We performed a comparison between AWS Control Tower and Runecast based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about VMware, Nutanix, IBM and others in Cloud Management."It aligns well with the customer's needs and it ultimately fosters a strong customer-company relationship."
"It offers automated recommendations for security and policies, creating a landing zone and providing a list of policies."
"It provides centralized solutions for all AWS accounts in one place, customized to meet the organization's specific needs."
"One of the standout advantages is the fine-grained control it offers in terms of permissions and privileges."
"It provides a central point for account management, access control, and compliance monitoring."
"There are two features in Control Tower which are the most valuable. One is the guardrails because it has preventive and detective guardrails."
"Compliance is the most valuable feature."
"It is incredibly user-friendly and functions seamlessly."
"Runecast is a good partner for VMware. Once we have installed it, we can see all the problems and issues. It also has VMware knowledge-based articles."
"AWS Control Tower should improve its fast execution. It also needs more tools for triggering and monitoring AWS services. AWS Control Tower needs more tracking as well."
"The integration with other AWS functions has room for improvement."
"The initial setup is complex."
"The sole drawback is its restriction to enable only one Control Tower."
"The product's affordability depends on the value it brings to specific organizations."
"There should be more automation security tools in the Control Tower."
"The tool's setup is very technical. Its pricing can be cheaper."
"By making APIs and organizational units more centralized, it would be simpler to pinpoint the source of issues in case of a breach and would ultimately benefit everyone involved."
"The product lacks network assessment capabilities. We cannot view our network assets or scan switches, routers, or IPs for vulnerabilities and issues."
AWS Control Tower is ranked 11th in Cloud Management with 15 reviews while Runecast is ranked 16th in Cloud-Native Application Protection Platforms (CNAPP) with 1 review. AWS Control Tower is rated 8.2, while Runecast is rated 9.0. The top reviewer of AWS Control Tower writes "A robust protection for efficient cloud governance and security". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Runecast writes "Helps with risk assessments for containers, assessing security, and ensuring container compliance". AWS Control Tower is most compared with AWS Trusted Advisor, Oracle Enterprise Manager Cloud Control, VMware Aria Automation and Morpheus, whereas Runecast is most compared with VMware Aria Operations.
We monitor all Cloud Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.