprehensive suite of tools for application deployment, virtual machine management, and data analytics. It allows seamless integration with Power BI and offers a user-friendly interface supported by detailed documentation and technical support. Though users appreciate its capabilities, they sometimes face challenges with costs, setup, and interface complexity, alongside integration and performance issues. Frequent updates and a learning curve are also noted, though Azure's cloud-based security and scalability remain critical for disaster recovery and business continuity.

What are Azure's key features?
  • Integrated Services: Ensures compatibility with Microsoft and non-Microsoft environments.
  • Scalability: Supports growing business demands with flexible computing power.
  • Security: Offers robust cloud-based security features for data protection.
  • Cost Efficiency: Provides options that optimize costs for diverse requirements.
  • Application Deployment: Facilitates quick rollout of apps and services.
What benefits should users expect from Azure?
  • Operational Optimization: Allows companies to streamline processes effectively.
  • Innovative Efficiency: Empowers businesses to innovate with powerful tools.
  • Reliable Support: Backed by strong technical support and comprehensive documentation.
  • Flexible Cloud Solutions: Offers a range of options for cloud migrations and infrastructure management.

Microsoft Azure is widely implemented in industries like financial services, healthcare, and logistics for hosting enterprise applications and vital services. Companies utilize its capabilities for IoT applications, DevOps, and Kubernetes clusters, benefiting from its cloud migrations, data analytics, and active directory support.

Microsoft

VMware Cloud Foundation makes it easy to deploy and run a hybrid cloud. VMware Cloud Foundation provides integrated cloud infrastructure (compute, storage, networking, and security) and cloud management services to run enterprise applications in both private and public environments.

VMware
 

Sample Customers

BMW, Toyota, easyJet, NBC Sports, HarperCollins, Aviva, TalkTalk Business, Avanade, and Telenor.
ricoh, dell technologies, sky
Buyer's Guide
Microsoft Azure vs. VMware Cloud Foundation
July 2025
Free Report: Microsoft Azure vs. VMware Cloud Foundation
Find out what your peers are saying about Microsoft Azure vs. VMware Cloud Foundation and other solutions. Updated: July 2025.
DOWNLOAD NOW
863,901 professionals have used our research since 2012.
See our Microsoft Azure vs. VMware Cloud Foundation report.
See our list of best Infrastructure as a Service Clouds (IaaS) vendors.

We monitor all Infrastructure as a Service Clouds (IaaS) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.