AWS Firewall Manager vs Azure Firewall Manager comparison

Amazon Web Services (AWS) and Microsoft are both solutions in the Firewall Security Management category. Amazon Web Services (AWS) is ranked #9 with an average rating of 8.3, while Microsoft is ranked #10 with an average rating of 9.3. Amazon Web Services (AWS) holds a 3.5% mindshare in Firewall Security Management, compared to Microsoft’s 2.3% mindshare. Additionally, 100% of Amazon Web Services (AWS) users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 85% of Microsoft users who would recommend it.

AWS Firewall Manager

Read 10 AWS Firewall Manager reviews

956 Views
956 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Azure Firewall Manager

Read 9 Azure Firewall Manager reviews

807 Views
476 Comparison Views

85% willing to recommend

AWS Firewall Manager

Azure Firewall Manager

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Nov 4, 2024

AWS Firewall Manager and Azure Firewall Manager are top contenders in the cloud security management sector. AWS Firewall Manager shines with seamless AWS service integration, yet Azure Firewall Manager impresses with its extensive features, justifying its premium cost.

Features: AWS Firewall Manager provides centralized management of firewall rules, security groups, and third-party firewalls. Its integration with AWS services boosts regulatory compliance and security posture. Azure Firewall Manager offers advanced threat protection, deep integration with Azure Security Center, and automated policy deployment, which enables superior threat management.

Room for Improvement: AWS Firewall Manager could expand its feature set beyond AWS-centric integrations, streamline its interface, and enhance analytics capabilities. Azure Firewall Manager may benefit from simplifying its setup process, improving user interface design, and reducing resource consumption to lower costs.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: AWS Firewall Manager is known for its straightforward deployment process and reliable customer service within the AWS ecosystem. Azure Firewall Manager requires more time to set up due to its complex features but offers excellent support that aids in managing its capabilities effectively.

Pricing and ROI: AWS Firewall Manager offers a cost-effective solution with predictable pricing tied to AWS resource usage, providing clear ROI for AWS-heavy organizations. Azure Firewall Manager's higher cost is offset by its advanced features, which promise substantial ROI for enterprises deeply invested in Azure services.

To learn more, read our detailed AWS Firewall Manager vs. Azure Firewall Manager Report (Updated: December 2025).

Buyer's Guide

AWS Firewall Manager vs. Azure Firewall Manager

December 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 879,259 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

AWS Firewall Manager

Ranking in Firewall Security Management

9th

Average Rating

8.0

Reviews Sentiment

6.6

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Azure Firewall Manager

Ranking in Firewall Security Management

10th

Average Rating

8.6

Reviews Sentiment

4.8

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Microsoft Security Suite (27th)

Mindshare comparison

As of December 2025, in the Firewall Security Management category, the mindshare of AWS Firewall Manager is 3.5%, down from 5.3% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Azure Firewall Manager is 2.3%, up from 1.8% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Firewall Security Management Market Share Distribution
Product	Market Share (%)
AWS Firewall Manager	3.5%
Azure Firewall Manager	2.3%
Other	94.2%

Firewall Security Management

Featured Reviews

ShantanuKhare

Senior IT Auditor at Ernst & Young

Has strengthened compliance management and improved threat detection through real-time security integrations

We work with the compliance monitoring capability in AWS Firewall Manager, and my firm has one level of additional layer of security over the compliance management that AWS Firewall Manager provides, so we implement both of them. It is helpful for our compliance, as the compliance manager manages compliance with leading industry standards such as FedRAMP, which my company complies with, GDPR laws, and ISO 27001. It has an impact on our security policies because it has an inheritance rule where anything implemented on AWS Firewall Manager gets overridden on AWS Organizations, which works on the concept of root organization units. I would assess this feature positively, as we have integrated AWS Firewall Manager with GuardDuty, which provides real-time threat detection and alerts to our teams.

Read full review

Sikkander Batcha

DevOps Engineer at CloudIQ

Has managed traffic effectively but lacks visibility and advanced control features

Azure Firewall is typically behind other vendor firewalls because we don't see what kind of traffic is traveling through it. That is one drawback. The main drawback is that we need log support from Azure Firewall, which can be quite costly. There is no login feature in Azure Firewall because only the IAM feature is available in the Azure site; we manage it only through the Azure portal, not through any other portal. Other vendors, such as Palo Alto, provide GUI or CLI interfaces to manage their firewalls, whereas we only manage Azure Firewall through the Azure portal. In the future, I would like to see additional features in Azure Firewall Manager to make it more competitive, such as technologies like App-ID and User-ID that Palo Alto has. Azure Firewall currently only allows traffic based on layer four and sometimes layer seven, so they need to improve in those areas compared to other vendors.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The most valuable feature is the centrally managed rule. I also like the central orchestration."

"AWS Firewall Manager isn't a separate solution when you create the virtual private cloud (VPC), so you can control the traffic through that security group."

"It is helpful for our compliance, as the compliance manager manages compliance with leading industry standards such as FedRAMP, which my company complies with, GDPR laws, and ISO 27001."

"Once this solution is set up, we hardly have to touch it."

"The interface is intuitive and it is easy for the users."

"Also, the strength of the community is invaluable."

"We work with compliance monitoring in the product, which is helpful for identifying framework-based misconfigurations, as it can tell you where to deploy firewall policies based on the frameworks."

"It has centralized cloud firewall management rules. It provides compliance in tracking and reporting."

More AWS Firewall Manager pros

"The tool's support is good."

"From a traffic management perspective, it's a good firewall because it's automatically scalable based on the traffic availability."

"The solution is very easy to set up."

"It is easy to install and does not require any plugins for your browser."

"We are utilizing Azure Entra ID for group labeling, so Active Directory, or now it is Entra ID, securing our application for everyone who accesses it, and Azure Firewall Manager is definitely securing our projects and all its features are fine."

"The best feature of Azure Firewall Manager is that it is easy to maintain and configure."

"From a traffic management perspective, it's a good firewall because it's automatically scalable based on the traffic availability."

"Azure Firewall Manager centralizes network security management with a hub and spoke architecture."

More Azure Firewall Manager pros

Cons

"The system should be more customizable."

"Enabling and configuring the logging is not that straightforward."

"For AWS WAF, we have seen cases where it allowed suspicious HTTPS headers even if they carried malicious payloads."

"It needs to be more employee-friendly, and the security management could be more efficient."

"I would like to see AWS add some UTM features to the firewall. It would also be great if AWS Firewall had native IPS/IDS. They have the separate IPS/IDS, GuardDuty."

"AWS Firewall Manager should be open to manage other third-party appliances as well."

"This solution is suitable for a small-scale enterprise and may not scale up to a very high volume of traffic or a large number of servers."

"They could consider organizing and enhancing documentation in a more structured and chronological manner"

More AWS Firewall Manager cons

"We could do only one-way NAT-ing, where the traffic comes from outside to internal, to Azure, which is fine. However, when we actually do NAT-ed traffic to hit the firewall, that way is not working."

"For Azure Firewall Manager, the learning curve for new people is a bit challenging, but the integration should be more straightforward for configuring a centralized system."

"Azure charges for many aspects including scaling, automated scaling deployment, and traffic management, which leads to higher costs."

"The configuration and settings require substantial time for learning, particularly for new users."

"The tool's security features need to improve. It needs also to include a monitoring system for logs. It is also complicated to find a query on the Azure firewall."

"The configuration and settings require substantial time for learning, particularly for new users. Improvements in ease of configuration would benefit users significantly."

"There should be a simple one-click deployment for a firewall, rather than a set of setup instructions that include steps such as the DNS configuration, et cetera."

More Azure Firewall Manager cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"It is a cost-efficient product."

"From what I've heard from my colleagues, it appears that the pricing is competitive, which influenced our decision to choose this option."

"The AWS Firewall Manager is a little on the costly side."

"The licensing is on a pay-as-you-go basis and we are billed monthly."

"The solution is certainly expensive in comparison with other cloud services."

"The price of the solution is reasonable but it is reasonable for the features."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Firewall Security Management solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

879,259 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

10%

Computer Software Company

Manufacturing Company

Retailer

Financial Services Firm

20%

Computer Software Company

18%

Retailer

Educational Organization

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	5
Large Enterprise	8

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	4
Midsize Enterprise	2
Large Enterprise	2

Questions from the Community

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for AWS Firewall Manager?

AWS licenses in general are expensive, as the overall suite of services that we buy from AWS goes in the range of tens of million dollars. The services we get are value for money; AWS has a pay-as-...

See all answers

What needs improvement with AWS Firewall Manager?

The areas of improvement are definitely platform resiliency, as we have seen outages on the AWS backbone, and whenever there is an outage on the AWS backbone, it impacts all the services hosted on ...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for AWS Firewall Manager?

We host our applications on the AWS platform, and to secure our boundaries, we are using AWS Firewall Manager, Web Application Firewall, and AWS Shield Advanced.

See all answers

What do you like most about Azure Firewall Manager?

The most valuable feature of Azure Firewall Manager is the testing and configuration.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Azure Firewall Manager?

The pricing for Azure Firewall Manager is expensive. In our project, we have used both Palo Alto Firewall and Azure Firewall. Azure charges for many aspects including scaling, automated scaling dep...

See all answers

What needs improvement with Azure Firewall Manager?

See all answers

Comparisons

Fortinet FortiGate Cloud vs AWS Firewall Manager

Compared 46% of the time

Palo Alto Networks Panorama vs AWS Firewall Manager

Compared 16% of the time

AlgoSec vs AWS Firewall Manager

Compared 10% of the time

Tufin Orchestration Suite vs AWS Firewall Manager

Compared 9% of the time

Skybox Security Suite vs AWS Firewall Manager

Compared 6% of the time

More AWS Firewall Manager Competitors

FortiGate Cloud-Native Firewall (FortiGate CNF) vs Azure Firewall Manager

Compared 24% of the time

Azure Firewall vs Azure Firewall Manager

Compared 20% of the time

AlgoSec vs Azure Firewall Manager

Compared 13% of the time

Palo Alto Networks Panorama vs Azure Firewall Manager

Compared 13% of the time

Microsoft Defender for Cloud vs Azure Firewall Manager

Compared 7% of the time

More Azure Firewall Manager Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

AWS Firewall Manager

December 2025

Download AWS Firewall Manager product report

Buyer's Guide

Azure Firewall Manager

December 2025

Download Azure Firewall Manager product report

Overview

AWS Firewall Manager is a security management service which allows you to centrally configure and manage firewall rules across your accounts and applications in AWS Organization. As new applications are created, Firewall Manager makes it easy to bring new applications and resources into compliance by enforcing a common set of security rules. Now you have a single service to build firewall rules, create security policies, and enforce them in a consistent, hierarchical manner across your entire infrastructure.

Using AWS Firewall Manager, you can easily roll out AWS WAF rules for your Application Load Balancers, API Gateways, and Amazon CloudFront distributions. Similarly, you can create AWS Shield Advanced protections for your Application Load Balancers, ELB Classic Load Balancers, Elastic IP Addresses and CloudFront distributions. Finally, with AWS Firewall Manager, you can enable security groups for your Amazon EC2 and ENI resource types in Amazon VPCs.

Amazon Web Services (AWS)

Azure Firewall Manager is a security management service that provides central security policy and route management for cloud-based security perimeters.

To learn more about our solution, ask questions, and share feedback, join our Microsoft Security, Compliance and Identity Community.

Microsoft

Sample Customers

Expedia, Intuit, Royal Dutch Shell, Brooks Brothers

Information Not Available

Buyer's Guide

AWS Firewall Manager vs. Azure Firewall Manager

December 2025

Free Report: AWS Firewall Manager vs. Azure Firewall Manager

Find out what your peers are saying about AWS Firewall Manager vs. Azure Firewall Manager and other solutions. Updated: December 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

879,259 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our AWS Firewall Manager vs. Azure Firewall Manager report.

See our list of best Firewall Security Management vendors.

We monitor all Firewall Security Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.